2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility

Football Championship Subdivision discussions
SumItUp
Level1
Level1
Posts: 216
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 2:29 pm
I am a fan of: Liberty Flames

2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility

Post by SumItUp »

This information is to help keep track of the playoff picture. There are 106 FCS teams for 2010. This number does not include the SWAC or Ivy League since those conferences choose to not participate in the FCS playoffs. To qualify for an at-large bid to the playoffs, a team needs a minimum of 7 Division 1 (FBS or FCS) wins. If a team is categorized as a BUBBLE team, they must win all of their remaining D1 games to be eligible for an at-large bid. If a team is categorized as ELIMINATED, they are not capable of winning 7 D1 games during this season. Last season, 27 of the eligible teams reached 7 D1 wins. This year, with the addition of two new auto bid conferences (Big South & NEC), there are also 2 additional at-large positions available.

After week 4, two teams (Lamar & Savannah State) have been eliminated. There are 19 teams that are on the bubble. Three of those teams (Eastern Illinois, Elon and Southern Illinois) participated in last year's playoffs.

Bubble Teams (19) - Butler, Campbell, Charleston Southern, Eastern Illinois, Eastern Kentucky, Elon, Howard, Idaho State, Indiana State, Nicholls State, North Carolina A&T, North Carolina Central, Presbyterian, Southern Illinois, Southern Utah, Stony Brook, Tennessee Tech, Tennessee-Martin, Valparaiso

Eliminated in Week 4 (2) - Lamar, Savannah State
User avatar
KAUMASS
Posts: 67
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:56 am
I am a fan of: UAlbany
A.K.A.: KAUMASS

Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility

Post by KAUMASS »

The winner of the big South could possibly be 6-5 and in the playoffs... I see Stony Brook possibly being 6-5, with a win over a D2 for 5 D1 wins and in the playoffs :o Crazy huh?
User avatar
kuntryboimike
Level2
Level2
Posts: 660
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 2:50 pm
I am a fan of: Liberty

Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility

Post by kuntryboimike »

Is it possible? Sure. Is it gonna happen? Not a chance :) haha
Redwyn
Level1
Level1
Posts: 151
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 8:32 pm
I am a fan of: Stony Brook

Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility

Post by Redwyn »

Umm, Stony Brook is unlikely to be 6-5. I see us at 7-4 at the very worst.
Final 7 games are:
Presbyterian
Coastal Carolina
Lafayette
VMI
Liberty
Charleston Southern
Gardner Webb
Last edited by Redwyn on Sun Sep 26, 2010 4:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Image
danefan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 7989
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:51 pm
I am a fan of: UAlbany
Location: Hudson Valley, New York

Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility

Post by danefan »

kuntryboimike wrote:Is it possible? Sure. Is it gonna happen? Not a chance :) haha
Would've happened last year if the Big South had an AQ. SBU was 6-5 and won the tiebreaker head-to-head. :thumb:
User avatar
kuntryboimike
Level2
Level2
Posts: 660
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 2:50 pm
I am a fan of: Liberty

Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility

Post by kuntryboimike »

At SB :) Playing AT Liberty? I really just don't see it happening. If we were at SB this year I would be very concerned. The only conference game I'm semi-worried about is playing AT Coastal.
User avatar
ToTheLeft
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 6:40 pm
I am a fan of: Liberty University

Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility

Post by ToTheLeft »

kuntryboimike wrote:At SB :) Playing AT Liberty? I really just don't see it happening. If we were at SB this year I would be very concerned. The only conference game I'm semi-worried about is playing AT Coastal.
:ohno:

SBU is the best team in the conference other than LU. We should be very worried about that game, especially since it more than likely will decide the conference.
Image
User avatar
ToTheLeft
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 6:40 pm
I am a fan of: Liberty University

Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility

Post by ToTheLeft »

danefan wrote:
kuntryboimike wrote:Is it possible? Sure. Is it gonna happen? Not a chance :) haha
Would've happened last year if the Big South had an AQ. SBU was 6-5 and won the tiebreaker head-to-head. :thumb:
Exactly. SBU doesn't do anything great OOC, but they do get ready for the BSC schedule and they always get better as the season goes on. They'll be ready to contend for a title.
Image
User avatar
SDHornet
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19511
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets

Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility

Post by SDHornet »

SumItUp, I think cal-davis is on the bubble...although I am not sure if South Alabama is a counter as I think they are still in transition (making them a non-counter :?: ).

They are currently 1-3 with an FBS game (a very weak SJSU team) this week.
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45628
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility

Post by dbackjon »

Thanks for doing this again, SumItUp
:thumb:
SumItUp
Level1
Level1
Posts: 216
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 2:29 pm
I am a fan of: Liberty Flames

Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility

Post by SumItUp »

I could use a little help.

1/ Are there any teams that are ineligible for a at-large bid? (Georgia State, South Alabama, Lamar, etc...??) I have not included South Alabama in the list of 106 teams. Currently, I have not listed any team as ineligible.
2/ Do games against Georgia State, South Alabama, ODU and Lamar count as a D-1 win? Currently, a win against these schools is considered a D1 win.

