I don't feel like doing actual math, so... CASE CLOSED
WAC Expansion: UTSA/Texas St to give formal presentations
Re: WAC Expansion: UTSA/Texas St to give formal presentation
Ours were, what, $230?
I don't feel like doing actual math, so... CASE CLOSED
I don't feel like doing actual math, so... CASE CLOSED
Re: WAC Expansion: UTSA/Texas St to give formal presentation
ODU's student athletic fees are (barely) higher than JMU's, so I'm not sure where he's getting the $700 figure. Plus they're both around $1100, not $1400.rationalgriz wrote:At James Madison, they are $1,400 per student per year. Old Dominion and Appalachian State are about $700 per student/year; while the average in the Big Sky Conference is $200/student/year.
rationalgriz wrote:Heck, had we gone to the WAC a few years ago, we’d probably be in a much more lucrative Mountain West Conference right now with schools we consider on academic par – Wyoming, Colorado State, etc.
Not that he isn't saying the truth, but there's nothing more attractive than the AD you're courting saying that they'd rather be in the MWC...and showing that they'd move from the WAC as soon as they get the chance. And in another indirect way, he just dissed the WAC's academic standards compared to the MWC. If I was the WAC's commissioner, I'd be really upset at the above statement. But then again, the WAC is a helluva desperate league right now.
Otherwise, the letter gives great insights into the Montana situation, and the FCS as a whole.
- 89Hen
- Supporter

- Posts: 39283
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: WAC Expansion: UTSA/Texas St to give formal presentation
T-Dog wrote:Our season tickets are $120. Now someone figure it out.
Then I take back my bullshit call and change it to incredulous.Silenoz wrote:Ours were, what, $230?

-
Ursus A. Horribilis
- Maroon Supporter

- Posts: 21615
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 12:17 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana Grizzlies
- A.K.A.: Bill Brasky
Re: WAC Expansion: UTSA/Texas St to give formal presentation
$230 was the absolute min. also for endzone seating.89Hen wrote:T-Dog wrote:Our season tickets are $120. Now someone figure it out.Then I take back my bullshit call and change it to incredulous.Silenoz wrote:Ours were, what, $230?
-
BearIt
- Level2

- Posts: 500
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 6:07 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
- Location: Silverthorne, CO
Re: WAC Expansion: UTSA/Texas St to give formal presentation
Wow, The FCS is pretty financially dependent on the Griz being there.The FCS playoff system is hurting financially. We produced $1.1 million of last year’s budget of $2.5 million. The other 11 games produced less than $1 million TOTAL.
I wonder how long the playoff system will survive if Montana isn't there for several seasons whether it is from not qualifying or moving to FBS.
-
Ursus A. Horribilis
- Maroon Supporter

- Posts: 21615
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 12:17 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana Grizzlies
- A.K.A.: Bill Brasky
Re: WAC Expansion: UTSA/Texas St to give formal presentation
I wasn't trying to be a prick to a lot of the posters that are always bitching about the home playoff games for MT, App, & Delaware but I've been saying this for years now. They want to cry about the fact that the NCAA has to be able to float this playoff on the back of these teams. Well see how fucking long it lasts without the heavyweights bringing in the dough to support it.BearIt wrote:Wow, The FCS is pretty financially dependent on the Griz being there.The FCS playoff system is hurting financially. We produced $1.1 million of last year’s budget of $2.5 million. The other 11 games produced less than $1 million TOTAL.
I wonder how long the playoff system will survive if Montana isn't there for several seasons whether it is from not qualifying or moving to FBS.
I've maintained that pretty much any team not named MT, App., or Delaware ought to be fucking thanking us for the largesse we provide them instead of crying about the home games we get.
- DJH
- Level3

