The Duggars and Child Molestation Cover-up

[kalm]

Baldy for the win!

Indeed. Perhaps Duggar should also write a biography about his experiences...on account of their so similar.

[Baldy]

Baldy for the win!

Indeed. Perhaps Duggar should also write a biography about his experiences...on account of their so similar.

Who knew they were so similar? Did he "casually masturbate" lying beside his sister in bed as well?

[kalm]

Indeed. Perhaps Duggar should also write a biography about his experiences...on account of their so similar.

Who knew they were so similar? Did he "casually masturbate" lying beside his sister in bed as well?

I don't know. I'll wait for his tell all book to come out like Dunham's. Maybe his siblings will endorse it like Dunham's sister did.

“Imputing predatory motives to a seven-year-old girl and assigning a role of victim to her sister, who apparently doesn’t feel victimised in the slightest … seems more predatory and abusive than anything that Dunham describes in the book, which also includes descriptions of masturbating in bed next to her sleeping sister (who hasn’t?) and bribing her with candy for kisses (come on),” wrote Gould, advising: “If you’re on the fence about whether Dunham is an ‘abuser’, you should probably read her book, and not a right-wing blogger’s cherry-picked version of its contents.”.

http://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/n ... use-claims" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Conks...sexually confused about other's sexual confusion.

[YoUDeeMan]

...assigning a role of victim to her sister, who apparently doesn’t feel victimised in the slightest …

Ahhh...kalm's new legal test of whether someone is a victim.

Right up there with..."Hey, she liked it!"

[kalm]

...assigning a role of victim to her sister, who apparently doesn’t feel victimised in the slightest …

Ahhh...kalm's new legal test of whether someone is a victim.

Right up there with..."Hey, she liked it!"

I'll let the "victim" decide rather than a culture warrior if you don't mind.

[Pwns]

So what's the magic age where you can ascribe "predatory motives" to someone? Duggar was 14...not old enough to consent in any state to sex in any state and not old enough to get the death penalty.

And what does that Guardian article mean by "who hasn't"?

[Baldy]

Who knew they were so similar? Did he "casually masturbate" lying beside his sister in bed as well?

I don't know. I'll wait for his tell all book to come out like Dunham's. Maybe his siblings will endorse it like Dunham's sister did.

“Imputing predatory motives to a seven-year-old girl and assigning a role of victim to her sister, who apparently doesn’t feel victimised in the slightest … seems more predatory and abusive than anything that Dunham describes in the book, which also includes descriptions of masturbating in bed next to her sleeping sister (who hasn’t?) and bribing her with candy for kisses (come on),” wrote Gould, advising: “If you’re on the fence about whether Dunham is an ‘abuser’, you should probably read her book, and not a right-wing blogger’s cherry-picked version of its contents.”.

http://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/n ... use-claims" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Conks...sexually confused about other's sexual confusion.

Her sister is also a queer...maybe Dunham's predatory behavior had a hand in it.

Donks...unable to see the hypocrisy for hypocricy's sake.

kalm, you do know that most normal people see what Dunham and Duggar both did as children is viewed as kids being kids, correct?

[Baldy]

Ahhh...kalm's new legal test of whether someone is a victim.

Right up there with..."Hey, she liked it!"

I'll let the "victim" decide rather than a culture warrior if you don't mind.

Even when the "victim" is 1 year old?

Really?

Damn, you certainly are very progressive, aren't you?

[GannonFan]

Ahhh...kalm's new legal test of whether someone is a victim.

Right up there with..."Hey, she liked it!"

I'll let the "victim" decide rather than a culture warrior if you don't mind.

Yikes, not really your finest hour here, Kalm.

[kalm]

I'll let the "victim" decide rather than a culture warrior if you don't mind.

Yikes, not really your finest hour here, Kalm.

The now adult sister reflects on what happened with gaps filled in by her sister, understands, and forgives. Or we should trust the culture warrior taking things out of context to condemn?

OK

[kalm]

I'll let the "victim" decide rather than a culture warrior if you don't mind.

Even when the "victim" is 1 year old?

Really?

Damn, you certainly are very progressive, aren't you?

Hey GATW, can I get an assist here?

[Baldy]

Even when the "victim" is 1 year old?

Really?

Damn, you certainly are very progressive, aren't you?

