God "Could Have" Protected Kids, Chose Not To....SMFH

Political discussions
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 31515
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: God "Could Have" Protected Kids, Chose Not To....SMFH

Post by Gil Dobie »

death dealer wrote:
Gil Dobie wrote:
A blanket statement without evidence, does not make it a commandment.
1 Samuel 15:3. Read it.
Where does it say this is a commandment and where does it say this is not a sin?
Image
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 31515
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: God "Could Have" Protected Kids, Chose Not To....SMFH

Post by Gil Dobie »

D1B wrote:
Gil Dobie wrote:
I know the commandments and I have read the black and white. What people put between the lines is their stuff. Can you show me the commandment that states it's okay to kill men, women and children of another tribe or race and it's not a sin?
You're an idiot.
You don't have a Mama Cat to help you with your reply. :cry:
Image
User avatar
death dealer
Level3
Level3
Posts: 2631
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 10:49 am
I am a fan of: Appalachian Mud Squids
A.K.A.: Contaminated

Re: God "Could Have" Protected Kids, Chose Not To....SMFH

Post by death dealer »

OK. Let's do verses 1-3.

1 Samuel said to Saul, “I am the one the Lord sent to anoint you king over his people Israel; so listen now to the message from the Lord. 2 This is what the Lord Almighty says: ‘I will punish the Amalekites for what they did to Israel when they waylaid them as they came up from Egypt. 3 Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy[a] all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.”

God commands him through his mouthpiece Samuel to kill the Amalekites. When he does not do it the way he's commanded to, God rejects him and takes away his divine annointment as king. Commandment, disobedience, punishment. Try as much as you want, this is what it says. Try as you might to say it is taken out of context, or whatever, the fact is that the Amalekites offended Yahweh, he ordered his annointed King to wipe them out, when the King disobeyed, he was demoted, repalced, and ultimately allowed to be killed in battle.
Dear lord... please allow this dangerous combination of hair spary, bat slobber, and D.O.T. four automatic transmission fluid to excite my mind, occupy my spirits, and enrage my body, provoking me to kick any man or woman in the back of the head regardless of what he or she has or has not done unto me. All my Best, Earlie Cuyler.
User avatar
bluehenbillk
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7660
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:26 am
I am a fan of: elaware
Location: East Coast/Hawaii

Re: God "Could Have" Protected Kids, Chose Not To....SMFH

Post by bluehenbillk »

Our priest talked about this subject yesterday, on why does God allow these things to happen.

Does this story ring a bell: Jesus on the cross, "My God my God, why have you forsaken me?". Even his own son asked the same question.

But yea, it has everything to do with more or less religion in school... :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Make Delaware Football Great Again
biobengal
Level1
Level1
Posts: 402
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:30 am
I am a fan of: Bengals... Black Bears

Re: God "Could Have" Protected Kids, Chose Not To....SMFH

Post by biobengal »

Gil Dobie wrote:
biobengal wrote:
The Biblical action scenes are quite clear on this.
A blanket statement without evidence, does not make it a commandment.
Ex 12:14-15: Moses killed an Egyptian for HITTING another man
Ex 21:20-21: It's cool to kill slaves... provided they die slowly
Num 15:32-36: It's cool to kill someone gathering sticks on the Sabbath.
Deut 2:31-34; Num 31:12-18: Kill all adults of captured city... but not the virgins.
Ex 22:18: Witches? Who needs em'?

Of course, many more examples of seemingly arbitrary killing can be found in the Bible. However, these examples would be considered justified killings and not "murder", which is probably a better term. Most of the sanctioned killing is perpetrated against "others", those of another race, tribe, etc.. This is clearly a codification of evolutionary principles.
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: God "Could Have" Protected Kids, Chose Not To....SMFH

Post by D1B »

Gil Dobie wrote:
D1B wrote:
You're an idiot.
You don't have a Mama Cat to help you with your reply. :cry:
Jeeze, Dildobie, you've surprised me with your breathtaking stupidity.

