What does that have to do with the # of receptions your receivers get?kalm wrote:And we run the ball as much as we throw.AZGrizFan wrote:
Yeah. Never mind EWU throws the ball over 100 times more per season than the Griz.
Montana to play Washington and Oregon
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter

- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Montana to play Washington and Oregon
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69424
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Montana to play Washington and Oregon
Not much, but it sounded good at the moment. Btw, we are comparing a #1 vs #3 receiver.AZGrizFan wrote:What does that have to do with the # of receptions your receivers get?kalm wrote:
And we run the ball as much as we throw.
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Montana to play Washington and Oregon
That, and Henderson has played one full season, in a mediocre at best offense, in which he led the nation in YPC.AZGrizFan wrote:Yeah. Never mind EWU throws the ball over 100 times more per season than the Griz.kalm wrote:
Have you been keeping track? What's the score?![]()
In all honesty, they're just reactionary. Very few times do I instigate. I respect the program more than half of Griz nation.
And I think Henderson is a solid talent. But his numbers are similar to Bourne as a #3 last year and Shaquille Hill is certainly no slouch.
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter

- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Montana to play Washington and Oregon
Apples and oranges, but you knew that.kalm wrote:Not much, but it sounded good at the moment. Btw, we are comparing a #1 vs #3 receiver.AZGrizFan wrote:
What does that have to do with the # of receptions your receivers get?
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

Re: Montana to play Washington and Oregon
Just not the best ones, apparently.Grizalltheway wrote:Cool. We've nabbed some pretty good players from the PNW in recent years, despite not having played a PAC 12 school since 2005. thumb:EWURanger wrote:
Not just about the money. Playing the PNW Pac-12 schools is important for the program in terms of exposure and recruiting as well.

Re: Montana to play Washington and Oregon
Well, damn. Good thing none of them have sucked for a good while, then.Mvemjsunpx wrote:The thing is… EWU's quarterbacks have to be that good for the team to not suck.kalm wrote:
Beau Baldwin, Zach Hill (QB's coach) and recent history. It's a safe bet. It's like recognizing that Henderson would probably be the #3 or 4 WR in Cheney. Might push for two if he really performed.

Re: Montana to play Washington and Oregon
Why? I think it's fairly obvious that Henderson is not better than Kupp...but please, let's hear your argument.Brock Landers wrote:kalm wrote:
Beau Baldwin, Zach Hill (QB's coach) and recent history. It's a safe bet. It's like recognizing that Henderson would probably be the #3 or 4 WR in Cheney. Might push for two if he really performed.![]()
You over-extended your reach on that one. You gotta keep the trolls within the realms of reason, or else you snap us out of the illusion
And from what I have seen, he's not better than Bourne, either. So yeah, I'd put him at #3 in the EWU offense.

Re: Montana to play Washington and Oregon
And still ran for more yards per game than Montana did in 2014. Ouch.kalm wrote:And we run the ball as much as we throw.AZGrizFan wrote:
Yeah. Never mind EWU throws the ball over 100 times more per season than the Griz.

- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Montana to play Washington and Oregon
I don't think there's a big enough sample size with Henderson to fairly say that one way or the other. Luckily he should have two full seasons left in a pass-happy offense to prove himself to the haters/foolz.EWURanger wrote:Why? I think it's fairly obvious that Henderson is not better than Kupp...but please, let's hear your argument.Brock Landers wrote:![]()
You over-extended your reach on that one. You gotta keep the trolls within the realms of reason, or else you snap us out of the illusion![]()
And from what I have seen, he's not better than Bourne, either. So yeah, I'd put him at #3 in the EWU offense.
Re: Montana to play Washington and Oregon
Hater? Nah. Realist?Grizalltheway wrote:I don't think there's a big enough sample size with Henderson to fairly say that one way or the other. Luckily he should have two full seasons left in a pass-happy offense to prove himself to the haters/foolz.EWURanger wrote:
Why? I think it's fairly obvious that Henderson is not better than Kupp...but please, let's hear your argument.![]()
And from what I have seen, he's not better than Bourne, either. So yeah, I'd put him at #3 in the EWU offense.

