legalized Gay/Lesbian Murder

[polsongrizz]

A California lawyer proposed a ballot initiative to legalize the execution of gay and lesbian people in the state. Orange County attorney Matt McLaughlin.
http://www.vox.com/2015/3/22/8270411/ca ... executions

A more efficient ballot would be to legalize the execution of lawyers and polititians.

[travelinman67]

...more accurately, his initiative authorizes the SHOOTING of gays and lesbians, which makes this initiative...

...irrelevant.

By the time anything like this passed (hell, anything's possible), firearms will have been outlawed in CA.

Bet he never thought of that.

BOOM!

[polsongrizz]

...more accurately, his initiative authorizes the SHOOTING of gays and lesbians, which makes this initiative...

...irrelevant.

By the time anything like this passed (hell, anything's possible), firearms will have been outlawed in CA.

Bet he never thought of that.

BOOM!

Boom my ass... The measure authorizes the EXECUTION of said persons. No where does it say how you may achieve that. It does say you may use bullets or any other convenient method. No mention of a gun though.
The measure would also make it illegal, with the threat of a $1 million fine, up to 10 years in prison, and permanent expulsion from the state, to advocate for gay rights to an audience that includes minors.

http://oag.ca.gov/system/files/initiati ... y%29_0.pdf
BAM...

[Chizzang]

The question on my mind is:
Would I throw away the right to practice law (Disbarred) just to make some kind of odd statement



This guy will be run up the flagpole and disbarred within 180 days
and unless he's got some kind of a book deal in the works - was it worth it..?

[Ivytalk]

15 minutes of fame for this douchebag.

The lunacy of the CA initiative procedure rears its ugly head again.

[kalm]

15 minutes of fame for this douchebag.

The lunacy of the CA initiative procedure rears its ugly head again.

The people aren't smart enough to self-legislate.

[travelinman67]

The question on my mind is:
Would I throw away the right to practice law (Disbarred) just to make some kind of odd statement



This guy will be run up the flagpole and disbarred within 180 days
and unless he's got some kind of a book deal in the works - was it worth it..?

The agenda.

This initiative IS NOT ABOUT HATE.

It's about the initiative process in California.

For decades, the Leftislature in CA has worked to limit the ability of voters to act through the initiative process, in effect, attempting to eliminate the entire constitutional procedure...traditionally used to remedy California's failed partisan government.
In this past election, the Secretary of State disqualified 17 proposals, often for dubious reasons, many are now facing legal challenges as having been unconstitutionally kept off the ballot...

...which brings us to the challenge process.

Currently, all challenges to disqualifications go through the State Attorney General, Kamala Harris...yes, THAT Kamala Harris!

Starting with the infamous Prop 108 ruling, where she declared sole standing to defend proposed initiatives and the courts confirmed Harris' sole standing, THEN REFUSED TO DEFEND THE LAW, Harris created a legal terrain where the State Attorney General becomes the sole arbiter of whether initiatives reach the ballot, and if passed, whether they become law.

Harris, FIERCELY POLITICAL, has used this authority liberally to silence California's initiative process.

Of those 17 initiatives disqualified, several were found to have met all requirements, but their content and proposed law went against the California Democrat agenda, and thus, were kept off the ballot. There are several legal actions making their way through the courts to remedy this breakdown...and eventually, Harris's shenanigans will be stopped...

...which brings us to the "Sodomite Suppression Act".

99.99999999999999999999999% of the electorate understands that a law proposing the extermination of a class of people solely resulting from their sexual preference is...

...insanity.

It would never pass. If the earth stopped rotating, the sun stopped shining, gravity ended, Kanye West learned to sing, and this initiative passed, it would never become law.

But, that's not the point.

Out of this bizarre incident, Gov. Moonbeam, Harris, and the Leftislature are attempting to craft another method to supplant Harris's unconstitutional abdication of her constitutionally proscribed duties (as California's chief law enforcement officer, she is sworn to enforce and defend the law), whereby they can continue to short circuit California's initiative process and retain their sole control of the State's governance.

Wake up, people.

[kalm]

The question on my mind is:
Would I throw away the right to practice law (Disbarred) just to make some kind of odd statement



This guy will be run up the flagpole and disbarred within 180 days
and unless he's got some kind of a book deal in the works - was it worth it..?

The agenda.

This initiative IS NOT ABOUT HATE.

It's about the initiative process in California.

For decades, the Leftislature in CA has worked to limit the ability of voters to act through the initiative process, in effect, attempting to eliminate the entire constitutional procedure...traditionally used to remedy California's failed partisan government.
In this past election, the Secretary of State disqualified 17 proposals, often for dubious reasons, many are now facing legal challenges as having been unconstitutionally kept off the ballot...

