



kalm wrote:Are you suggesting prison rape? That's discussing SH! Besides, Michelle Pfeifer was hotter.SuperHornet wrote:Oh, come ON, kalm! Are you telling me you didn't want to do time with Olivia Newton-John?
![]()
Now back to the topic. This is a really **** up deal and screw the Obama administration and any congressmen that voted for the Fisa Amendment Act. And just like before, companies like Google, Apple, Facebook etc. that are colluding with the government (aka fascism) are removed from any legal responsibility. The NSA now basically has a back door into all electronic communications including content of all of these companies with very little to no oversight.![]()
![]()
![]()
Here's a good follow up about "PRISM' from Glenn Greenwald who broke the original story:
(I wonder if the leaker/whistleblower of the PRISM doc's is going to be prosecuted or just disappeared?)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/ju ... s-nsa-data" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Rand Paul going to bat:
If the president and Congress would simply obey the fourth amendment, this new shocking revelation that the government is now spying on citizens' phone data en masse would never have happened. That I have to keep reintroducing the fourth amendment – and that a majority of senators keep voting against it – is a good reflection of the arrogance that dominates Washington.
During my filibuster, I quoted Glenn Greenwald, who wrote:
"There is a theoretical framework being built that posits that the US government has unlimited power. When it comes to any kind of threats it perceives, it makes the judgment to take whatever action against them that it warrants without any constraints or limitations of any kind."
If the seizure and surveillance of Americans' phone records – across the board and with little to no discrimination – is now considered a legitimate security precaution, there is literally no protection of any kind guaranteed anymore to American citizens. In their actions, more outrageous and numerous by the day, this administration continues to treat the US constitution as a dead letter.
Senator Obama said of President Bush and Fisa in 2008:
"We must reaffirm that no one in this country is above the law."
No one in America should be above the law. Including this president.![]()
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... nstitution" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

BullyCID1990 wrote:Fvck all of it.
Pussy ass Americans cause this shit, expecting presidents to "keep us safe". Fvck that. You have a better chance of getting struck by lightning than being killed in a terrorist attack. But every time some murder monkey kills somebody, the politicians make political hay and point fingers.
If there were less pussy ass Americans afraid of their own pussy shadows this shit wouldn't happen. Fvck
Sent from the center of the universe.




Funny thing is that you think it's just the Obama govt.BDKJMU wrote:IRS, Justice Dept, now NSA. Further proof that Obama's govt is completely out of control and isn't too be trusted......

Bush granted the use of a hammer to hammer in a nail. Obama took that to mean a sledgehammer....kalm wrote:Funny thing is that you think it's just the Obama govt.BDKJMU wrote:IRS, Justice Dept, now NSA. Further proof that Obama's govt is completely out of control and isn't too be trusted......


It's always fun to see conspiracy theories become conspiracy facts.ASUG8 wrote:This administration is going to make expandspanoses out of all of us before it's over.
Did anyone else just hear a black helicopter?

To be fair...most of his shit isn't that far off base....it's his big "go to shit" that gets the attention.CitadelGrad wrote:It's always fun to see conspiracy theories become conspiracy facts.ASUG8 wrote:This administration is going to make expandspanoses out of all of us before it's over.
Did anyone else just hear a black helicopter?

Even if it's unconstitutional?tribe_pride wrote:kalm wrote:
Are you suggesting prison rape? That's discussing SH! Besides, Michelle Pfeifer was hotter.![]()
Now back to the topic. This is a really **** up deal and screw the Obama administration and any congressmen that voted for the Fisa Amendment Act. And just like before, companies like Google, Apple, Facebook etc. that are colluding with the government (aka fascism) are removed from any legal responsibility. The NSA now basically has a back door into all electronic communications including content of all of these companies with very little to no oversight.![]()
![]()
![]()
Here's a good follow up about "PRISM' from Glenn Greenwald who broke the original story:
(I wonder if the leaker/whistleblower of the PRISM doc's is going to be prosecuted or just disappeared?)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/ju ... s-nsa-data" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Rand Paul going to bat:
![]()
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... nstitution" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
With respect to the companies, they have no choice. They must comply with a subpoena or court order or they are breaking the law. While you can argue certain things about these companies, they had no choice in these situations.

Who wants to risk that fight as a public company? It would take a privately held company with cash to stand up, only because owner convictions. See hobby lobby.kalm wrote:
Even if it's unconstitutional?

BDKJMU wrote:Bush granted the use of a hammer to hammer in a nail. Obama took that to mean a sledgehammer....kalm wrote:
Funny thing is that you think it's just the Obama govt.





