
IvyTalk watching porn at work.





Hey there Jim Dandy, you mess with the bull and you get......Ivytalk wrote:Nothing like multiple photo posts from the Dutch-Door Brothers of UNI.

Awwww, Dodger Joe helpin a buddy.JoltinJoe wrote:


"What an ultramaroon. What a nincowpoop." -- Professor Bugs Bunny, in response to D1B's pathetic attempts at "humor."D1B wrote:Hey there Jim Dandy, you mess with the bull and you get......Ivytalk wrote:Nothing like multiple photo posts from the Dutch-Door Brothers of UNI.
Maybe you should be like Simple Andy and let Liar Joe do all your talking. You don't have it.Ivytalk wrote:"What an ultramaroon. What a nincowpoop." -- Professor Bugs Bunny, in response to D1B's pathetic attempts at "humor."D1B wrote:
Hey there Jim Dandy, you mess with the bull and you get......
Crohn's Disease sucks.D1B wrote:
IvyTurd, listening intently at his Crohn's disease support group

You're probably right, Dildo1Bugger. God knows Joe cleans your clock on your weak-assed Catholic threads.D1B wrote:Maybe you should be like Simple Andy and let Liar Joe do all your talking. You don't have it.Ivytalk wrote:
"What an ultramaroon. What a nincowpoop." -- Professor Bugs Bunny, in response to D1B's pathetic attempts at "humor."
Yeah, right.Ivytalk wrote:You're probably right, Dildo1Bugger. God knows Joe cleans your clock on your weak-assed Catholic threads.D1B wrote:
Maybe you should be like Simple Andy and let Liar Joe do all your talking. You don't have it.

also bear in mind that this bottom 50% receive just about all of the monies set aside for social welfare programs. So paying associated user fees is the VERY LEAST they can do to offset the burden of their existence in this society...TwinTownBisonFan wrote:bear in mind that this bottom 50% pays a much higher percentage of their income in sales taxes and use fees. they also feel the bite of property taxes more acutely as well. (while the wealthy have more, and more expensive property, usually a much lower percentage of their personal wealth is tied up in it)Appaholic wrote:
I don't think they are lazy at all. But they are hypocrites & just as selfish as the ultra-rich. They scream for the ultra-rich to pay a higher percentage of income tax while at the same time bemoan their ability to pay ANY income tax at all.
it's a rather large red herring to suggest that the bottom 50% of income earners in this country skate by paying no taxes. they are the butt end of at least half a dozen regressive tax schemes.
Appy - got any stats. Like how much we're spending on the poor? Not saying you're wrong....Appaholic wrote:also bear in mind that this bottom 50% receive just about all of the monies set aside for social welfare programs. So paying associated user fees is the VERY LEAST they can do to offset the burden of their existence in this society...TwinTownBisonFan wrote:
bear in mind that this bottom 50% pays a much higher percentage of their income in sales taxes and use fees. they also feel the bite of property taxes more acutely as well. (while the wealthy have more, and more expensive property, usually a much lower percentage of their personal wealth is tied up in it)
it's a rather large red herring to suggest that the bottom 50% of income earners in this country skate by paying no taxes. they are the butt end of at least half a dozen regressive tax schemes.

The +/-46% who pay no income tax or receive a larger return than they paid into the system also include the only "citizens" who, through means testing, would qualify for social programs such as Medicaid, Food Stamps, Section 8, etc. Therefore, I feel confident in my earlier statement. However, I do not have time to peruse the internet for the actual stats as I need to get to work to support these chronic deadbeats....D1B wrote:Appy - got any stats. Like how much we're spending on the poor? Not saying you're wrong....Appaholic wrote:
also bear in mind that this bottom 50% receive just about all of the monies set aside for social welfare programs. So paying associated user fees is the VERY LEAST they can do to offset the burden of their existence in this society...

