Probable 2012 Rule Changes

Football Championship Subdivision discussions
Post Reply
User avatar
bluehenbillk
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7660
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:26 am
I am a fan of: elaware
Location: East Coast/Hawaii

Probable 2012 Rule Changes

Post by bluehenbillk »

http://www.ncaa.org/wps/wcm/connect/pub ... nce+safety" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

because they concern "player safety" these rules could be put into effect in the next 30 days for the 2012 season:

Highlights-

-Kickoffs move up to the 35 (i.e. same as NFL) and touchbacks come out to the 25.

-If your helmet comes off(except on a facemask penalty), you have to come out for a play - like you were injured & if you're carrying the ball & your helmet comes off the play stops right there (NFL has same rule as of 2011).

-Leaping rule on placements now to carryover to punts as well.
Make Delaware Football Great Again
grizzaholic
One Man Wolfpack
One Man Wolfpack
Posts: 34860
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
I am a fan of: Hodgdon
A.K.A.: Random Mailer
Location: Backwoods of Montana

Re: Probable 2012 Rule Changes

Post by grizzaholic »

bluehenbillk wrote:http://www.ncaa.org/wps/wcm/connect/pub ... nce+safety

because they concern "player safety" these rules could be put into effect in the next 30 days for the 2012 season:

Highlights-

-Kickoffs move up to the 35 (i.e. same as NFL) and touchbacks come out to the 25.

-If your helmet comes off(except on a facemask penalty), you have to come out for a play - like you were injured & if you're carrying the ball & your helmet comes off the play stops right there (NFL has same rule as of 2011).

-Leaping rule on placements now to carryover to punts as well.
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST. What a bunch of bullshit. Why not just make it two hand touch or flag.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."

Justin Halpern
User avatar
bluehenbillk
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7660
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:26 am
I am a fan of: elaware
Location: East Coast/Hawaii

Re: Probable 2012 Rule Changes

Post by bluehenbillk »

You can sum up the reason for the proposed rule changes with one word: "concussions"
Make Delaware Football Great Again
grizzaholic
One Man Wolfpack
One Man Wolfpack
Posts: 34860
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
I am a fan of: Hodgdon
A.K.A.: Random Mailer
Location: Backwoods of Montana

Re: Probable 2012 Rule Changes

Post by grizzaholic »

bluehenbillk wrote:You can sum up the reason for the proposed rule changes with one word: "concussions"
:jack:
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."

Justin Halpern
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19233
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: Probable 2012 Rule Changes

Post by GannonFan »

I don't understand the outrage over any of those rule changes - none of them would significantly impact the game. After all the chest thumping about the kickoffs in the NFL, we still had plenty of guys running it out of the endzone so all the paranoia that kickoff returns would disappear was just that, paranoia. I was more upset when they made changes to when and how the clock runs - these changes are so minimal it shouldn't even be noticeable.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
grizzaholic
One Man Wolfpack
One Man Wolfpack
Posts: 34860
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
I am a fan of: Hodgdon
A.K.A.: Random Mailer
Location: Backwoods of Montana

Re: Probable 2012 Rule Changes

Post by grizzaholic »

GannonFan wrote:I don't understand the outrage over any of those rule changes - none of them would significantly impact the game. After all the chest thumping about the kickoffs in the NFL, we still had plenty of guys running it out of the endzone so all the paranoia that kickoff returns would disappear was just that, paranoia. I was more upset when they made changes to when and how the clock runs - these changes are so minimal it shouldn't even be noticeable.
:ohno:
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."

Justin Halpern
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19233
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: Probable 2012 Rule Changes

Post by GannonFan »

grizzaholic wrote:
GannonFan wrote:I don't understand the outrage over any of those rule changes - none of them would significantly impact the game. After all the chest thumping about the kickoffs in the NFL, we still had plenty of guys running it out of the endzone so all the paranoia that kickoff returns would disappear was just that, paranoia. I was more upset when they made changes to when and how the clock runs - these changes are so minimal it shouldn't even be noticeable.
:ohno:
Which one don't you like? It's going to take more than an emoticon unfortunately.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
JayJ79
Level3
Level3
Posts: 4253
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 7:52 pm
I am a fan of: myself

Re: Probable 2012 Rule Changes

Post by JayJ79 »

I figured they'd be moving the kickoff back up, and I have no problem with that. but why the hell are you messing with the touchback distance? seems dumb.

I'm all for the loss-of-helmet rule. perhaps it will encourage players to buckle their damn chinstraps properly.
grizzaholic
One Man Wolfpack
One Man Wolfpack
Posts: 34860
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
I am a fan of: Hodgdon
A.K.A.: Random Mailer
Location: Backwoods of Montana

Re: Probable 2012 Rule Changes

Post by grizzaholic »

GannonFan wrote:
grizzaholic wrote: :ohno:
Which one don't you like? It's going to take more than an emoticon unfortunately.
Kickoffs moved to the 35...touchbacks move to the 25. Both bullshit rules if you ask me.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."

