How 'bout Brian Williams?

[Baldy]

Hmmm...whom to believe.

A left of center website headed by an actual journalist or a story written by a hitman from a radical far left-wing progtard repository....

Decisions, decisions.

Look over there!

Unfortunately, Balsac, all the deflect and divert in the world can't change the two lies that Billy boy told right in front of god and everybody on tape:

a) He was in a war zone in Argentina

b) He was in the Falklands



The unfortunate facts are that:

a) there was no war zone in Argentina so he couldn't have been in a war zone in Argentina, and

b) there were no American reporters in the Falklands....

so sad...

O'reilly is such a pussy that even Super Honet could whup his azz...

Well lookie here dementiadawg appears. In his dirty diaper and all.

It's a banner day for you. You were at least partially right for once. 1 outta 4 ain't bad for you...not at all.

O'Reilly exaggerated, no doubt, but this is a war of semantics and your side has lost badly. O'Reilly has always said he was in Buenos Aries and Argentina covering the Faulklands War. He never stated that he was on the Faulklands, sorry. It seems the only people who don't know that the Faulklands aren't in Argentina or in Buenos Aires are David Corn, David Corn fanboys, and dumb hick Illinois farmhands.

When Mediaite and Politico both are saying that Corn stepped on his little needle dick, it's time to pack up, call it a day, and try again tomorrow.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/201 ... 02962.html

[houndawg]

Look over there!

Unfortunately, Balsac, all the deflect and divert in the world can't change the two lies that Billy boy told right in front of god and everybody on tape:

a) He was in a war zone in Argentina

b) He was in the Falklands



The unfortunate facts are that:

a) there was no war zone in Argentina so he couldn't have been in a war zone in Argentina, and

b) there were no American reporters in the Falklands....

so sad...

O'reilly is such a pussy that even Super Honet could whup his azz...

Well lookie here dementiadawg appears. In his dirty diaper and all.

It's a banner day for you. You were at least partially right for once. 1 outta 4 ain't bad for you...not at all.

O'Reilly exaggerated, no doubt, but this is a war of semantics and your side has lost badly. O'Reilly has always said he was in Buenos Aries and Argentina covering the Faulklands War. He never stated that he was on the Faulklands, sorry. It seems the only people who don't know that the Faulklands aren't in Argentina or in Buenos Aires are David Corn, David Corn fanboys, and dumb hick Illinois farmhands.

When Mediaite and Politico both are saying that Corn stepped on his little needle dick, it's time to pack up, call it a day, and try again tomorrow.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/201 ... 02962.html

He lied through his teeth, Balsac. Here it is verbatim:

"I was in a situation one time,in a war zone in Argentina, in the Falklands, where my photographer got run down and then hit his and was bleeding from the ear on the concrete. And the army was chasing us."

Oddly nobody else who was with him remembers it that way, above and beyond the fact that Argentina wasn't a war zone and there were no American reporters on the Falklands. I do concede that for O'Reilly that isn't much of a lie relative to his usual drivel.

Thanks for playing, we have some wonderful gifts for you. Next contestant please..

[Grizalltheway]

Can we just agree that damn near every journalist these days is a self-aggrandizing douchebag?

[houndawg]

Look over there!

Unfortunately, Balsac, all the deflect and divert in the world can't change the two lies that Billy boy told right in front of god and everybody on tape:

a) He was in a war zone in Argentina

b) He was in the Falklands



The unfortunate facts are that:

a) there was no war zone in Argentina so he couldn't have been in a war zone in Argentina, and

b) there were no American reporters in the Falklands....

so sad...

O'reilly is such a pussy that even Super Honet could whup his azz...

Well lookie here dementiadawg appears. In his dirty diaper and all.

It's a banner day for you. You were at least partially right for once. 1 outta 4 ain't bad for you...not at all.

O'Reilly exaggerated, no doubt, but this is a war of semantics and your side has lost badly. O'Reilly has always said he was in Buenos Aries and Argentina covering the Faulklands War. He never stated that he was on the Faulklands, sorry. It seems the only people who don't know that the Faulklands aren't in Argentina or in Buenos Aires are David Corn, David Corn fanboys, and dumb hick Illinois farmhands.

When Mediaite and Politico both are saying that Corn stepped on his little needle dick, it's time to pack up, call it a day, and try again tomorrow.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/201 ... 02962.html

Pass that one on to unravelinman, he's been trying forever and can't come up with anything decent.

