Actually, at many bases the answer to that question is NO. And neither are the gate guards.Grizalltheway wrote:The MPs aren't?AZGrizFan wrote:
WTF? You think everybody on a military base is running around with loaded weapons at the ready?![]()
![]()
Norway terror attack
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter

- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Norway terror attack
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

- dbackjon
- Moderator Team

- Posts: 45627
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
Re: Norway terror attack
AZGrizFan wrote:What was he shooting with, Jon? An AK-47?dbackjon wrote:
But people on here expect that at a youth camp![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I guarantee you, if I'm on an island with 100 other people and a guy is shooting at us with a handgun, there's no fucking WAY he's going to shoot for 90 minutes. 10 guys rush him from 10 different directions, he's going down. I realize these were teenagers, but running, hiding, swimming into the water, none of that worked. They allowed themselves to be hunted, and (armed or not), I ain't goin' out that way.
Multiple weapons, including semi-auto glock. He was dressed as a policeman. You know what you would do NOW. What would you do as a 15-year old?
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Norway terror attack
Circumnavigate the globe?dbackjon wrote:AZGrizFan wrote:
What was he shooting with, Jon? An AK-47?
I guarantee you, if I'm on an island with 100 other people and a guy is shooting at us with a handgun, there's no fucking WAY he's going to shoot for 90 minutes. 10 guys rush him from 10 different directions, he's going down. I realize these were teenagers, but running, hiding, swimming into the water, none of that worked. They allowed themselves to be hunted, and (armed or not), I ain't goin' out that way.
Multiple weapons, including semi-auto glock. He was dressed as a policeman. You know what you would do NOW. What would you do as a 15-year old?
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Norway terror attack
JHC, you've officially jumped the shark on this one.AZGrizFan wrote:What was he shooting with, Jon? An AK-47?dbackjon wrote:
But people on here expect that at a youth camp![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I guarantee you, if I'm on an island with 100 other people and a guy is shooting at us with a handgun, there's no fucking WAY he's going to shoot for 90 minutes. 10 guys rush him from 10 different directions, he's going down. I realize these were teenagers, but running, hiding, swimming into the water, none of that worked. They allowed themselves to be hunted, and (armed or not), I ain't goin' out that way.
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter

- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Norway terror attack
a) the "dressed as a policeman" thing would work right up until he capped the first person.dbackjon wrote:AZGrizFan wrote:
What was he shooting with, Jon? An AK-47?
I guarantee you, if I'm on an island with 100 other people and a guy is shooting at us with a handgun, there's no fucking WAY he's going to shoot for 90 minutes. 10 guys rush him from 10 different directions, he's going down. I realize these were teenagers, but running, hiding, swimming into the water, none of that worked. They allowed themselves to be hunted, and (armed or not), I ain't goin' out that way.
Multiple weapons, including semi-auto glock. He was dressed as a policeman. You know what you would do NOW. What would you do as a 15-year old?
b) I've already acknowledged the fact they were teenagers, and I can't honestly say how I'd have reacted 35 years ago had this happened, but I'm not a big fan of burying my head in the sand and hoping it all just goes away.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

- AZGrizFan
- Supporter

- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Norway terror attack
How so? He methodically killed 80 people over the course of 90 minutes...if that isn't the definition of being "hunted" I don't know what is.Grizalltheway wrote:JHC, you've officially jumped the shark on this one.AZGrizFan wrote:
What was he shooting with, Jon? An AK-47?
I guarantee you, if I'm on an island with 100 other people and a guy is shooting at us with a handgun, there's no fucking WAY he's going to shoot for 90 minutes. 10 guys rush him from 10 different directions, he's going down. I realize these were teenagers, but running, hiding, swimming into the water, none of that worked. They allowed themselves to be hunted, and (armed or not), I ain't goin' out that way.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Norway terror attack
Assuming you were completely unarmed, can you honestly say you would have charged straight at a guy with an assault rifle to try to take him down?AZGrizFan wrote:a) the "dressed as a policeman" thing would work right up until he capped the first person.dbackjon wrote:
Multiple weapons, including semi-auto glock. He was dressed as a policeman. You know what you would do NOW. What would you do as a 15-year old?
b) I've already acknowledged the fact they were teenagers, and I can't honestly say how I'd have reacted 35 years ago had this happened, but I'm not a big fan of burying my head in the sand and hoping it all just goes away.
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Norway terror attack
I'm talking about the "allowed themselves" part. They were on a tiny island, it's not like they had a lot of places to go.AZGrizFan wrote:How so? He methodically killed 80 people over the course of 90 minutes...if that isn't the definition of being "hunted" I don't know what is.Grizalltheway wrote:
JHC, you've officially jumped the shark on this one.
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter

- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Norway terror attack
Not alone...reread my statement.Grizalltheway wrote:Assuming you were completely unarmed, can you honestly say you would have charged straight at a guy with an assault rifle to try to take him down?AZGrizFan wrote:
a) the "dressed as a policeman" thing would work right up until he capped the first person.
b) I've already acknowledged the fact they were teenagers, and I can't honestly say how I'd have reacted 35 years ago had this happened, but I'm not a big fan of burying my head in the sand and hoping it all just goes away.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

- SDHornet
- Supporter

- Posts: 19511
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
- I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets
Re: Norway terror attack
Of course Europe isn't violent. Since when have those pussies ever had to defend themselves in the last 50 years. I can't wait to see how they hold their own when we can no longer afford to keep protecting them.D1B wrote:Most of em are better. Look at us SD. We're the most violent nation on earth and have been so for at least a couple decades. We're greedy, fat, dumb, arrogant and two-faced.SDHornet wrote: Yeah but Eruozone countries are much better than the US (), shouldn't they be more efficient and at least competent when responding to one guy with a gun?
Maybe they should have been more competant. We didn't wake the fuck up till 9/11.
9/11 was an inside job. Haven't you watched the hundred or so youtube movies es posted.
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter

- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Norway terror attack
50 years? You give them too much credit. It's been going on 100 years now.SDHornet wrote:Of course Europe isn't violent. Since when have those pussies ever had to defend themselves in the last 50 years. I can't wait to see how they hold their own when we can no longer afford to keep protecting them.D1B wrote:
Most of em are better. Look at us SD. We're the most violent nation on earth and have been so for at least a couple decades. We're greedy, fat, dumb, arrogant and two-faced.
Maybe they should have been more competant. We didn't wake the fuck up till 9/11.
9/11 was an inside job. Haven't you watched the hundred or so youtube movies es posted.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

- SDHornet
- Supporter

- Posts: 19511
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
- I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets
Re: Norway terror attack
Well I'd like to believe we weren't carrying the full weight of Europe on our backs until after Churchill outspent the British Empire on his warmongering and since the Germans haven't been allowed to keep a force large enough to ever stop a Russian takeover.AZGrizFan wrote:50 years? You give them too much credit. It's been going on 100 years now.SDHornet wrote: Of course Europe isn't violent. Since when have those pussies ever had to defend themselves in the last 50 years. I can't wait to see how they hold their own when we can no longer afford to keep protecting them.
9/11 was an inside job. Haven't you watched the hundred or so youtube movies es posted.
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Norway terror attack
Churchill was warmongering?SDHornet wrote:Well I'd like to believe we weren't carrying the full weight of Europe on our backs until after Churchill outspent the British Empire on his warmongering and since the Germans haven't been allowed to keep a force large enough to ever stop a Russian takeover.AZGrizFan wrote:
50 years? You give them too much credit. It's been going on 100 years now.
- SDHornet
- Supporter

- Posts: 19511
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
- I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets
Re: Norway terror attack
Yup. He started a couple of skirmishes in his days...but they weren't that big...Grizalltheway wrote:Churchill was warmongering?SDHornet wrote: Well I'd like to believe we weren't carrying the full weight of Europe on our backs until after Churchill outspent the British Empire on his warmongering and since the Germans haven't been allowed to keep a force large enough to ever stop a Russian takeover.
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Norway terror attack
I don't think getting involved in a war the Germans initiated constitutes 'starting'.SDHornet wrote:Yup. He started a couple of skirmishes in his days...but they weren't that big...Grizalltheway wrote:
Churchill was warmongering?
- SDHornet
- Supporter

- Posts: 19511
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
- I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets
Re: Norway terror attack
Ah yes the warmongering Germans. They fought exactly 3 wars from 1815 thru 1914 and 0 wars from 1871 thru 1914 while being ruled by Bismarch and the Kaiser. Sounds like a formidable threat to the Brits.Grizalltheway wrote:I don't think getting involved in a war the Germans initiated constitutes 'starting'.SDHornet wrote: Yup. He started a couple of skirmishes in his days...but they weren't that big...
- BDKJMU
- Level5

