Devastating Weather - thanks fuckhead denier conks - SMFH

[Baldy]

And the same geniuses 30 years ago were convinced we were going into an ice age.

Bullshit.

[AZGrizFan]

Bullshit.

D1B OWNED again.

[D1B]

D1B OWNED again.

Couple of fuck wad conks. TIME!

Same Geniuses? Prove it, limp dick.

[AZGrizFan]

D1B OWNED again.

Couple of fuck wad conks. TIME!

Same Geniuses? Prove it, limp dick.

One would presume they were the experts in their respective fields at the time. Much like the yokels you slobber over today...either way, they're wrong WAY more than they're right and turning the world upside down over the predictions of a bunch of paid-off snake-oil salesmen isn't the answer.

[D1B]

Couple of fuck wad conks. TIME!

Same Geniuses? Prove it, limp dick.

One would presume they were the experts in their respective fields at the time.

So we're presuming now.

While you're backpeddling, prove they're the same geniuses, limp dick.

[AZGrizFan]

One would presume they were the experts in their respective fields at the time.

So we're presuming now.

While you're backpeddling, prove they're the same geniuses, limp dick.

"Same" was a generic statement, lumpy. Leave it to you to take it literally.

Take your defeat like a man.

[D1B]

So we're presuming now.

While you're backpeddling, prove they're the same geniuses, limp dick.

"Same" was a generic statement, lumpy. Leave it to you to take it literally.

Take your defeat like a man.

Nice back peddalin, limp dick.

Your argument essentially is, the science and scientists referenced in 2 issues of TIME magazine from the 70's is generally the same as the science and scientists of today, 2013.

[Bronco]

-
Obama's New Energy Secretary: Global Warming "Not Debatable".

Via The Hill:
New Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz doesn’t want to spend his tenure battling over climate science.

“Let me make it very clear that there is no ambiguity in terms of the scientific basis calling for a prudent response on climate change,” Moniz told Energy Department employees shortly after his swearing-in.

“I am not interested in debating what is not debatable,” Moniz said in his remarks at the Tuesday ceremony. “There is plenty to debate as we try and move forward on our climate agenda.”
The comment was part of much wider-ranging remarks, available here, on Moniz’s overall agenda.

[kalm]

"Same" was a generic statement, lumpy. Leave it to you to take it literally.

Take your defeat like a man.

Nice back peddalin, limp dick.

Your argument essentially is, the science and scientists referenced in 2 issues of TIME magazine from the 70's is generally the same as the science and scientists of today, 2013.

The computer models and easy access to information alone has changed the game. Weather is a big part of my business. If you watch NOAA's forecasts on a daily basis like I do, you'll find it's highly accurate in both short term and seasonal forecasting. If you live in Tornado Ally, paying close attention to their science might also save your life.

[D1B]

Nice back peddalin, limp dick.

Your argument essentially is, the science and scientists referenced in 2 issues of TIME magazine from the 70's is generally the same as the science and scientists of today, 2013.

The computer models and easy access to information alone has changed the game. Weather is a big part of my business. If you watch NOAA's forecasts on a daily basis like I do, you'll find it's highly accurate in both short term and seasonal forecasting. If you live in Tornado Ally, paying close attention to their science might also save your life.

Shut the hell up, Kalm. Go find your own dumb conk! Z is mine.

[AZGrizFan]

Nice back peddalin, limp dick.

Your argument essentially is, the science and scientists referenced in 2 issues of TIME magazine from the 70's is generally the same as the science and scientists of today, 2013.

The computer models and easy access to information alone has changed the game. Weather is a big part of my business. If you watch NOAA's forecasts on a daily basis like I do, you'll find it's highly accurate in both short term and seasonal forecasting. If you live in Tornado Ally, paying close attention to their science might also save your life.

So those dumb bastards in Oklahoma just didn't pay close enough attention?

[D1B]

The computer models and easy access to information alone has changed the game. Weather is a big part of my business. If you watch NOAA's forecasts on a daily basis like I do, you'll find it's highly accurate in both short term and seasonal forecasting. If you live in Tornado Ally, paying close attention to their science might also save your life.

So those dumb bastards in Oklahoma just didn't pay close enough attention?

Uh, they did pay close attention, you stupid fucking conk. Thousands would have been killed in the 70's. They would have been sitting in their living rooms reading TIME, right before heading to Oz.

You're just a glutton for punishment.

[AZGrizFan]

So those dumb bastards in Oklahoma just didn't pay close enough attention?

