FCS playoff brackets

Football Championship Subdivision discussions
Post Reply
User avatar
BlackFalkin
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3876
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 4:49 pm
I am a fan of: EASTERN WASHINGTON
Location: Southern California

Re: FCS playoff brackets

Post by BlackFalkin »

jsbusness wrote:As a new viewer I may have missed a discussion on this topic, but can anyone explain to me why the FCS does not rank all the teams and bracket the playoff teams in a logical order of #1 vs #28, #2 vs #27, etc? That is the way things were done before the big gas crises a few years ago and they(?) decided to pair teams according to location. By always pairing the Southland and Big Sky conference, for example, as they do each year, usually two good teams must face each other in the first round, while two comparably mediocre teams get an easier draw. It is not a true playoff pairing as exists in most other playoff sports such as basketball's March madness and baseball's World Series. Anyone know why?

Welcome! Im BlackFalkin and Im something like King here.. but You answered your own question there Chief. In the playoffs their are CONSIDERABLY more ppl on that plane.. Like the AD, the SID, the coaches wives, etc.. So it -COULD- be that, coupled with some schools lack of a budget.. Like Coastal Carolina flying 130 people to Spokane... they can bus or take ac cheaper flight to Towson or Maine.
EWU FOOTBALL 2004|2005|2010|2012|2013|2014|2016|2018|BigSky Champions
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
Grizo406
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 5456
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 12:48 pm
I am a fan of: UM, MSU, GSU, ASU
A.K.A.: A true ICON/HOF'er
Location: NPR, Florida

Re: FCS playoff brackets

Post by Grizo406 »

BlackFalkin wrote:
jsbusness wrote:As a new viewer I may have missed a discussion on this topic, but can anyone explain to me why the FCS does not rank all the teams and bracket the playoff teams in a logical order of #1 vs #28, #2 vs #27, etc? That is the way things were done before the big gas crises a few years ago and they(?) decided to pair teams according to location. By always pairing the Southland and Big Sky conference, for example, as they do each year, usually two good teams must face each other in the first round, while two comparably mediocre teams get an easier draw. It is not a true playoff pairing as exists in most other playoff sports such as basketball's March madness and baseball's World Series. Anyone know why?

Welcome! Im BlackFalkin and Im something like King here.. but You answered your own question there Chief. In the playoffs their are CONSIDERABLY more ppl on that plane.. Like the AD, the SID, the coaches wives, etc.. So it -COULD- be that, coupled with some schools lack of a budget.. Like Coastal Carolina flying 130 people to Spokane... they can bus or take ac cheaper flight to Towson or Maine.
That you are! :notworthy:
Image
Image
Image
grizzaholic
One Man Wolfpack
One Man Wolfpack
Posts: 34860
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
I am a fan of: Hodgdon
A.K.A.: Random Mailer
Location: Backwoods of Montana

Re: FCS playoff brackets

Post by grizzaholic »

jsbusness wrote:As a new viewer I may have missed a discussion on this topic, but can anyone explain to me why the FCS does not rank all the teams and bracket the playoff teams in a logical order of #1 vs #28, #2 vs #27, etc? That is the way things were done before the big gas crises a few years ago and they(?) decided to pair teams according to location. By always pairing the Southland and Big Sky conference, for example, as they do each year, usually two good teams must face each other in the first round, while two comparably mediocre teams get an easier draw. It is not a true playoff pairing as exists in most other playoff sports such as basketball's March madness and baseball's World Series. Anyone know why?
First off: Welcome

b: don't listen to BF. He has syphilis, so he is a bit crazy

6.93: Have a thick skin, shit happens and....yeah. Don't take too much to heart.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."

Justin Halpern
User avatar
bluehenbillk
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7660
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:26 am
I am a fan of: elaware
Location: East Coast/Hawaii

Re: FCS playoff brackets

Post by bluehenbillk »

Here's why: if the visiting team travels a minimum amount of miles, I believe 300 the NCAA helps pay travel costs. Of course the NCAA also takes the majority of the ticket revenue too. For years the NCAA lost money running the championship but the extra money from Frisco put it in the black.
Make Delaware Football Great Again
User avatar
Aho Old Guy
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1436
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:18 pm
I am a fan of: Tweetsee
A.K.A.: Evil & Nastie

Re: FCS playoff brackets

Post by Aho Old Guy »

BlackFalkin wrote:Welcome! Im BlackFalkin and Im something like King here...
Here, King. Here, King. Have a treat. Good boy!

"Theoretically" with the play-in round, teams ranked 9-24 meet each other ( 24 V. 9, 23 V. 10, 22 V. 11, etc) conceivably resulting in a conventional 16-team 2nd Round with 16 V. 1, 15 V. 2, 14 V. 3 ....