- Posts: 3210
- Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 9:17 pm
- I am a fan of: The MVC
- Location: NORTHERN IOWA
Re: WAC Expansion: UTSA/Texas St to give formal presentation
Oh BS. Technically the NCAA is supposed to be a non-profit organization anyway. I'm sure the FBS bowl games, and the NCAA basketball tournament are the ONLY sports to actually make money. Are they going to start cutting EVERY other postseason for EVERY other sport? Because you can bet your ass that women's lacrosse and swimming and diving teams all over the country are losing money for the NCAA too. The NCAA has plenty of money.
The FCS and the FCS playoffs are not going anywhere. Personally, I wish Montana would just shit or get off the pot. If you want to leave, just GTFO, and stop talking about it.
The FCS and the FCS playoffs are not going anywhere. Personally, I wish Montana would just shit or get off the pot. If you want to leave, just GTFO, and stop talking about it.
UNI FIGHT
- dbackjon
- Moderator Team

- Posts: 45628
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
Re: WAC Expansion: UTSA/Texas St to give formal presentation
yup. Other than men's basketball, no post-season tourney makes money. Men's hoops subsidize the whole system.DJH wrote:Oh BS. Technically the NCAA is supposed to be a non-profit organization anyway. I'm sure the FBS bowl games, and the NCAA basketball tournament are the ONLY sports to actually make money. Are they going to start cutting EVERY other postseason for EVERY other sport? Because you can bet your ass that women's lacrosse and swimming and diving teams all over the country are losing money for the NCAA too. The NCAA has plenty of money.
The FCS and the FCS playoffs are not going anywhere. Personally, I wish Montana would just shit or get off the pot. If you want to leave, just GTFO, and stop talking about it.
Re: WAC Expansion: UTSA/Texas St to give formal presentation
Yeah, I think that email is more doom and gloom than some are giving it credit for. I mean, it's an AMAZING piece of information, but Montana isn't the end all be all of the FCS playoffs. If they go FBS, others will take their place. Not to toot my own horn here, but ODU for one is probably a good example...and we're here to stay for the forseeable future. JMU is another, and I'm sure there are more.
By the way, if the Griz move up, does Montana St. begin getting their former FCS pool of recruits? Does MSU pick up the legacy what UM will leave behind in that state?
By the way, if the Griz move up, does Montana St. begin getting their former FCS pool of recruits? Does MSU pick up the legacy what UM will leave behind in that state?
-
Ursus A. Horribilis
- Maroon Supporter

- Posts: 21615
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 12:17 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana Grizzlies
- A.K.A.: Bill Brasky
Re: WAC Expansion: UTSA/Texas St to give formal presentation
The first thing they'd do is trim expenses if it was losing too much money. That's the fact Jack.
-
Ursus A. Horribilis
- Maroon Supporter

- Posts: 21615
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 12:17 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana Grizzlies
- A.K.A.: Bill Brasky
Re: WAC Expansion: UTSA/Texas St to give formal presentation
Possibly a little bit. I know that I will be traveling to MSU to watch playoff football if this all comes to fruition. It is extremely doubtful that the Griz will be in a bowl game that I will give a flying fuck about. I will become a lot more of a fan of MSU Football than I have ever been in the past. To be honest though, I've always rooted for them if they weren't playing us.∞∞∞ wrote:Yeah, I think that email is more doom and gloom than some are giving it credit for. I mean, it's an AMAZING piece of information, but Montana isn't the end all be all of the FCS playoffs. If they go FBS, others will take their place. Not to toot my own horn here, but ODU for one is probably a good example...and we're here to stay for the forseeable future. JMU is another, and I'm sure there are more.
By the way, if the Griz move up, does Montana St. begin getting their former FCS pool of recruits? Does MSU pick up the legacy what UM will leave behind in that state?
Re: WAC Expansion: UTSA/Texas St to give formal presentation
Does this email change your mind about not wanting to move up? I feel like it paints a bleak picture for UM, but I'm trying to see this from the perspective of an AD who may simply be trying to find a reason for making the jump. There's a lot of reasons why Montana should go, but I think very little for why they shouldn't. Maybe there really aren't many reasons UM shouldn't, but my gut is telling me that there are and he purposely didn't include them in the email.Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:The first thing they'd do is trim expenses if it was losing too much money. That's the fact Jack.
Last edited by ∞∞∞ on Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- DJH
- Level3

