Big Sky Power Rankings 11-8

Football Championship Subdivision discussions
User avatar
Screamin_Eagle174
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 16619
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
I am a fan of: Peaches
A.K.A.: SE174
Location: Spokanistan

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 11-8

Post by Screamin_Eagle174 »

EWURanger wrote:
BigSkyBears wrote:UNC beats PSU and get it's first multi-conference win season in many, many, many years. I'm not sure it will be enough for Scott to keep his job though. We had higher hopes for this season.
Congrats to the Bears, after those tough close losses to MSU and EWU, you guys deserved to win a close one.

I actually thought there would be more parity in the Big Sky this year, but the only real surprise has been Montana not being as dominant as usual. ISU, PSU, and UNC being perrenial cellar-dwellars does nothing for the conference, so I hope that all of these programs can start to turn things around.
I don't know, Sac has at the very least lived up to expectations, and slightly turned the corner. They were within a couple plays or two of being in contention for the Big Sky title. So close, but no cigar. They have a fair amount of players returning next year though I believe.
User avatar
eaglesfootball
Level1
Level1
Posts: 148
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 12:09 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern Washington
A.K.A.: eaglesfootball

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 11-8

Post by eaglesfootball »

sac state, suu, and cal poly are all play off worthy teams that won't make it in this year. sac state should contend next year.
User avatar
Screamin_Eagle174
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 16619
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
I am a fan of: Peaches
A.K.A.: SE174
Location: Spokanistan

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 11-8

Post by Screamin_Eagle174 »

eaglesfootball wrote:sac state, suu, and cal poly are all play off worthy teams that won't make it in this year. sac state should contend next year.
If CP beats Davis tonight, they will make the playoffs. :twocents:
User avatar
EWURanger
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 4712
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:06 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern Washington

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 11-8

Post by EWURanger »

Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:
eaglesfootball wrote:sac state, suu, and cal poly are all play off worthy teams that won't make it in this year. sac state should contend next year.
If CP beats Davis tonight, they will make the playoffs. :twocents:
I am wondering what will happen in the following scenario:

Cal-Poly beats Davis, putting them at 8-3
EWU beats ISU, putting them at 9-2
Montana beats MSU, putting them at 8-3
MSU loses to UM, putting them at 8-3

All four teams in, in this scenario?

If Poly wins tonight, and UM loses to MSU, I am thinking Montana is out, with Poly taking their spot. :twocents:
Image
User avatar
Screamin_Eagle174
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 16619
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
I am a fan of: Peaches
A.K.A.: SE174
Location: Spokanistan

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 11-8

Post by Screamin_Eagle174 »

EWURanger wrote:
Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:
If CP beats Davis tonight, they will make the playoffs. :twocents:
I am wondering what will happen in the following scenario:

Cal-Poly beats Davis, putting them at 8-3
EWU beats ISU, putting them at 9-2
Montana beats MSU, putting them at 8-3
MSU loses to UM, putting them at 8-3

All four teams in, in this scenario?

If Poly wins tonight, and UM loses to MSU, I am thinking Montana is out, with Poly taking their spot. :twocents:
If all those scenarios play out, I see all of them making it and keeping out a 7-4 MVFC team. I don't know, it should be an interesting selection Sunday. :nod: Montana is out for sure at 7-4 (6-4 D-I).
User avatar
EWURanger
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 4712
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:06 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern Washington

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 11-8

Post by EWURanger »

Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:
EWURanger wrote:I don't know, Sac has at the very least lived up to expectations, and slightly turned the corner. They were within a couple plays or two of being in contention for the Big Sky title. So close, but no cigar. They have a fair amount of players returning next year though I believe.
Fair point, but I guess I expected Sac to really turn the corner this year - so for me, anyway, it wasn't much of a surprise to see them playing really well. I had a feeling they would contend for a play-off spot this year. They might be one of the best teams to be left out.
Image
User avatar
native
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5635
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
I am a fan of: Weber State
Location: On the road from Cibola

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 11-8

Post by native »

EWURanger wrote:
Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:
Fair point, but I guess I expected Sac to really turn the corner this year - so for me, anyway, it wasn't much of a surprise to see them playing really well. I had a feeling they would contend for a play-off spot this year. They might be one of the best teams to be left out.
DII teams on the schedule and excessive FBS games come back to haunt.

Right about now I am wishing that Weber were playing another FCS team next week instead of Texas Tech.

...OR maybe they beat TT. :mrgreen:
Proud Prince of Purple Pomposity
Image
Image
Image
YT is not a communist. He's just a ...young pup.
User avatar
Wildcat Ryan
Level3
Level3
Posts: 2798
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 6:59 pm
I am a fan of: WEBER STATE
A.K.A.: WILDCAT, WILDCATFAN

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 11-8

Post by Wildcat Ryan »

native wrote:
EWURanger wrote:
Fair point, but I guess I expected Sac to really turn the corner this year - so for me, anyway, it wasn't much of a surprise to see them playing really well. I had a feeling they would contend for a play-off spot this year. They might be one of the best teams to be left out.
DII teams on the schedule and excessive FBS games come back to haunt.

Right about now I am wishing that Weber were playing another FCS team next week instead of Texas Tech.

...OR maybe they beat TT. :mrgreen:

Me to, I'd rather Weber play @ like Southern Utah instead
Image
User avatar
native
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5635
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
I am a fan of: Weber State
Location: On the road from Cibola

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 11-8

Post by native »

Wildcat Ryan wrote:
native wrote:
DII teams on the schedule and excessive FBS games come back to haunt.

Right about now I am wishing that Weber were playing another FCS team next week instead of Texas Tech.

...OR maybe they beat TT. :mrgreen:

Me to, I'd rather Weber play @ like Southern Utah instead
I am OK with one FBS game per season, but two FBS games is one too many. I am glad that Weber has stopped playing down and plays a straight DI schedule, though.
Proud Prince of Purple Pomposity
Image
Image
Image
YT is not a communist. He's just a ...young pup.
User avatar
SDHornet
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19511
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 11-8

Post by SDHornet »

EWURanger wrote:
Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:
Fair point, but I guess I expected Sac to really turn the corner this year - so for me, anyway, it wasn't much of a surprise to see them playing really well. I had a feeling they would contend for a play-off spot this year. They might be one of the best teams to be left out.
Considering our projected starting QB was hurt in the first half of the first game of the season, our two top WR's got hurt and missed almost all of the season, the Hornets did a tremendous job this season. I think we only have 15 seniors and if the two WR's can get their medical redshirt approved, we will be stacked next season on offense...stacked. :nod:
User avatar
SDHornet
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19511
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 11-8

Post by SDHornet »

native wrote:
Wildcat Ryan wrote:

Me to, I'd rather Weber play @ like Southern Utah instead
I am OK with one FBS game per season, but two FBS games is one too many. I am glad that Weber has stopped playing down and plays a straight DI schedule, though.
The Hornets need to drop the D-II game. If the administration is serious about getting to the playoffs, they can not afford to burn a game on a non-counter.
Post Reply