Justin Halpern
CAA Flagship
4th&29
4th&29
Posts: 38529
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
I am a fan of: Old Dominion
A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
Location: Pizza Hell

Re: Probable 2012 Rule Changes

Post by CAA Flagship »

grizzaholic wrote:
GannonFan wrote:
Which one don't you like? It's going to take more than an emoticon unfortunately.
Kickoffs moved to the 35...touchbacks move to the 25. Both bullshit rules if you ask me.
I'm OK with the kickoff spot, but touchbacks to the 25 will mean more touchbacks as compared to the NFL. Catch it 5 yards deep and you have to go 30 yards to break even instead of 25. :ohno:

But then again, this is FCS football and the dueces are always wild. :thumb:
JayJ79
Level3
Level3
Posts: 4253
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 7:52 pm
I am a fan of: myself

Re: Probable 2012 Rule Changes

Post by JayJ79 »

just don't forget to take a knee on those touchbacks. :lol:
[youtube][/youtube]
danefan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 7989
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:51 pm
I am a fan of: UAlbany
Location: Hudson Valley, New York

Re: Probable 2012 Rule Changes

Post by danefan »

CAA Flagship wrote:
grizzaholic wrote:
Kickoffs moved to the 35...touchbacks move to the 25. Both bullshit rules if you ask me.
I'm OK with the kickoff spot, but touchbacks to the 25 will mean more touchbacks as compared to the NFL. Catch it 5 yards deep and you have to go 30 yards to break even instead of 25. :ohno:

But then again, this is FCS football and the dueces are always wild. :thumb:
Maybe the hope is to deter people from booting it out of the endzone? More placement kicks since the touchback is somewhat of a penalty now?
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19233
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: Probable 2012 Rule Changes

Post by GannonFan »

danefan wrote:
CAA Flagship wrote: I'm OK with the kickoff spot, but touchbacks to the 25 will mean more touchbacks as compared to the NFL. Catch it 5 yards deep and you have to go 30 yards to break even instead of 25. :ohno:

But then again, this is FCS football and the dueces are always wild. :thumb:
Maybe the hope is to deter people from booting it out of the endzone? More placement kicks since the touchback is somewhat of a penalty now?
Agreed - why would you aim for touchbacks as the kicking team - if anything, we may see even more returns. People like to complain about change even before they think through what the changes could mean. Just reflex complaining.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
JayJ79
Level3
Level3
Posts: 4253
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 7:52 pm
I am a fan of: myself

Re: Probable 2012 Rule Changes

Post by JayJ79 »

changes the punting game too, if touchbacks come out to the 25 instead of the 20
Mvemjsunpx
Level5
Level5
Posts: 14865
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:44 pm
I am a fan of: Montana

Re: Probable 2012 Rule Changes

Post by Mvemjsunpx »

GannonFan wrote:
danefan wrote:
Maybe the hope is to deter people from booting it out of the endzone? More placement kicks since the touchback is somewhat of a penalty now?
Agreed - why would you aim for touchbacks as the kicking team - if anything, we may see even more returns. People like to complain about change even before they think through what the changes could mean. Just reflex complaining.
But, it that's the case, how do these rules help player safety? It ends up just being change for the sake of change with no other purpose. "Oooh, look at us! We can move numbers around! WHEEEEEE!"
grizzaholic
One Man Wolfpack
One Man Wolfpack
Posts: 34860
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
I am a fan of: Hodgdon
A.K.A.: Random Mailer
Location: Backwoods of Montana

Re: Probable 2012 Rule Changes

Post by grizzaholic »

Mvemjsunpx wrote:
GannonFan wrote:
Agreed - why would you aim for touchbacks as the kicking team - if anything, we may see even more returns. People like to complain about change even before they think through what the changes could mean. Just reflex complaining.
But, it that's the case, how do these rules help player safety? It ends up just being change for the sake of change with no other purpose. "Oooh, look at us! We can move numbers around! WHEEEEEE!"
Exactly.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."

Justin Halpern
Vidav
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 10804
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:42 pm
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: The Russian
Location: Missoula, MT

Re: Probable 2012 Rule Changes

Post by Vidav »

grizzaholic wrote:
Mvemjsunpx wrote:
But, it that's the case, how do these rules help player safety? It ends up just being change for the sake of change with no other purpose. "Oooh, look at us! We can move numbers around! WHEEEEEE!"
Exactly.
Don't argue, it's just reflex arguing. Please think things through first. :coffee:
grizzaholic
One Man Wolfpack
One Man Wolfpack
Posts: 34860
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
I am a fan of: Hodgdon
A.K.A.: Random Mailer
Location: Backwoods of Montana

Re: Probable 2012 Rule Changes

Post by grizzaholic »

Vidav wrote:
grizzaholic wrote:
Exactly.
Don't argue, it's just reflex arguing. Please think things through first. :coffee:
I did. It is nothing but a bunch of shit-hawks caught up in the shit-wind that is a Shit-a-Cane. Nothing good will come of this.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."