Fair or not, in the play-in round Team #24 could **Bid** their way into a home game against Team #9. (Most) FCS fans have come to accept the bid process, though some folks still beach about it. This is done strictly for economic reasons by the NCAA. It costs money to put on the playoff show.

Same reason for the 'regionalization' --- Few FCS programs make money. A playoff reward can be a substantial financial burden to many schools.

Then, there is ECB. Stop complaining, whiners :lol: We rock. :D
"But the damned and the guiltiest among you are the men who had the capacity to know, yet chose to blank out reality, the men who were willing to sell their intelligence into cynical servitude..."
- John Galt
User avatar
andy7171
Firefly
Firefly
Posts: 27951
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:12 am
I am a fan of: Wiping.
A.K.A.: HE HATE ME
Location: Eastern Palouse

Re: FCS playoff brackets

Post by andy7171 »

BlackFalkin wrote:Welcome! Im BlackFalkin and Im something like King here.. but You answered your own question there Chief. In the playoffs their are CONSIDERABLY more ppl on that plane.. Like the AD, the SID, the coaches wives, etc.. So it -COULD- be that, coupled with some schools lack of a budget.. Like Coastal Carolina flying 130 people to Spokane... they can bus or take ac cheaper flight to Towson or Maine.
Fantastic way to introduce yourself! :notworthy:
"Elaine, you're from Baltimore, right?"
"Yes, well, Towson actually."
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: FCS playoff brackets

Post by Ibanez »

Grizo406 wrote:
BlackFalkin wrote:

Welcome! Im BlackFalkin and Im something like King here.. but You answered your own question there Chief. In the playoffs their are CONSIDERABLY more ppl on that plane.. Like the AD, the SID, the coaches wives, etc.. So it -COULD- be that, coupled with some schools lack of a budget.. Like Coastal Carolina flying 130 people to Spokane... they can bus or take ac cheaper flight to Towson or Maine.
That you are! :notworthy:
No. Don't build that fuck stain up.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: FCS playoff brackets

Post by Ibanez »

grizzaholic wrote:
jsbusness wrote:As a new viewer I may have missed a discussion on this topic, but can anyone explain to me why the FCS does not rank all the teams and bracket the playoff teams in a logical order of #1 vs #28, #2 vs #27, etc? That is the way things were done before the big gas crises a few years ago and they(?) decided to pair teams according to location. By always pairing the Southland and Big Sky conference, for example, as they do each year, usually two good teams must face each other in the first round, while two comparably mediocre teams get an easier draw. It is not a true playoff pairing as exists in most other playoff sports such as basketball's March madness and baseball's World Series. Anyone know why?
First off: Welcome

b: don't listen to BF. He has syphilis, so he is a bit crazy

6.93: Have a thick skin, shit happens and....yeah. Don't take too much to heart.
Also Sodomy.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: FCS playoff brackets

Post by Ibanez »

jsbusness wrote:As a new viewer I may have missed a discussion on this topic, but can anyone explain to me why the FCS does not rank all the teams and bracket the playoff teams in a logical order of #1 vs #28, #2 vs #27, etc? That is the way things were done before the big gas crises a few years ago and they(?) decided to pair teams according to location. By always pairing the Southland and Big Sky conference, for example, as they do each year, usually two good teams must face each other in the first round, while two comparably mediocre teams get an easier draw. It is not a true playoff pairing as exists in most other playoff sports such as basketball's March madness and baseball's World Series. Anyone know why?
Welcome to CS. I hope you have a sense of humor and thick skin. We joke and tear each other down, but it is all in good fun. There are many former players and intelligent men on here that truly understand the game and that try to understand the committee and the ADs of their respective schools.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
User avatar
vutomcat
Level2
Level2
Posts: 904
Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 11:38 am
I am a fan of: Villanova
Location: South Jersey

Re: FCS playoff brackets

Post by vutomcat »

jsbusness wrote:As a new viewer I may have missed a discussion on this topic, but can anyone explain to me why the FCS does not rank all the teams and bracket the playoff teams in a logical order of #1 vs #28, #2 vs #27, etc? That is the way things were done before the big gas crises a few years ago and they(?) decided to pair teams according to location. By always pairing the Southland and Big Sky conference, for example, as they do each year, usually two good teams must face each other in the first round, while two comparably mediocre teams get an easier draw. It is not a true playoff pairing as exists in most other playoff sports such as basketball's March madness and baseball's World Series. Anyone know why?

