Trump 2.0: MAGAA

[Caribbean Hen]

You still don’t understand that my post was about Tim Poole being there not to mention asking the opening question. Just like the tweet pointed out. I could care less what he asked. He’s long time troll who got caught taking money from Russia. But go ahead and defend him and his awesome journalistic creds, comrade.

Actual footage of SG after kalm casually flips lobs at him.

And that's what you still don't get. Your so call "establishment media" is a bunch of narrative water carriers. For some reason, you so want to be known as in intellectual, that you still stick to the establishment media even though they have been exposed for what they are. Narrative engineers.

The establishment media has beclowned itself so badly, no one of importance listens to them. This is why I grill you and Uni St Behar over your posts. You're lazy and assume that since the NY Times ran an article, it's actually the truth. Put down the establishment media and think for yourself.

Great badminton GIF by the way. You get points for that.

Who knows what he thinks, he just parrots what others think

[UNI88]

[BDKJMU]

We’re the libs at the Economist saying the same thing with all the lasting damage the stringpullers of Biden were doing (like driving up inflation & the debt, letting 10+ million illegals flood the country, etc)?

[BDKJMU]

FAFO

[BDKJMU]

More FAFO.

[kalm]

More FAFO.

This may get interesting. Why did Patel quickly take down his tweet?

[BDKJMU]

[Bobcat]

The rockstar president with the mandate is doing the peoples work!

Thats why Americans love Trump

[UNI88]

We’re the libs at the Economist saying the same thing with all the lasting damage the stringpullers of Biden were doing (like driving up inflation & the debt, letting 10+ million illegals flood the country, etc)?

trump's done more damage in 3 months than biden did in 4 years (and that's saying something because the damage biden did as you noted was not insignificant).

The Economist Bias and Reliability

The Economist, AllSides Media Bias Rating

The Economist – Bias and Credibility

[Bobcat]

When is the liberal media gonna realize nobody is even reading their agenda lies anymore.

Like, whatever they write next week, I already dont believe it. Its propaganda lies and indoctrination and they think we are falling for it.

Remember the media wants you to believe an encrypted app is "dangerous on a dirty internet connection". If that really was the case they should have been all over the government since 2014. Lies and creating narrative

[kalm]

When is the liberal media gonna realize nobody is even reading their agenda lies anymore.

Like, whatever they write next week, I already dont believe it. Its propaganda lies and indoctrination and they think we are falling for it.

Remember the media wants you to believe an encrypted app is "dangerous on a dirty internet connection". If that really was the case they should have been all over the government since 2014. Lies and creating narrative

[BDKJMU]

We’re the libs at the Economist saying the same thing with all the lasting damage the stringpullers of Biden were doing (like driving up inflation & the debt, letting 10+ million illegals flood the country, etc)?

trump's done more damage in 3 months than biden did in 4 years (and that's saying something because the damage biden did as you noted was not insignificant).

The Economist Bias and Reliability

The Economist, AllSides Media Bias Rating

The Economist – Bias and Credibility

You’re opinion.

You just posted 3 bias checkers that state’s Economist leans left.

We’re the libs at the Economist

Thanks for confirming!

[UNI88]

trump's done more damage in 3 months than biden did in 4 years (and that's saying something because the damage biden did as you noted was not insignificant).

The Economist Bias and Reliability

The Economist, AllSides Media Bias Rating

The Economist – Bias and Credibility

You’re opinion.

You just posted 3 bias checkers that state’s Economist leans left.

Leans left is slightly lib and closer to the center than you, trump and other MAQA yahoos. Plus their accuracy/reliability/factualness is extremely high. Can you say the same about your sources?

If them being slightly lib disqualifies their opinions then you, trump and other MAQA yahoos being hard populist right makes your opinions even less trustworthy.

[BDKJMU]

You’re opinion.

You just posted 3 bias checkers that state’s Economist leans left.

Leans left is slightly lib and closer to the center than you, trump and other MAQA yahoos.

If them being slightly lib disqualifies their opinions then you, trump and other MAQA yahoos being hard populist right makes your opinions even less trustworthy.

In your opinion.

[UNI88]

Leans left is slightly lib and closer to the center than you, trump and other MAQA yahoos.

If them being slightly lib disqualifies their opinions then you, trump and other MAQA yahoos being hard populist right makes your opinions even less trustworthy.

In your opinion.

