Conks and Reproductive Rights, II

Political discussions
User avatar
Cap'n Cat
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13614
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:38 am
I am a fan of: Mostly myself.
A.K.A.: LabiaInTheSunlight

Conks and Reproductive Rights, II

Post by Cap'n Cat »

Image


:ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno:
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Conks and Reproductive Rights, II

Post by Ibanez »

Cap'n Cat wrote:Image


:ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno:
hahahahahahaha
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Conks and Reproductive Rights, II

Post by 89Hen »

And that meme shows exactly why the pro-abortion folks don't get it. :coffee:
Image
User avatar
JohnStOnge
Egalitarian
Egalitarian
Posts: 20316
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:47 pm
I am a fan of: McNeese State
A.K.A.: JohnStOnge

Re: Conks and Reproductive Rights, II

Post by JohnStOnge »

So...let's see...if you say a woman doesn't have a right to kill her own progeny that means you're saying she's not a person? Is that what that means?

Or maybe saying that other people shouldn't have to pay for a woman's contraception is saying she's not a person?

You do realize that taking either of those positions is pretty ridiculous, right?
Well, I believe that I must tell the truth
And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?

Deep Purple: No One Came
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69151
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Conks and Reproductive Rights, II

Post by kalm »

89Hen wrote:And that meme shows exactly why the pro-abortion folks don't get it. :coffee:
The only people who are pro abortion are congressional conks after a weekend bender...at least the straight ones...
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Grizalltheway
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 35688
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
Location: BSC

Re: Conks and Reproductive Rights, II

Post by Grizalltheway »

kalm wrote:
89Hen wrote:And that meme shows exactly why the pro-abortion folks don't get it. :coffee:
The only people who are pro abortion are congressional conks after a weekend bender...at least the straight ones...
So no one?
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Conks and Reproductive Rights, II

Post by 89Hen »

kalm wrote:
89Hen wrote:And that meme shows exactly why the pro-abortion folks don't get it. :coffee:
The only people who are pro abortion...
Anyone who is pro-choice has to believe that abortion is not murder. Can you argue otherwise?
Image
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Conks and Reproductive Rights, II

Post by Ibanez »

JohnStOnge wrote:So...let's see...if you say a woman doesn't have a right to kill her own progeny that means you're saying she's not a person? Is that what that means?

Or maybe saying that other people shouldn't have to pay for a woman's contraception is saying she's not a person?

You do realize that taking either of those positions is pretty ridiculous, right?
No, it's saying that Republicans give more value and rights to unborn babies and corporations than it does to women aka abortion rights.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Conks and Reproductive Rights, II

Post by 89Hen »

Ibanez wrote:
JohnStOnge wrote:So...let's see...if you say a woman doesn't have a right to kill her own progeny that means you're saying she's not a person? Is that what that means?

Or maybe saying that other people shouldn't have to pay for a woman's contraception is saying she's not a person?

You do realize that taking either of those positions is pretty ridiculous, right?
No, it's saying that Republicans give more value and rights to unborn babies and corporations than it does to women aka abortion rights.
Maybe that's what it's saying, but that doesn't make it true.
Image
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Conks and Reproductive Rights, II

Post by Ibanez »

89Hen wrote:
Ibanez wrote: No, it's saying that Republicans give more value and rights to unborn babies and corporations than it does to women aka abortion rights.
Maybe that's what it's saying, but that doesn't make it true.
That's how I understand that cleverly crafted meme. :roll:

Not saying I agree, just an explanation. :mrgreen:
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
OL FU
Level3
Level3
Posts: 4336
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:25 pm
I am a fan of: Furman
Location: Greenville SC

Re: Conks and Reproductive Rights, II

Post by OL FU »

:? Conks don't have reproductive rights, we're all men :?
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: Conks and Reproductive Rights, II

Post by Ivytalk »

Cap'n Cat wrote:Image


:ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno:
Hey, douchenozzle, an office building isn't a person. Only the corporation that owns it is a person. :nod:
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: Conks and Reproductive Rights, II

Post by D1B »

kalm wrote:
89Hen wrote:And that meme shows exactly why the pro-abortion folks don't get it. :coffee:
The only people who are pro abortion are congressional conks after a weekend bender...at least the straight ones...
Yeah, all none of em.

