Are any of the jurors on record yet as saying they thought it was self defense? Just because they acquitted him, doesn't necessarily mean they believed his story.blueballs wrote:Stalking????kalm wrote:
Well sure, if it goes down EXACTLY as Zimm claims, he should sue just to protect his name.![]()
Still, he killed an unarmed kid who's mistake was to confront a stalker. The Robitussin/nowhere near innocent is pure conjecture. Zimmerman's stalking is not.
Florida has a very well defined and strict stalking law. This case in no way fits that law. As the juror and the defense attorneys stated to the media yesterday, this was self defense, period.
I'm curious to see what they say.