[Baldy]

Well lookie here dementiadawg appears. In his dirty diaper and all.

It's a banner day for you. You were at least partially right for once. 1 outta 4 ain't bad for you...not at all.

O'Reilly exaggerated, no doubt, but this is a war of semantics and your side has lost badly. O'Reilly has always said he was in Buenos Aries and Argentina covering the Faulklands War. He never stated that he was on the Faulklands, sorry. It seems the only people who don't know that the Faulklands aren't in Argentina or in Buenos Aires are David Corn, David Corn fanboys, and dumb hick Illinois farmhands.

When Mediaite and Politico both are saying that Corn stepped on his little needle dick, it's time to pack up, call it a day, and try again tomorrow.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/201 ... 02962.html

He lied through his teeth, Balsac. Here it is verbatim:

"I was in a situation one time,in a war zone in Argentina, in the Falklands, where my photographer got run down and then hit his and was bleeding from the ear on the concrete. And the army was chasing us."

Oddly nobody else who was with him remembers it that way, above and beyond the fact that Argentina wasn't a war zone and there were no American reporters on the Falklands. I do concede that for O'Reilly that isn't much of a lie relative to his usual drivel.

Thanks for playing, we have some wonderful gifts for you. Next contestant please..

You're flailing, dd.

The people who were on the ground have backed up his claim that it was a full blown riot, military, tanks in the streets, etc. The video from CBS and CNN at the time backs it up. On CNN, Eric Engberg claimed it was a tame riot, no sirens, no gunfire, etc. However, from his own lips on the CBS story, he says there was gunfire, teargas, battles between the police/military and rioters. Dan Rather confirmed it back in 1982. Even then the NY Times reported that people died in the riot.

It's over, you lost...this "story" has run it's course, and it didn't even get out of the gate. It got as much play as the chick with genital warts on her tongue. Drink a little Ensure and take a nap. When the nurse wakes you up in the morning it will be all over.

[houndawg]

He lied through his teeth, Balsac. Here it is verbatim:

"I was in a situation one time,in a war zone in Argentina, in the Falklands, where my photographer got run down and then hit his and was bleeding from the ear on the concrete. And the army was chasing us."

Oddly nobody else who was with him remembers it that way, above and beyond the fact that Argentina wasn't a war zone and there were no American reporters on the Falklands. I do concede that for O'Reilly that isn't much of a lie relative to his usual drivel.

Thanks for playing, we have some wonderful gifts for you. Next contestant please..

You're flailing, dd.

The people who were on the ground have backed up his claim that it was a full blown riot, military, tanks in the streets, etc. The video from CBS and CNN at the time backs it up. On CNN, Eric Engberg claimed it was a tame riot, no sirens, no gunfire, etc. However, from his own lips on the CBS story, he says there was gunfire, teargas, battles between the police/military and rioters. Dan Rather confirmed it back in 1982. Even then the NY Times reported that people died in the riot.

It's over, you lost...this "story" has run it's course, and it didn't even get out of the gate. It got as much play as the chick with genital warts on her tongue. Drink a little Ensure and take a nap. When the nurse wakes you up in the morning it will be all over.

There you go again, Balsac, answering a charge that hasn't been made.

No war zone. No Falklands. Two lies.

Stick to the point, son. If you want to talk about some other situation, start your own thread.

And it looks like the fun is just beginning... chickenhawk Bill is going after the NYT reporter with "everything he has". Thats bound to strike terror into the heart of just about anybody...

[kalm]

He lied through his teeth, Balsac. Here it is verbatim:

"I was in a situation one time,in a war zone in Argentina, in the Falklands, where my photographer got run down and then hit his and was bleeding from the ear on the concrete. And the army was chasing us."

Oddly nobody else who was with him remembers it that way, above and beyond the fact that Argentina wasn't a war zone and there were no American reporters on the Falklands. I do concede that for O'Reilly that isn't much of a lie relative to his usual drivel.

Thanks for playing, we have some wonderful gifts for you. Next contestant please..

You're flailing, dd.

The people who were on the ground have backed up his claim that it was a full blown riot, military, tanks in the streets, etc. The video from CBS and CNN at the time backs it up. On CNN, Eric Engberg claimed it was a tame riot, no sirens, no gunfire, etc. However, from his own lips on the CBS story, he says there was gunfire, teargas, battles between the police/military and rioters. Dan Rather confirmed it back in 1982. Even then the NY Times reported that people died in the riot.

