Read. Learn.Baldy wrote:Grizalltheway wrote:Poor Baldlie. The truth hurts.![]()
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/16/opini ... .html?_r=0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Read. Learn.Baldy wrote:Grizalltheway wrote:Poor Baldlie. The truth hurts.![]()


I've seen that assessment. What gets me is that "since 9/11" thing. Why say "since 9/11?" So you're going to compare numbers and leave 9/11 out? that's ridiculous. If you want to compare the number of deaths due to "right wing terror" and those due to "Islamic terror" compare the numbers. Don't friggin' set the boundaries in order to exclude an event that led to almost 3,000 fatalities. Go ahead and include the Oklahoma City bombing fatalities too and call it a "right wing" terrorism thing. But if you include everything Islamist terrorism is going to be WAY ahead. You take the number of Americans killed by Islamists and compare it to the number killed by what they're calling "right wing" terrorists and it's not remotely close.Grizalltheway wrote:Read. Learn.Baldy wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/16/opini ... .html?_r=0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;



Yeah...CID1990 wrote:Why is everybody surprised that it's NEWS when a white male goes on a shooting spree?

I love how you're all about numbers and statistics until they don't support your views. It's hilarious. It really, really is.JohnStOnge wrote:Grizalltheway wrote:
Read. Learn.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/16/opini ... .html?_r=0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The idea that "right wing" and/or "anti government" terrorism is a bigger threat than Islamist terrorism right now is ridiculous.
Best PoBoys? Now that may warrant a trip.travelinman67 wrote:Lafayette is one of my favorite cities...Home of the Ragin Cajuns. Best PoBoys in the South.
Was a little extra pissed that this happened in Lafayette...then heard the shooter's from Alabama.
Of course.

Stopping? Eliminate? No.Pwns wrote: Still not as silly as the idea of stopping these incidents with background checks, waiting periods, and "assault weapons" bans.
Opinion. Radical left-wing opinion.Grizalltheway wrote:Read. Learn.Baldy wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/16/opini ... .html?_r=0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

travelinman67 wrote:Lafayette is one of my favorite cities...Home of the Ragin Cajuns. Best PoBoys in the South.
Was a little extra pissed that this happened in Lafayette...then heard the shooter's from Alabama.
Of course.

https://medium.com/hatewatch-blog/lafay ... a16afc9643" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;“Do not mistake yourselves for one minute, the enemy sees all posted on this website. I do not want to discourage the last hope for the best, but you must realize the power of the lone wolf, is the power that come forth in ALL situations.” Houser wrote on a forum dedicated to the New York chapter of Golden Dawn, Greece’s far-right neo-Nazi political party. “Look within yourselves.”
That comment was one of dozens of messages that Houser, 59, left on several Internet message boards, all of which provide a picture of a politically disaffected, angry man who viewed the United States as a “financially failing filth farm,” expressed interest in white power groups, anti-Semitic ideas, the anti-gay Westboro Baptist Church, as well as a number of conspiracy theories often espoused by the antigovernment right.
But his extremism appears to have gone deeper. In 2005, he registered to attend David Duke’s EURO Conference in New Orleans, according to a spreadsheet of conference registrations obtained by Hatewatch. He lauded Duke, one of the most recognizable figures of the American radical right, a neo-Nazi, longtime Ku Klux Klan leader and now an international spokesman for Holocaust denial. On a PoliticalForum.com, Houser wrote in 2013, “David Duke has been unseen or hear of in years, but at one time appeared exactly what US needed.”
Elsewhere online, Houser described his interests as “hustling” and said that his political involvement was minimal, though he belonged to a forum associated with Tea Party Nation. He sang the praise of Adolf Hitler many times, saying “Hitler is loved for the results of his pragmatism,” last January on the website stateofmind13.com.
Aside from his affinity for Hitler and Golden Dawn, he expressed racists extremism elsewhere. He promoted the disproven racist theory that a connection exists between race and IQ, and even promoted The Bell Curve, a book written by racist Charles Murray.

Refute the numbers and surveys, or piss off.Baldy wrote:Opinion. Radical left-wing opinion.Grizalltheway wrote:
Read. Learn.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/16/opini ... .html?_r=0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;![]()
![]()
If I'm law abiding, am deemed to be mentally fit, and can pass a criminal background check I should have the ability to purchase a gun. The thing is, very little of that happens when guns are stolen and traded on the black market. The purchase process between the two Carolinas differs greatly as well just as it seems it does in Alabama and Louisiana. Should we have a Federally mandated gun purchase process? Maybe, but I would have concerns that they would begin tracking what each individual has in his/her possession when it's really none of their business. Make sure I'm legal, not crazy, and over 18 and that's where government's involvement should end.Skjellyfetti wrote:Stopping? Eliminate? No.Pwns wrote: Still not as silly as the idea of stopping these incidents with background checks, waiting periods, and "assault weapons" bans.
But, reduce? Sure.
Do you really think that's ridiculous?![]()
Do you think we should get rid of background checks and waiting periods?

Was in town on vacation for a ULL game, stopped by a corner market, picked up a fried crawfish PoBoy and headed over to the campus.Ibanez wrote:Best PoBoys? Now that may warrant a trip.travelinman67 wrote:Lafayette is one of my favorite cities...Home of the Ragin Cajuns. Best PoBoys in the South.
Was a little extra pissed that this happened in Lafayette...then heard the shooter's from Alabama.
Of course.