Justin Halpern
Vidav
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 10804
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:42 pm
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: The Russian
Location: Missoula, MT

Re: Probable 2012 Rule Changes

Post by Vidav »

grizzaholic wrote:
Vidav wrote:
Don't argue, it's just reflex arguing. Please think things through first. :coffee:
I did. It is nothing but a bunch of shit-hawks caught up in the shit-wind that is a Shit-a-Cane. Nothing good will come of this.
You got that shit right.
User avatar
SuperHornet
SuperHornet
SuperHornet
Posts: 20858
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:24 pm
I am a fan of: Sac State
Location: Twentynine Palms, CA

Re: Probable 2012 Rule Changes

Post by SuperHornet »

The only way bringing a touchback out to the 25 would make sense to me would be to expand the field to CFL-size, and that's probably not going to happen any time soon. In fact, that may not be possible in some of the older stadia.
Image

SuperHornet's Athletics Hall of Fame includes Jacksonville State kicker Ashley Martin, the first girl to score in a Division I football game. She kicked 3 PATs in a 2001 game for J-State.
User avatar
BDKJMU
Level5
Level5
Posts: 36567
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
I am a fan of: JMU
A.K.A.: BDKJMU
Location: Philly Burbs

Re: Probable 2012 Rule Changes

Post by BDKJMU »

GannonFan wrote:I don't understand the outrage over any of those rule changes - none of them would significantly impact the game. After all the chest thumping about the kickoffs in the NFL, we still had plenty of guys running it out of the endzone so all the paranoia that kickoff returns would disappear was just that, paranoia. I was more upset when they made changes to when and how the clock runs - these changes are so minimal it shouldn't even be noticeable.
Was a huge drop in kick returns and touchbacks nearly tripled:

"There were 1,375 kickoff returns in 2011, compared with 2,033 in 2010, according to Elias Sports Bureau. And touchbacks nearly tripled to 1,120 in 2011 compared with 416 in 2010. Touchdown returns on kickoffs dropped to nine in 2011 from 23 in 2010."
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/football ... 52926056/1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I agree on the clock rule. The networks increased TV timeouts over the years and then complain they can't get the game into a 3 hr time slot. So what does the NFL do- decreases the amount of football with the BS clock rules they put in 4-5 years back (and 3 years ago in college).
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
User avatar
BDKJMU
Level5
Level5
Posts: 36567
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
I am a fan of: JMU
A.K.A.: BDKJMU
Location: Philly Burbs

Re: Probable 2012 Rule Changes

Post by BDKJMU »

grizzaholic wrote:
bluehenbillk wrote:http://www.ncaa.org/wps/wcm/connect/pub ... nce+safety

because they concern "player safety" these rules could be put into effect in the next 30 days for the 2012 season:

Highlights-

-Kickoffs move up to the 35 (i.e. same as NFL) and touchbacks come out to the 25.

-If your helmet comes off(except on a facemask penalty), you have to come out for a play - like you were injured & if you're carrying the ball & your helmet comes off the play stops right there (NFL has same rule as of 2011).

-Leaping rule on placements now to carryover to punts as well.
JESUS **** CHRIST. What a bunch of bullshit. Why not just make it two hand touch or flag.
Exactly. They've taken out the clothes line, horse collar, wedge on kickoffs. Now have helmet to helmet penalties, defenseless receiver, and now this.. :ohno:
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
DJnVa
Level1
Level1
Posts: 129
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:56 am
I am a fan of: Old Dominion
Location: Virginia

Re: Probable 2012 Rule Changes

Post by DJnVa »

danefan wrote:Maybe the hope is to deter people from booting it out of the endzone? More placement kicks since the touchback is somewhat of a penalty now?

Doesn't that defeat the purpose of making the changes to deter concussions? If the idea is to have less KO returns, why penalize a team that kicks it through the end zone?

EDIT: Oops. Covered, by like, 15 people already.
User avatar
bluehenbillk
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7660
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:26 am
I am a fan of: elaware
Location: East Coast/Hawaii

Re: Probable 2012 Rule Changes

Post by bluehenbillk »

All the forementioned rule changes were approved by the NCAA this week. They go into effect this season.
Make Delaware Football Great Again
grizzaholic
One Man Wolfpack
One Man Wolfpack
Posts: 34860
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
I am a fan of: Hodgdon
A.K.A.: Random Mailer
Location: Backwoods of Montana

Re: Probable 2012 Rule Changes

Post by grizzaholic »

bluehenbillk wrote:All the forementioned rule changes were approved by the NCAA this week. They go into effect this season.
Well that just sucks my ass.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."

Justin Halpern
Post Reply