...which brings us to the challenge process.

Currently, all challenges to disqualifications go through the State Attorney General, Kamala Harris...yes, THAT Kamala Harris!

Starting with the infamous Prop 108 ruling, where she declared sole standing to defend proposed initiatives and the courts confirmed Harris' sole standing, THEN REFUSED TO DEFEND THE LAW, Harris created a legal terrain where the State Attorney General becomes the sole arbiter of whether initiatives reach the ballot, and if passed, whether they become law.

Harris, FIERCELY POLITICAL, has used this authority liberally to silence California's initiative process.

Of those 17 initiatives disqualified, several were found to have met all requirements, but their content and proposed law went against the California Democrat agenda, and thus, were kept off the ballot. There are several legal actions making their way through the courts to remedy this breakdown...and eventually, Harris's shenanigans will be stopped...

...which brings us to the "Sodomite Suppression Act".

99.99999999999999999999999% of the electorate understands that a law proposing the extermination of a class of people solely resulting from their sexual preference is...

...insanity.

It would never pass. If the earth stopped rotating, the sun stopped shining, gravity ended, Kanye West learned to sing, and this initiative passed, it would never become law.

But, that's not the point.

Out of this bizarre incident, Gov. Moonbeam, Harris, and the Leftislature are attempting to craft another method to supplant Harris's unconstitutional abdication of her constitutionally proscribed duties (as California's chief law enforcement officer, she is sworn to enforce and defend the law), whereby they can continue to short circuit California's initiative process and retain their sole control of the State's governance.

Wake up, people.

Again, the people aren't smart enough to self-legislate.

[travelinman67]

The agenda.

This initiative IS NOT ABOUT HATE.

It's about the initiative process in California.

For decades, the Leftislature in CA has worked to limit the ability of voters to act through the initiative process, in effect, attempting to eliminate the entire constitutional procedure...traditionally used to remedy California's failed partisan government.
In this past election, the Secretary of State disqualified 17 proposals, often for dubious reasons, many are now facing legal challenges as having been unconstitutionally kept off the ballot...

...which brings us to the challenge process.

Currently, all challenges to disqualifications go through the State Attorney General, Kamala Harris...yes, THAT Kamala Harris!

Starting with the infamous Prop 108 ruling, where she declared sole standing to defend proposed initiatives and the courts confirmed Harris' sole standing, THEN REFUSED TO DEFEND THE LAW, Harris created a legal terrain where the State Attorney General becomes the sole arbiter of whether initiatives reach the ballot, and if passed, whether they become law.

Harris, FIERCELY POLITICAL, has used this authority liberally to silence California's initiative process.

Of those 17 initiatives disqualified, several were found to have met all requirements, but their content and proposed law went against the California Democrat agenda, and thus, were kept off the ballot. There are several legal actions making their way through the courts to remedy this breakdown...and eventually, Harris's shenanigans will be stopped...

...which brings us to the "Sodomite Suppression Act".

99.99999999999999999999999% of the electorate understands that a law proposing the extermination of a class of people solely resulting from their sexual preference is...

...insanity.

It would never pass. If the earth stopped rotating, the sun stopped shining, gravity ended, Kanye West learned to sing, and this initiative passed, it would never become law.

But, that's not the point.

Out of this bizarre incident, Gov. Moonbeam, Harris, and the Leftislature are attempting to craft another method to supplant Harris's unconstitutional abdication of her constitutionally proscribed duties (as California's chief law enforcement officer, she is sworn to enforce and defend the law), whereby they can continue to short circuit California's initiative process and retain their sole control of the State's governance.

Wake up, people.

Again, the people aren't smart enough to self-legislate.

Says the Democrat operative.

[kalm]

Again, the people aren't smart enough to self-legislate.

Says the Democrat operative.

Huh? I thought conservatives would agree? What does my statement have to do with Democrats? Democrats are pro democracy.

Maybe if you keep trumpeting that statement it will someday be true!

[houndawg]

Says the Democrat operative.

Huh? I thought conservatives would agree? What does my statement have to do with Democrats? Democrats are pro democracy.

Maybe if you keep trumpeting that statement it will someday be true!

Hook, line, and sinker.

[travelinman67]

You two need to lay off the pot.

I live in Leftistland. The Democrat party OPPOSES the initiative process...always have, always will...because it dilutes their totalitarian, nanny state, big government agenda.

Sober up, boys.

In California, the initiative system has remedied MANY Leftislature-generated ills.

[polsongrizz]

People who bitch and complain about Ca, or any state and yet refuse to leave crack me the Fuk up...

[CID1990]

The measure authorizes the EXECUTION of said persons. No where does it say how you may achieve that. It does say you may use bullets or any other convenient method. No mention of a gun though

SO only mentioning bullets but not guns implies that they would stuff bullets up gays' noses until they suffocate?


