2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility
2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility
This information is to help keep track of the playoff picture. There are 106 FCS teams for 2010. This number does not include the SWAC or Ivy League since those conferences choose to not participate in the FCS playoffs. To qualify for an at-large bid to the playoffs, a team needs a minimum of 7 Division 1 (FBS or FCS) wins. If a team is categorized as a BUBBLE team, they must win all of their remaining D1 games to be eligible for an at-large bid. If a team is categorized as ELIMINATED, they are not capable of winning 7 D1 games during this season. Last season, 27 of the eligible teams reached 7 D1 wins. This year, with the addition of two new auto bid conferences (Big South & NEC), there are also 2 additional at-large positions available.
After week 4, two teams (Lamar & Savannah State) have been eliminated. There are 19 teams that are on the bubble. Three of those teams (Eastern Illinois, Elon and Southern Illinois) participated in last year's playoffs.
Bubble Teams (19) - Butler, Campbell, Charleston Southern, Eastern Illinois, Eastern Kentucky, Elon, Howard, Idaho State, Indiana State, Nicholls State, North Carolina A&T, North Carolina Central, Presbyterian, Southern Illinois, Southern Utah, Stony Brook, Tennessee Tech, Tennessee-Martin, Valparaiso
Eliminated in Week 4 (2) - Lamar, Savannah State
After week 4, two teams (Lamar & Savannah State) have been eliminated. There are 19 teams that are on the bubble. Three of those teams (Eastern Illinois, Elon and Southern Illinois) participated in last year's playoffs.
Bubble Teams (19) - Butler, Campbell, Charleston Southern, Eastern Illinois, Eastern Kentucky, Elon, Howard, Idaho State, Indiana State, Nicholls State, North Carolina A&T, North Carolina Central, Presbyterian, Southern Illinois, Southern Utah, Stony Brook, Tennessee Tech, Tennessee-Martin, Valparaiso
Eliminated in Week 4 (2) - Lamar, Savannah State
Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility
The winner of the big South could possibly be 6-5 and in the playoffs... I see Stony Brook possibly being 6-5, with a win over a D2 for 5 D1 wins and in the playoffs
Crazy huh?
- kuntryboimike
- Level2

- Posts: 660
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 2:50 pm
- I am a fan of: Liberty
Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility
Is it possible? Sure. Is it gonna happen? Not a chance
haha
Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility
Umm, Stony Brook is unlikely to be 6-5. I see us at 7-4 at the very worst.
Final 7 games are:
Presbyterian
Coastal Carolina
Lafayette
VMI
Liberty
Charleston Southern
Gardner Webb
Final 7 games are:
Presbyterian
Coastal Carolina
Lafayette
VMI
Liberty
Charleston Southern
Gardner Webb
Last edited by Redwyn on Sun Sep 26, 2010 4:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.


-
danefan
- Supporter

- Posts: 7989
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:51 pm
- I am a fan of: UAlbany
- Location: Hudson Valley, New York
Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility
Would've happened last year if the Big South had an AQ. SBU was 6-5 and won the tiebreaker head-to-head.kuntryboimike wrote:Is it possible? Sure. Is it gonna happen? Not a chancehaha
- kuntryboimike
- Level2

- Posts: 660
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 2:50 pm
- I am a fan of: Liberty
Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility
At SB
Playing AT Liberty? I really just don't see it happening. If we were at SB this year I would be very concerned. The only conference game I'm semi-worried about is playing AT Coastal.
Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility
kuntryboimike wrote:At SBPlaying AT Liberty? I really just don't see it happening. If we were at SB this year I would be very concerned. The only conference game I'm semi-worried about is playing AT Coastal.
SBU is the best team in the conference other than LU. We should be very worried about that game, especially since it more than likely will decide the conference.

Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility
Exactly. SBU doesn't do anything great OOC, but they do get ready for the BSC schedule and they always get better as the season goes on. They'll be ready to contend for a title.danefan wrote:Would've happened last year if the Big South had an AQ. SBU was 6-5 and won the tiebreaker head-to-head.kuntryboimike wrote:Is it possible? Sure. Is it gonna happen? Not a chancehaha

- SDHornet
- Supporter

- Posts: 19511
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
- I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets
Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility
SumItUp, I think cal-davis is on the bubble...although I am not sure if South Alabama is a counter as I think they are still in transition (making them a non-counter
).
They are currently 1-3 with an FBS game (a very weak SJSU team) this week.
They are currently 1-3 with an FBS game (a very weak SJSU team) this week.
Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility
I could use a little help.
1/ Are there any teams that are ineligible for a at-large bid? (Georgia State, South Alabama, Lamar, etc...??) I have not included South Alabama in the list of 106 teams. Currently, I have not listed any team as ineligible.
2/ Do games against Georgia State, South Alabama, ODU and Lamar count as a D-1 win? Currently, a win against these schools is considered a D1 win.
If someone has different information, please provide a source.
1/ Are there any teams that are ineligible for a at-large bid? (Georgia State, South Alabama, Lamar, etc...??) I have not included South Alabama in the list of 106 teams. Currently, I have not listed any team as ineligible.
2/ Do games against Georgia State, South Alabama, ODU and Lamar count as a D-1 win? Currently, a win against these schools is considered a D1 win.
If someone has different information, please provide a source.
Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility
^ South Dakota, North Dakota, and Bryant are all ineligible this year.

Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility
ODU was eligible for the playoffs last year in our inagural season (and we did reach 7 D1 wins), so I don't see why GSU and South Alabama and Lamar wouldn't be eligible.SumItUp wrote:1/ Are there any teams that are ineligible for a at-large bid? (Georgia State, South Alabama, Lamar, etc...??) I have not included South Alabama in the list of 106 teams. Currently, I have not listed any team as ineligible..
Yes.SumItUp wrote:2/ Do games against Georgia State, South Alabama, ODU and Lamar count as a D-1 win? Currently, a win against these schools is considered a D1 win..
edit: I just looked at South Alabama's schedule and I don't think they have enough FCS opponents to qualify, so I guess they're ineligible. Lamar has eight FCS schools scheduled but already lost 2, probably disqualifying them. GSU has 1 FCS win and 6 FCS schools left on the schedule (and the BCS National Champion).
- CatMom
- Level3

- Posts: 4289
- Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:28 pm
- I am a fan of: Texas St & Tight Ends
- A.K.A.: CatMILF
- Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility
On The Bubble
Northwestern State
1-3 with the 1 win being a DII, with 7 games left
I'd also include SLU
1-3
It's a DI win but they have 7 games left and would have to go 6-1 in conference.
Northwestern State
1-3 with the 1 win being a DII, with 7 games left
I'd also include SLU
1-3
It's a DI win but they have 7 games left and would have to go 6-1 in conference.
Last edited by CatMom on Sun Sep 26, 2010 7:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility
thanks dgreco for the info on the XSD's and Bryant.dgreco wrote:^ South Dakota, North Dakota, and Bryant are all ineligible this year.
Last year, South Dakota, North Dakota, Bryant, Central Arkansas, Winston-Salem, NC Central and Presbyterian were all ineligible due to reclassifying/provisional status.
Central Arkansas is now eligible.
Winston-Salem left D1.
Are each of the others still ineligible?
Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility
dbackjon wrote:Thanks for doing this again, SumItUp
- CatMom
- Level3

- Posts: 4289
- Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:28 pm
- I am a fan of: Texas St & Tight Ends
- A.K.A.: CatMILF
- Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility
Per the NCAA Stats siteSumItUp wrote:thanks dgreco for the info on the XSD's and Bryant.dgreco wrote:^ South Dakota, North Dakota, and Bryant are all ineligible this year.
Last year, South Dakota, North Dakota, Bryant, Central Arkansas, Winston-Salem, NC Central and Presbyterian were all ineligible due to reclassifying/provisional status.
Central Arkansas is now eligible.
Winston-Salem left D1.
Are each of the others still ineligible?
Reclassifying/Provisional
South Alabama
Georgia State
N C Central
North Dakota
Lamar
Presbyterian
Bryant
South Dakota
While UCA was reclassifying they counted as a DI win/loss for the SLC.
Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility
I don't get it. Why was ODU eligible last year while GSU and Lamar aren't because they're under "Reclassifying/Provisional?" Pretty sure those two are eligible...not sure about the others.CatMom wrote:Per the NCAA Stats siteSumItUp wrote:
thanks dgreco for the info on the XSD's and Bryant.
Last year, South Dakota, North Dakota, Bryant, Central Arkansas, Winston-Salem, NC Central and Presbyterian were all ineligible due to reclassifying/provisional status.
Central Arkansas is now eligible.
Winston-Salem left D1.
Are each of the others still ineligible?
Reclassifying/Provisional
South Alabama
Georgia State
N C Central
North Dakota
Lamar
Presbyterian
Bryant
While UCA was reclassifying they counted as a DI win/loss for the SLC.
South Dakota
- CatMom
- Level3

- Posts: 4289
- Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:28 pm
- I am a fan of: Texas St & Tight Ends
- A.K.A.: CatMILF
- Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility
Lamar confuses me because they are already part of the SLC for everything else and are bringing back their football as opposed to being new to it. This tends to make me think they count, as they are not moving up from a lower division. Someone needs to clarify it for me.
- SuperHornet
- SuperHornet

- Posts: 20858
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:24 pm
- I am a fan of: Sac State
- Location: Twentynine Palms, CA
Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility
Your list is a bit confusing because it leaves out the vast majority of FCS teams. Are you assuming that anyone with a win is "above" the bubble?

