Of course it will and you're welcome!Ivytalk wrote:That there is going right into my siggy!kalm wrote:
Objection! My opinion is irrelevant!!!
Kochs Going Soft
-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69117
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Kochs Going Soft
- CID1990
- Level5

- Posts: 25486
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
- I am a fan of: Pie
- A.K.A.: CID 1990
- Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร
Re: Kochs Going Soft
So are the Kochs no longer DE DEBBIL?
Maybe only lesser imps or demons now?
Maybe only lesser imps or demons now?
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
- CitadelGrad
- Level4

- Posts: 5210
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:19 pm
- I am a fan of: Jack Kerouac
- A.K.A.: El Cid
- Location: St. Louis
Re: Kochs Going Soft
This isn't surprising. The Kochs have always self-identified as libertarian.
If they self-identify as libertarian, then they must be libertarian. They get to use the libertarian restroom and everything.
If they self-identify as libertarian, then they must be libertarian. They get to use the libertarian restroom and everything.
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson, in letter to William S. Smith, 1787

- Thomas Jefferson, in letter to William S. Smith, 1787

- Chizzang
- Level5

- Posts: 19274
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
- I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
- A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
- Location: Palermo Italy
Re: Kochs Going Soft
There's a few closet Libertarians around here (Be Careful!!!) being offensive is a crime nowCitadelGrad wrote:This isn't surprising. The Kochs have always self-identified as libertarian.
If they self-identify as libertarian, then they must be libertarian. They get to use the libertarian restroom and everything.
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
- Pwns
- Level4

- Posts: 7344
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:38 pm
- I am a fan of: Georgia Friggin' Southern
- A.K.A.: FCS_pwns_FBS (AGS)
Re: Kochs Going Soft
The authors of the "US is an oligarchy" study could not be reached for comment on this story. 
Celebrate Diversity.*
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69117
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Kochs Going Soft
Good point, and that's the trouble with labels. They can meaning over time and be manipulated to fit a political narrative.GannonFan wrote:Pretty broad umbrella there, don't you think? You could argue that past Presidents like Truman and TR were neocons if you hold to that wide of a definition. Heck, Wilson was pretty much a neocon too, getting us into WW1 when we had no business being there.kalm wrote:
So Reagan was a passive-aggressive foreign interventionist.And no mention of playing both sides of the Iran-Iraq war either. Not a good argument at all.
![]()
ne·o·con·serv·a·tive
ˌnēōkənˈsərvədiv/
adjective
adjective: neo-conservative
1.
relating to or denoting a return to a modified form of a traditional viewpoint, in particular a political ideology characterized by an emphasis on free-market capitalism and an interventionist foreign policy.
At some point you need to put a time fence around what you're describing. Bush II and his group, certainly neocons. Bush I and those who came before, I think conservative is just fine.
Regardless, Reagan and Bush 1 were both interventionists and they both subscribed to "free" market capitalism. I'm not all that familiar with Truman's economics (Fair Deal sounded populist) but TR was definitely not a supply sider. Economics is part of the definition too.


