The Bombs: Domestic Terrorism

[JohnStOnge]

Look over there......it’s Elizabeth Warren!

Trump has taught his minions well....

Yes let me know when Warren gets up in front of a bunch of frothing at the mouth cultists and pats a politician on the back for physically assaulting a reporter.

[CID1990]

I’m still waiting for a ruling on “rhetoric causes violence” because nearly everybody here seems to have switched opinions on the matter

Or at least the desire to talk about it, anyway

[SeattleGriz]

Look over there......it’s Elizabeth Warren!

Trump has taught his minions well....

You're broken down D1B Capn Cat routine is tired and old.

Cleets currently fills the naggy athiest whiner role.

Jobs filled dude. Find a new one.

[Chizzang]

Look over there......it’s Elizabeth Warren!

Trump has taught his minions well....

You're broken down D1B Capn Cat routine is tired and old.

Cleets currently fills the naggy athiest whiner role.

Jobs filled dude. Find a new one.

Hey drunk posting guy...
I'm not an atheist

[SeattleGriz]

You're broken down D1B Capn Cat routine is tired and old.

Cleets currently fills the naggy athiest whiner role.

Jobs filled dude. Find a new one.

Hey drunk posting guy...
I'm not an atheist

Whatever you say StOnge! MAGA!

America hater.

[JohnStOnge]

I’m still waiting for a ruling on “rhetoric causes violence” because nearly everybody here seems to have switched opinions on the matter

Or at least the desire to talk about it, anyway

It's a very difficult cause and effect proposition to infer. Virtually impossible to conduct a controlled experiment to address the question.

It's similar to trying to determine whether or not violent movies or rap music cause violence.

What we can say, though, is that Trump does routinely promote violence. That's just an observation.

[CID1990]

The man likely has mental health issues, but I'm sure we'll throw him in jail for 25 years to life instead of get him the help he needs.

Oh please

This guy will go away for a couple decades and that’s exactly what he deserves. Anybody who can be goaded into sending bombs to multiple people is morally and ethically ineligible to ever walk the street with you, or me. Sociopath or not, treatment or not

We actually used to involuntarily commit people for all kinds of things, Treep

But that was inhumane. Want to take three guesses why we don’t throw all the schizos who refuse to take their meds into Camp Butner (a famous asylum in NC when I was growing up)? Want to guess who said involuntary committal for “mental issues” was inhumane?

Once again the stuff that comes out of you sure sounds wonderful but as usual there’s no critical thought behind it. Unless you are really are suggesting that we go back to the days of preemptively committing people who “act crazy”

Until you’re ready to COMPEL mental health treatment (which is locking them away forever for many of them) and then define what level of “crazy talk” gets you locked away.... you might want to back off considering nuts who do crazy things as victims and view them as the permanent menaces they are

[ALPHAGRIZ1]

Look over there......it’s Elizabeth Warren!

Trump has taught his minions well....

You're broken down D1B Capn Cat routine is tired and old.

Cleets currently fills the naggy athiest whiner role.

Jobs filled dude. Find a new one.

Cleets is half the man a half man is......... And he still has 28% more testosterone than mangeoff

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

[SeattleGriz]

You're broken down D1B Capn Cat routine is tired and old.

Cleets currently fills the naggy athiest whiner role.

Jobs filled dude. Find a new one.

Cleets is half the man a half man is......... And he still has 28% more testosterone than mangeoff

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

1/4 man substitute. Don't make his mom angry.

[Chizzang]

The man likely has mental health issues, but I'm sure we'll throw him in jail for 25 years to life instead of get him the help he needs.

Oh please

This guy will go away for a couple decades and that’s exactly what he deserves. Anybody who can be goaded into sending bombs to multiple people is morally and ethically ineligible to ever walk the street with you, or me. Sociopath or not, treatment or not

We actually used to involuntarily commit people for all kinds of things, Treep

But that was inhumane. Want to take three guesses why we don’t throw all the schizos who refuse to take their meds into Camp Butner (a famous asylum in NC when I was growing up)? Want to guess who said involuntary committal for “mental issues” was inhumane?

Once again the stuff that comes out of you sure sounds wonderful but as usual there’s no critical thought behind it. Unless you are really are suggesting that we go back to the days of preemptively committing people who “act crazy”

Until you’re ready to COMPEL mental health treatment (which is locking them away forever for many of them) and then define what level of “crazy talk” gets you locked away.... you might want to back off considering nuts who do crazy things as victims and view them as the permanent menaces they are

So you're saying that crazy people that actively try to kill people
are different than say a cat lady that talks to pigeons
and sends herself letters so the mailman will come by

[Pwns]

I’m still waiting for a ruling on “rhetoric causes violence” because nearly everybody here seems to have switched opinions on the matter

Or at least the desire to talk about it, anyway

Trump isn't responsible for this guy any more than Black lives matter is responsible for the Dallas police killings .