-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69424
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Montana to play Washington and Oregon
Oh yeah...and btw...
Thanks for getting me in trouble with Landers, Chizzy.
Thanks for getting me in trouble with Landers, Chizzy.
- Brock Landers
- Level2

- Posts: 2213
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 3:34 pm
- I am a fan of: Things
Re: Montana to play Washington and Oregon
He isn't better than Kupp. Kupp is the best receiver in FCS. He is better than Bourne and Hill though.EWURanger wrote:Why? I think it's fairly obvious that Henderson is not better than Kupp...but please, let's hear your argument.Brock Landers wrote:![]()
You over-extended your reach on that one. You gotta keep the trolls within the realms of reason, or else you snap us out of the illusion![]()
And from what I have seen, he's not better than Bourne, either. So yeah, I'd put him at #3 in the EWU offense.
As for "my argument"...
From what I've seen, he's better than Bourne, so yeah, I'd put him at #2 in the EWU offense. Good enough for you? I wanted to be as objective as you in your post.
Seriously though, just think about the damage Henderson would do in the EWU offense
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Montana to play Washington and Oregon
Just look at this poor schmuck who wouldn't even crack the practice squad at EWU.
https://twitter.com/hashtag/TodayBetter ... y?src=hash" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://twitter.com/hashtag/TodayBetter ... y?src=hash" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Montana to play Washington and Oregon
Well, if what I've been reading about the new Stitt offense is true, Ellis should have plenty of opportunity to show his stuff.Brock Landers wrote:He isn't better than Kupp. Kupp is the best receiver in FCS. He is better than Bourne and Hill though.EWURanger wrote:
Why? I think it's fairly obvious that Henderson is not better than Kupp...but please, let's hear your argument.![]()
And from what I have seen, he's not better than Bourne, either. So yeah, I'd put him at #3 in the EWU offense.
As for "my argument"...
From what I've seen, he's better than Bourne, so yeah, I'd put him at #2 in the EWU offense. Good enough for you? I wanted to be as objective as you in your post.
Seriously though, just think about the damage Henderson would do in the EWU offense

-
grizzaholic
- One Man Wolfpack

- Posts: 34860
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
- I am a fan of: Hodgdon
- A.K.A.: Random Mailer
- Location: Backwoods of Montana
Re: Montana to play Washington and Oregon
Who was that? I am just a dumb ISU fan.Grizalltheway wrote:Just look at this poor schmuck who wouldn't even crack the practice squad at EWU.
https://twitter.com/hashtag/TodayBetter ... y?src=hash" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
GREAT catch btw.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."
Justin Halpern
Justin Halpern
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Montana to play Washington and Oregon
Jones.grizzaholic wrote:Who was that? I am just a dumb ISU fan.Grizalltheway wrote:Just look at this poor schmuck who wouldn't even crack the practice squad at EWU.
https://twitter.com/hashtag/TodayBetter ... y?src=hash" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
GREAT catch btw.
-
grizzaholic
- One Man Wolfpack

- Posts: 34860
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
- I am a fan of: Hodgdon
- A.K.A.: Random Mailer
- Location: Backwoods of Montana
Re: Montana to play Washington and Oregon
He is pretty good..and not scared of going across the middle.Grizalltheway wrote:Jones.grizzaholic wrote:
Who was that? I am just a dumb ISU fan.
GREAT catch btw.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."
Justin Halpern
Justin Halpern
-
YoUDeeMan
- Level5

- Posts: 12088
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
- I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
- A.K.A.: Delaware Homie
Re: Montana to play Washington and Oregon
Hey, how's that Vernon Adams doing these days?
I heard he was able to count to three, so they let him graduate from EWU.
I heard he was able to count to three, so they let him graduate from EWU.
These signatures have a 500 character limit?
What if I have more personalities than that?
What if I have more personalities than that?
- Brock Landers
- Level2

