AZGrizFan wrote:Hope and change.kalm wrote:
We had to help out the bankers and keep the taxes low.![]()
![]()


AZGrizFan wrote:Hope and change.kalm wrote:
We had to help out the bankers and keep the taxes low.![]()
![]()


No shit sherlock.AZGrizFan wrote:It's patently obvious who the "angry one" is here, Wedgie.Wedgebuster wrote:From my notoriously non-partisan and unbiased common sense driven point of view, it appears to me that the vast majority of supposed "bad deeds, poor decisions, flawed policies, and/or general un American" behaviors allegedly committed by Obama are more aptly described as needed counters to the horrendous state of affairs that were left him from your favorite retard George W. Bush. But all we hear from the fox and friends and you and a few others right here is how bad everything is going, and that it is all the fault of the Democrats.
Obama is really got under your skin, and really pissing you off Z, let it out!!
You will be liberated!!
![]()

You are just angering the conks, and angry conks go around accusing others of being angry, seems like JBB is a conk, and he does this almost as much as Z.Seahawks08 wrote:Yes it does.It doesn't get any clearer than that.

Anger personified.Wedgebuster wrote:From my notoriously non-partisan and unbiased common sense driven point of view, it appears to me that the vast majority of supposed "bad deeds, poor decisions, flawed policies, and/or general un American" behaviors allegedly committed by Obama are more aptly described as needed counters to the horrendous state of affairs that were left him from your favorite retard George W. Bush. But all we hear from the fox and friends and you and a few others right here is how bad everything is going, and that it is all the fault of the Democrats.


Ok JBB. I'm sure you think it's working..AZGrizFan wrote:Anger personified.Wedgebuster wrote:From my notoriously non-partisan and unbiased common sense driven point of view, it appears to me that the vast majority of supposed "bad deeds, poor decisions, flawed policies, and/or general un American" behaviors allegedly committed by Obama are more aptly described as needed counters to the horrendous state of affairs that were left him from your favorite retard George W. Bush. But all we hear from the fox and friends and you and a few others right here is how bad everything is going, and that it is all the fault of the Democrats.


Angry old man who missed his pronghorn quota. Or maybe marmots. Whatever.Wedgebuster wrote:Ok JBB. I'm sure you think it's working..AZGrizFan wrote:
Anger personified.
![]()
![]()

Marmot makes some good clothing and gear.Ivytalk wrote:Angry old man who missed his pronghorn quota. Or maybe marmots. Whatever.Wedgebuster wrote:
Ok JBB. I'm sure you think it's working..
![]()
![]()


So we should have stayed in Iraq and pulled out of Afghanistan? Interesting.Can someone tell me how many Iraqis have died since our "troops" pulled out of Iraq (8 yesterday, 28 two days before that, 9 a couple days before that...just to give folks a head start)?
Anyone hear that the Taliban and AQ have recently given orders to focus their violence on foreign troops, and not Pakistani troops? Wonder why. And Happy New Year - well, actually maybe not so happy - to the families of the 10 US troops killed in Afghanistan so far this year. O'Bama's chosen war is going so swimmingly well.


Thanks for jumping in...nice of you to show off your limited ability to grasp options. You are the perfect audience for Obushma.Seahawks08 wrote:So we should have stayed in Iraq and pulled out of Afghanistan? Interesting.Can someone tell me how many Iraqis have died since our "troops" pulled out of Iraq (8 yesterday, 28 two days before that, 9 a couple days before that...just to give folks a head start)?
Anyone hear that the Taliban and AQ have recently given orders to focus their violence on foreign troops, and not Pakistani troops? Wonder why. And Happy New Year - well, actually maybe not so happy - to the families of the 10 US troops killed in Afghanistan so far this year. O'Bama's chosen war is going so swimmingly well.




Poor choice of words there Seahawks. They are easy to bomb.Seahawks08 wrote:It doesn't even matter at this point. Iran has an advanced nuclear program, so at the very least they will get a crude nuclear device similar to North Korea. And I haven't looked into it, but there are probably nuclear facilities under urban areas which would make them impossible to bomb.

Why do we have troops in either country?Seahawks08 wrote:Alright commander, what would you have done?

damnit i can't tell if your serious or not. Haven't been here long enough to know. So I will resist commenting further.Poor choice of words there Seahawks. They are easy to bomb.
Iraq = trainers for the iraqi military? Deter Iran? I really don't know at this point.Why do we have troops in either country?


Give me your comment, I highly value input.Seahawks08 wrote:damnit i can't tell if your serious or not. Haven't been here long enough to know. So I will resist commenting further.Poor choice of words there Seahawks. They are easy to bomb.![]()


Glad you agree.Seahawks08 wrote:

It's ok, Wedgie...if I'd voted Obama I'd be pissed as hell too.Wedgebuster wrote:IVY, quit it with the anger crap here. This is the internet, I ain't a judge, but you is angry.![]()
![]()
Quit it, you are proving my point, and I was doing great as it was.![]()
If you want to sniff AZs jock, do it on your own time, not the firms, nor mine.


Iraq - you don't know?Seahawks08 wrote:Iraq = trainers for the iraqi military? Deter Iran? I really don't know at this point.
Afghan = i think we should bring the troops home gradually, but more of an end of this year deadline rather than 2014. Let the CIA keep doing its business there.

My point is that we THINK, based on our intelligence, that the Iranians are developing a bomb. Very much like our intel told us about WMD's in Iraq. A lot of the Dems like to play MMQB and say that we knew there were no WMD's, yet at the time Dems and Repubs alike were pretty unilateral in bombing the crap out of them. Selective memories, I suppose.Seahawks08 wrote:It doesn't even matter at this point. Iran has an advanced nuclear program, so at the very least they will get a crude nuclear device similar to North Korea. And I haven't looked into it, but there are probably nuclear facilities under urban areas which would make them impossible to bomb.

Wedgebuster wrote:From my notoriously non-partisan and unbiased common sense driven point of view