If someone has different information, please provide a source.
User avatar
dgreco
Level2
Level2
Posts: 2024
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Bryant
Location: Boston

Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility

Post by dgreco »

^ South Dakota, North Dakota, and Bryant are all ineligible this year.
Image
Image
∞∞∞
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12373
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 7:30 am

Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility

Post by ∞∞∞ »

SumItUp wrote:1/ Are there any teams that are ineligible for a at-large bid? (Georgia State, South Alabama, Lamar, etc...??) I have not included South Alabama in the list of 106 teams. Currently, I have not listed any team as ineligible..
ODU was eligible for the playoffs last year in our inagural season (and we did reach 7 D1 wins), so I don't see why GSU and South Alabama and Lamar wouldn't be eligible.
SumItUp wrote:2/ Do games against Georgia State, South Alabama, ODU and Lamar count as a D-1 win? Currently, a win against these schools is considered a D1 win..
Yes.

edit: I just looked at South Alabama's schedule and I don't think they have enough FCS opponents to qualify, so I guess they're ineligible. Lamar has eight FCS schools scheduled but already lost 2, probably disqualifying them. GSU has 1 FCS win and 6 FCS schools left on the schedule (and the BCS National Champion).
User avatar
CatMom
Level3
Level3
Posts: 4289
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:28 pm
I am a fan of: Texas St & Tight Ends
A.K.A.: CatMILF
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility

Post by CatMom »

On The Bubble

Northwestern State
1-3 with the 1 win being a DII, with 7 games left

I'd also include SLU
1-3
It's a DI win but they have 7 games left and would have to go 6-1 in conference.
Last edited by CatMom on Sun Sep 26, 2010 7:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
SumItUp
Level1
Level1
Posts: 216
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 2:29 pm
I am a fan of: Liberty Flames

Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility

Post by SumItUp »

dgreco wrote:^ South Dakota, North Dakota, and Bryant are all ineligible this year.
thanks dgreco for the info on the XSD's and Bryant.

Last year, South Dakota, North Dakota, Bryant, Central Arkansas, Winston-Salem, NC Central and Presbyterian were all ineligible due to reclassifying/provisional status.

Central Arkansas is now eligible.
Winston-Salem left D1.
Are each of the others still ineligible?
SumItUp
Level1
Level1
Posts: 216
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 2:29 pm
I am a fan of: Liberty Flames

Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility

Post by SumItUp »

dbackjon wrote:Thanks for doing this again, SumItUp
:thumb:
User avatar
CatMom
Level3
Level3
Posts: 4289
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:28 pm
I am a fan of: Texas St & Tight Ends
A.K.A.: CatMILF
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility

Post by CatMom »

SumItUp wrote:
dgreco wrote:^ South Dakota, North Dakota, and Bryant are all ineligible this year.
thanks dgreco for the info on the XSD's and Bryant.

Last year, South Dakota, North Dakota, Bryant, Central Arkansas, Winston-Salem, NC Central and Presbyterian were all ineligible due to reclassifying/provisional status.

Central Arkansas is now eligible.
Winston-Salem left D1.
Are each of the others still ineligible?
Per the NCAA Stats site
Reclassifying/Provisional
South Alabama
Georgia State
N C Central
North Dakota
Lamar
Presbyterian
Bryant
South Dakota
While UCA was reclassifying they counted as a DI win/loss for the SLC.
∞∞∞
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12373
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 7:30 am

Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility

Post by ∞∞∞ »

CatMom wrote:
SumItUp wrote:
thanks dgreco for the info on the XSD's and Bryant.

Last year, South Dakota, North Dakota, Bryant, Central Arkansas, Winston-Salem, NC Central and Presbyterian were all ineligible due to reclassifying/provisional status.

Central Arkansas is now eligible.
Winston-Salem left D1.
Are each of the others still ineligible?
Per the NCAA Stats site
Reclassifying/Provisional
South Alabama
Georgia State
N C Central
North Dakota
Lamar
Presbyterian
Bryant

While UCA was reclassifying they counted as a DI win/loss for the SLC.
South Dakota
I don't get it. Why was ODU eligible last year while GSU and Lamar aren't because they're under "Reclassifying/Provisional?" Pretty sure those two are eligible...not sure about the others.
User avatar
CatMom
Level3
Level3
Posts: 4289
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:28 pm
I am a fan of: Texas St & Tight Ends
A.K.A.: CatMILF
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility

Post by CatMom »

Lamar confuses me because they are already part of the SLC for everything else and are bringing back their football as opposed to being new to it. This tends to make me think they count, as they are not moving up from a lower division. Someone needs to clarify it for me.
User avatar
SuperHornet
SuperHornet
SuperHornet
Posts: 20858
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:24 pm
I am a fan of: Sac State
Location: Twentynine Palms, CA

Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility

Post by SuperHornet »

Your list is a bit confusing because it leaves out the vast majority of FCS teams. Are you assuming that anyone with a win is "above" the bubble?
Image

