Same-Sex Marriages in NJ to begin Monday!!!

[CAA Flagship]

I called Obama a bigot plenty - got banned from Democratic Underground for 2 years because of my "FUCK YOU OBAMA" thread

Democratic Underground?

Jesus Jon, you came out of the closet, now it's time to come out of the basement. Sunshine is awesome.

[LeadBolt]

It will be legal everywhere within a decade.


BTW - I met up with a buddy of mine who was in town for work from Charlotte. Picked him up - he was wearing a The Citadel t-shirt. Asked him where he got it - said a regular **** of his was a Grad (and now a lawyer in Charlotte) I guess his buddy that went to The Citadel described the student population (at least back in the 90's as half gay

This may come as a surprise to you and Chitstain and the rest of you pinko communist cornholer greasy starfish munchers, but there have always been gay cadets and everyone knew they were gay and nobody messed with them. I can name 4 guys in my company alone in the 1980s. Nobody really cared.

There was no black no white, no gay or straight, only gray. The only thing I would dispute is the percentage. My company had 120 cadets, about 4-5 of whom were gay. That would be about the percentage across the Corps I would guess.

That % of gays fits with the general population of 2-4%.

[Chizzang]

It will be legal everywhere within a decade.


BTW - I met up with a buddy of mine who was in town for work from Charlotte. Picked him up - he was wearing a The Citadel t-shirt. Asked him where he got it - said a regular **** of his was a Grad (and now a lawyer in Charlotte) I guess his buddy that went to The Citadel described the student population (at least back in the 90's as half gay

This may come as a surprise to you and Chitstain and the rest of you pinko communist cornholer greasy starfish munchers, but there have always been gay cadets and everyone knew they were gay and nobody messed with them. I can name 4 guys in my company alone in the 1980s. Nobody really cared.

There was no black no white, no gay or straight, only gray. The only thing I would dispute is the percentage. My company had 120 cadets, about 4-5 of whom were gay. That would be about the percentage across the Corps I would guess.

oh thank you so much...

CID you are the gift that keeps on giving

[D1B]

Anyone who willingly chooses the life of a catholic priest is a pedophile or a seriously fucked up person. That you don't get this simple fact is testament to your high level of indoctrination.

The fact that you don't know what a fact is speaks to you high level of idiocy.

[89Hen]

The fact that you don't know what a fact is speaks to you high level of idiocy.

Looks good on you.

[D1B]

Looks good on you.

Tell your 7 year old that was a good one.

[CID1990]

This may come as a surprise to you and Chitstain and the rest of you pinko communist cornholer greasy starfish munchers, but there have always been gay cadets and everyone knew they were gay and nobody messed with them. I can name 4 guys in my company alone in the 1980s. Nobody really cared.

There was no black no white, no gay or straight, only gray. The only thing I would dispute is the percentage. My company had 120 cadets, about 4-5 of whom were gay. That would be about the percentage across the Corps I would guess.

That % of gays fits with the general population of 2-4%.

Yeah well BackdoorJon sez his boy toy said it was half. I interpreted that as 50%.

[Chizzang]

That % of gays fits with the general population of 2-4%.

Yeah well BackdoorJon sez his boy toy said it was half. I interpreted that as 50%.

I think we all know it's a hell of a lot higher than 2-4%

but nice try CIDney

[JohnStOnge]

This is the worst kind. Everybody knows I think having marriage between homosexuals is ridiculous and the fact that we're doing it shows the society has gone bonkers. But if the people of a jurisdiction do it through the political process so be it. If they want to be idiots let them be idiots. It is their right.

But when it's done through Judicial fiat that's a different matter. That is fundamentally wrong. It's done a lot in this country but it should not be done at all. And it doesn't even matter if the end is good. In this case the end is NOT good. But even if it were no end justifies the means of establishing social policy through Judicial fiat.

[Bison Fan in NW MN]

I'm all for gay marriage but must admit that Jon's routine is getting a bit tired. That's the part about any minority group that gets annoying after awhile. You get what's rightfully yours and then you have to spike the football and denigrate others who don't agree with you. Bad form honestly.

Until we have equal rights across the country, I won't back down.


And I will continue to call hateful bigots like Christie for what they are: Bigots.


I am sorry my wanting equality is so inconvienent for you.


want to do something about it - campaign for it. Don't tolerate anyone that is not for equality. Don't vote for anyone that is a bigot.

The sooner I get full equality, the sooner I will shut the **** up.

Just because someone does not believe in gay marriage and supports it does not mean they are a bigot.

[mrklean]

Who gives a shit?

[kalm]

This is the worst kind. Everybody knows I think having marriage between homosexuals is ridiculous and the fact that we're doing it shows the society has gone bonkers. But if the people of a jurisdiction do it through the political process so be it. If they want to be idiots let them be idiots. It is their right.