Although it should be pointed out that Trump at doesn't tell his supporters that the media will kill them for being white and start "what do we want? Dead journalists!" chants at his rallies.

[CID1990]

Oh please

This guy will go away for a couple decades and that’s exactly what he deserves. Anybody who can be goaded into sending bombs to multiple people is morally and ethically ineligible to ever walk the street with you, or me. Sociopath or not, treatment or not

We actually used to involuntarily commit people for all kinds of things, Treep

But that was inhumane. Want to take three guesses why we don’t throw all the schizos who refuse to take their meds into Camp Butner (a famous asylum in NC when I was growing up)? Want to guess who said involuntary committal for “mental issues” was inhumane?

Once again the stuff that comes out of you sure sounds wonderful but as usual there’s no critical thought behind it. Unless you are really are suggesting that we go back to the days of preemptively committing people who “act crazy”

Until you’re ready to COMPEL mental health treatment (which is locking them away forever for many of them) and then define what level of “crazy talk” gets you locked away.... you might want to back off considering nuts who do crazy things as victims and view them as the permanent menaces they are

So you're saying that crazy people that actively try to kill people
are different than say a cat lady that talks to pigeons
and sends herself letters so the mailman will come by

Yes

But prior to actively trying to kill people, how different were they in terms of whether they should be locked away?

Cat lady talking to pigeons is just cat lady talking to pigeons until she poisons her neighbors with strychnine. Then they become “warning signs” that we all missed

[Gil Dobie]

2 more bombs discovered this morning.

Are conservatives on here OK if Republicans start receiving these? I'm asking because I can't imagine that y'all would be reacting the same way if the tables were turned.

Too many people wacked out on politics. Start the month with Ricin mail to the right, finish the month with bombs to the left. The wiggety wacked base for each party continues to spew hate towards each other. Life is too short, enjoy you family and friends.

[SeattleGriz]

2 more bombs discovered this morning.

Are conservatives on here OK if Republicans start receiving these? I'm asking because I can't imagine that y'all would be reacting the same way if the tables were turned.

Too many people wacked out on politics. Start the month with Ricin mail to the right, finish the month with bombs to the left. The wiggety wacked base for each party continues to spew hate towards each other. Life is too short, enjoy you family and friend.

Leftists vs Alt right

[kalm]

I’m still waiting for a ruling on “rhetoric causes violence” because nearly everybody here seems to have switched opinions on the matter

Or at least the desire to talk about it, anyway

I think it’s a worthy debate (senses a trap )

Short answer if based strictly on how you phrased it: no.

At least not all the time.

“Can” it? Yes.

Primate groups have varying degrees of social hierarchy. Certain groups are more prone to following and desire authority and leadership.

But humans (and I’m guessing other species) have also shown the ability to rise above.

The underlying libertarian argument is potentially very interesting.


(There...I’ve said enough without saying much at all.... )

What say you, CID?

[mainejeff]

Look over there......it’s Elizabeth Warren!

Trump has taught his minions well....

You're broken down D1B Capn Cat routine is tired and old.

Cleets currently fills the naggy athiest whiner role.

Jobs filled dude. Find a new one.

Only when you get rid of all of your other aliases on here dude. I feel like I'm reading the same dozen people with different user names. Enough with the tiki torch routine!

[mainejeff]

You're broken down D1B Capn Cat routine is tired and old.

Cleets currently fills the naggy athiest whiner role.

Jobs filled dude. Find a new one.

Cleets is half the man a half man is......... And he still has 28% more testosterone than mangeoff

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

You'll see how much testosterone I have after I get a few beers in you and flip you over. You're nothing but a closeted pillow biter.

[kalm]

Cleets is half the man a half man is......... And he still has 28% more testosterone than mangeoff

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

You'll see how much testosterone I have after I get a few beers in you and flip you over. You're nothing but a closeted pillow biter.

Oh wow. The rapey left. How wonderful.

[CID1990]

I’m still waiting for a ruling on “rhetoric causes violence” because nearly everybody here seems to have switched opinions on the matter

Or at least the desire to talk about it, anyway

I think it’s a worthy debate (senses a trap )

Short answer if based strictly on how you phrased it: no.

At least not all the time.

“Can” it? Yes.

Primate groups have varying degrees of social hierarchy. Certain groups are more prone to following and desire authority and leadership.