Conks fuck almost as many boys as catholic priests.
Last edited by D1B on Tue Jul 15, 2014 2:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: Conks and Reproductive Rights, II

Post by D1B »

89Hen wrote:And that meme shows exactly why the pro-abortion folks don't get it. :coffee:
Conk Disease - the inability to show or understand empathy. Usually caused by one dimensional thinking, lack of critical ethical inquiry and lack of creativity.

In this case, they have no clue that unwanted pregnancy is a scourge to women and often ruins their lives. Their black and white world view (a fetus is a person, therefore abortion is murder) is a cop out to avoid understanding tough, complex issues and doing the right thing, even if it's unpalatable to their checkbook or ravenous desire for power and control.

See also:

The death penalty
Gun control
Hispanic Immigration
Welfare
Women's rights
The war on drugs
The war on terror
Organized religion and separation of church and state
Taxes
Supply side economics and Ayn Rand
Homosexuality
The plight of the black man
The prison industrial complex
Military spending
Marijuana
The youth of America
The fine arts
.....and on and on and on.......

Conks - total fuckheads.
User avatar
Chizzang
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19274
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
Location: Palermo Italy

Re: Conks and Reproductive Rights, II

Post by Chizzang »

89Hen wrote:And that meme shows exactly why the pro-abortion folks don't get it. :coffee:
Depends on exactly what you mean by "Don't get it"
Because sometimes the chasm between the two sides is so far apart neither side seems to "get it"


:kisswink:
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
User avatar
JohnStOnge
Egalitarian
Egalitarian
Posts: 20316
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:47 pm
I am a fan of: McNeese State
A.K.A.: JohnStOnge

Re: Conks and Reproductive Rights, II

Post by JohnStOnge »

No, it's saying that Republicans give more value and rights to unborn babies and corporations than it does to women aka abortion rights.
Actually for it to make sense, there would have to be a situation in which people were saying that a woman has no right to life and no right to exercise free speech through contributions to the candidate of her choice.

The issue of abortion rights revolves around the nature of the unborn. If you recognize the truth...that abortion is the killing of a living member of our species...you SHOULD be able to see why it makes sense to say a woman can't elect to have somebody do that. It is no more a denial of rights than saying I can't kill my wife because I'm tired of being married is.
Well, I believe that I must tell the truth
And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?

Deep Purple: No One Came
Image
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Conks and Reproductive Rights, II

Post by 89Hen »

D1B wrote:In this case, they have no clue that unwanted pregnancy is a scourge to women and often ruins their lives. Their black and white world view (a fetus is a person, therefore abortion is murder)
I'd love to hear your definition of a "person". I don't pretend to know the exact moment and that's why I'm against abortion at any point. How can you say at day 89 of a pregnancy it's OK, but at day 90 it's not? We're not talking about granting a driver's license or some other privilege where we arbitrarily set an age for granting that privilege, we're talking about THE most basic right... life.

BTW, a conviction of DUI can ruin your life too, even if you're caught without hurting a single person. Perhaps we should do away with those convictions. We wouldn't want to infringe on somebody's bad choices they made themselves.
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69151
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Conks and Reproductive Rights, II

Post by kalm »

89Hen wrote:
kalm wrote:
The only people who are pro abortion...
Anyone who is pro-choice has to believe that abortion is not murder. Can you argue otherwise?
That still doesn't make them pro abortion.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: Conks and Reproductive Rights, II

Post by AZGrizFan »

D1B wrote:
89Hen wrote:And that meme shows exactly why the pro-abortion folks don't get it. :coffee:
Conk Disease - the inability to show or understand empathy. Usually caused by one dimensional thinking, lack of critical ethical inquiry and lack of creativity.

In this case, they have no clue that unwanted pregnancy is a scourge to women and often ruins their lives. Their black and white world view (a fetus is a person, therefore abortion is murder) is a cop out to avoid understanding tough, complex issues and doing the right thing, even if it's unpalatable to their checkbook or ravenous desire for power and control.

See also:

The death penalty
Gun control
Hispanic Immigration
Welfare
Women's rights
The war on drugs
The war on terror
Organized religion and separation of church and state
Taxes
Supply side economics and Ayn Rand
Homosexuality
The plight of the black man
The prison industrial complex
Military spending
Marijuana
The youth of America
The fine arts
.....and on and on and on.......