When it comes to religion, especially your Christianity, just shut up and take your beating like a man. Nothing in it is factual, provable, logical or consistent. You believe it, you were born into it, your father and terrified mother forced you to believe under threat of punishment and here you are, trying to defend marble tablets and the ridiculous comic book epic that is your bible.

You're a victim and we're here to help you.
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: God "Could Have" Protected Kids, Chose Not To....SMFH

Post by D1B »

bluehenbillk wrote:Our priest talked about this subject yesterday, on why does God allow these things to happen.

Does this story ring a bell: Jesus on the cross, "My God my God, why have you forsaken me?". Even his own son asked the same question.

But yea, it has everything to do with more or less religion in school... :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Your priest is either a charlatan or a moron.
JoltinJoe
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7050
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 6:42 pm

Re: God "Could Have" Protected Kids, Chose Not To....SMFH

Post by JoltinJoe »

death dealer wrote:OK. Let's do verses 1-3.

1 Samuel said to Saul, “I am the one the Lord sent to anoint you king over his people Israel; so listen now to the message from the Lord. 2 This is what the Lord Almighty says: ‘I will punish the Amalekites for what they did to Israel when they waylaid them as they came up from Egypt. 3 Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy[a] all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.”

God commands him through his mouthpiece Samuel to kill the Amalekites. When he does not do it the way he's commanded to, God rejects him and takes away his divine annointment as king. Commandment, disobedience, punishment. Try as much as you want, this is what it says. Try as you might to say it is taken out of context, or whatever, the fact is that the Amalekites offended Yahweh, he ordered his annointed King to wipe them out, when the King disobeyed, he was demoted, repalced, and ultimately allowed to be killed in battle.
Yes, and the Amalekites were devoted to destroying Israel because of their faith in Yahweh. The point of this story in that, by second guessing God's direction, Saul elevated his wisdom to that over God. We have finite wisdom and understanding, and we should not second guess what God directs because we do not understand why. Also, you have to understand that this story is told, after the passage of time, as an explanation as to why hatred of the Jews continues to exist in the world and is directed toward Israel. The Amalekites are understood to be the group from which dislike of the Jews started; God had directed that this prejudice be destroyed, but the Jews continue to suffer because they disobeyed this command.

Again, no one story in the Bible represents the entirety of the Bible. It must be assessed in totality, and it should be understood of as the story of an evolving and deepening relationship between man and God, a series of revelation, discernment, and understanding. Like any relationship, the relationship between man and God must continue to grow in knowledge and understanding. If the relationship between a married couple is stagnant, it will eventually dissolve.
biobengal
Level1
Level1
Posts: 402
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:30 am
I am a fan of: Bengals... Black Bears

Re: God "Could Have" Protected Kids, Chose Not To....SMFH

Post by biobengal »

JoltinJoe wrote:Again, no one story in the Bible represents the entirety of the Bible. It must be assessed in totality, and it should be understood of as the story of an evolving and deepening relationship between man and God, a series of revelation, discernment, and understanding. Like any relationship, the relationship between man and God must continue to grow in knowledge and understanding. If the relationship between a married couple is stagnant, it will eventually dissolve.
Sadly, this is not the predominant view of Biblical teaching in many Christian circles..... IMO.
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: God "Could Have" Protected Kids, Chose Not To....SMFH

Post by D1B »

JoltinJoe wrote:
death dealer wrote:OK. Let's do verses 1-3.

1 Samuel said to Saul, “I am the one the Lord sent to anoint you king over his people Israel; so listen now to the message from the Lord. 2 This is what the Lord Almighty says: ‘I will punish the Amalekites for what they did to Israel when they waylaid them as they came up from Egypt. 3 Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy[a] all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.”