Uh, they did pay close attention, you stupid fucking conk. Thousands would have been killed in the 70's. They would have been sitting in their living rooms reading TIME, right before heading to Oz.

You're just a glutton for punishment.

I'm not talking about THOSE dumb bastards. I'm talking about the ones who aren't here anymore. Are you fucking retarded?

[D1B]

Uh, they did pay close attention, you stupid fucking conk. Thousands would have been killed in the 70's. They would have been sitting in their living rooms reading TIME, right before heading to Oz.

You're just a glutton for punishment.

I'm not talking about THOSE dumb bastards. I'm talking about the ones who aren't here anymore. Are you fucking retarded?

Nice backpeddal limp dick. You're flailing.

[AZGrizFan]

I'm not talking about THOSE dumb bastards. I'm talking about the ones who aren't here anymore. Are you fucking retarded?

Nice backpeddal limp dick. You're flailing.

Your standard response when you're exposed: "nice backpedal, limp dick".

[Baldy]

One would presume they were the experts in their respective fields at the time.

So we're presuming now.

Why not? It's what the alarmists do.

[houndawg]

The computer models and easy access to information alone has changed the game. Weather is a big part of my business. If you watch NOAA's forecasts on a daily basis like I do, you'll find it's highly accurate in both short term and seasonal forecasting. If you live in Tornado Ally, paying close attention to their science might also save your life.

So those dumb bastards in Oklahoma just didn't pay close enough attention?

They didn't pray hard enough.

[D1B]

So we're presuming now.

Why not? It's what the alarmists do.

Dumb fuck conks requiring the world to be literally on fire before they accept the fact that the globe is warming at an alarming rate.

[D1B]

End of thread. Neeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeext......

[Baldy]

End of thread. Neeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeext......

"Are Spending Their Limited Operating Budgets"

AND

"Obscene Profits"

[kalm]

End of thread. Neeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeext......

"Are Spending Their Limited Operating Budgets"

AND

"Obscene Profits"

[Baldy]

Not sure what is so confusing.

According to the GAO, annual federal climate spending has increased from $4.6 billion in 2003 to $8.8 billion in 2010, amounting to $106.7 billion over that period. The money was spent in four general categories: technology to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, science to understand climate changes, international assistance for developing countries, and wildlife adaptation to respond to actual or expected changes. Technology spending, the largest category, grew from $2.56 billion to $5.5 billion over this period, increasingly advancing over others in total share. Data compiled by Joanne Nova at the Science and Policy Institute indicates that the U.S. Government spent more than $32.5 billion on climate studies between 1989 and 2009. This doesn’t count about $79 billion more spent for climate change technology research, foreign aid and tax breaks for “green energy.”

http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2 ... -hysteria/

Do all those billions and billions and billions of research dollars equate to "limited operating budgets" to you?

[93henfan]

Not sure what is so confusing.

According to the GAO, annual federal climate spending has increased from $4.6 billion in 2003 to $8.8 billion in 2010, amounting to $106.7 billion over that period. The money was spent in four general categories: technology to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, science to understand climate changes, international assistance for developing countries, and wildlife adaptation to respond to actual or expected changes. Technology spending, the largest category, grew from $2.56 billion to $5.5 billion over this period, increasingly advancing over others in total share. Data compiled by Joanne Nova at the Science and Policy Institute indicates that the U.S. Government spent more than $32.5 billion on climate studies between 1989 and 2009. This doesn’t count about $79 billion more spent for climate change technology research, foreign aid and tax breaks for “green energy.”

http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2 ... -hysteria/

Do all those billions and billions and billions of research dollars equate to "limited operating budgets" to you?

Considering oil companies made $123 billion profit in one year alone (2007), I'd call that small potatoes over the 20 year period referenced.

Oil makes four times as much in one year as the US Government puts into climate research over 20 years combined. Wow. That's perspective.

[AZGrizFan]

Not sure what is so confusing.



http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2 ... -hysteria/

Do all those billions and billions and billions of research dollars equate to "limited operating budgets" to you?

Considering oil companies made $123 billion profit in one year alone (2007), I'd call that small potatoes over the 20 year period referenced.

Oil makes four times as much in one year as the US Government puts into climate research over 20 years combined. Wow. That's perspective.

So, are you implying that the oil companies spend ALL their profits on defeating global warming science?

[andy7171]

Eventually, everyone "spandos Issue" comes to light.