Hey GATW, can I get an assist here?

I don't think GATW wants to jump into the hole you've dug for yourself.

[Grizalltheway]

I don't know. I'll wait for his tell all book to come out like Dunham's. Maybe his siblings will endorse it like Dunham's sister did.



http://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/n ... use-claims" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Conks...sexually confused about other's sexual confusion.

Her sister is also a queer...maybe Dunham's predatory behavior had a hand in it.

Donks...unable to see the hypocrisy for hypocricy's sake.

kalm, you do know that most normal people see what Dunham and Duggar both did as children is viewed as kids being kids, correct?

Have we determined how old the kids in Duggar's case were? A 14 year old fingering his 5 year old sister is not kids being kids, if that were the case.

[kalm]

Hey GATW, can I get an assist here?

I don't think GATW wants to jump into the hole you've dug for yourself.

Okee Dokee.

[GannonFan]

Yikes, not really your finest hour here, Kalm.

The now adult sister reflects on what happened with gaps filled in by her sister, understands, and forgives. Or we should trust the culture warrior taking things out of context to condemn?

OK

Yeah, but the meme you put out there with your other post doesn't reflect that kind of nuance.

And if the Duggar girls come out and say that they understand and forgive what the brother did should we all just nod our heads and move on?

[kalm]

Hey GATW, can I get an assist here?

I don't think GATW wants to jump into the hole you've dug for yourself.

I was referring to the Gay Irish thread where GATW made a reasoned argument, and all hell broke loose with Andy, 89, and Cluck being as confused as you are here.

[kalm]

The now adult sister reflects on what happened with gaps filled in by her sister, understands, and forgives. Or we should trust the culture warrior taking things out of context to condemn?

OK

Yeah, but the meme you put out there with your other post doesn't reflect that kind of nuance.

And if the Duggar girls come out and say that they understand and forgive what the brother did should we all just nod our heads and move on?

Absolutely. And the same for the other girls he groped if they're at peace with it too. As Baldy posited a few posts back, much of this can be chalked up to "kids being kids". The fact that Dunham exposed (ha) herself publicly while the Duggars went on to be preachy, hypocritical, fundies makes them an easier target.

[Baldy]

I don't think GATW wants to jump into the hole you've dug for yourself.

I was referring to the Gay Irish thread where GATW made a reasoned argument, and all hell broke loose with Andy, 89, and Cluck being as confused as you are here.

Oh yeah, the thread where you and WTAG got pounded like a prison dick.
Gotcha.

[Grizalltheway]

I was referring to the Gay Irish thread where GATW made a reasoned argument, and all hell broke loose with Andy, 89, and Cluck being as confused as you are here.

Oh yeah, the thread where you and WTAG got pounded like a prison dick.
Gotcha.

Yeah, that was a classic Conk encounter. Don't even know what the fuck you're arguing about, then declare victory after enough hyenas show up and cackle.

[kalm]

Oh yeah, the thread where you and WTAG got pounded like a prison dick.
Gotcha.

Yeah, that was a classic Conk encounter. Don't even know what the fuck you're arguing about, then declare victory after enough hyenas show up and cackle.

89 eventually cops to not having read you article for context. Baldy still thinks 89 somehow won.

[Baldy]

Yeah, that was a classic Conk encounter. Don't even know what the fuck you're arguing about, then declare victory after enough hyenas show up and cackle.

89 eventually cops to not having read you article for context. Baldy still thinks 89 somehow won.

Actually, Cluck ripped most of the tits in that thread. Try a little salve and maybe some aloe.
You'll be ok.

[dbackjon]

My hero lol. Your patented lame ass response to everything. Yes, you are a fucking idiot.

[Grizalltheway]

89 eventually cops to not having read you article for context. Baldy still thinks 89 somehow won.

Actually, Cluck ripped most of the tits in that thread. Try a little salve and maybe some aloe.
You'll be ok.

Yep, textbook example of a false equivalence. Not surprised you lapped it up.

[Baldy]

Actually, Cluck ripped most of the tits in that thread. Try a little salve and maybe some aloe.
You'll be ok.

Yep, textbook example of a false equivalence. Not surprised you lapped it up.

No need to lash out, kid. You can't win 'em all.

[travelinman67]

...Yes, you are a fucking idiot.

HEY! That's MY line!