God commands him through his mouthpiece Samuel to kill the Amalekites. When he does not do it the way he's commanded to, God rejects him and takes away his divine annointment as king. Commandment, disobedience, punishment. Try as much as you want, this is what it says. Try as you might to say it is taken out of context, or whatever, the fact is that the Amalekites offended Yahweh, he ordered his annointed King to wipe them out, when the King disobeyed, he was demoted, repalced, and ultimately allowed to be killed in battle.
Yes, and the Amalekites were devoted to destroying Israel because of their faith in Yahweh. The point of this story in that, by second guessing God's direction, Saul elevated his wisdom to that over God. We have finite wisdom and understanding, and we should not second guess what God directs because we do not understand why. Also, you have to understand that this story is told, after the passage of time, as an explanation as to why hatred of the Jews continues to exist in the world and is directed toward Israel. The Amalekites are understood to be the group from which dislike of the Jews started; God had directed that this prejudice be destroyed, but the Jews continue to suffer because they disobeyed this command.

Again, no one story in the Bible represents the entirety of the Bible. It must be assessed in totality, and it should be understood of as the story of an evolving and deepening relationship between man and God, a series of revelation, discernment, and understanding. Like any relationship, the relationship between man and God must continue to grow in knowledge and understanding. If the relationship between a married couple is stagnant, it will eventually dissolve.
What exactly is "evolving" as far as a relationship with god? :lol: Here, someone second guesses him and he's dead. God is pretty consistent here and this does not constitute a healthy relationship :dunce:


Your god is an all-knowing, violent, homicidal maniac who committed the most barbaric atrocities to his creations, including to his own son or clone. Just read the bible.
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: God "Could Have" Protected Kids, Chose Not To....SMFH

Post by D1B »

biobengal wrote:
JoltinJoe wrote:Again, no one story in the Bible represents the entirety of the Bible. It must be assessed in totality, and it should be understood of as the story of an evolving and deepening relationship between man and God, a series of revelation, discernment, and understanding. Like any relationship, the relationship between man and God must continue to grow in knowledge and understanding. If the relationship between a married couple is stagnant, it will eventually dissolve.
Sadly, this is not the predominant view of Biblical teaching in many Christian circles..... IMO.
It's also a cop-out apologists knee jerk when cornered about the true nature of their god, as revealed in his own words in the bible.
JoltinJoe
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7050
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 6:42 pm

Re: God "Could Have" Protected Kids, Chose Not To....SMFH

Post by JoltinJoe »

D1B wrote:
biobengal wrote:
Sadly, this is not the predominant view of Biblical teaching in many Christian circles..... IMO.
It's also a cop-out apologists knee jerk when cornered about the true nature of their god, as revealed in his own words in the bible.
You spent how many years in Catholic schools and you never learned this? :coffee:
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: God "Could Have" Protected Kids, Chose Not To....SMFH

Post by D1B »

JoltinJoe wrote:
D1B wrote:
It's also a cop-out apologists knee jerk when cornered about the true nature of their god, as revealed in his own words in the bible.
You spent how many years in Catholic schools and you never learned this? :coffee:
Uhh, its a recent phenomenon whose impetus has nothing to with fostering positive relationships with god and everything to do with secularist, athesists, humanists, scientists and free thinkers exposing the countless contradictions, errors and tales of brutality and murder in the bible and the church to an increasingly informed and thus skeptical swarm, and forcing the church to change its teachings and offer a more benevolent and anti-biblical rendition of their god.

They should call him God 2.0. :lol: Here's a new logo for you:

Image
User avatar
bluehenbillk
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7660
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:26 am
I am a fan of: elaware
Location: East Coast/Hawaii

Re: God "Could Have" Protected Kids, Chose Not To....SMFH

Post by bluehenbillk »

I'm no Biblical scholar but I wanted to pose this question yesterday.

The subject about why does God allow these things to happen...

