Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars

Political discussions
User avatar
ASUG8
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 17570
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 12:57 pm
I am a fan of: ASU
Location: SC

Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars

Post by ASUG8 »

mrklean wrote:The Problem is not gas vs. water vs. electric, its really how much bang you get for your buck. Tell me when you can get a V6 at 40 MPG or a V6 /5.6 at 30 MPG. We have the tech to do it. and we all know why they won't. Trust me, THe V6 with 30 MPG has been invented. a while ago. FACT!!!!!
It's hiding in plain sight. Corvette Stingray with 6.2L/450 hp V8 expected to be near 30 mpg.

http://money.cnn.com/gallery/autos/2013 ... index.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars

Post by Ibanez »

My Civic Hybrid gets about 40 miles to the gallon and has a 10 gallon tank. I routinely get 390-405 miles on a tank. The Hybrid is comfortable, quiet and gets me from point A to point B. The main thing I wish It would do, was accelerate quicker.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
grizzaholic
One Man Wolfpack
One Man Wolfpack
Posts: 34860
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
I am a fan of: Hodgdon
A.K.A.: Random Mailer
Location: Backwoods of Montana

Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars

Post by grizzaholic »

Ibanez wrote:My Civic Hybrid gets about 40 miles to the gallon and has a 10 gallon tank. I routinely get 390-405 miles on a tank. The Hybrid is comfortable, quiet and gets me from point A to point B. The main thing I wish It would do, was accelerate quicker.
You run your car down to damn near empty before filling?
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."

Justin Halpern
User avatar
Grizalltheway
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 35688
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
Location: BSC

Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars

Post by Grizalltheway »

grizzaholic wrote:
Ibanez wrote:My Civic Hybrid gets about 40 miles to the gallon and has a 10 gallon tank. I routinely get 390-405 miles on a tank. The Hybrid is comfortable, quiet and gets me from point A to point B. The main thing I wish It would do, was accelerate quicker.
You run your car down to damn near empty before filling?
YOLO.
grizzaholic
One Man Wolfpack
One Man Wolfpack
Posts: 34860
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
I am a fan of: Hodgdon
A.K.A.: Random Mailer
Location: Backwoods of Montana

Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars

Post by grizzaholic »

Grizalltheway wrote:
grizzaholic wrote:
You run your car down to damn near empty before filling?
YOLO.
Image
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."

Justin Halpern
User avatar
Grizalltheway
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 35688
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
Location: BSC

Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars

Post by Grizalltheway »

And here I thought we were friends. :cry:
grizzaholic
One Man Wolfpack
One Man Wolfpack
Posts: 34860
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
I am a fan of: Hodgdon
A.K.A.: Random Mailer
Location: Backwoods of Montana

Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars

Post by grizzaholic »

Grizalltheway wrote:And here I thought we were friends. :cry:
Living in 174's closet cost us our friendship.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."

Justin Halpern
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars

Post by Ibanez »

grizzaholic wrote:
Ibanez wrote:My Civic Hybrid gets about 40 miles to the gallon and has a 10 gallon tank. I routinely get 390-405 miles on a tank. The Hybrid is comfortable, quiet and gets me from point A to point B. The main thing I wish It would do, was accelerate quicker.
You run your car down to damn near empty before filling?
I have before to know how far it'll go. I usually fill up when I'm at 375 knowing I can get at least another 35 miles out if it.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19233
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars

Post by GannonFan »

kalm wrote:
GannonFan wrote:
No need to wait for that. We already recognize now it is one of our bigger energy failures. Trouble is convincing the politicians to just let it go - some just can't let go of that porkbarrel no matter how bad the policy is.
I wonder if Monsanto and other big AG have prospered from it?
I'm sure they have, and continue to do so. Text book example of how trying to pick a technology out from the rest and then repeatedly trying to champion it in spite of clear evidence that it's a loser is not a real energy policy. That tarriff we have on imported ethanol made from sugar (much cheaper, much less impactful on food supplies, and also better for the environment (psst, corn ethanol isn't much better greenhouse gas-wise than oil, shhh, don't tell anyone)) is another example of dumb decisions we've taken to try to made corn ethanol into a propped-up success. All for naught.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
User avatar
Grizalltheway
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 35688
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
Location: BSC

Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars

Post by Grizalltheway »

GannonFan wrote:
kalm wrote:
I wonder if Monsanto and other big AG have prospered from it?
I'm sure they have, and continue to do so. Text book example of how trying to pick a technology out from the rest and then repeatedly trying to champion it in spite of clear evidence that it's a loser is not a real energy policy. That tarriff we have on imported ethanol made from sugar (much cheaper, much less impactful on food supplies, and also better for the environment (psst, corn ethanol isn't much better greenhouse gas-wise than oil, shhh, don't tell anyone)) is another example of dumb decisions we've taken to try to made corn ethanol into a propped-up success. All for naught.
I can't imagine sugar-based ethanol is much better, considering how many acres of rain forest have been cleared to grow it.
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19233
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars

