U.S. Army gives new M4 contract to Colt

Political discussions
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: U.S. Army gives new M4 contract to Colt

Post by Ibanez »

Grizalltheway wrote:
CAA Flagship wrote:Germans :lol:
Image
Sledders gonna sled.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
User avatar
Grizalltheway
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 35688
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
Location: BSC

Re: U.S. Army gives new M4 contract to Colt

Post by Grizalltheway »

Ibanez wrote:
Grizalltheway wrote:
Image
Sledders gonna sled.
Deutschers gonna deutsch.
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: U.S. Army gives new M4 contract to Colt

Post by Ibanez »

Grizalltheway wrote:
Ibanez wrote: Sledders gonna sled.
Deutschers gonna deutsch.
Don't get caught Ridin' German.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25486
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: U.S. Army gives new M4 contract to Colt

Post by CID1990 »

mrklean wrote: We were behind on the Tank. In fact the early German tanks were created by an American
Not correct. Christie invented the Christie suspension, which was an element of tank design, but the Germans did not widely utilize it.

You are thinking of the Soviets, who used Christie's suspension in the T-34, which made it infinitely more maneuverable than the German heavy tanks. The T-34 was the best tank of the war.

The Germans used it in their early tanks, but they were lightly armed and not significantly superior to France's tanks. The difference was their tactics. Blitzkrieg nullified the Maginot Line, and it could have been done with even the sorry tanks we had in the 1930s (which were essentially Model T Fords and WWI era British overtreads).



Sent from the center of the universe.
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
User avatar
93henfan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 56358
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:03 pm
Location: Slower Delaware

Re: U.S. Army gives new M4 contract to Colt

Post by 93henfan »

CID1990 wrote:
mrklean wrote: We were behind on the Tank. In fact the early German tanks were created by an American
Not correct. Christie invented the Christie suspension, which was an element of tank design, but the Germans did not widely utilize it.

You are thinking of the Soviets, who used Christie's suspension in the T-34, which made it infinitely more maneuverable than the German heavy tanks. The T-34 was the best tank of the war.

The Germans used it in their early tanks, but they were lightly armed and not significantly superior to France's tanks. The difference was their tactics. Blitzkrieg nullified the Maginot Line, and it could have been done with even the sorry tanks we had in the 1930s (which were essentially Model T Fords and WWI era British overtreads).



Sent from the center of the universe.
I love the accounts of T-34's being fitted with their crews off of the assembly line and driving directly to the eastern front to fight. :notworthy:
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
User avatar
mrklean
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3794
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 11:06 am
I am a fan of: Georgia Southern Uni.
Location: Stockbridge, GA

Re: U.S. Army gives new M4 contract to Colt

Post by mrklean »

CID1990 wrote:
mrklean wrote: We were behind on the Tank. In fact the early German tanks were created by an American
Not correct. Christie invented the Christie suspension, which was an element of tank design, but the Germans did not widely utilize it.

You are thinking of the Soviets, who used Christie's suspension in the T-34, which made it infinitely more maneuverable than the German heavy tanks. The T-34 was the best tank of the war.

The Germans used it in their early tanks, but they were lightly armed and not significantly superior to France's tanks. The difference was their tactics. Blitzkrieg nullified the Maginot Line, and it could have been done with even the sorry tanks we had in the 1930s (which were essentially Model T Fords and WWI era British overtreads).

During the start of WWII, the French had 3x as many tanks than the Germans. However, the French did not use them in mass as the Germans. The French used their tanks as support for ground troops.

Sent from the center of the universe.
ImageImage
FROM DA DURTY SOUTH!
User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25486
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: U.S. Army gives new M4 contract to Colt

Post by CID1990 »

That's what I said.

Blitzkrieg tactics were the departure from the conventional. At the time that Rommel and Guderian put it to use, it would have been successful with even the most inferior tanks.


Sent from the center of the universe.
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: U.S. Army gives new M4 contract to Colt

Post by Ibanez »

93henfan wrote:
CID1990 wrote:
Not correct. Christie invented the Christie suspension, which was an element of tank design, but the Germans did not widely utilize it.

You are thinking of the Soviets, who used Christie's suspension in the T-34, which made it infinitely more maneuverable than the German heavy tanks. The T-34 was the best tank of the war.

The Germans used it in their early tanks, but they were lightly armed and not significantly superior to France's tanks. The difference was their tactics. Blitzkrieg nullified the Maginot Line, and it could have been done with even the sorry tanks we had in the 1930s (which were essentially Model T Fords and WWI era British overtreads).



Sent from the center of the universe.
I love the accounts of T-34's being fitted with their crews off of the assembly line and driving directly to the eastern front to fight. :notworthy:

Oh yeah. I've read some stories and seen interviews of the T-34 at the Battle of Prochorovka (and Kursk). To think, T-34 commanders were trained to specifically fight and exploit the weaknesses (thin armour on the sides) in the Panzer. :thumb: :notworthy: :notworthy: The Soviets ability to move production as well as they did was an incredible feat that allowed them to churn out weaponry that really saved the day.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: U.S. Army gives new M4 contract to Colt

Post by Ibanez »

CID1990 wrote:That's what I said.