Well according to the Bible, God himself did these kind of things at least 3 times I can remember:

-The Noah's Ark story - you assume tens of thousands drowned...
-Sodom & Gomorrah(sp) - burnt those towns and their inhabitants to the ground
-Passover - Egypt's 1st born son's dying

If there was a point to those, I'm finding the message in a massacred 1st grade Connecticut class muffled....
Make Delaware Football Great Again
JoltinJoe
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7050
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 6:42 pm

Re: God "Could Have" Protected Kids, Chose Not To....SMFH

Post by JoltinJoe »

D1B wrote: Uhh, its a recent phenomenon whose impetus has nothing to with fostering positive relationships with god and everything to do with secularist, athesists, humanists, scientists and free thinkers exposing the countless contradictions, errors and tales of brutality and murder in the bible and the church to an increasingly informed and thus skeptical swarm, and forcing the church to change its teachings and offer a more benevolent and anti-biblical rendition of their god.
Yes, recent development, if you count Augustine as "recent." :coffee:

It's recent to you, though. :roll:
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: God "Could Have" Protected Kids, Chose Not To....SMFH

Post by D1B »

JoltinJoe wrote:
D1B wrote: Uhh, its a recent phenomenon whose impetus has nothing to with fostering positive relationships with god and everything to do with secularist, athesists, humanists, scientists and free thinkers exposing the countless contradictions, errors and tales of brutality and murder in the bible and the church to an increasingly informed and thus skeptical swarm, and forcing the church to change its teachings and offer a more benevolent and anti-biblical rendition of their god.
Yes, recent development, if you count Augustine as "recent." :coffee:

It's recent to you, though. :roll:
Yeah, words, Joe. :ohno: But in application, very recent.

Atheists saved your god, ironically, for now.
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: God "Could Have" Protected Kids, Chose Not To....SMFH

Post by D1B »

bluehenbillk wrote:I'm no Biblical scholar but I wanted to pose this question yesterday.

The subject about why does God allow these things to happen...

Well according to the Bible, God himself did these kind of things at least 3 times I can remember:

-The Noah's Ark story - you assume tens of thousands drowned...
-Sodom & Gomorrah(sp) - burnt those towns and their inhabitants to the ground
-Passover - Egypt's 1st born son's dying

If there was a point to those, I'm finding the message in a massacred 1st grade Connecticut class muffled....
It's simple, Bill. God, as conceived or better yet, contrived by the christians, does not exist.

The christian god is both impossible and if you have to believe - wholly unworthy of worship.
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 31515
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: God "Could Have" Protected Kids, Chose Not To....SMFH

Post by Gil Dobie »

JoltinJoe wrote:
death dealer wrote:OK. Let's do verses 1-3.

1 Samuel said to Saul, “I am the one the Lord sent to anoint you king over his people Israel; so listen now to the message from the Lord. 2 This is what the Lord Almighty says: ‘I will punish the Amalekites for what they did to Israel when they waylaid them as they came up from Egypt. 3 Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy[a] all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.”

God commands him through his mouthpiece Samuel to kill the Amalekites. When he does not do it the way he's commanded to, God rejects him and takes away his divine annointment as king. Commandment, disobedience, punishment. Try as much as you want, this is what it says. Try as you might to say it is taken out of context, or whatever, the fact is that the Amalekites offended Yahweh, he ordered his annointed King to wipe them out, when the King disobeyed, he was demoted, repalced, and ultimately allowed to be killed in battle.
Yes, and the Amalekites were devoted to destroying Israel because of their faith in Yahweh. The point of this story in that, by second guessing God's direction, Saul elevated his wisdom to that over God. We have finite wisdom and understanding, and we should not second guess what God directs because we do not understand why. Also, you have to understand that this story is told, after the passage of time, as an explanation as to why hatred of the Jews continues to exist in the world and is directed toward Israel. The Amalekites are understood to be the group from which dislike of the Jews started; God had directed that this prejudice be destroyed, but the Jews continue to suffer because they disobeyed this command.

Again, no one story in the Bible represents the entirety of the Bible. It must be assessed in totality, and it should be understood of as the story of an evolving and deepening relationship between man and God, a series of revelation, discernment, and understanding. Like any relationship, the relationship between man and God must continue to grow in knowledge and understanding. If the relationship between a married couple is stagnant, it will eventually dissolve.
Good explanation!
Image
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 31515
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: God "Could Have" Protected Kids, Chose Not To....SMFH

Post by Gil Dobie »

biobengal wrote:
Gil Dobie wrote:
A blanket statement without evidence, does not make it a commandment.
Ex 12:14-15: Moses killed an Egyptian for HITTING another man
Ex 21:20-21: It's cool to kill slaves... provided they die slowly
Num 15:32-36: It's cool to kill someone gathering sticks on the Sabbath.
Deut 2:31-34; Num 31:12-18: Kill all adults of captured city... but not the virgins.
Ex 22:18: Witches? Who needs em'?