- Posts: 3210
- Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 9:17 pm
- I am a fan of: The MVC
- Location: NORTHERN IOWA
Re: WAC Expansion: UTSA/Texas St to give formal presentation
Actually, the first thing they would/did do is ADD teams to the playoffs. That IS a fact, jack.Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:The first thing they'd do is trim expenses if it was losing too much money. That's the fact Jack.
UNI FIGHT
-
Ursus A. Horribilis
- Maroon Supporter

- Posts: 21615
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 12:17 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana Grizzlies
- A.K.A.: Bill Brasky
Re: WAC Expansion: UTSA/Texas St to give formal presentation
I think it was fairly open and honest. It doesn't change my mind because it is slanted in the direction you've expressed a little bit though. As with UM they always lay out the expenses very clearly but the revenues are somewhat glossed over. A lot of the revenue that SHOULD be classified as football revenue are not. I'm sure if the BSC members were to let us have the money WE are responsible for then it would tip the scales slightly.∞∞∞ wrote:Does this email change your mind about not wanting to move up? I feel like it paints a bleak picture for UM, but I'm trying to see this from the perspective of an AD who may simply be trying to find a reason for making the jump. There's a lot of reasons why Montana should go, but I think very little for why they shouldn't. Maybe there really aren't many reasons UM shouldn't, but my gut is telling me that there are and he purposely didn't include them in the email.Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:The first thing they'd do is trim expenses if it was losing too much money. That's the fact Jack.
On one hand he talks about the TV revenue that is accorded to the home school when the Griz are involved. I get that, but how about in OUR OWN school, at our own games we accord the money made AT OUR games to our own football program?
There was a ton of good info. in there but it was skewed that direction for a reason. As I said about a year ago what you do to get the fan base moving the way you want them to go is lay out a couple of options...one shitty that you know they won't go for, one that may not be what a lot of the fan base wants but is better than the less attractive option, while saying that staying with what you're doing is untenable.
Adding things like "the faculty doesn't consider BSC members as peer institutions" seems like an emotional bunch of BS that had no business being in there.
-
Ursus A. Horribilis
- Maroon Supporter

- Posts: 21615
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 12:17 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana Grizzlies
- A.K.A.: Bill Brasky
Re: WAC Expansion: UTSA/Texas St to give formal presentation
Very likely. They would then completely regionalize it like D2. Good stuff right?DJH wrote:Actually, the first thing they would/did do is ADD teams to the playoffs. That IS a fact, jack.Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:The first thing they'd do is trim expenses if it was losing too much money. That's the fact Jack.
-
frinq
- Level1

- Posts: 457
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 4:14 pm
- I am a fan of: Portland State University
- A.K.A.: frinq
Re: WAC Expansion: UTSA/Texas St to give formal presentation
If you ask any faculty anywhere who they compare themselves to, the answer will always be several academic rungs above where they actually are. I agree; this is AD BS. I chuckled when I read that "Montana faculty" figured they were on par with U. Washington (or most of the others mentioned).
-
Ursus A. Horribilis
- Maroon Supporter

- Posts: 21615
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 12:17 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana Grizzlies
- A.K.A.: Bill Brasky
Re: WAC Expansion: UTSA/Texas St to give formal presentation
Exactly. It was as unnecessary as it gets.frinq wrote:If you ask any faculty anywhere who they compare themselves to, the answer will always be several academic rungs above where they actually are. I agree; this is AD BS. I chuckled when I read that "Montana faculty" figured they were on par with U. Washington (or most of the others mentioned).
If that truly is part of all this then integrity of it just went down quite a few notches.
- SDHornet
- Supporter