It's over, you lost...this "story" has run it's course, and it didn't even get out of the gate. It got as much play as the chick with genital warts on her tongue. Drink a little Ensure and take a nap. When the nurse wakes you up in the morning it will be all over.

Badly, drop Bill O's jock from your mouth and slowly walk away…

Bill O'Reilly's account of a 1982 riot in Argentina is being sharply contradicted by seven other journalists who were his colleagues and were also there at the time.

The people all challenge O'Reilly's depiction of Buenos Aires as a "war zone" and a "combat situation." They also doubt his description of a CBS cameraman being injured in the chaos.

"Nobody remembers this happening," said Manny Alvarez, who was a cameraman for CBS News in Buenos Aires.

Jim Forrest, who was a sound engineer for CBS there, said that when he heard O'Reilly retell the Argentina riot story to interviewer Marvin Kalb several years ago, he contacted Kalb and said "I was on that crew, and I don't recall his version of events."

The contradictions come several days after Mother Jones, a left-leaning magazine, first reported about the discrepancies in O'Reilly's claims about his coverage of the Falklands War. O'Reilly was a young correspondent for CBS News at the time, assigned to cover the war from Buenos Aires, which was more than 1,000 miles from the offshore conflict zone.
In the years since, O'Reilly -- now the biggest star on Fox News -- has repeatedly referred to his experience in the "war zone."
In his 2001 book, "The No Spin Zone," O'Reilly wrote, "I've reported on the ground in active war zones from El Salvador to the Falklands."

On his show "The O'Reilly Factor" in 2013, O'Reilly told a guest, "I was in a situation one time, in a war zone in Argentina, in the Falklands, where my photographer got run down and then hit his head and was bleeding from the ear on the concrete. And the army was chasing us. I had to make a decision. And I dragged him off, you know, but at the same time, I'm looking around and trying to do my job, but I figure I had to get this guy out of there because that was more important."

Mother Jones challenged some of these claims. O'Reilly responded by accusing the magazine of trying to smear him to hurt Fox News, and said the report's co-author, David Corn, is a liar and an "irresponsible guttersnipe."

Eric Engberg, a CBS correspondent who was also in Buenos Aires at the time, defended Corn in a Facebook post on Friday and said, "It was not a war zone or even close. It was an 'expense account zone.'"

Longtime NBC News correspondent George Lewis, who was also there at the time, agreed with Engberg, writing on Facebook, "Cushiest war I ever covered."

Did O'Reilly's photographer get "run down" and bloodied?

CNN has interviewed seven people who were there for CBS, and none of them recall anyone from the network being injured.
"If somebody got hurt, we all would have known," Alvarez said.

[houndawg]

"Expense Account Zone"

He could put it after his name, like Jr., or Esq.....

Bill O'Reilly, Eaz...

[Baldy]

You're flailing, dd.

The people who were on the ground have backed up his claim that it was a full blown riot, military, tanks in the streets, etc. The video from CBS and CNN at the time backs it up. On CNN, Eric Engberg claimed it was a tame riot, no sirens, no gunfire, etc. However, from his own lips on the CBS story, he says there was gunfire, teargas, battles between the police/military and rioters. Dan Rather confirmed it back in 1982. Even then the NY Times reported that people died in the riot.

It's over, you lost...this "story" has run it's course, and it didn't even get out of the gate. It got as much play as the chick with genital warts on her tongue. Drink a little Ensure and take a nap. When the nurse wakes you up in the morning it will be all over.

Badly, drop Bill O's jock from your mouth and slowly walk away…

Bill O'Reilly's account of a 1982 riot in Argentina is being sharply contradicted by seven other journalists who were his colleagues and were also there at the time.

The people all challenge O'Reilly's depiction of Buenos Aires as a "war zone" and a "combat situation." They also doubt his description of a CBS cameraman being injured in the chaos.

"Nobody remembers this happening," said Manny Alvarez, who was a cameraman for CBS News in Buenos Aires.

Jim Forrest, who was a sound engineer for CBS there, said that when he heard O'Reilly retell the Argentina riot story to interviewer Marvin Kalb several years ago, he contacted Kalb and said "I was on that crew, and I don't recall his version of events."