But when it's done through Judicial fiat that's a different matter. That is fundamentally wrong. It's done a lot in this country but it should not be done at all. And it doesn't even matter if the end is good. In this case the end is NOT good. But even if it were no end justifies the means of establishing social policy through Judicial fiat.

Not very libertarian of you...

Seriously why would anyone in their right mind have a problem with it?

[CID1990]

Yeah well BackdoorJon sez his boy toy said it was half. I interpreted that as 50%.

I think we all know it's a hell of a lot higher than 2-4%

but nice try CIDney

I'm pretty sure you're just trolling because I have it on good authority that you aren't a fvcking retard. (Apologies to retards they can't help it)

[BDKJMU]

Until we have equal rights across the country, I won't back down.


And I will continue to call hateful bigots like Christie for what they are: Bigots.


I am sorry my wanting equality is so inconvienent for you.


want to do something about it - campaign for it. Don't tolerate anyone that is not for equality. Don't vote for anyone that is a bigot.

The sooner I get full equality, the sooner I will shut the **** up.

Just because someone does not believe in gay marriage and supports it does not mean they are a bigot.

Yep.

[dbackjon]

Until we have equal rights across the country, I won't back down.


And I will continue to call hateful bigots like Christie for what they are: Bigots.


I am sorry my wanting equality is so inconvienent for you.


want to do something about it - campaign for it. Don't tolerate anyone that is not for equality. Don't vote for anyone that is a bigot.

The sooner I get full equality, the sooner I will shut the **** up.

Just because someone does not believe in gay marriage and supports it does not mean they are a bigot.

So what does it make you? Intolerant? Why do you oppose it?









Hint, any answer will end up the same (BIGOTRY)

[dbackjon]

Just because someone does not believe in gay marriage and supports it does not mean they are a bigot.

Yep.

Never good when BDKKKJMU agrees with you on civil rights.

[BDKJMU]

Yep.

Never good when BDKKKJMU agrees with you on civil rights.

You're the most bigoted person on here...,

[dbackjon]

Never good when BDKKKJMU agrees with you on civil rights.

You're the most bigoted person on here...,

Nope - I love and respect everyone - except those who are intolerant of others.

I could care less if you are a racist/sexist/homophobic tool, just don't try to impose your warped morality on me.

Legalizing gay marriage only affects those that participate. Your hatred and bigotry affects others.

[LeadBolt]

That % of gays fits with the general population of 2-4%.

Yeah well BackdoorJon sez his boy toy said it was half. I interpreted that as 50%.

Typical over estimation by those out of the main stream looking for acceptance.

[LeadBolt]

Yeah well BackdoorJon sez his boy toy said it was half. I interpreted that as 50%.

I think we all know it's a hell of a lot higher than 2-4%

but nice try CIDney

ABC study says 4%; Gates Study says 1.7%; Gallup study says 3.5%, thus 2-4% seems reasonable based upon empirical data or facts rather than unsubstantiated belief by those who have been indoctrinated, you know science vs. religion.

[JohnStOnge]

Not very libertarian of you...

Seriously why would anyone in their right mind have a problem with it?

Being against Judicial fiat is VERY Libertarian. Judges are not supposed to be determining the direction of the society. They're stepping out of their role when they do that. Their job is, or at least it should be, to ask themselves whether or not the people that passed a certain law or ratified certain language to a Constitution understood what they were doing to require or prohibit a certain thing. They are not supposed to exercise their own opinion as to what is best or "just" at all. They are not supposed to impose any will at all. They are not supposed to worry about what they think is best.

But they are not like that. They are completely out of control.

Judges making policy is authoritarianism.

[93henfan]

Judges making policy is authoritarianism.

Yes, when they take away rights, but this is about giving rights to people who didn't have them before.

[JohnStOnge]

Judges making policy is authoritarianism.

Yes, when they take away rights, but this is about giving rights to people who didn't have them before.

First of all, there is no "right" to have a relationship recognized as a marriage.

But aside from that, what you're doing is going to the "ends justify means" approach.

Being for judges making policy because you like the policy they make is like being for monarchy as a form of government because the King makes what you think are good decisions. The end does NOT justify the means. There is a fundamental problem with having judges impose their own will and it should not be tolerated.

[Skjellyfetti]

If you don't think it should be the courts... who should decide what is and what isn't Constitutional?

The legislative branch? That would be a fuckup of epic proportions.

The executive branch? Talk about monarchy...

[Chizzang]

I think we all know it's a hell of a lot higher than 2-4%

but nice try CIDney

ABC study says 4%; Gates Study says 1.7%; Gallup study says 3.5%, thus 2-4% seems reasonable based upon empirical data or facts rather than unsubstantiated belief by those who have been indoctrinated, you know science vs. religion.

there's a Poll on how Gay the Citadel is..?

(I had no idea)

This thread couldn't get any better