Blitzkrieg tactics were the departure from the conventional. At the time that Rommel and Guderian put it to use, it would have been successful with even the most inferior tanks.


Sent from the center of the universe.
The French did the same thing in WW1 with the machine gun. They failed to recognize that weaponry had advanced to the next level.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
User avatar
mrklean
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3794
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 11:06 am
I am a fan of: Georgia Southern Uni.
Location: Stockbridge, GA

Re: U.S. Army gives new M4 contract to Colt

Post by mrklean »

Ibanez wrote:
CID1990 wrote:That's what I said.

Blitzkrieg tactics were the departure from the conventional. At the time that Rommel and Guderian put it to use, it would have been successful with even the most inferior tanks.


Sent from the center of the universe.
The French did the same thing in WW1 with the machine gun. They failed to recognize that weaponry had advanced to the next level.
Thats why there are France :rofl:
ImageImage
FROM DA DURTY SOUTH!
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: U.S. Army gives new M4 contract to Colt

Post by Ibanez »

mrklean wrote:
Ibanez wrote: The French did the same thing in WW1 with the machine gun. They failed to recognize that weaponry had advanced to the next level.
Thats why there are France :rofl:
To quote a movie, "That don't make no sense!" :suspicious:
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19233
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: U.S. Army gives new M4 contract to Colt

Post by GannonFan »

Ibanez wrote:
93henfan wrote:
I love the accounts of T-34's being fitted with their crews off of the assembly line and driving directly to the eastern front to fight. :notworthy:

Oh yeah. I've read some stories and seen interviews of the T-34 at the Battle of Prochorovka (and Kursk). To think, T-34 commanders were trained to specifically fight and exploit the weaknesses (thin armour on the sides) in the Panzer. :thumb: :notworthy: :notworthy: The Soviets ability to move production as well as they did was an incredible feat that allowed them to churn out weaponry that really saved the day.
While we didn't build the tanks, we (the US) did a significant job in terms of giving the USSR tons of equipment (trains, locomotives, aircraft, and most importantly trucks) that let them focus on the tank production. It was a team effort. :thumb:
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: U.S. Army gives new M4 contract to Colt

Post by Ibanez »

GannonFan wrote:
Ibanez wrote:

Oh yeah. I've read some stories and seen interviews of the T-34 at the Battle of Prochorovka (and Kursk). To think, T-34 commanders were trained to specifically fight and exploit the weaknesses (thin armour on the sides) in the Panzer. :thumb: :notworthy: :notworthy: The Soviets ability to move production as well as they did was an incredible feat that allowed them to churn out weaponry that really saved the day.
While we didn't build the tanks, we (the US) did a significant job in terms of giving the USSR tons of equipment (trains, locomotives, aircraft, and most importantly trucks) that let them focus on the tank production. It was a team effort. :thumb:
Yes it was. I wonder how things would've turned out if the leadership listened to Patton and went for Moscow after Berlin. :ugeek:
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
User avatar
mrklean
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3794
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 11:06 am
I am a fan of: Georgia Southern Uni.
Location: Stockbridge, GA

Re: U.S. Army gives new M4 contract to Colt

Post by mrklean »

Ibanez wrote:
GannonFan wrote:
While we didn't build the tanks, we (the US) did a significant job in terms of giving the USSR tons of equipment (trains, locomotives, aircraft, and most importantly trucks) that let them focus on the tank production. It was a team effort. :thumb:
Yes it was. I wonder how things would've turned out if the leadership listened to Patton and went for Moscow after Berlin. :ugeek:
We would have won.
ImageImage
FROM DA DURTY SOUTH!
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: U.S. Army gives new M4 contract to Colt

Post by Ibanez »

mrklean wrote:
Ibanez wrote: Yes it was. I wonder how things would've turned out if the leadership listened to Patton and went for Moscow after Berlin. :ugeek:
We would have won.
I assume that too, but how would the world have ended up if we defeated the communists, militarily? What events wouldn't have happened (Bay of Pigs, Star Wars, etc...)?
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25486
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: U.S. Army gives new M4 contract to Colt

Post by CID1990 »

Ibanez wrote:
mrklean wrote:
We would have won.
I assume that too, but how would the world have ended up if we defeated the communists, militarily? What events wouldn't have happened (Bay of Pigs, Star Wars, etc...)?
It might well be a completely different world.


Sent from the center of the universe.
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: U.S. Army gives new M4 contract to Colt

Post by Ibanez »

CID1990 wrote:
Ibanez wrote: I assume that too, but how would the world have ended up if we defeated the communists, militarily? What events wouldn't have happened (Bay of Pigs, Star Wars, etc...)?
It might well be a completely different world.


Sent from the center of the universe.
I await Newt Gingrich's book on this subject.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
Post Reply