Of course, many more examples of seemingly arbitrary killing can be found in the Bible. However, these examples would be considered justified killings and not "murder", which is probably a better term. Most of the sanctioned killing is perpetrated against "others", those of another race, tribe, etc.. This is clearly a codification of evolutionary principles.
The way I see it, is killing is against one of the 10 commandments, which I see as the word of God. The stories in the Bible were written at another time in history with a different perspective on life. There writers were human and interjected their own bias. I don't see God as a vengeful God, but as a loving God with 10 commandments to live by. Sin is going against these commandments. If I break these commandments, God forgives.
Image
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: God "Could Have" Protected Kids, Chose Not To....SMFH

Post by D1B »

Gil Dobie wrote:
JoltinJoe wrote:
Yes, and the Amalekites were devoted to destroying Israel because of their faith in Yahweh. The point of this story in that, by second guessing God's direction, Saul elevated his wisdom to that over God. We have finite wisdom and understanding, and we should not second guess what God directs because we do not understand why. Also, you have to understand that this story is told, after the passage of time, as an explanation as to why hatred of the Jews continues to exist in the world and is directed toward Israel. The Amalekites are understood to be the group from which dislike of the Jews started; God had directed that this prejudice be destroyed, but the Jews continue to suffer because they disobeyed this command.

Again, no one story in the Bible represents the entirety of the Bible. It must be assessed in totality, and it should be understood of as the story of an evolving and deepening relationship between man and God, a series of revelation, discernment, and understanding. Like any relationship, the relationship between man and God must continue to grow in knowledge and understanding. If the relationship between a married couple is stagnant, it will eventually dissolve.
Good explanation!
It's a rationalization, Gil.
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: God "Could Have" Protected Kids, Chose Not To....SMFH

Post by D1B »

Gil Dobie wrote:
biobengal wrote:
Ex 12:14-15: Moses killed an Egyptian for HITTING another man
Ex 21:20-21: It's cool to kill slaves... provided they die slowly
Num 15:32-36: It's cool to kill someone gathering sticks on the Sabbath.
Deut 2:31-34; Num 31:12-18: Kill all adults of captured city... but not the virgins.
Ex 22:18: Witches? Who needs em'?

Of course, many more examples of seemingly arbitrary killing can be found in the Bible. However, these examples would be considered justified killings and not "murder", which is probably a better term. Most of the sanctioned killing is perpetrated against "others", those of another race, tribe, etc.. This is clearly a codification of evolutionary principles.
The way I see it, is killing is against one of the 10 commandments, which I see as the word of God. The stories in the Bible were written at another time in history with a different perspective on life. There writers were human and interjected their own bias. I don't see God as a vengeful God, but as a loving God with 10 commandments to live by. Sin is going against these commandments. If I break these commandments, God forgives.
Really, Gil? The Ten Commandments? :lol: There are countless more important and better (for humans) edicts put forth by deists, non christians, atheists and free thinkers. MOF, here a list of 10 commandments infinitely better than your god's version. Imagine if we follow these..... :coffee:

1.Do not condemn people on the basis of their ethnicity or their color.
2.Do not ever even think of using people as private property.
3.Despise those who use violence or the threat of it in sexual relations.
4.Hide your face and weep if you dare to harm a child.
5.Do not condemn people for their inborn nature. (“Why would God create so many homosexuals, only to torture and destroy them?”)
6.Be aware that you, too, are an animal, and dependent on the web of nature. Try to think and act accordingly.
7.Do not imagine you can avoid judgment if you rob people [by lying to them] rather than with a knife.
8.Turn off that cell phone.
9.Denounce all jihadists and crusaders for what they are: psychopathic criminals with ugly delusions and terrible sexual repression.
10.Reject any faith if their commandments contradict any of the above.
Christopher Hitchens

Another question, Gil - Why did god wait some 100,000 years to give us these "pearls of wisdom"? He could have save millions of lives and much hardship if he did.