Their accuracy/reliability/factualness is extremely high. Can you say the same about your sources?

[BDKJMU]

In your opinion.

Their accuracy/reliability/factualness is extremely high.

Again in your opinion.

[UNI88]

Their accuracy/reliability/factualness is extremely high.

Again in your opinion.

The links back me up. Just because you, trump and other MAQA yahoos don't like something doesn't make it wrong, FAKE NEWs or whatever smear you want to try and tarnish it with.

Maybe you should try to strengthen your own ideas rather than using logical fallacies to attack opposing ideas and opinions.

[Bobcat]

In your opinion

[BDKJMU]

Again in your opinion.

The links back me up. Just because you, trump and other MAQA yahoos don't like something doesn't make it wrong, FAKE NEWs or whatever smear you want to try and tarnish it with.

Maybe you should try to strengthen your own ideas rather than using logical fallacies to attack opposing ideas and opinions.

Links or not (which themselves are biased (all sources are)) doesn‘t change the fact that the adjectives you threw out are your opinion.

[UNI88]

The links back me up. Just because you, trump and other MAQA yahoos don't like something doesn't make it wrong, FAKE NEWs or whatever smear you want to try and tarnish it with.

Maybe you should try to strengthen your own ideas rather than using logical fallacies to attack opposing ideas and opinions.

Links or not (which themselves are biased (all sources are)) doesn‘t change the fact that the adjectives you threw out are your opinion.

I'm not alone in that opinion.

Not liking trump does not make me a lib, socialist, communist, radical left lunatic, or whatever name calling trump and MAQA yahoos want to engage in. I'm a small L libertarian and I love this country and want what's best for it just as much as they claim to.

[Bobcat]

Typical liberal When they say "you are a Nazi" They mean I am a Nazi When they say "you are a fascist" they mean I am a fascist

The whole world knows this now and thats why we ignore

[UNI88]

Fox News Poll: The first 100 days of President Trump's second term

[Caribbean Hen]

We’re the libs at the Economist saying the same thing with all the lasting damage the stringpullers of Biden were doing (like driving up inflation & the debt, letting 10+ million illegals flood the country, etc)?

trump's done more damage in 3 months than biden did in 4 years (and that's saying something because the damage biden did as you noted was not insignificant).

The Economist Bias and Reliability

The Economist, AllSides Media Bias Rating

The Economist – Bias and Credibility

Wrong

[UNI88]

trump's done more damage in 3 months than biden did in 4 years (and that's saying something because the damage biden did as you noted was not insignificant).

The Economist Bias and Reliability

The Economist, AllSides Media Bias Rating

The Economist – Bias and Credibility

Wrong

As BDK says - that's "you’re opinion."

Now back to trump's abysmal approval ratings ...

[UNI88]

Trump’s polling plunge continues as he loses ground on immigration and his trade war

A slew of new approval polling this week finds the president underwater with voters in terms of his overall job performance and popularity of his efforts to address individual issues, including immigration — the area where he’s longest held an advantage over Democratic opponents.

In a Reuters/Ipsos poll published Wednesday, nearly two thirds of Americans said uncontrolled migration was an issue of concern for them. Yet the share of respondents who approved of Trump’s actions was just 45 percent, lower than the 46 percent opposed to them. The rest were undecided. For context: the president enjoyed a double-digit advantage on this issue in Reuters polling taken over the final two weeks of the election.
...
A YouGov poll released Wednesday found that 50 percent of American adults believe that Abrego Garcia should be returned home, in line with a Supreme Court ruling ordering that the administration “facilitate” his retrieval. The share of Americans who took the White House’s position was just six percentage points higher than the share who had no opinion.

Meanwhile, a DDHQ/The Hill poll put out on Thursday indicates that Trump’s overall approval has dropped from above 50 percent in January to 44.7 percent today.

And in case after case, Trump officials have turned to bluster and disinformation rather than acknowledging errors or “handing it” to their critics.

Speaking of bluster: Trump’s trade agenda has caused his popularity to erode as well. On economic issues, the president is seeing the same drop in support even as a shaky stock market mounts a recovery. Economists are warning of a wave of capital flight and impending recession resulting from the on-again-off-again “reciprocal” tariff announcements, as well as the 10 percent duties the US slapped on all imports.

Trump has dropped 5 percentage points on this issue since January in the Reuters/Ipsos poll, and he now hovers just a few points above where Joe Biden was at the end of December 2024.