I think governors can impact their economies through tax policies quicker and with more effect than any president can impact the national economy...Chizzang wrote:Question?:
Do governors have any effect on a states economic success..?
(Just wondering)
Agreed,Col Hogan wrote:I think governors can impact their economies through tax policies quicker and with more effect than any president can impact the national economy...Chizzang wrote:Question?:
Do governors have any effect on a states economic success..?
(Just wondering)
Two words: Jerry BrownChizzang wrote:Question?:
Do governors have any effect on a states economic success..?
(Just wondering)
Link?travelinman67 wrote:Two words: Jerry BrownChizzang wrote:Question?:
Do governors have any effect on a states economic success..?
(Just wondering)
California's economy has rapidly moved underground to avoid government regulators whose existence is founded upon generating fees, fines and taxation.
Industry has fled California...get a clue.
Open your ears and eyes, Kalmlite.SDHornet wrote:Link?travelinman67 wrote:
Two words: Jerry Brown
California's economy has rapidly moved underground to avoid government regulators whose existence is founded upon generating fees, fines and taxation.
Industry has fled California...get a clue.
BDKJMU wrote:A month ago was reported as an abysmal .2% annualized. Well, apparently its worse. -.7% annualized...
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... nce-again/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
And yet just like the 1st quarter last year, the donks try to blame it on "cold weather" You know, there's global warming...except when talking about 1st quarter GDP..
CA has the fifth largest economy on the planet.travelinman67 wrote:Two words: Jerry BrownChizzang wrote:Question?:
Do governors have any effect on a states economic success..?
(Just wondering)
California's economy has rapidly moved underground to avoid government regulators whose existence is founded upon generating fees, fines and taxation.
Industry has fled California...get a clue.
According to the Democrats.houndawg wrote:CA has the fifth largest economy on the planet.travelinman67 wrote:
Two words: Jerry Brown
California's economy has rapidly moved underground to avoid government regulators whose existence is founded upon generating fees, fines and taxation.
Industry has fled California...get a clue.
What?travelinman67 wrote:According to the Democrats.houndawg wrote:
CA has the fifth largest economy on the planet.
It's actually 8th largest.
Government spending isn't supposed to be added to GDP...drop that out and 12% of the $2.2 trillion goes
buh-bye!
So do we count military hardware (which is Government Spending) as GDP..?kalm wrote:What?travelinman67 wrote:
According to the Democrats.
It's actually 8th largest.
Government spending isn't supposed to be added to GDP...drop that out and 12% of the $2.2 trillion goes
buh-bye!
Sweden must have a GDP of around zero then. They need to get their shit order.
Freeway projectsChizzang wrote:So do we count military hardware (which is Government Spending) as GDP..?kalm wrote:
What?
Sweden must have a GDP of around zero then. They need to get their shit order.
Shit order?kalm wrote:What?travelinman67 wrote:
According to the Democrats.
It's actually 8th largest.
Government spending isn't supposed to be added to GDP...drop that out and 12% of the $2.2 trillion goes
buh-bye!
Sweden must have a GDP of around zero then. They need to get their shit order.
You didn't build that!kalm wrote:Freeway projectsChizzang wrote:
So do we count military hardware (which is Government Spending) as GDP..?
Airports
Food supplies for universities
fiber optic infrastructure.
Bullshit on any truck with a full tank of gas for $40. Today's even small size trucks have fuel tank capacities in the high teens-low 20s gallons, and the 1/2 tons more than that. AAA showed today's national avg at $2.74 and Illinois at $2.95.houndawg wrote:BDKJMU wrote:A month ago was reported as an abysmal .2% annualized. Well, apparently its worse. -.7% annualized...
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... nce-again/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
And yet just like the 1st quarter last year, the donks try to blame it on "cold weather" You know, there's global warming...except when talking about 1st quarter GDP..
The sky is falling!
This is the end of western civilization as we know it.
CEO pay has never been higher, record stock market too, and I can fill my truck for $40.
Third term. Why not? It took FDR four terms to clean up after the conks back in the day.
Averages are nice, but nobody pays the average and people don't care what the national average is. They care about what they actually pay. I didn't go to SPINX yesterday and pay an average of $2.74/gallon. It was $2.34. Averages are talking points to show that, on the whole, things are better or worst. That makes you feel good. Makes you feel that things are better (or not) but it's a marketing ploy to get you to make an emotional connection.BDKJMU wrote:Bullshit on any truck with a full tank of gas for $40. Today's even small size trucks have fuel tank capacities in the high teens-low 20s gallons, and the 1/2 tons more than that. AAA showed today's national avg at $2.74 and Illinois at $2.95.houndawg wrote:
The sky is falling!
This is the end of western civilization as we know it.
CEO pay has never been higher, record stock market too, and I can fill my truck for $40.
Third term. Why not? It took FDR four terms to clean up after the conks back in the day.
http://fuelgaugereport.aaa.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
And the avg was $1.89 when Obama entered office..
Chizzang - can we get a ruling on the fuel tank capacity and gas mileage?BDKJMU wrote:Bullshit on any truck with a full tank of gas for $40. Today's even small size trucks have fuel tank capacities in the high teens-low 20s gallons, and the 1/2 tons more than that. AAA showed today's national avg at $2.74 and Illinois at $2.95.houndawg wrote:
The sky is falling!
This is the end of western civilization as we know it.
CEO pay has never been higher, record stock market too, and I can fill my truck for $40.
Third term. Why not? It took FDR four terms to clean up after the conks back in the day.
http://fuelgaugereport.aaa.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
And the avg was $1.89 when Obama entered office..
And that was in SC, one of the lower cost states where the AAA avg today is $2.44. Within 20 cents +/- of your state avg makes sense. And its still bs that anyone today is going to fill a full tank of gas on a truck in IL (today avg $2.95) for $40..Ibanez wrote:Averages are nice, but nobody pays the average and people don't care what the national average is. They care about what they actually pay. I didn't go to SPINX yesterday and pay an average of $2.74/gallon. It was $2.34. Averages are talking points to show that, on the whole, things are better or worst. That makes you feel good. Makes you feel that things are better (or not) but it's a marketing ploy to get you to make an emotional connection.BDKJMU wrote:
Bullshit on any truck with a full tank of gas for $40. Today's even small size trucks have fuel tank capacities in the high teens-low 20s gallons, and the 1/2 tons more than that. AAA showed today's national avg at $2.74 and Illinois at $2.95.
http://fuelgaugereport.aaa.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
And the avg was $1.89 when Obama entered office..
You should know by know that Politics has to tug on the heart strings. That's how you get elected and get policy moving forward. Emotion not logic (see Obamacare).
HI54UNI wrote:Chizzang - can we get a ruling on the fuel tank capacity and gas mileage?BDKJMU wrote:
Bullshit on any truck with a full tank of gas for $40. Today's even small size trucks have fuel tank capacities in the high teens-low 20s gallons, and the 1/2 tons more than that. AAA showed today's national avg at $2.74 and Illinois at $2.95.
http://fuelgaugereport.aaa.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
And the avg was $1.89 when Obama entered office..
