Kalm, what's your take on the video?BDKJMU wrote:The amateur video was uploaded to YouTube Sunday afternoon by user "MrFr0zak."
Why can't we all just get along?89Hen wrote:Kalm, what's your take on the video?BDKJMU wrote:The amateur video was uploaded to YouTube Sunday afternoon by user "MrFr0zak."
I see a bunch of protesters egging on the cops, and them doing their job quickly and safely without engaging the crowd. Looks textbook to me.
God bless them...Nancy Pelosi
I thought it was a 45 second video on continuous loop.89Hen wrote:Was the last 2:30 different than the first three minutes of babble?kalm wrote:One Marine, thirty cops:
Yep.89Hen wrote:Kalm, what's your take on the video?BDKJMU wrote:The amateur video was uploaded to YouTube Sunday afternoon by user "MrFr0zak."
I see a bunch of protesters egging on the cops, and them doing their job quickly and safely without engaging the crowd. Looks textbook to me.
Great campaign commercial on how the donks support these loons. .Bronco wrote:-God bless them...Nancy Pelosi
[youtube][/youtube]
Scary thing is Kalm thinks the ex-Marine makes a good case. God bless our servicemen and women, but just because somebody is a vet doesn't make them an expert in politics or policing.AZGrizFan wrote:I thought it was a 45 second video on continuous loop.89Hen wrote: Was the last 2:30 different than the first three minutes of babble?
These are US citizens.
There is no honor in this.
Go to Iraq or Afghanistan.
Why are you doing this to people.
These people don't have guns.
At the top of his lungs.
Honestly, it's amazing he wasn't taken out. Absolutely psychotic.
Gil Dobie wrote:Well, at least Occupy Washington DC has not been violent yet.
The Park Police were supposed to start evicting the tent people yesterday but only gave out more warnings. There is a hearing this morning on the next action. Protests are fine, shanty towns on park property are not.
Gil Dobie wrote:Well, at least Occupy Washington DC has not been violent yet.
Well thank you form relaying my thoughts!89Hen wrote:Scary thing is Kalm thinks the ex-Marine makes a good case. God bless our servicemen and women, but just because somebody is a vet doesn't make them an expert in politics or policing.AZGrizFan wrote:
I thought it was a 45 second video on continuous loop.
These are US citizens.
There is no honor in this.
Go to Iraq or Afghanistan.
Why are you doing this to people.
These people don't have guns.
At the top of his lungs.
Honestly, it's amazing he wasn't taken out. Absolutely psychotic.
Disagree. Their message was compromised from the start, like most liberal movements, by the split in protesters. Have a anti-war march and you get 50% anti-war, 17% socialist movement, 13% anti World Bank, 10% gay rights, 8% pro-choice, 6% anarchists... The only reason they are mentioned in the news now is if there is court or police action to move them out of their tent villages.kalm wrote:4.). The Occupy movement has been successful in remaining visible and highlighting some inenquities in our system
Yes, but the discussion is still on going and they helped with that.89Hen wrote:Disagree. Their message was compromised from the start, like most liberal movements, by the split in protesters. Have a anti-war march and you get 50% anti-war, 17% socialist movement, 13% anti World Bank, 10% gay rights, 8% pro-choice, 6% anarchists... The only reason they are mentioned in the news now is if there is court or police action to move them out of their tent villages.kalm wrote:4.). The Occupy movement has been successful in remaining visible and highlighting some inenquities in our system
Hen, check your math. That adds up to 104%. Subtract 6.93% (all of the anarchists plus a few fringe gays) and you'll be close enough to claim rounding error!89Hen wrote:Disagree. Their message was compromised from the start, like most liberal movements, by the split in protesters. Have a anti-war march and you get 50% anti-war, 17% socialist movement, 13% anti World Bank, 10% gay rights, 8% pro-choice, 6% anarchists... The only reason they are mentioned in the news now is if there is court or police action to move them out of their tent villages.kalm wrote:4.). The Occupy movement has been successful in remaining visible and highlighting some inenquities in our system
In other N California newshttp://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollRep ... ab1639f64d" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
One would think that the Occupy movement and San Francisco were made for each other. Perhaps at one time they were, but a new Survey USA poll shows that even the City by the Bay has its limits. The poll of 500 adults in the San Francisco area — surely the most progressive-friendly poll sample ever taken — shows that almost half of those who supported the Occupy movement in general now have changed their minds. [...]
According to this poll, Occupy support in the Bay area would have been 58/34 at one point. Now it’s 35/57, which is a flip of 46 points in the gap. Combining support and opposition numbers, Democrat support for Occupy is now 40/56, and even among self-professed liberals, where 27% have switched to opposition, it’s only 52/35. Among San Francisco adults. Note too that the movement has not gained converts in anything like the numbers they are alienating, which means that the longer they go, the weaker they are getting politically. Via Hotair.com
OAKLAND — Faced with ever-increasing violence between police and Occupy protesters, Oakland Mayor Jean Quan is seeking help from a new source: Occupy Wall Street.
Quan plans to ask leaders of the national Occupy movement to convince their Oakland cohorts to shun violence during their protests over economic inequality, officials said Monday.
What discussion and with whom?kalm wrote:Yes, but the discussion is still on going and they helped with that.
Math is spot on. Whenever the libs have a march in DC they always overreport the numbers.Ivytalk wrote:Hen, check your math. That adds up to 104%. Subtract 6.93% (all of the anarchists plus a few fringe gays) and you'll be close enough to claim rounding error!89Hen wrote: Disagree. Their message was compromised from the start, like most liberal movements, by the split in protesters. Have a anti-war march and you get 50% anti-war, 17% socialist movement, 13% anti World Bank, 10% gay rights, 8% pro-choice, 6% anarchists... The only reason they are mentioned in the news now is if there is court or police action to move them out of their tent villages.
Don't make whip out another Taibbi piece.89Hen wrote:What discussion and with whom?kalm wrote:Yes, but the discussion is still on going and they helped with that.