- Posts: 36401
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
Re: Norway terror attack
-------------------------
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Norway terror attack
Not sure what that time period has to do with what happened after 1914 but...okay.SDHornet wrote:Ah yes the warmongering Germans. They fought exactly 3 wars from 1815 thru 1914 and 0 wars from 1871 thru 1914 while being ruled by Bismarch and the Kaiser. Sounds like a formidable threat to the Brits.Grizalltheway wrote:
I don't think getting involved in a war the Germans initiated constitutes 'starting'.
- SDHornet
- Supporter

- Posts: 19511
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
- I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets
Re: Norway terror attack
It has to do with Churchill painting the Germans as a war hungry and violent nation in order to stir up a pro-war and anti-German sentiment in both Parliament and to the British public leading up to the Great War. It’s harder to go to war without political and public support.Grizalltheway wrote:Not sure what that time period has to do with what happened after 1914 but...okay.SDHornet wrote: Ah yes the warmongering Germans. They fought exactly 3 wars from 1815 thru 1914 and 0 wars from 1871 thru 1914 while being ruled by Bismarch and the Kaiser. Sounds like a formidable threat to the Brits.
Re: Norway terror attack
Nice backpedaling Z. 
"Sarah Palin absolutely blew AWAY the audience tonight. If there was any doubt as to whether she was savvy enough, tough enough or smart enough to carry the mantle of Vice President, she put those fears to rest tonight. She took on Barack Obama DIRECTLY on every issue and exposed... She did it with warmth and humor, and came across as the every-person....it's becoming mroe and more clear that she was a genius pick for McCain."
AZGrizfan - Summer 2008
AZGrizfan - Summer 2008
Re: Norway terror attack
Bullshit, you fucking liar. When was the last time you were on a base?AZGrizFan wrote:Actually, at many bases the answer to that question is NO. And neither are the gate guards.Grizalltheway wrote:
The MPs aren't?
The world has changed since your stint on welfare, during the Greneda War.
"Sarah Palin absolutely blew AWAY the audience tonight. If there was any doubt as to whether she was savvy enough, tough enough or smart enough to carry the mantle of Vice President, she put those fears to rest tonight. She took on Barack Obama DIRECTLY on every issue and exposed... She did it with warmth and humor, and came across as the every-person....it's becoming mroe and more clear that she was a genius pick for McCain."
AZGrizfan - Summer 2008
AZGrizfan - Summer 2008
Re: Norway terror attack
Yeah, that's it Ed Gibbon.SDHornet wrote:It has to do with Churchill painting the Germans as a war hungry and violent nation in order to stir up a pro-war and anti-German sentiment in both Parliament and to the British public leading up to the Great War. It’s harder to go to war without political and public support.Grizalltheway wrote:
Not sure what that time period has to do with what happened after 1914 but...okay.
"Sarah Palin absolutely blew AWAY the audience tonight. If there was any doubt as to whether she was savvy enough, tough enough or smart enough to carry the mantle of Vice President, she put those fears to rest tonight. She took on Barack Obama DIRECTLY on every issue and exposed... She did it with warmth and humor, and came across as the every-person....it's becoming mroe and more clear that she was a genius pick for McCain."
AZGrizfan - Summer 2008
AZGrizfan - Summer 2008
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter

- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Norway terror attack
D1B wrote:Bullshit, you fucking liar. When was the last time you were on a base?AZGrizFan wrote:
Actually, at many bases the answer to that question is NO. And neither are the gate guards.
The world has changed since your stint on welfare, during the Greneda War.
Yesterday, Colonel Klink.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

Re: Norway terror attack
At Joint Base Charleston, every guard has his side arm and there are sentries posted with Tactical Shotguns or M16's, 24/7.AZGrizFan wrote:Actually, at many bases the answer to that question is NO. And neither are the gate guards.Grizalltheway wrote:
The MPs aren't?
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
- andy7171
- Firefly

- Posts: 27951
- Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:12 am
- I am a fan of: Wiping.
- A.K.A.: HE HATE ME
- Location: Eastern Palouse
Re: Norway terror attack
Not to derail all the pleasant conversation, but credit where credit is due. This post was fantastic!Grizalltheway wrote:Circumnavigate the globe?dbackjon wrote:
Multiple weapons, including semi-auto glock. He was dressed as a policeman. You know what you would do NOW. What would you do as a 15-year old?
"Elaine, you're from Baltimore, right?"
"Yes, well, Towson actually."
"Yes, well, Towson actually."