The contradictions come several days after Mother Jones, a left-leaning magazine, first reported about the discrepancies in O'Reilly's claims about his coverage of the Falklands War. O'Reilly was a young correspondent for CBS News at the time, assigned to cover the war from Buenos Aires, which was more than 1,000 miles from the offshore conflict zone.
In the years since, O'Reilly -- now the biggest star on Fox News -- has repeatedly referred to his experience in the "war zone."
In his 2001 book, "The No Spin Zone," O'Reilly wrote, "I've reported on the ground in active war zones from El Salvador to the Falklands."

On his show "The O'Reilly Factor" in 2013, O'Reilly told a guest, "I was in a situation one time, in a war zone in Argentina, in the Falklands, where my photographer got run down and then hit his head and was bleeding from the ear on the concrete. And the army was chasing us. I had to make a decision. And I dragged him off, you know, but at the same time, I'm looking around and trying to do my job, but I figure I had to get this guy out of there because that was more important."

Mother Jones challenged some of these claims. O'Reilly responded by accusing the magazine of trying to smear him to hurt Fox News, and said the report's co-author, David Corn, is a liar and an "irresponsible guttersnipe."

Eric Engberg, a CBS correspondent who was also in Buenos Aires at the time, defended Corn in a Facebook post on Friday and said, "It was not a war zone or even close. It was an 'expense account zone.'"

Longtime NBC News correspondent George Lewis, who was also there at the time, agreed with Engberg, writing on Facebook, "Cushiest war I ever covered."

Did O'Reilly's photographer get "run down" and bloodied?

CNN has interviewed seven people who were there for CBS, and none of them recall anyone from the network being injured.
"If somebody got hurt, we all would have known," Alvarez said.

You and dirty diaper boy giving each other reciprocal reach-a-rounds is cute cute and all, klam, but the truth is that nobody cares. Once the video evidence was released, this "story" was a dud. The only people trying to prop it up now are the booger eating progtards who don't know when to tuck their tail and head home. The horse died, you can give up now.

[kalm]

Badly, drop Bill O's jock from your mouth and slowly walk away…

You and dirty diaper boy giving each other reciprocal reach-a-rounds is cute cute and all, klam, but the truth is that nobody cares. Once the video evidence was released, this "story" was a dud. The only people trying to prop it up now are the booger eating progtards who don't know when to tuck their tail and head home. The horse died, you can give up now.

Surrender accepted!

[Baldy]

You and dirty diaper boy giving each other reciprocal reach-a-rounds is cute cute and all, klam, but the truth is that nobody cares. Once the video evidence was released, this "story" was a dud. The only people trying to prop it up now are the booger eating progtards who don't know when to tuck their tail and head home. The horse died, you can give up now.

Surrender accepted!

Progtard FAIL!

http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/201 ... 02962.html

[kalm]

You and dirty diaper boy giving each other reciprocal reach-a-rounds is cute cute and all, klam, but the truth is that nobody cares. Once the video evidence was released, this "story" was a dud. The only people trying to prop it up now are the booger eating progtards who don't know when to tuck their tail and head home. The horse died, you can give up now.

Surrender accepted!

[Baldy]

Surrender accepted!

Progtard FAIL!

http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/201 ... 02962.html

[kalm]

Surrender accepted!

[Baldy]

Progtard FAIL!

http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/201 ... 02962.html

[ASUG8]

We also have a new head of the VA who thought he was in the US Special forces, but he was mistaken also.

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-h ... al-n311981" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[YoUDeeMan]

I'm Brian and so's my wife.

[houndawg]

Badly, drop Bill O's jock from your mouth and slowly walk away…

You and dirty diaper boy giving each other reciprocal reach-a-rounds is cute cute and all, klam, but the truth is that nobody cares. Once the video evidence was released, this "story" was a dud. The only people trying to prop it up now are the booger eating progtards who don't know when to tuck their tail and head home. The horse died, you can give up now.

Really? O'Reilly is still in the full ballistic mode, threatened some chick reporter with "coming after her with everything he has" and that she "could take that as a threat".

Bitch would prolly whup hiz azz.

[kalm]

More reporting from your humble correspondent...

http://money.cnn.com/2015/02/25/media/b ... enschildt/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[houndawg]

Surrender accepted!