If you see god as a loving god then you do not beleive in the christian god.

Gil, what religion are you?
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 31515
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: God "Could Have" Protected Kids, Chose Not To....SMFH

Post by Gil Dobie »

D1B wrote:
Gil Dobie wrote:
The way I see it, is killing is against one of the 10 commandments, which I see as the word of God. The stories in the Bible were written at another time in history with a different perspective on life. There writers were human and interjected their own bias. I don't see God as a vengeful God, but as a loving God with 10 commandments to live by. Sin is going against these commandments. If I break these commandments, God forgives.
Really, Gil? The Ten Commandments? :lol: There are countless more important and better (for humans) edicts put forth by deists, non christians, atheists and free thinkers. MOF, here a list of 10 commandments infinitely better than your god's version. Imagine if we follow these..... :coffee:

1.Do not condemn people on the basis of their ethnicity or their color.
2.Do not ever even think of using people as private property.
3.Despise those who use violence or the threat of it in sexual relations.
4.Hide your face and weep if you dare to harm a child.
5.Do not condemn people for their inborn nature. (“Why would God create so many homosexuals, only to torture and destroy them?”)
6.Be aware that you, too, are an animal, and dependent on the web of nature. Try to think and act accordingly.
7.Do not imagine you can avoid judgment if you rob people [by lying to them] rather than with a knife.
8.Turn off that cell phone.
9.Denounce all jihadists and crusaders for what they are: psychopathic criminals with ugly delusions and terrible sexual repression.
10.Reject any faith if their commandments contradict any of the above.
Christopher Hitchens

Another question, Gil - Why did god wait some 100,000 years to give us these "pearls of wisdom"? He could have save millions of lives and much hardship if he did.

If you see god as a loving god then you do not beleive in the christian god.

Gil, what religion are you?
The Christian God is a loving God, but I can see why you focus on the negative.
Image
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: God "Could Have" Protected Kids, Chose Not To....SMFH

Post by D1B »

Gil Dobie wrote:
D1B wrote:
Really, Gil? The Ten Commandments? :lol: There are countless more important and better (for humans) edicts put forth by deists, non christians, atheists and free thinkers. MOF, here a list of 10 commandments infinitely better than your god's version. Imagine if we follow these..... :coffee:

1.Do not condemn people on the basis of their ethnicity or their color.
2.Do not ever even think of using people as private property.
3.Despise those who use violence or the threat of it in sexual relations.
4.Hide your face and weep if you dare to harm a child.
5.Do not condemn people for their inborn nature. (“Why would God create so many homosexuals, only to torture and destroy them?”)
6.Be aware that you, too, are an animal, and dependent on the web of nature. Try to think and act accordingly.
7.Do not imagine you can avoid judgment if you rob people [by lying to them] rather than with a knife.
8.Turn off that cell phone.
9.Denounce all jihadists and crusaders for what they are: psychopathic criminals with ugly delusions and terrible sexual repression.
10.Reject any faith if their commandments contradict any of the above.
Christopher Hitchens

Another question, Gil - Why did god wait some 100,000 years to give us these "pearls of wisdom"? He could have save millions of lives and much hardship if he did.

If you see god as a loving god then you do not beleive in the christian god.