Post by GannonFan »

Grizalltheway wrote:
GannonFan wrote:
I'm sure they have, and continue to do so. Text book example of how trying to pick a technology out from the rest and then repeatedly trying to champion it in spite of clear evidence that it's a loser is not a real energy policy. That tarriff we have on imported ethanol made from sugar (much cheaper, much less impactful on food supplies, and also better for the environment (psst, corn ethanol isn't much better greenhouse gas-wise than oil, shhh, don't tell anyone)) is another example of dumb decisions we've taken to try to made corn ethanol into a propped-up success. All for naught.
I can't imagine sugar-based ethanol is much better, considering how many acres of rain forest have been cleared to grow it.
Sugar doesn't take a lot of arable land to grow. Deforestation issues are because of soy and cattle in Brazil, not because of sugar.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
User avatar
BDKJMU
Level5
Level5
Posts: 36392
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
I am a fan of: JMU
A.K.A.: BDKJMU
Location: Philly Burbs

Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars

Post by BDKJMU »

Grizalltheway wrote:
GannonFan wrote:
I'm sure they have, and continue to do so. Text book example of how trying to pick a technology out from the rest and then repeatedly trying to champion it in spite of clear evidence that it's a loser is not a real energy policy. That tarriff we have on imported ethanol made from sugar (much cheaper, much less impactful on food supplies, and also better for the environment (psst, corn ethanol isn't much better greenhouse gas-wise than oil, shhh, don't tell anyone)) is another example of dumb decisions we've taken to try to made corn ethanol into a propped-up success. All for naught.
I can't imagine sugar-based ethanol is much better, considering how many acres of rain forest have been cleared to grow it.
I thought it was jungle they were clearing?
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
grizzaholic
One Man Wolfpack
One Man Wolfpack
Posts: 34860
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
I am a fan of: Hodgdon
A.K.A.: Random Mailer
Location: Backwoods of Montana

Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars

Post by grizzaholic »

Ibanez wrote:
grizzaholic wrote:
You run your car down to damn near empty before filling?
I have before to know how far it'll go. I usually fill up when I'm at 375 knowing I can get at least another 35 miles out if it.
You know that when you run your car down that low the pick up will start grabbing shit from the bottom of the tank..right?
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."

Justin Halpern
CAA Flagship
4th&29
4th&29
Posts: 38529
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
I am a fan of: Old Dominion
A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
Location: Pizza Hell

Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars

Post by CAA Flagship »

grizzaholic wrote:
Grizalltheway wrote:And here I thought we were friends. :cry:
Living in 174's closet cost us our friendship.
Be careful of the hats. You don't want to bend any brims. :coffee:
houndawg
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25096
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
I am a fan of: SIU
A.K.A.: houndawg
Location: Egypt

Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars

Post by houndawg »

ASUG8 wrote:
grizzaholic wrote:
I tried to read ASUG6's post but all the numbers confused me. I took math 205 from OSBF in college.

I tell Trip to **** off all the time. ;)
:tothehand:
There's no one on this board aside from OSBF himself that could pass that course. Maybe Opie.......
A 200 level Math class? Please. :tothehand:
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.


"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
GSUhooligan
Level2
Level2
Posts: 501
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 10:24 am
I am a fan of: Georgia Southern
A.K.A.: HAIL SOUTHERN!

Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars

Post by GSUhooligan »

grizzaholic wrote:
mrklean wrote:The Problem is not gas vs. water vs. electric, its really how much bang you get for your buck. Tell me when you can get a V6 at 40 MPG or a V6 /5.6 at 30 MPG. We have the tech to do it. and we all know why they won't. Trust me, THe V6 with 30 MPG has been invented. a while ago. FACT!!!!!
If it is fact, post the facts



I don't care if you do or not. I will burn a bucket of gas in your honor today.
Since 2011 the Ford Mustang base model is a 305HP V6 that gets 31 MPG....
Image
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars

Post by Ibanez »

grizzaholic wrote:
Ibanez wrote: I have before to know how far it'll go. I usually fill up when I'm at 375 knowing I can get at least another 35 miles out if it.
You know that when you run your car down that low the pick up will start grabbing shit from the bottom of the tank..right?
Yea. But I like to test the tank when i first by a vehicle. I never let it get that low.

