You should tell 89.CAA Flagship wrote:It's called compromise. Ever hear of it?houndawg wrote:
![]()
You OK, buddy?![]()
Btw blindly worshipping the flag, which is what some people apparently want, is not a sign of a healthy democracy.

You should tell 89.CAA Flagship wrote:It's called compromise. Ever hear of it?houndawg wrote:
![]()
You OK, buddy?![]()

Wrong. People just don't want going out of the way to show disrespect.Grizalltheway wrote:You should tell 89.CAA Flagship wrote: It's called compromise. Ever hear of it?![]()
Btw blindly worshipping the flag, which is what some people apparently want, is not a sign of a healthy democracy.




What do you do at UM games?Grizalltheway wrote:You should tell 89.CAA Flagship wrote: It's called compromise. Ever hear of it?![]()
Btw blindly worshipping the flag, which is what some people apparently want, is not a sign of a healthy democracy.





I'm fine, buddy. How are you doing?houndawg wrote:AZGrizFan wrote:
I have no problem with their actions. They're causing conversation and debate on a sensitive topic WITHOUT the burning, looting and rioting by other groups allegedly promotion racial equality (I'm looking at YOU, BlackLivesMatters ****). They're not disrespecting the flag, or veterans, or anything of that nature. They're drawing attention to what they perceive as an injustice, in a peaceful way. The way it is supposed to be done.![]()
You OK, buddy?


Drink and bitch about our defensive coordinator.CAA Flagship wrote:What do you do at UM games?Grizalltheway wrote: You should tell 89.
Btw blindly worshipping the flag, which is what some people apparently want, is not a sign of a healthy democracy.

Carry on then.Grizalltheway wrote:Drink and bitch about our defensive coordinator.CAA Flagship wrote: What do you do at UM games?

Nope. I had it right.houndawg wrote:Nope. They refuse to acknowledge what the players are protesting and insist on making it about the troops. Standard tactic for them, attempt change the narrative.CAA Flagship wrote: Nope. He has it right.


I wish nobody blindly worshiped the flag. The should show the proper respect because they have their eyes wide open to what it means. As for compromise, I guess you missed the part where I said the Cowboys nailed it. Taking a knee as a team to make a point and then all standing for the anthem... that's the epitome of compromise.Grizalltheway wrote:You should tell 89.CAA Flagship wrote: It's called compromise. Ever hear of it?![]()
Btw blindly worshipping the flag, which is what some people apparently want, is not a sign of a healthy democracy.


I'm all in support of people who want to demonstrate with the flag - I've never had a problem with flag burning as a form of protest for instance. Protesting during a time that other people are showing reverence (e.g. during the anthem) is certainly a freedom and something they can do, but you just have to realize the message is going to be thrown in with people now being supremely pissed at you, which is what the NFL anthem kneeling has done. Again, certainly a freedom to do, as it's a freedom for the fans who boo them doing it are free to do, just a question if it's the most effective form of protest to address the societal ill that is being protested in the first place. You're right, the cowboy thing was/is a better way of protesting without interfering with the reverence of the anthem. However, that's probably lost now too since it wasn't the first way the protest was done.89Hen wrote:I wish nobody blindly worshiped the flag. The should show the proper respect because they have their eyes wide open to what it means. As for compromise, I guess you missed the part where I said the Cowboys nailed it. Taking a knee as a team to make a point and then all standing for the anthem... that's the epitome of compromise.Grizalltheway wrote: You should tell 89.
Btw blindly worshipping the flag, which is what some people apparently want, is not a sign of a healthy democracy.

The compromise thing refers to AZ saying he doesn't have a problem with players kneeling, since they're at least protesting/expressing themselves in a peaceful and non-destructive way. I'm not saying you have to agree with him, but he does make a good point IMO.89Hen wrote:I wish nobody blindly worshiped the flag. The should show the proper respect because they have their eyes wide open to what it means. As for compromise, I guess you missed the part where I said the Cowboys nailed it. Taking a knee as a team to make a point and then all standing for the anthem... that's the epitome of compromise.Grizalltheway wrote: You should tell 89.
Btw blindly worshipping the flag, which is what some people apparently want, is not a sign of a healthy democracy.

Free to protest. Not freedom from consequences. NFL will come down hard on players if viewership and attendance continue to plummet. People have a hard time relating to a bunch of millionaires protesting mistreatment. Even if it is peacefully done.GannonFan wrote:I'm all in support of people who want to demonstrate with the flag - I've never had a problem with flag burning as a form of protest for instance. Protesting during a time that other people are showing reverence (e.g. during the anthem) is certainly a freedom and something they can do, but you just have to realize the message is going to be thrown in with people now being supremely pissed at you, which is what the NFL anthem kneeling has done. Again, certainly a freedom to do, as it's a freedom for the fans who boo them doing it are free to do, just a question if it's the most effective form of protest to address the societal ill that is being protested in the first place. You're right, the cowboy thing was/is a better way of protesting without interfering with the reverence of the anthem. However, that's probably lost now too since it wasn't the first way the protest was done.89Hen wrote: I wish nobody blindly worshiped the flag. The should show the proper respect because they have their eyes wide open to what it means. As for compromise, I guess you missed the part where I said the Cowboys nailed it. Taking a knee as a team to make a point and then all standing for the anthem... that's the epitome of compromise.


