You had already made the inference that most of the defenses were bad DF and I am just pointing out that the defenses do look bad because some are not real good BUT all BSC defenses look less than formidable due to the fact that this year some of the best offenses I have ever seen as a conference are making the defensive #'s look bad. I have been watching BSC football for a long time and I don't ever remember seeing this may teams with such good offenses.
That is why I am so interested to see the matchups around the country. It is gonna be some really good football to see. I want to see if the highly ranked D's can be exploited by the highly ranked O's.
First Round Upsets?
-
Ursus A. Horribilis
- Maroon Supporter

- Posts: 21615
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 12:17 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana Grizzlies
- A.K.A.: Bill Brasky
-
danefan
- Supporter

- Posts: 7989
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:51 pm
- I am a fan of: UAlbany
- Location: Hudson Valley, New York
Re: First Round Upsets?
Chicken or the egg?Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:You had already made the inference that most of the defenses were bad DF and I am just pointing out that the defenses do look bad because some are not real good BUT all BSC defenses look less than formidable due to the fact that this year some of the best offenses I have ever seen as a conference are making the defensive #'s look bad. I have been watching BSC football for a long time and I don't ever remember seeing this may teams with such good offenses.
That is why I am so interested to see the matchups around the country. It is gonna be some really good football to see. I want to see if the highly ranked D's can be exploited by the highly ranked O's.
Were the Big Sky offenses good because the defenses were bad? Or were the defenses bad because the offenses were good?
The light shall shine down on our dilemna on Saturday.
-
Ursus A. Horribilis
- Maroon Supporter

- Posts: 21615
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 12:17 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana Grizzlies
- A.K.A.: Bill Brasky
Re: First Round Upsets?
exactly.danefan wrote:Chicken or the egg?Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:You had already made the inference that most of the defenses were bad DF and I am just pointing out that the defenses do look bad because some are not real good BUT all BSC defenses look less than formidable due to the fact that this year some of the best offenses I have ever seen as a conference are making the defensive #'s look bad. I have been watching BSC football for a long time and I don't ever remember seeing this may teams with such good offenses.
That is why I am so interested to see the matchups around the country. It is gonna be some really good football to see. I want to see if the highly ranked D's can be exploited by the highly ranked O's.
Were the Big Sky offenses good because the defenses were bad? Or were the defenses bad because the offenses were good?
![]()
![]()
![]()
The light shall shine down on our dilemna on Saturday.
- Thumper 76
- Level2

- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 4:33 pm
- I am a fan of: South Dakota State
- Location: Where ever I happen to be
Re: First Round Upsets?
The thing you don't see in that score is that the defense for SDSU only allowed one td in that game, while CP got two off of turnovers for td's.kemajic wrote:You have no way of knowing that since they played against entirely different offenses.danefan wrote: Once again - National Defense Rankings
Total Defense
16. SDSU
61. Montana St.
Scoring Defense
5. SDSU
51. Montana St.
SDSU's defense is way better than MSU.
Montana and SDSU played one common opponent.
UM 35; CPSLO 23 CPSLO had 317 yards TO
CPSLO 21; SDSU 14 CPSLO had 333 yards TO
Doesn't look like a unique defense to me.

Please don't tell Obama what comes after a Trillion.
-
danefan
- Supporter

- Posts: 7989
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:51 pm
- I am a fan of: UAlbany
- Location: Hudson Valley, New York
Re: First Round Upsets?
Exactly. Here is a real look at SDSU's defensive resultsThumper 76 wrote:The thing you don't see in that score is that the defense for SDSU only allowed one td in that game, while CP got two off of turnovers for td's.kemajic wrote: You have no way of knowing that since they played against entirely different offenses.
Montana and SDSU played one common opponent.
UM 35; CPSLO 23 CPSLO had 317 yards TO
CPSLO 21; SDSU 14 CPSLO had 333 yards TO
Doesn't look like a unique defense to me.
Opponent - Points given up by defense
Ga. Southern - 6
Indiana St. - 0
Illinois St. - 10 (1 INT return for TD by ISU)
Cal Poly - 7 (1 INT return for TD and 1 fumble return for TD by CP)
Missouri St. 17
North Dakota St.- 13
UNI - 14
Youngstown St. - 3
Southern Ill. - 27 (1 INT return for TD for SIU)
Minnesota - 9 (1 fumble return for TD for Minn)
Western Ill. - 7
- putter
- Level2

- Posts: 1134
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:39 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
- Location: Great Falls, Montana
Re: First Round Upsets?
This conversations seems to be the immovable object against the unstoppable force. The 3 Big Sky teams offenses are for real but Ursus is right. The key to all three games will be the the defenses as IMO these teams can score on anyone but can they keep their opponents our of the endzone???
"Born in other countries, yet believing you could be happy in this, our laws acknowledge, as they should do, your right to join us in society, conforming, as I doubt not you will do, to our established rules. That these rules shall be as equal as prudential considerations will admit, will certainly be the aim of our legislatures, general and particular." --Thomas Jefferson, letter to Hugh White, 1801