Gil, what religion are you?
The Christian God is a loving God, but I can see why you focus on the negative.
Soooo, one should just disregard all the murder, infanticide, racism, genocide, forced slavery, rape and torture commanded by the christiain god against mostly innocent people for simply not kissing his ass?
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: God "Could Have" Protected Kids, Chose Not To....SMFH

Post by Ibanez »

D1B wrote:
Gil Dobie wrote:
The way I see it, is killing is against one of the 10 commandments, which I see as the word of God. The stories in the Bible were written at another time in history with a different perspective on life. There writers were human and interjected their own bias. I don't see God as a vengeful God, but as a loving God with 10 commandments to live by. Sin is going against these commandments. If I break these commandments, God forgives.
Really, Gil? The Ten Commandments? :lol: There are countless more important and better (for humans) edicts put forth by deists, non christians, atheists and free thinkers. MOF, here a list of 10 commandments infinitely better than your god's version. Imagine if we follow these..... :coffee:

1.Do not condemn people on the basis of their ethnicity or their color.
2.Do not ever even think of using people as private property.
3.Despise those who use violence or the threat of it in sexual relations.
4.Hide your face and weep if you dare to harm a child.
5.Do not condemn people for their inborn nature. (“Why would God create so many homosexuals, only to torture and destroy them?”)
6.Be aware that you, too, are an animal, and dependent on the web of nature. Try to think and act accordingly.
7.Do not imagine you can avoid judgment if you rob people [by lying to them] rather than with a knife.
8.Turn off that cell phone.
9.Denounce all jihadists and crusaders for what they are: psychopathic criminals with ugly delusions and terrible sexual repression.
10.Reject any faith if their commandments contradict any of the above.
Christopher Hitchens

Another question, Gil - Why did god wait some 100,000 years to give us these "pearls of wisdom"? He could have save millions of lives and much hardship if he did.

If you see god as a loving god then you do not beleive in the christian god.

Gil, what religion are you?
I see a Supreme being that has no interaction with the earth. Man, throughout the ages, attributed unexplained events to this God as either punishment or reward for their behavior. We know that what was a flood sent to destroy the word, was really a natural flooding of a geographic era. We know now that what was plagues sent to persuade the Pharaoh to free the Jews, was really a natural phenomena has occurred countless times since this supposed event. God, Allah, Tom Cruise, whatever you call your deity, gave us a world. He gave us reasoning. It is up to us to use that reasoning and understand nature and to cooperate with nature.

Deism is the way to go. :twocents:
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: God "Could Have" Protected Kids, Chose Not To....SMFH

Post by D1B »

Ibanez wrote:
D1B wrote:
Really, Gil? The Ten Commandments? :lol: There are countless more important and better (for humans) edicts put forth by deists, non christians, atheists and free thinkers. MOF, here a list of 10 commandments infinitely better than your god's version. Imagine if we follow these..... :coffee:

1.Do not condemn people on the basis of their ethnicity or their color.
2.Do not ever even think of using people as private property.
3.Despise those who use violence or the threat of it in sexual relations.
4.Hide your face and weep if you dare to harm a child.
5.Do not condemn people for their inborn nature. (“Why would God create so many homosexuals, only to torture and destroy them?”)
6.Be aware that you, too, are an animal, and dependent on the web of nature. Try to think and act accordingly.
7.Do not imagine you can avoid judgment if you rob people [by lying to them] rather than with a knife.
8.Turn off that cell phone.
9.Denounce all jihadists and crusaders for what they are: psychopathic criminals with ugly delusions and terrible sexual repression.
10.Reject any faith if their commandments contradict any of the above.
Christopher Hitchens

Another question, Gil - Why did god wait some 100,000 years to give us these "pearls of wisdom"? He could have save millions of lives and much hardship if he did.

If you see god as a loving god then you do not beleive in the christian god.

Gil, what religion are you?
I see a Supreme being that has no interaction with the earth. Man, throughout the ages, attributed unexplained events to this God as either punishment or reward for their behavior. We know that what was a flood sent to destroy the word, was really a natural flooding of a geographic era. We know now that what was plagues sent to persuade the Pharaoh to free the Jews, was really a natural phenomena has occurred countless times since this supposed event. God, Allah, Tom Cruise, whatever you call your deity, gave us a world. He gave us reasoning. It is up to us to use that reasoning and understand nature and to cooperate with nature.

Deism is the way to go. :twocents:

I too believe in a life force or higher power.

The christian conception of god however is impossible and the religion/political system created around this god is an unfortunate but dominant myth that has kept man in chains for centuries.
Post Reply