SuperHornet's Athletics Hall of Fame includes Jacksonville State kicker Ashley Martin, the first girl to score in a Division I football game. She kicked 3 PATs in a 2001 game for J-State.
- SDHornet
- Supporter

- Posts: 19511
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
- I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets
Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility
Yes. Anyone not listed is still at least 2 losses away from being eliminated from the playoffs. So if we lose to MSU, we will then be on the bubble with a 2-3 (1-3 D1 ) record and only 6 D1 games left for a maximum possible 7 D1 wins if the Hornets were to miraculously run the table.SuperHornet wrote:Your list is a bit confusing because it leaves out the vast majority of FCS teams. Are you assuming that anyone with a win is "above" the bubble?
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter

- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility
You've been here 3 years and this STILL confuses you?SuperHornet wrote:Your list is a bit confusing because it leaves out the vast majority of FCS teams. Are you assuming that anyone with a win is "above" the bubble?
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

- BlueHen86
- Supporter

- Posts: 13555
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:40 pm
- I am a fan of: The McManus Brothers
- A.K.A.: Duffman
- Location: Area XI
Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility
I thought the SWAC did participate in the playoffs, or did that change? Last I knew, SWAC teams were eligible for the playoffs, it's just that the SWAC has tie-ins to post season games that make it unlikely (but possible) that a SWAC team could be in the playoffs.SumItUp wrote:This information is to help keep track of the playoff picture. There are 106 FCS teams for 2010. This number does not include the SWAC or Ivy League since those conferences choose to not participate in the FCS playoffs. To qualify for an at-large bid to the playoffs, a team needs a minimum of 7 Division 1 (FBS or FCS) wins. If a team is categorized as a BUBBLE team, they must win all of their remaining D1 games to be eligible for an at-large bid. If a team is categorized as ELIMINATED, they are not capable of winning 7 D1 games during this season. Last season, 27 of the eligible teams reached 7 D1 wins. This year, with the addition of two new auto bid conferences (Big South & NEC), there are also 2 additional at-large positions available.
After week 4, two teams (Lamar & Savannah State) have been eliminated. There are 19 teams that are on the bubble. Three of those teams (Eastern Illinois, Elon and Southern Illinois) participated in last year's playoffs.
Bubble Teams (19) - Butler, Campbell, Charleston Southern, Eastern Illinois, Eastern Kentucky, Elon, Howard, Idaho State, Indiana State, Nicholls State, North Carolina A&T, North Carolina Central, Presbyterian, Southern Illinois, Southern Utah, Stony Brook, Tennessee Tech, Tennessee-Martin, Valparaiso
Eliminated in Week 4 (2) - Lamar, Savannah State
- UNHWildCats
- Level4

- Posts: 6984
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:47 pm
- I am a fan of: New Hampshire
- A.K.A.: UNHWildCats
Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility
I will be putting together my first chart tomorrow that will include every team and its elimination number.
- UNHWildCats
- Level4

- Posts: 6984
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:47 pm
- I am a fan of: New Hampshire
- A.K.A.: UNHWildCats
Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility
SWAC teams remain eligible for at large selections, but the division winners meet for the SWAC title. Its unlikely a SWAC team would ever get a at large invite but they do remain eligible.BlueHen86 wrote:I thought the SWAC did participate in the playoffs, or did that change? Last I knew, SWAC teams were eligible for the playoffs, it's just that the SWAC has tie-ins to post season games that make it unlikely (but possible) that a SWAC team could be in the playoffs.SumItUp wrote:This information is to help keep track of the playoff picture. There are 106 FCS teams for 2010. This number does not include the SWAC or Ivy League since those conferences choose to not participate in the FCS playoffs. To qualify for an at-large bid to the playoffs, a team needs a minimum of 7 Division 1 (FBS or FCS) wins. If a team is categorized as a BUBBLE team, they must win all of their remaining D1 games to be eligible for an at-large bid. If a team is categorized as ELIMINATED, they are not capable of winning 7 D1 games during this season. Last season, 27 of the eligible teams reached 7 D1 wins. This year, with the addition of two new auto bid conferences (Big South & NEC), there are also 2 additional at-large positions available.
After week 4, two teams (Lamar & Savannah State) have been eliminated. There are 19 teams that are on the bubble. Three of those teams (Eastern Illinois, Elon and Southern Illinois) participated in last year's playoffs.
Bubble Teams (19) - Butler, Campbell, Charleston Southern, Eastern Illinois, Eastern Kentucky, Elon, Howard, Idaho State, Indiana State, Nicholls State, North Carolina A&T, North Carolina Central, Presbyterian, Southern Illinois, Southern Utah, Stony Brook, Tennessee Tech, Tennessee-Martin, Valparaiso
Eliminated in Week 4 (2) - Lamar, Savannah State


