Justice Dept. Investigation re: Zimmerman

Political discussions
User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25486
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: Justice Dept. Investigation re: Zimmerman

Post by CID1990 »

I wonder how Holder is going to weasel out of charging Zimmerman, since that is the only possible outcome here.

Maybe they'll "investigate" until 2016 and then let the next administration explain it to the rabble.


Sent from the center of the universe.
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Justice Dept. Investigation re: Zimmerman

Post by Ibanez »

Cluck U wrote:
Ibanez wrote:
Shouldn't it say he "has" the right. I mean, they weren't taken away were they? :coffee:

Spoiler: show
Just be a dick for you being a dick to me in another thread. Grammar Nazis UNITE! :mrgreen:
If you were writing a book about the incident, you would use, "had", because the incident we are referring to was in the past. He still, "has" those rights...but he is being made a victim due to the incidents in the past...thus, the, "had" reference. Freakin' Nazi! :ohno:

BTW, I am writing a book in order to profit from this supposed tragedy. It will be called, "Pop a Cap in a Punk...Regardless of Color".

Of course, the movie will include the songs, "Jump Around", "The Night Chicago Died" (a re-worked version by NWA that foCUSSes on black-on-black urban crime), and, "Another One bites the Dust". Special effects will include Chameleon Man, who will jump people, sucker punch them, and rob them of their jewelry. He will change colors during mug shots and TV interviews in order to confuse the public. The President will have a cameo where he says, "Chameleon Man looks like my son...because I am black...no wait...half black...no wait, he looks like my half white part...and you know I'd hit a white girl if Bertha Butt, I mean, Michelle, would let me...and WTF color is that guy anyway?"

Get in on the funding now...it is sure to be a great investment. :nod:
You do realize I wasn't serious, right?

Btw, I feel Straight Outta Compton should be covered. Maybe TI can do, Straight Outta Sanford.

Straight outta Sanford, crazy motherfucker named ZMan
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69179
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Justice Dept. Investigation re: Zimmerman

Post by kalm »

Cluck U wrote:
kalm wrote: Z's the victim now. :lol:
Dude had a right to carry (some may not like it, but he had the right to do so).

Dude had a right to walk around (some may not like it but he had the right to do so).

Dude had a right to look for a potential perp (some may not like it, but he had the right to do so).

Dude got attacked and beaten by a punk.

Dude got set up and demonized by the MSM.

Dude was threatened by hordes of the uneducated, bottom dwellers of society.

Dude was made a part of a racist agenda.

Of course he is the victim. :nod: What part of all that is untrue?
His actions that night and his history suggests he was looking for some action. He confronted a kid who also had rights. We will never know who started the physical altercation or the degree to which either was winning. He's responsible for the death of another. Zimmerman went looking for trouble and found it. Sorry, but I don't consider him a victim.
Image
Image
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69179
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Justice Dept. Investigation re: Zimmerman

Post by kalm »

Cluck U wrote:
kalm wrote: Z's the victim now. :lol:
Dude had a right to carry (some may not like it, but he had the right to do so).

Dude had a right to walk around (some may not like it but he had the right to do so).

Dude had a right to look for a potential perp (some may not like it, but he had the right to do so).

Dude got attacked and beaten by a punk.

Dude got set up and demonized by the MSM.

Dude was threatened by hordes of the uneducated, bottom dwellers of society.

Dude was made a part of a racist agenda.

Of course he is the victim. :nod: What part of all that is untrue?
His actions that night and his history suggests he was looking for some action. He confronted a kid who also had rights. We will never know who started the physical altercation or the degree to which either was winning. He's responsible for the death of another. Zimmerman went looking for trouble and found it. Sorry, but I don't consider him a victim.
Image
Image
Image
blueballs
Level3
Level3
Posts: 2590
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 7:00 am
I am a fan of: Cap'n's porn collection
A.K.A.: blueballs
Location: Central FL, where bums have to stay in their designated area on the sidewalk

Re: Justice Dept. Investigation re: Zimmerman

Post by blueballs »

kalm wrote:
Cluck U wrote:
Dude had a right to carry (some may not like it, but he had the right to do so).

Dude had a right to walk around (some may not like it but he had the right to do so).

Dude had a right to look for a potential perp (some may not like it, but he had the right to do so).

Dude got attacked and beaten by a punk.

Dude got set up and demonized by the MSM.

Dude was threatened by hordes of the uneducated, bottom dwellers of society.

Dude was made a part of a racist agenda.

Of course he is the victim. :nod: What part of all that is untrue?
His actions that night and his history suggests he was looking for some action. He confronted a kid who also had rights. We will never know who started the physical altercation or the degree to which either was winning. He's responsible for the death of another. Zimmerman went looking for trouble and found it. Sorry, but I don't consider him a victim.
There is no evidence that Zimmerman confronted Martin, or that he was looking for some action. In fact, the evidence presented at the trial suggests quite the opposite, that Martin had every opportunity to avoid the conflict but instead chose to assault Zimmerman and inflict bodily harm on him.

Zimmerman was a victim of a vicious beating at the hands of Martin, Martin was the victim of Zimmerman exercising his right to self defense under Florida law. That is what the evidence presented at the trial showed.