But humans (and I’m guessing other species) have also shown the ability to rise above.

The underlying libertarian argument is potentially very interesting.


(There...I’ve said enough without saying much at all.... )

What say you, CID?

The libertarian argument is that people saying incendiary things should be kept separate from the actions people take, ostensibly because of those incendiary statements. People can say what they want

And that we should come down with both feet on the tops of the heads of those who act on incendiary rhetoric. Im quite UN-libertarian in that I do believe in losing the keys after locking some people up - you’ve lost your right to the libertarian utopia when your freedoms whack other people

My only beef right now is that both sides are doing it, both sides are denying they are doing it (while claiming the other is), and everybody is ignoring the hypocrisy

[SeattleGriz]

You'll see how much testosterone I have after I get a few beers in you and flip you over. You're nothing but a closeted pillow biter.

Oh wow. The rapey left. How wonderful.

I'd hate to see MaineJeff's van!

[CID1990]

Cleets is half the man a half man is......... And he still has 28% more testosterone than mangeoff

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

You'll see how much testosterone I have after I get a few beers in you and flip you over. You're nothing but a closeted pillow biter.

I’ve cracked the heads of a couple belligerent queens down at Dudley’s in Charleston in my day

Pushing twinks around gives you a false sense of masculinity

Sort of like pushing around meek women - I’ve cracked a few of those skulls too

[kalm]

I think it’s a worthy debate (senses a trap )

Short answer if based strictly on how you phrased it: no.

At least not all the time.

“Can” it? Yes.

Primate groups have varying degrees of social hierarchy. Certain groups are more prone to following and desire authority and leadership.

But humans (and I’m guessing other species) have also shown the ability to rise above.

The underlying libertarian argument is potentially very interesting.


(There...I’ve said enough without saying much at all.... )

What say you, CID?

The libertarian argument is that people saying incendiary things should be kept separate from the actions people take, ostensibly because of those incendiary statements. People can say what they want

And that we should come down with both feet on the tops of the heads of those who act on incendiary rhetoric. Im quite UN-libertarian in that I do believe in losing the keys after locking some people up - you’ve lost your right to the libertarian utopia when your freedoms whack other people

My only beef right now is that both sides are doing it, both sides are denying they are doing it (while claiming the other is), and everybody is ignoring the hypocrisy

The only thing I'd add is the fight to prove which side is worse or does it more. It's fun to troll about and argue over, like whether Mercer is better or ETSU, but it seems rather pointless.

[AZGrizFan]

I’m still waiting for a ruling on “rhetoric causes violence” because nearly everybody here seems to have switched opinions on the matter

Or at least the desire to talk about it, anyway

I think it’s a worthy debate (senses a trap )

Short answer if based strictly on how you phrased it: no.

At least not all the time.

“Can” it? Yes.

Primate groups have varying degrees of social hierarchy. Certain groups are more prone to following and desire authority and leadership.

But humans (and I’m guessing other species) have also shown the ability to rise above.

The underlying libertarian argument is potentially very interesting.


(There...I’ve said enough without saying much at all.... )

What say you, CID?

Solid position. Very firm.

[AZGrizFan]

I think it’s a worthy debate (senses a trap )

Short answer if based strictly on how you phrased it: no.

At least not all the time.

“Can” it? Yes.

Primate groups have varying degrees of social hierarchy. Certain groups are more prone to following and desire authority and leadership.

But humans (and I’m guessing other species) have also shown the ability to rise above.

The underlying libertarian argument is potentially very interesting.


(There...I’ve said enough without saying much at all.... )

What say you, CID?

The libertarian argument is that people saying incendiary things should be kept separate from the actions people take, ostensibly because of those incendiary statements. People can say what they want

And that we should come down with both feet on the tops of the heads of those who act on incendiary rhetoric. Im quite UN-libertarian in that I do believe in losing the keys after locking some people up - you’ve lost your right to the libertarian utopia when your freedoms whack other people

My only beef right now is that both sides are doing it, both sides are denying they are doing it (while claiming the other is), and everybody is ignoring the hypocrisy

Agreed with the first part, but not the lasts sentence. The MSM is the one trying to claim there’s some kind of difference between the two....minimizing ricin and riots as opposed to fake bombs. The MSM are the ones insisting Trump (or at least his rhetoric) is behind these bombs, and insisting that he must “apologize” or denounce it, while making no such connection between clinton’s, Holder’s, Waters’ or Obama’s violent rhetoric and the crazy actions of the left.

[mainejeff]

Oh wow. The rapey left. How wonderful.

I'd hate to see MaineJeff's van!

A gay man with a van? Seriously?