SuperHornet's Athletics Hall of Fame includes Jacksonville State kicker Ashley Martin, the first girl to score in a Division I football game. She kicked 3 PATs in a 2001 game for J-State.
User avatar
SDHornet
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19511
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets

Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility

Post by SDHornet »

SuperHornet wrote:Your list is a bit confusing because it leaves out the vast majority of FCS teams. Are you assuming that anyone with a win is "above" the bubble?
Yes. Anyone not listed is still at least 2 losses away from being eliminated from the playoffs. So if we lose to MSU, we will then be on the bubble with a 2-3 (1-3 D1 ) record and only 6 D1 games left for a maximum possible 7 D1 wins if the Hornets were to miraculously run the table.
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility

Post by AZGrizFan »

SuperHornet wrote:Your list is a bit confusing because it leaves out the vast majority of FCS teams. Are you assuming that anyone with a win is "above" the bubble?
You've been here 3 years and this STILL confuses you? :rofl:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
BlueHen86
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13555
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:40 pm
I am a fan of: The McManus Brothers
A.K.A.: Duffman
Location: Area XI

Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility

Post by BlueHen86 »

SumItUp wrote:This information is to help keep track of the playoff picture. There are 106 FCS teams for 2010. This number does not include the SWAC or Ivy League since those conferences choose to not participate in the FCS playoffs. To qualify for an at-large bid to the playoffs, a team needs a minimum of 7 Division 1 (FBS or FCS) wins. If a team is categorized as a BUBBLE team, they must win all of their remaining D1 games to be eligible for an at-large bid. If a team is categorized as ELIMINATED, they are not capable of winning 7 D1 games during this season. Last season, 27 of the eligible teams reached 7 D1 wins. This year, with the addition of two new auto bid conferences (Big South & NEC), there are also 2 additional at-large positions available.

After week 4, two teams (Lamar & Savannah State) have been eliminated. There are 19 teams that are on the bubble. Three of those teams (Eastern Illinois, Elon and Southern Illinois) participated in last year's playoffs.

Bubble Teams (19) - Butler, Campbell, Charleston Southern, Eastern Illinois, Eastern Kentucky, Elon, Howard, Idaho State, Indiana State, Nicholls State, North Carolina A&T, North Carolina Central, Presbyterian, Southern Illinois, Southern Utah, Stony Brook, Tennessee Tech, Tennessee-Martin, Valparaiso

Eliminated in Week 4 (2) - Lamar, Savannah State
I thought the SWAC did participate in the playoffs, or did that change? Last I knew, SWAC teams were eligible for the playoffs, it's just that the SWAC has tie-ins to post season games that make it unlikely (but possible) that a SWAC team could be in the playoffs.
User avatar
UNHWildCats
Level4
Level4
Posts: 6984
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:47 pm
I am a fan of: New Hampshire
A.K.A.: UNHWildCats

Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility

Post by UNHWildCats »

I will be putting together my first chart tomorrow that will include every team and its elimination number.
User avatar
UNHWildCats
Level4
Level4
Posts: 6984
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:47 pm
I am a fan of: New Hampshire
A.K.A.: UNHWildCats

Re: 2010 At-Large Playoff Elimination & Eligibility

Post by UNHWildCats »

BlueHen86 wrote:
SumItUp wrote:This information is to help keep track of the playoff picture. There are 106 FCS teams for 2010. This number does not include the SWAC or Ivy League since those conferences choose to not participate in the FCS playoffs. To qualify for an at-large bid to the playoffs, a team needs a minimum of 7 Division 1 (FBS or FCS) wins. If a team is categorized as a BUBBLE team, they must win all of their remaining D1 games to be eligible for an at-large bid. If a team is categorized as ELIMINATED, they are not capable of winning 7 D1 games during this season. Last season, 27 of the eligible teams reached 7 D1 wins. This year, with the addition of two new auto bid conferences (Big South & NEC), there are also 2 additional at-large positions available.

After week 4, two teams (Lamar & Savannah State) have been eliminated. There are 19 teams that are on the bubble. Three of those teams (Eastern Illinois, Elon and Southern Illinois) participated in last year's playoffs.

Bubble Teams (19) - Butler, Campbell, Charleston Southern, Eastern Illinois, Eastern Kentucky, Elon, Howard, Idaho State, Indiana State, Nicholls State, North Carolina A&T, North Carolina Central, Presbyterian, Southern Illinois, Southern Utah, Stony Brook, Tennessee Tech, Tennessee-Martin, Valparaiso

Eliminated in Week 4 (2) - Lamar, Savannah State
I thought the SWAC did participate in the playoffs, or did that change? Last I knew, SWAC teams were eligible for the playoffs, it's just that the SWAC has tie-ins to post season games that make it unlikely (but possible) that a SWAC team could be in the playoffs.
SWAC teams remain eligible for at large selections, but the division winners meet for the SWAC title. Its unlikely a SWAC team would ever get a at large invite but they do remain eligible.
Post Reply