- Posts: 2213
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 3:34 pm
- I am a fan of: Things
Re: Montana to play Washington and Oregon
I harbor no illusions that Stitt's offense is going to be as potent as EWU during season #1EWURanger wrote:Well, if what I've been reading about the new Stitt offense is true, Ellis should have plenty of opportunity to show his stuff.Brock Landers wrote: He isn't better than Kupp. Kupp is the best receiver in FCS. He is better than Bourne and Hill though.
As for "my argument"...
From what I've seen, he's better than Bourne, so yeah, I'd put him at #2 in the EWU offense. Good enough for you? I wanted to be as objective as you in your post.
Seriously though, just think about the damage Henderson would do in the EWU offense
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter

- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Montana to play Washington and Oregon
Agreed. I wish we were playing NDSU in late October instead of August.Brock Landers wrote:I harbor no illusions that Stitt's offense is going to be as potent as EWU during season #1EWURanger wrote:
Well, if what I've been reading about the new Stitt offense is true, Ellis should have plenty of opportunity to show his stuff.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

-
Get'em_Griz
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:37 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
- Location: Missoula, MT
Re: Montana to play Washington and Oregon
If we meet up with NDSU in the playoffs, watch out! The Griz hopefully will be a machine when the playoffs roll around.AZGrizFan wrote:Agreed. I wish we were playing NDSU in late October instead of August.Brock Landers wrote: I harbor no illusions that Stitt's offense is going to be as potent as EWU during season #1![]()

1995 and 2001 FCS NATIONAL CHAMPS
Big Sky Champs - '69, '70, '82, '93, '95, '96, '98, '99, '00-'09, '11
National Champs Runner-Ups: '96, '00, '04, '08, '09
Playoffs - '82, '88, '89, '93-'09, '11, '13, '14
Re: Montana to play Washington and Oregon
Who is the presumptive starter at QB, or is it too early to tell?Brock Landers wrote:I harbor no illusions that Stitt's offense is going to be as potent as EWU during season #1EWURanger wrote:
Well, if what I've been reading about the new Stitt offense is true, Ellis should have plenty of opportunity to show his stuff.

- AZGrizFan
- Supporter

- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Montana to play Washington and Oregon
Brady Gustafson, RS JR out of Billings West HS.EWURanger wrote:Who is the presumptive starter at QB, or is it too early to tell?Brock Landers wrote: I harbor no illusions that Stitt's offense is going to be as potent as EWU during season #1
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Montana to play Washington and Oregon
Honestly, if we could manage 35 ppg in Delaney's stone age offense (to EWU's 44), I don't see why we couldn't do 9 ppg better with Stitt's offense, even if there are wrinkles to iron out early on.Brock Landers wrote:I harbor no illusions that Stitt's offense is going to be as potent as EWU during season #1EWURanger wrote:
Well, if what I've been reading about the new Stitt offense is true, Ellis should have plenty of opportunity to show his stuff.
-
Mvemjsunpx
- Level5

- Posts: 14865
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:44 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
Re: Montana to play Washington and Oregon
Wait, what was "stone age" about the offense the last two years? It wasn't really any different stylistically than the multiple-type offenses currently used by most NFL teams.Grizalltheway wrote:Honestly, if we could manage 35 ppg in Delaney's stone age offense (to EWU's 44), I don't see why we couldn't do 9 ppg better with Stitt's offense, even if there are wrinkles to iron out early on.Brock Landers wrote: I harbor no illusions that Stitt's offense is going to be as potent as EWU during season #1
Anyway, the Griz should score more simply through the virtue of running a lot more plays. Montana scored 30 ppg last year averaging 63.8 offensive plays-per-game. CO Mines averaged 89.9 plays-per-game last season, so—if the Griz manage the same pace—that would translate to 41.7 ppg with zero improvement in offensive efficiency whatsoever. Of course, that would likely translate to more points allowed too, but still…