- Posts: 19511
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
- I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets
Re: WAC Expansion: UTSA/Texas St to give formal presentation
In the email he also put quite a bit of stock in making money at a bowl game which isn't fact unless its a BCS bowl game or one of the very few non-BCS bowl games (Holiday Bowl has a decent payout, no idea about others). 
Re: WAC Expansion: UTSA/Texas St to give formal presentation
eGriz.com was mentioned in CBS's College Football Blog
http://www.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entr ... 8/25072871
http://www.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entr ... 8/25072871
Montana's AD Jim O'Day has heard these concerns, and replied with a remarkably long, detailed e-mail that was circulated among Montana fans before being posted to eGriz.com, a popular Montana Grizzlies fan board. We have confirmed with the Montana athletic department that the letter is genuine. And while it's much too long to post here in full, there was one particularly scary detail about how the school currently struggles with finances (bolded emphasis ours):
- Fresno St. Alum
- Level3

- Posts: 2623
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 3:03 pm
- I am a fan of: poontang
- A.K.A.: Rainman
- Location: My House
Re: WAC Expansion: UTSA/Texas St to give formal presentation
I think the minimum pay out for a bowl is 750K per team. I'm not 100% on it, it was in the local paper a few years ago. I know it 750K(my rainman instinct says so) but the fresno bee might be wrong.SDHornet wrote:In the email he also put quite a bit of stock in making money at a bowl game which isn't fact unless its a BCS bowl game or one of the very few non-BCS bowl games (Holiday Bowl has a decent payout, no idea about others).

- Fresno St. Alum
- Level3

- Posts: 2623
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 3:03 pm
- I am a fan of: poontang
- A.K.A.: Rainman
- Location: My House
Re: WAC Expansion: UTSA/Texas St to give formal presentation
What's funny is you guys bitching about a probable future rule that won't matter one bit to UTSA, Texas St., Montana if they want to move up. Let me simplify what Quinn(csi) said. WAC is a desperate ho looking for dick. Montana, UTSA, Texas St., have dicks and want to bang her. Montana is the only one worried about STDs. Denver & Seattle are girls with dildos and the WAC is flirting with them too. Point is they'll be in the WAC if they whip it out. The NCAA won't cock block that 

Re: WAC Expansion: UTSA/Texas St to give formal presentation
now that is an analogy for the record books
Re: WAC Expansion: UTSA/Texas St to give formal presentation
Fresno St. Alum wrote:What's funny is you guys bitching about a probable future rule that won't matter one bit to UTSA, Texas St., Montana if they want to move up. Let me simplify what Quinn(csi) said. WAC is a desperate ho looking for dick. Montana, UTSA, Texas St., have dicks and want to bang her. Montana is the only one worried about STDs. Denver & Seattle are girls with dildos and the WAC is flirting with them too. Point is they'll be in the WAC if they whip it out. The NCAA won't cock block that
Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway. - John Wayne
- freebird
- Level1

- Posts: 162
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 12:57 pm
- I am a fan of: 2010 National Champions
- A.K.A.: Eastern Washington
Re: WAC Expansion: UTSA/Texas St to give formal presentation
Montana only has around 30 in state players on their roster (covering all 5 eligibility years). I'm not sure how many of those are walk ons and some might still be on their roster if they were recruiting at the BCS level. So MSU would probably pick up some in state recruits, but it would not appear to be a significant number.∞∞∞ wrote:Yeah, I think that email is more doom and gloom than some are giving it credit for. I mean, it's an AMAZING piece of information, but Montana isn't the end all be all of the FCS playoffs. If they go FBS, others will take their place. Not to toot my own horn here, but ODU for one is probably a good example...and we're here to stay for the forseeable future. JMU is another, and I'm sure there are more.
By the way, if the Griz move up, does Montana St. begin getting their former FCS pool of recruits? Does MSU pick up the legacy what UM will leave behind in that state?