Just trying to maintain the silly factor of this thread

[polsongrizz]

The measure authorizes the EXECUTION of said persons. No where does it say how you may achieve that. It does say you may use bullets or any other convenient method. No mention of a gun though

SO only mentioning bullets but not guns implies that they would stuff bullets up gays' noses until they suffocate?


Just trying to maintain the silly factor of this thread

I have a High Powered Wrist Rocket to fire those rounds with...If that fails I shall go back to the tried and true childhood game of taping a marble to the bottom and throwing it in the air and hoping for some hope of accuracy...

[travelinman67]

People who bitch and complain about Ca, or any state and yet refuse to leave crack me the Fuk up...

If you're implying that I am "refusing" to leave California (Densedawg's meme), you are wrong. I no longer own any property in California, and only live here because of kids/grandkids. As soon as they sell their properties (currently listed) they're leaving and so will I.

My advice to my clients was simple: Protect your neighborhood, city, county, and state with zeal. California is the example of the failures of permissive, lawless, liberalism.

[CID1990]

I spent two days in San Francisco back in 2010 on my way to Hong Kong and Vietnam.

I took a stroll down on those old dock warehouses. The dungeness crab mac n cheese was excellent.

[kalm]

You two need to lay off the pot.

I live in Leftistland. The Democrat party OPPOSES the initiative process...always have, always will...because it dilutes their totalitarian, nanny state, big government agenda.

Sober up, boys.

In California, the initiative system has remedied MANY Leftislature-generated ills.

I live in North Leftisland. Ask any Washington State liberal how they feel about Tim Eyman and the initiative process or any conservative liquor store owner regarding Costco buying the ability to sell booze.

People love their standard of living but don't want to pay for it and will jump at an opportunity to line their own pocket figuring government will still come up with the money to provide services. And often times government will through other methods.

Direct democracy via the people's initiative works both sides of the aisle and is a bad idea.

[YoUDeeMan]

The question on my mind is:
Would I throw away the right to practice law (Disbarred) just to make some kind of odd statement



This guy will be run up the flagpole and disbarred within 180 days
and unless he's got some kind of a book deal in the works - was it worth it..?

Sigh...the tolerant left won't tolerate differing views.

Surprise.

[LeadBolt]

The question on my mind is:
Would I throw away the right to practice law (Disbarred) just to make some kind of odd statement



This guy will be run up the flagpole and disbarred within 180 days
and unless he's got some kind of a book deal in the works - was it worth it..?

Sigh...the tolerant left won't tolerate differing views.

Surprise.

The liberal left can be as rigid and destructive as any force in American life.
Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Obviously the initiative is stupid, but shouldn't we be tolerant of diversity?

Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.
Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/autho ... icCPwGo.99" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[kalm]

Sigh...the tolerant left won't tolerate differing views.

Surprise.

The liberal left can be as rigid and destructive as any force in American life.
Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Obviously the initiative is stupid, but shouldn't we be tolerant of diversity?

Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.
Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/autho ... icCPwGo.99" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Hope this helps ya, LB.

[YoUDeeMan]

Morgan Freeman went from Godlike actor to complete dope in Lucy.

[travelinman67]

You two need to lay off the pot.

I live in Leftistland. The Democrat party OPPOSES the initiative process...always have, always will...because it dilutes their totalitarian, nanny state, big government agenda.

Sober up, boys.

In California, the initiative system has remedied MANY Leftislature-generated ills.

I live in North Leftisland. Ask any Washington State liberal how they feel about Tim Eyman and the initiative process or any conservative liquor store owner regarding Costco buying the ability to sell booze.

People love their standard of living but don't want to pay for it and will jump at an opportunity to line their own pocket figuring government will still come up with the money to provide services. And often times government will through other methods.

Direct democracy via the people's initiative works both sides of the aisle and is a bad idea.

Your opinion.

Dems exercise Nth degree politics...I.e. they don't know where to stop.

Americans don't need chicken farms with 24/7 environmental monitoring and daily animal care inspectors to ensure "trade worker" animals are living in non-stressed, free-range, condominium-quartered, custom-menu, disease/antibiotic free, work environments so they may produce $6/dozen eggs.

Dem regulatory avalanches define absurdity.

Dem excess directly oppresses liberty.

I'm sorry, Kalm, that you're either incapable of understanding this problem, or too immature to acknowledge it.

[Brock Landers]

The other religion of peace, amirite?

I for one would like to hear Pastor Steven Anderson's thoughts on the matter

Wait, I don't see the usual suspects in here. What a waste.

[Pwns]

I can't believe people are actually taking this at face value.