Progtard FAIL!

http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/201 ... 02962.html

Here it is again just in case

You're going to love the next coupleof debunkings, Balsac, turns out the hits just keep coming...'

http://money.cnn.com/2015/02/25/media/b ... enschildt/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Stop it man you're killin me....

Seriously, your unhairyness, you have got to use your pull to get this guy the Republican nomination, the dolt wing of the party will believe every word and the rest of us will get a couple of years of entertainment..

[Baldy]

Progtard FAIL!

http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/201 ... 02962.html

Here it is again just in case

You're going to love the next coupleof debunkings, Balsac, turns out the hits just keep coming...'

http://money.cnn.com/2015/02/25/media/b ... enschildt/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Stop it man you're killin me....

Seriously, your unhairyness, you have got to use your pull to get this guy the Republican nomination, the dolt wing of the party will believe every word and the rest of us will get a couple of years of entertainment..

A he said she said from 37 years ago? You got 'em now, I have no doubt this one is gonna stick.

[houndawg]

Here it is again just in case

You're going to love the next coupleof debunkings, Balsac, turns out the hits just keep coming...'

http://money.cnn.com/2015/02/25/media/b ... enschildt/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Stop it man you're killin me....

Seriously, your unhairyness, you have got to use your pull to get this guy the Republican nomination, the dolt wing of the party will believe every word and the rest of us will get a couple of years of entertainment..

A he said she said from 37 years ago? You got 'em now, I have no doubt this one is gonna stick.

Balsac!

You're missing the point again; it doesn't matter if anything "sticks". This is about entertainment, right? Fox News is all about entertainment, as is BillyO; nobody ever accused him of being a reporter. Now you tell me when Bill Oreilly has ever been more entertaining, to a wider audience, than when he's stealing valor and threatening a chick reporter to "come after you with everything I have" and that she "could take that as a threat"? Pure gold I tell ya!

Put him on the conk ticket, the nation needs to laugh again.

Palin/O'Really in '16.

[Baldy]

A he said she said from 37 years ago? You got 'em now, I have no doubt this one is gonna stick.

Balsac!

You're missing the point again; it doesn't matter if anything "sticks". This is about entertainment, right? Fox News is all about entertainment, as is BillyO; nobody ever accused him of being a reporter. Now you tell me when Bill Oreilly has ever been more entertaining, to a wider audience, than when he's stealing valor and threatening a chick reporter to "come after you with everything I have" and that she "could take that as a threat"? Pure gold I tell ya!

Put him on the conk ticket, the nation needs to laugh again.

Palin/O'Really in '16.

That's the entire point, droopy. Unless the national media shines a light and forces an apology or a suspension or a resignation...something, this is nothing but jerk-off material for the mouth breathing extremists like you. Nothing less, nothing more.

Come see me when you get a real scandal.

[ASUG8]

More reporting from your humble correspondent...

http://money.cnn.com/2015/02/25/media/b ... enschildt/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

CNN? Really?

[houndawg]

He lied through his teeth, Balsac. Here it is verbatim:

"I was in a situation one time,in a war zone in Argentina, in the Falklands, where my photographer got run down and then hit his and was bleeding from the ear on the concrete. And the army was chasing us."

Oddly nobody else who was with him remembers it that way, above and beyond the fact that Argentina wasn't a war zone and there were no American reporters on the Falklands. I do concede that for O'Reilly that isn't much of a lie relative to his usual drivel.

Thanks for playing, we have some wonderful gifts for you. Next contestant please..

You're flailing, dd.

The people who were on the ground have backed up his claim that it was a full blown riot, military, tanks in the streets, etc. The video from CBS and CNN at the time backs it up. On CNN, Eric Engberg claimed it was a tame riot, no sirens, no gunfire, etc. However, from his own lips on the CBS story, he says there was gunfire, teargas, battles between the police/military and rioters. Dan Rather confirmed it back in 1982. Even then the NY Times reported that people died in the riot.

It's over, you lost...this "story" has run it's course, and it didn't even get out of the gate. It got as much play as the chick with genital warts on her tongue. Drink a little Ensure and take a nap. When the nurse wakes you up in the morning it will be all over.

You gotta get out more, Balmy, you're missing some great comedy. I gotta admit that prior to this I didn't see what people found entertaining about Billy O, but now I "get" it! Here you'll get a kick out of this...

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/02/anot ... ictitious/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

"..the producer who was about a foot shorter than oreilly didn't have any trouble holding him back.."