Conks - total fuckheads.
Jesus H. Christ. Cry me a fucking river.... :roll: :roll:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
Pwns
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7344
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:38 pm
I am a fan of: Georgia Friggin' Southern
A.K.A.: FCS_pwns_FBS (AGS)

Re: Conks and Reproductive Rights, II

Post by Pwns »

kalm wrote:
89Hen wrote: Anyone who is pro-choice has to believe that abortion is not murder. Can you argue otherwise?
That still doesn't make them pro abortion.
kalm,

Why do groups like planed parenthood oppose required ultrasound scans for anyone seeking an abortion? Don't they claim they want women to make informed decisions? Why not make sure that they are informed about the development of the unborn baby? The answer is that they don't want women to dither because what they have been told is a blob might too closely resemble a baby for their liking.

Why does planned parenthood think a 14-year-old can make a decision about abortions when they can't make practically any other decision about health care? Abortion is health care according to the pro-abortion folks, so why don't they need parents permission for a procedure that is 100% elective in the vast majority of cases? And why does pp go so far as to try and cover up cases of statutory rape?

Also, do you think the grey-haired, white-male billionaires who help bankroll planned parenthood do so because they care about women's health and children? F*** no. They do that because they are a part of the Malthusian religion.
Celebrate Diversity.*
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Conks and Reproductive Rights, II

Post by 89Hen »

kalm wrote:
89Hen wrote: Anyone who is pro-choice has to believe that abortion is not murder. Can you argue otherwise?
That still doesn't make them pro abortion.
It certainly makes them OK with it.
Image
User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25486
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: Conks and Reproductive Rights, II

Post by CID1990 »

kalm wrote:
89Hen wrote: Anyone who is pro-choice has to believe that abortion is not murder. Can you argue otherwise?
That still doesn't make them pro abortion.
ha ha

I love semantic acrobatics from the left
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
User avatar
Chizzang
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19274
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
Location: Palermo Italy

Re: Conks and Reproductive Rights, II

Post by Chizzang »

89Hen wrote:
kalm wrote:
That still doesn't make them pro abortion.
It certainly makes them OK with it.

Why does the value of life take on such monumental proportion when it comes to the fetus and yet, take on lesser value in other regards and situations..?
The holy cluster globule inside some other woman's body is the most important "thing" in the world to be debated somehow..?

When do we place the same general value on a globule of potential life as we do on another life in general?
why are Conservatives so OVER LOADED with values in this one little area

Odd frankly...
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25486
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: Conks and Reproductive Rights, II

Post by CID1990 »

Chizzang wrote:
89Hen wrote: It certainly makes them OK with it.

Why does the value of life take on such monumental proportion when it comes to the fetus and yet, take on lesser value in other regards and situations..?
The holy cluster globule inside some other woman's body is the most important "thing" in the world to be debated somehow..?

When do we place the same general value on a globule of potential life as we do on another life in general?
why are Conservatives so OVER LOADED with values in this one little area

Odd frankly...
Actually, I know others' mileage differs with my own, but my moral objection to abortion begins when the fetus becomes viable and/or has been scientifically proven to be capable of pain and suffering

So I'm willing to meet women halfway on the abortion issue- suck those little clumpy globules out all you want

But there is a point beyond which I consider it killing and I think that right now, that 20 week gestational line is a good benchmark.

And yes I'm a man and fvck you I am entitled to an opinion on it just as men were entitled to opinions on the gassing of Jews
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
User avatar
Chizzang
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19274
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
Location: Palermo Italy

Re: Conks and Reproductive Rights, II

Post by Chizzang »

CID1990 wrote:
Chizzang wrote:

Why does the value of life take on such monumental proportion when it comes to the fetus and yet, take on lesser value in other regards and situations..?
The holy cluster globule inside some other woman's body is the most important "thing" in the world to be debated somehow..?

When do we place the same general value on a globule of potential life as we do on another life in general?
why are Conservatives so OVER LOADED with values in this one little area

Odd frankly...
Actually, I know others' mileage differs with my own, but my moral objection to abortion begins when the fetus becomes viable and/or has been scientifically proven to be capable of pain and suffering

So I'm willing to meet women halfway on the abortion issue- suck those little clumpy globules out all you want

But there is a point beyond which I consider it killing and I think that right now, that 20 week gestational line is a good benchmark.

And yes I'm a man and fvck you I am entitled to an opinion on it just as men were entitled to opinions on the gassing of Jews

I am not far from where you stand... :nod:
The issue for me is always "is it capable of suffering" so animal rights / human rights / etc...
It's all about the capacity to suffer

Side Note:
In my opinion 20 weeks is LATE to have an abortion
Most women know they are pregnant within 8 weeks
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
Post Reply