Appaholic wrote:The +/-46% who pay no income tax or receive a larger return than they paid into the system also include the only "citizens" who, through means testing, would qualify for social programs such as Medicaid, Food Stamps, Section 8, etc. Therefore, I feel confident in my earlier statement. However, I do not have time to peruse the internet for the actual stats as I need to get to work to support these chronic deadbeats....D1B wrote:
Appy - got any stats. Like how much we're spending on the poor? Not saying you're wrong....
Yeah, or what percentage of our government spending is earmarked for these dregs of society? It has got to be miniscule and that being the case, why are the conks so pissed about it? There are so many bigger fish to fry than food stamps and quite frankly, in the long run, it's cheaper to toss a few bread crumbs their way than to clean up after riots or incarcerate them.Cap'n Cat wrote:Appaholic wrote:
The +/-46% who pay no income tax or receive a larger return than they paid into the system also include the only "citizens" who, through means testing, would qualify for social programs such as Medicaid, Food Stamps, Section 8, etc. Therefore, I feel confident in my earlier statement. However, I do not have time to peruse the internet for the actual stats as I need to get to work to support these chronic deadbeats....
Wonder why those, ahem, "46%" don't "pay", ahem, taxes? Is it because they're all lazy? Do they make enough?
Interested in your thoughts, Apper!
Ivytalk wrote: You're probably right, Dildo1Bugger. God knows Joe cleans your clock on your weak-assed Catholic threads.

JoltinJoe wrote:Ivytalk wrote: You're probably right, Dildo1Bugger. God knows Joe cleans your clock on your weak-assed Catholic threads.![]()
Does D1B remind you of someone dressed in black in this video?
[youtube][/youtube]

Recycling jokes that weren't funny the first time?D1B wrote:I want to apologized to IvyTrim. I accidently used Joltin Joe's portrait and erroneously said it was IvyTurd.
This is in fact Joltin Joe at the 2009 Pro Life "Rally in the Valley".
JoltinJoe wrote:Recycling jokes that weren't funny the first time?D1B wrote:I want to apologized to IvyTrim. I accidently used Joltin Joe's portrait and erroneously said it was IvyTurd.
This is in fact Joltin Joe at the 2009 Pro Life "Rally in the Valley".![]()
What's sad is I understand that, in your glory days, you use to be a football star.



Have at you!JoltinJoe wrote:Ivytalk wrote: You're probably right, Dildo1Bugger. God knows Joe cleans your clock on your weak-assed Catholic threads.![]()
Does D1B remind you of someone dressed in black in this video?
[youtube][/youtube]

No, I don't think ALL of them are lazy. And that's not the point IMO. It's our tax code that enables those folks to not pay any taxes through no fault of their own. What I do have a problem with is them bitching about others not paying their fair share, hence the hypocrisy of their argument. They should sit down & STFO or put some skin in the game if they want a voice.....Cap'n Cat wrote:Appaholic wrote:
The +/-46% who pay no income tax or receive a larger return than they paid into the system also include the only "citizens" who, through means testing, would qualify for social programs such as Medicaid, Food Stamps, Section 8, etc. Therefore, I feel confident in my earlier statement. However, I do not have time to peruse the internet for the actual stats as I need to get to work to support these chronic deadbeats....
Wonder why those, ahem, "46%" don't "pay", ahem, taxes? Is it because they're all lazy? Do they make enough?
Interested in your thoughts, Apper!

Well, that obviously makes it ok since it's a small percentage of the budget. Let them eat cake. So, as long as they only get their cumbucket girlfriends a "little bit pregnant" with another illegitimate child to suckle from the government teet, it's ok. Let's shut down GE......or we could let those who can't afford to take care of themselves die off so society improves overall.D1B wrote:Yeah, or what percentage of our government spending is earmarked for these dregs of society? It has got to be miniscule and that being the case, why are the conks so pissed about it? There are so many bigger fish to fry than food stamps and quite frankly, in the long run, it's cheaper to toss a few bread crumbs their way than to clean up after riots or incarcerate them.Cap'n Cat wrote:
Wonder why those, ahem, "46%" don't "pay", ahem, taxes? Is it because they're all lazy? Do they make enough?
Interested in your thoughts, Apper!