Pussies. Earlier Thur NY Times said: "The administration has now lost all credibility." Then Thur night they added "on this issue'Ibanez wrote:Hey, can we get a mod to combine the two threads that discuss this? ****, if I were still a mod i'd do it. Should I come out of retirement?
Anyway, the New York Times has come out swinging
the Obama administration issued the same platitude it has offered every time President Obama has been caught overreaching in the use of his powers: Terrorists are a real menace and you should just trust us to deal with them because we have internal mechanisms (that we are not going to tell you about) to make sure we do not violate your rights.http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/07/opini ... .html?_r=0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;The administration has now lost all credibility on this issue. Mr. Obama is proving the truism that the executive branch will use any power it is given and very likely abuse it. That is one reason we have long argued that the Patriot Act, enacted in the heat of fear after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks by members of Congress who mostly had not even read it, was reckless in its assignment of unnecessary and overbroad surveillance powers.

No defending Obama on this but it's still funny you gave\give Bush a pass.BDKJMU wrote:BDKJMU wrote:
Bush granted the use of a hammer to hammer in a nail. Obama took that to mean a sledgehammer....
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... TopStories" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;



And those same bashers who were all about "invasion of privacy", are now looking the other way and making excuses for Obama for not only continuing, but EXPANDING those same policies. Including the ever popular:ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Nobody gave Bush a pass on anything he is the most bashed president in the history of the USA.
Undeservedly
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2


I don't know if that's entirely true. I hear quite a bit of blame from the left cast toward Obama.DSUrocks07 wrote:And those same bashers who were all about "invasion of privacy", are now looking the other way and making excuses for Obama for not only continuing, but EXPANDING those same policies. Including the ever popular:ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Nobody gave Bush a pass on anything he is the most bashed president in the history of the USA.
Undeservedly
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2
"Bush did it first, Obama is blameless."

Yep, that's the establishment media for you. And they pretty much gave Bush the same benefit of the doubt regarding Iraq, torture, the security state etc. What's also funny is that it was a progressive journalist that broke this story. And people like Greenwald and Midea Benjamin of Code Pink have been pretty damn consistent in their criticism of both administrations all along. Could you imagine a conk journalist or news man breaking a story like this on Bush? How about a conk activist heckling Bush at a presidential press conference?BDKJMU wrote:Pussies. Earlier Thur NY Times said: "The administration has now lost all credibility." Then Thur night they added "on this issue'Ibanez wrote:Hey, can we get a mod to combine the two threads that discuss this? ****, if I were still a mod i'd do it. Should I come out of retirement?
Anyway, the New York Times has come out swinging
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/07/opini ... .html?_r=0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"Those reassurances have never been persuasive -- whether on secret warrants to scoop up a news agency's phone records or secret orders to kill an American suspected of terrorism -- especially coming from a president who once promised transparency and accountability. The administration has now lost all credibility."
The New York Times, overnight, amended the last line to say: "The administration has now lost all credibility on this issue."
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/06 ... edibility/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I thought it was a liberal journalist that broke this story?kalm wrote:Yep, that's the establishment media for you. And they pretty much gave Bush the same benefit of the doubt regarding Iraq, torture, the security state etc. What's also funny is that it was a progressive journalist that broke this story. And people like Greenwald and Midea Benjamin of Code Pink have been pretty damn consistent in their criticism of both administrations all along. Could you imagine a conk journalist or news man breaking a story like this on Bush? How about a conk activist heckling Bush at a presidential press conference?BDKJMU wrote:
Pussies. Earlier Thur NY Times said: "The administration has now lost all credibility." Then Thur night they added "on this issue'
"Those reassurances have never been persuasive -- whether on secret warrants to scoop up a news agency's phone records or secret orders to kill an American suspected of terrorism -- especially coming from a president who once promised transparency and accountability. The administration has now lost all credibility."
The New York Times, overnight, amended the last line to say: "The administration has now lost all credibility on this issue."
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/06 ... edibility/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Nice to see the establishment and conk medias jumping on the progressive bandwagon.![]()

Yes, but we can't use that label anymore...it's evil!BDKJMU wrote:I thought it was a liberal journalist that broke this story?kalm wrote:
Yep, that's the establishment media for you. And they pretty much gave Bush the same benefit of the doubt regarding Iraq, torture, the security state etc. What's also funny is that it was a progressive journalist that broke this story. And people like Greenwald and Midea Benjamin of Code Pink have been pretty damn consistent in their criticism of both administrations all along. Could you imagine a conk journalist or news man breaking a story like this on Bush? How about a conk activist heckling Bush at a presidential press conference?
Nice to see the establishment and conk medias jumping on the progressive bandwagon.![]()