"Compromise" was the term I used. Howz about you letting me define it?Grizalltheway wrote:The compromise thing refers to AZ saying he doesn't have a problem with players kneeling, since they're at least protesting/expressing themselves in a peaceful and non-destructive way. I'm not saying you have to agree with him, but he does make a good point IMO.89Hen wrote: I wish nobody blindly worshiped the flag. The should show the proper respect because they have their eyes wide open to what it means. As for compromise, I guess you missed the part where I said the Cowboys nailed it. Taking a knee as a team to make a point and then all standing for the anthem... that's the epitome of compromise.

The NFL is in a no-win spot here. How can they "come down hard" on the players? Everything labor related has to be by the collective bargaining agreement and I'm not sure there's anything in that that would allow the owners or the NFL to do anything to the players. And really, if they piss the players off too much they risk work stoppages and strikes and that's never good for business. And on the flip side, if this continues for a long period of time, they will continue to alienate the large segment of fans that don't agree with the method of protest (and I'm sure there are a smaller number, but larger than it should be, who don't agree what their protesting). So the NFL can't really do anything but try to keep their employees happy, hope this blows over soon, and hope that the bottom line isn't too impacted by the drops in attendance and viewership. Not an easy spot.AZGrizFan wrote:Free to protest. Not freedom from consequences. NFL will come down hard on players if viewership and attendance continue to plummet. People have a hard time relating to a bunch of millionaires protesting mistreatment. Even if it is peacefully done.GannonFan wrote:
I'm all in support of people who want to demonstrate with the flag - I've never had a problem with flag burning as a form of protest for instance. Protesting during a time that other people are showing reverence (e.g. during the anthem) is certainly a freedom and something they can do, but you just have to realize the message is going to be thrown in with people now being supremely pissed at you, which is what the NFL anthem kneeling has done. Again, certainly a freedom to do, as it's a freedom for the fans who boo them doing it are free to do, just a question if it's the most effective form of protest to address the societal ill that is being protested in the first place. You're right, the cowboy thing was/is a better way of protesting without interfering with the reverence of the anthem. However, that's probably lost now too since it wasn't the first way the protest was done.

Yes but you were responding to houndawg responding to Z.CAA Flagship wrote:"Compromise" was the term I used. Howz about you letting me define it?Grizalltheway wrote: The compromise thing refers to AZ saying he doesn't have a problem with players kneeling, since they're at least protesting/expressing themselves in a peaceful and non-destructive way. I'm not saying you have to agree with him, but he does make a good point IMO.

That's not a compromise. That's just a different opinion on the situation.Grizalltheway wrote:The compromise thing refers to AZ saying he doesn't have a problem with players kneeling, since they're at least protesting/expressing themselves in a peaceful and non-destructive way. I'm not saying you have to agree with him, but he does make a good point IMO.89Hen wrote: I wish nobody blindly worshiped the flag. The should show the proper respect because they have their eyes wide open to what it means. As for compromise, I guess you missed the part where I said the Cowboys nailed it. Taking a knee as a team to make a point and then all standing for the anthem... that's the epitome of compromise.


But you were responding to 89 who responded to you who responded in reference to me responding to houndawg responding to Z.Grizalltheway wrote:Yes but you were responding to houndawg responding to Z.CAA Flagship wrote: "Compromise" was the term I used. Howz about you letting me define it?

Tell that to Flaggy then.89Hen wrote:That's not a compromise. That's just a different opinion on the situation.Grizalltheway wrote: The compromise thing refers to AZ saying he doesn't have a problem with players kneeling, since they're at least protesting/expressing themselves in a peaceful and non-destructive way. I'm not saying you have to agree with him, but he does make a good point IMO.
I've never said it wasn't their right to do this. The NFL does have policies regarding the anthem and they have chosen to not take action. That's their right too. What I don't like is people who don't agree with the protest being labelled as "racist".

That's not a compromise.CAA Flagship wrote:It's called compromise. Ever hear of it?houndawg wrote:
![]()
You OK, buddy?![]()


SHHHHH.89Hen wrote:That's not a compromise.CAA Flagship wrote: It's called compromise. Ever hear of it?![]()

How so? Because they aren't expressing their discontent exactly as you want them to?89Hen wrote:That's not a compromise.CAA Flagship wrote: It's called compromise. Ever hear of it?![]()

You already washed your hands of this.Grizalltheway wrote:How so? Because they aren't expressing their discontent exactly as you want them to?89Hen wrote: That's not a compromise.