Now the wife...that's a different story.

what do you know about cars? You guys ride ATVs and tractors. :tothehand:
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
houndawg
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25096
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
I am a fan of: SIU
A.K.A.: houndawg
Location: Egypt

Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars

Post by houndawg »

grizzaholic wrote:HI, you are probably the most level headed poster here, but I disagree with your natural gas or electricity comments.

Natural gas should be for BBQ's, homes, and Hipsters. Electricity should be forgotten for cars.

Oil will never run out, and before I get skewered over the "never" I use that term for 500 years or so. Technology will get us all nu'clear powered cars.
:tothehand:

No wonder the BBQ is shhitty in Montana. :ohno:
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.


"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
User avatar
Grizalltheway
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 35688
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
Location: BSC

Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars

Post by Grizalltheway »

houndawg wrote:
grizzaholic wrote:HI, you are probably the most level headed poster here, but I disagree with your natural gas or electricity comments.

Natural gas should be for BBQ's, homes, and Hipsters. Electricity should be forgotten for cars.

Oil will never run out, and before I get skewered over the "never" I use that term for 500 years or so. Technology will get us all nu'clear powered cars.
:tothehand:

No wonder the BBQ is shhitty in Montana. :ohno:
Says the Californian. :roll:
User avatar
JohnStOnge
Egalitarian
Egalitarian
Posts: 20316
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:47 pm
I am a fan of: McNeese State
A.K.A.: JohnStOnge

Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars

Post by JohnStOnge »

I don't know if anyone's perfected a safe way to burn methane (particularly without the smell associated with it), but choices would be good.
Just as a technical matter: Methane is odorless and so is the flame associated with it. The odor associated with methane we use is a safety measure. Something that smells is added to it so that we humans will know if we have a natural gas leak.
Well, I believe that I must tell the truth
And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?

Deep Purple: No One Came
Image
User avatar
JohnStOnge
Egalitarian
Egalitarian
Posts: 20316
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:47 pm
I am a fan of: McNeese State
A.K.A.: JohnStOnge

Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars

Post by JohnStOnge »

If we survive for long enough as a species we will eventually have to come up with something other than fossil fuels. We will run out. Natural gas is a fossil fuel.

I don't think water is the solution per se because I think when you talk about water as a solution you're basically talking about hydrogen and you need energy to separate water molecules to get the hydrogen. Well, I guess it could be a source at some point but what I'm talking about is putting water in your vehicle. I think it more likely that we would have facilities that separate hydrogen and oxygen then provide hydrogen on an industrial scale.

Yeah it's going to be tough. At some point we will run out of fossil fuels. But I am confident that we can do it.
Well, I believe that I must tell the truth
And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?

Deep Purple: No One Came
Image
User avatar
JohnStOnge
Egalitarian
Egalitarian
Posts: 20316
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:47 pm
I am a fan of: McNeese State
A.K.A.: JohnStOnge

Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars

Post by JohnStOnge »

Oil will never run out
Yes it will. I don't think it'll be in our lifetimes. But it will.
Well, I believe that I must tell the truth
And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?

Deep Purple: No One Came
Image
houndawg
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25096
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
I am a fan of: SIU
A.K.A.: houndawg
Location: Egypt

Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars

Post by houndawg »

Grizalltheway wrote:
houndawg wrote:
:tothehand:

No wonder the BBQ is shhitty in Montana. :ohno:
Says the Californian. :roll:
Says anybody that knows doodly-squat about BBQ. :tothehand:

You have nice scenery out there bro, but when it comes to food you're a national embarrassment. :coffee:
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.


"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
grizzaholic
One Man Wolfpack
One Man Wolfpack
Posts: 34860
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
I am a fan of: Hodgdon
A.K.A.: Random Mailer
Location: Backwoods of Montana

Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars

Post by grizzaholic »

JohnStOnge wrote:
Oil will never run out
Yes it will. I don't think it'll be in our lifetimes. But it will.
No. It won't. go back to drinking your diesel.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."

Justin Halpern
grizzaholic
One Man Wolfpack
One Man Wolfpack
Posts: 34860
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
I am a fan of: Hodgdon
A.K.A.: Random Mailer
Location: Backwoods of Montana

Re: Gas v. Electric v. Water v. NG for cars

Post by grizzaholic »

houndawg wrote:
grizzaholic wrote:HI, you are probably the most level headed poster here, but I disagree with your natural gas or electricity comments.

Natural gas should be for BBQ's, homes, and Hipsters. Electricity should be forgotten for cars.

Oil will never run out, and before I get skewered over the "never" I use that term for 500 years or so. Technology will get us all nu'clear powered cars.
:tothehand:

No wonder the BBQ is shhitty in Montana. :ohno:
Don't be a douche. You know what I meant assclown. :roll: :coffee:
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."

Justin Halpern
Post Reply