EVERYTHING else is pure speculation on your part and not supported in any way by eyewitness testimony or physical evidence.
Blueballs: The ultimate 'bad case of the wants.'
User avatar
ALPHAGRIZ1
Level5
Level5
Posts: 16077
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:26 am
I am a fan of: 1995 Montana Griz
A.K.A.: Fuck Off
Location: America: and having my rights violated on a daily basis

Re: Justice Dept. Investigation re: Zimmerman

Post by ALPHAGRIZ1 »

I'm in Cluck......where do you want the money sent?

Just one request...........could we use Detroit as the city in the movie?

Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2
Image

ALPHAGRIZ1 - Now available in internet black

The flat earth society has members all around the globe
YoUDeeMan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12088
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
A.K.A.: Delaware Homie

Re: Justice Dept. Investigation re: Zimmerman

Post by YoUDeeMan »

Ibanez wrote:
You do realize I wasn't serious, right?

Btw, I feel Straight Outta Compton should be covered. Maybe TI can do, Straight Outta Sanford.

Straight outta Sanford, crazy motherfucker named ZMan
Of course you were kidding, but the important part here is character development.

Now, what do you think about Chameleon Man running committing crimes and popping caps in people while changing his skin color?
These signatures have a 500 character limit?

What if I have more personalities than that?
YoUDeeMan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12088
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
A.K.A.: Delaware Homie

Re: Justice Dept. Investigation re: Zimmerman

Post by YoUDeeMan »

kalm wrote:
He confronted a kid who also had rights.
kalm down houndawg...you are once again confusing facts with your inner racist and ageist beliefs.

Z-man was a victim. No matter how many times a person says it, following another person you believe might be suspicious is NOT a crime...and it does NOT warrant a physical assault.

Are you one of those people that says a rape victim was looking for trouble? :suspicious:
These signatures have a 500 character limit?

What if I have more personalities than that?
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Justice Dept. Investigation re: Zimmerman

Post by Ibanez »

Cluck U wrote:
Ibanez wrote:
You do realize I wasn't serious, right?

Btw, I feel Straight Outta Compton should be covered. Maybe TI can do, Straight Outta Sanford.

Straight outta Sanford, crazy motherfucker named ZMan
Of course you were kidding, but the important part here is character development.

Now, what do you think about Chameleon Man running committing crimes and popping caps in people while changing his skin color?
I think it will make one heck of a crime thriller. But you need a love interest, audiences love that stuff. :thumb:
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Justice Dept. Investigation re: Zimmerman

Post by Ibanez »

Cluck U wrote:
kalm wrote:
He confronted a kid who also had rights.
kalm down houndawg...you are once again confusing facts with your inner racist and ageist beliefs.

Z-man was a victim. No matter how many times a person says it, following another person you believe might be suspicious is NOT a crime...and it does NOT warrant a physical assault.

Are you one of those people that says a rape victim was looking for trouble? :suspicious:
She wouldn't dress that way if she didn't want it.



I kid, I kid. :mrgreen:
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69179
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Justice Dept. Investigation re: Zimmerman

Post by kalm »

blueballs wrote:
kalm wrote:
His actions that night and his history suggests he was looking for some action. He confronted a kid who also had rights. We will never know who started the physical altercation or the degree to which either was winning. He's responsible for the death of another. Zimmerman went looking for trouble and found it. Sorry, but I don't consider him a victim.
There is no evidence that Zimmerman confronted Martin, or that he was looking for some action. In fact, the evidence presented at the trial suggests quite the opposite, that Martin had every opportunity to avoid the conflict but instead chose to assault Zimmerman and inflict bodily harm on him.

Zimmerman was a victim of a vicious beating at the hands of Martin, Martin was the victim of Zimmerman exercising his right to self defense under Florida law. That is what the evidence presented at the trial showed.

EVERYTHING else is pure speculation on your part and not supported in any way by eyewitness testimony or physical evidence.
You could be correct. I didn't realize the evidence suggested Martin instigated the fight or that he had every opportunity to avoid it.

I'll gracefully bow of the argument with Tavis Smiley's question: where has the NRA been in supporting Martin's right to own a gun? If Trayvon had a gun he might still be with us....
Image
Image
Image
blueballs
Level3
Level3
Posts: 2590
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 7:00 am
I am a fan of: Cap'n's porn collection
A.K.A.: blueballs
Location: Central FL, where bums have to stay in their designated area on the sidewalk

Re: Justice Dept. Investigation re: Zimmerman

Post by blueballs »

kalm wrote:
blueballs wrote:
There is no evidence that Zimmerman confronted Martin, or that he was looking for some action. In fact, the evidence presented at the trial suggests quite the opposite, that Martin had every opportunity to avoid the conflict but instead chose to assault Zimmerman and inflict bodily harm on him.

Zimmerman was a victim of a vicious beating at the hands of Martin, Martin was the victim of Zimmerman exercising his right to self defense under Florida law. That is what the evidence presented at the trial showed.

EVERYTHING else is pure speculation on your part and not supported in any way by eyewitness testimony or physical evidence.
You could be correct. I didn't realize the evidence suggested Martin instigated the fight or that he had every opportunity to avoid it.

I'll gracefully bow of the argument with Tavis Smiley's question: where has the NRA been in supporting Martin's right to own a gun? If Trayvon had a gun he might still be with us....
Martin was a minor... he could not own a gun under Florida law.
Blueballs: The ultimate 'bad case of the wants.'
Post Reply