Damned if I know. Just another disturbed lone wolf white man as near as I can tell. Its not like he's a muslin.CID1990 wrote:Why is everybody surprised that it's NEWS when a white male goes on a shooting spree?


Saw Steve Riley and the Mamou Playboys at Tipitina's for $3. Nobody parties like cajunsSkjellyfetti wrote:well, tman and i can agree on something - lafayette is an awesome place.
been to the blackpot festival a few times.
http://blackpotfestival.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Duhhh OK...Grizalltheway wrote:Refute the numbers and surveys, or piss off.Baldy wrote: Opinion. Radical left-wing opinion.![]()
![]()
Muslins make up less than 1% of the population. Right-Wingers..."conservatives" make up approximately 40% of the population.Other data sets, using different definitions of political violence, tell comparable stories. The Global Terrorism Database maintained by the Start Center at the University of Maryland includes 65 attacks in the United States associated with right-wing ideologies and 24 by Muslim extremists since 9/11. The International Security Program at the New America Foundation identifies 39 fatalities from “non-jihadist” homegrown extremists and 26 fatalities from “jihadist” extremists.

I don't know if I can think of a single mass shooting that would've been stopped by these laws . Hardly any of the mass shooters I can think of from Columbine forward had any criminal history (the Columbine shooters had other people buy the guns for them).Skjellyfetti wrote:Stopping? Eliminate? No.Pwns wrote: Still not as silly as the idea of stopping these incidents with background checks, waiting periods, and "assault weapons" bans.
But, reduce? Sure.
Do you really think that's ridiculous?![]()
Do you think we should get rid of background checks and waiting periods?


I completely agree... ^Pwns wrote:I don't know if I can think of a single mass shooting that would've been stopped by these laws . Hardly any of the mass shooters I can think of from Columbine forward had any criminal history (the Columbine shooters had other people buy the guns for them).Skjellyfetti wrote:
Stopping? Eliminate? No.
But, reduce? Sure.
Do you really think that's ridiculous?![]()
Do you think we should get rid of background checks and waiting periods?
The waiting periods might be even more useless because mass shootings are not impulsive acts. They are often planned many months in advance. They always have long manifestos and diaries and such and they put a lot of planning into them. It's not just some spontaneous psychotic break that happens at any random time.
Maybe there are some gun crimes that these laws will stop, but they will not stop one person plotting to kill as many strangers as they can.

Yeah. What does that have to do with how big of a threat they are in aggregate?Baldy wrote:Duhhh OK...Grizalltheway wrote:
Refute the numbers and surveys, or piss off.
The "study" used in your opinion piece:Muslins make up less than 1% of the population. Right-Wingers..."conservatives" make up approximately 40% of the population.Other data sets, using different definitions of political violence, tell comparable stories. The Global Terrorism Database maintained by the Start Center at the University of Maryland includes 65 attacks in the United States associated with right-wing ideologies and 24 by Muslim extremists since 9/11. The International Security Program at the New America Foundation identifies 39 fatalities from “non-jihadist” homegrown extremists and 26 fatalities from “jihadist” extremists.
39 fatalities from those "right-wing terrorists" compared to 26 by Muslins.
If you want to compare apples to apples, do the math. Right-wingers are responsible for less than twice the numbers of deaths from terrorism as Muslins despite being approximately 40 times larger in population.![]()
Anything else?![]()

SHOULD. Such a simple little word.ASUG8 wrote:If I'm law abiding, am deemed to be mentally fit, and can pass a criminal background check I should have the ability to purchase a gun. The thing is, very little of that happens when guns are stolen and traded on the black market. The purchase process between the two Carolinas differs greatly as well just as it seems it does in Alabama and Louisiana. Should we have a Federally mandated gun purchase process? Maybe, but I would have concerns that they would begin tracking what each individual has in his/her possession when it's really none of their business. Make sure I'm legal, not crazy, and over 18 and that's where government's involvement should end.Skjellyfetti wrote:
Stopping? Eliminate? No.
But, reduce? Sure.
Do you really think that's ridiculous?![]()
Do you think we should get rid of background checks and waiting periods?

What are Texas laws like? Filling out paperwork and doing the background check in SC (either on the phone or online) and I'm out the door with a new firearm in under 10 minutes.AZGrizFan wrote:SHOULD. Such a simple little word.ASUG8 wrote:
If I'm law abiding, am deemed to be mentally fit, and can pass a criminal background check I should have the ability to purchase a gun. The thing is, very little of that happens when guns are stolen and traded on the black market. The purchase process between the two Carolinas differs greatly as well just as it seems it does in Alabama and Louisiana. Should we have a Federally mandated gun purchase process? Maybe, but I would have concerns that they would begin tracking what each individual has in his/her possession when it's really none of their business. Make sure I'm legal, not crazy, and over 18 and that's where government's involvement should end.![]()

No idea. I have resolved to never again buy a firearm at a gun shop--so, no more background checks for me.... The government already knows a couple of weapons I have....they don't need to know what ELSE I've got.ASUG8 wrote:What are Texas laws like? Filling out paperwork and doing the background check in SC (either on the phone or online) and I'm out the door with a new firearm in under 10 minutes.AZGrizFan wrote:
SHOULD. Such a simple little word.![]()