If you view the "FCS Selection 101" site it will answer many of your questions including the one you have here which was answered fairly well by the self proclaimed "king".
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: FCS playoff brackets

Post by Ibanez »

BlackFalkin wrote:
jsbusness wrote:As a new viewer I may have missed a discussion on this topic, but can anyone explain to me why the FCS does not rank all the teams and bracket the playoff teams in a logical order of #1 vs #28, #2 vs #27, etc? That is the way things were done before the big gas crises a few years ago and they(?) decided to pair teams according to location. By always pairing the Southland and Big Sky conference, for example, as they do each year, usually two good teams must face each other in the first round, while two comparably mediocre teams get an easier draw. It is not a true playoff pairing as exists in most other playoff sports such as basketball's March madness and baseball's World Series. Anyone know why?

Welcome! Im BlackFalkin and Im something like King here.. but You answered your own question there Chief. In the playoffs their are CONSIDERABLY more ppl on that plane.. Like the AD, the SID, the coaches wives, etc.. So it -COULD- be that, coupled with some schools lack of a budget.. Like Coastal Carolina flying 130 people to Spokane... they can bus or take ac cheaper flight to Towson or Maine.
You think you know everything and you don't. What you don't know (b/c you're a fucking idiot) is that CCU has a $23-24M endowment fund (larger than EWU) as well as wealthy donors and generous sponsors such as TD Ameritrade, Hooters and Naturally Fresh. CCU has been on target with their budget, so much so that they haven't had to raise tuition in over 4 years. EWU had to jack theirs up 11%. We've been able to conduct aggressive building projects, science research and building renovations without having to pass that buck off to the students. I'd say CCU is doing just fine.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: FCS playoff brackets

Post by AZGrizFan »

Ibanez wrote:
BlackFalkin wrote:

Welcome! Im BlackFalkin and Im something like King here.. but You answered your own question there Chief. In the playoffs their are CONSIDERABLY more ppl on that plane.. Like the AD, the SID, the coaches wives, etc.. So it -COULD- be that, coupled with some schools lack of a budget.. Like Coastal Carolina flying 130 people to Spokane... they can bus or take ac cheaper flight to Towson or Maine.
You think you know everything and you don't. What you don't know (b/c you're a fucking idiot) is that CCU has a $23-24M endowment fund (larger than EWU) as well as wealthy donors and generous sponsors such as TD Ameritrade, Hooters and Naturally Fresh. CCU has been on target with their budget, so much so that they haven't had to raise tuition in over 4 years. EWU had to jack theirs up 11%. We've been able to conduct aggressive building projects, science research and building renovations without having to pass that buck off to the students. I'd say CCU is doing just fine.
I don't care. I would just LOVE to see the Coastal players try to play football after the 1,096 mile bus ride to Maine. :lol: :lol:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69386
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: FCS playoff brackets

Post by kalm »

Ibanez wrote:
BlackFalkin wrote:

Welcome! Im BlackFalkin and Im something like King here.. but You answered your own question there Chief. In the playoffs their are CONSIDERABLY more ppl on that plane.. Like the AD, the SID, the coaches wives, etc.. So it -COULD- be that, coupled with some schools lack of a budget.. Like Coastal Carolina flying 130 people to Spokane... they can bus or take ac cheaper flight to Towson or Maine.
You think you know everything and you don't. What you don't know (b/c you're a fucking idiot) is that CCU has a $23-24M endowment fund (larger than EWU) as well as wealthy donors and generous sponsors such as TD Ameritrade, Hooters and Naturally Fresh. CCU has been on target with their budget, so much so that they haven't had to raise tuition in over 4 years. EWU had to jack theirs up 11%. We've been able to conduct aggressive building projects, science research and building renovations without having to pass that buck off to the students. I'd say CCU is doing just fine.
Chill... and perhaps get some product from one of your wealthy sponsors... :coffee:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Grizalltheway
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 35688
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
Location: BSC

Re: FCS playoff brackets

Post by Grizalltheway »

Ibanez wrote:
BlackFalkin wrote:

Welcome! Im BlackFalkin and Im something like King here.. but You answered your own question there Chief. In the playoffs their are CONSIDERABLY more ppl on that plane.. Like the AD, the SID, the coaches wives, etc.. So it -COULD- be that, coupled with some schools lack of a budget.. Like Coastal Carolina flying 130 people to Spokane... they can bus or take ac cheaper flight to Towson or Maine.
You think you know everything and you don't. What you don't know (b/c you're a fucking idiot) is that CCU has a $23-24M endowment fund (larger than EWU) as well as wealthy donors and generous sponsors such as TD Ameritrade, Hooters and Naturally Fresh. CCU has been on target with their budget, so much so that they haven't had to raise tuition in over 4 years. EWU had to jack theirs up 11%. We've been able to conduct aggressive building projects, science research and building renovations without having to pass that buck off to the students. I'd say CCU is doing just fine.
Hooters. :lol:
Post Reply