Why Does SNL Lampoon More GOPs than Donks?

[travelinman67]

SNL Conservative cast member not allowed to sit with other show alum during reunion. Placed in "overflow" room alone...

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/s ... cal-775080

Fucking bigot shouldn't have been invited back.

So, people who are not of the "Progressive" mindset are bigots?

[travelinman67]

BTW...Here's a list of 143 notable celebrity entertainers who were identified as Republicans...

http://m.ranker.com/list/actors-republi ... servatives

...and here's a list of SNL guest hosts since the beginning...

http://epguides.com/SaturdayNightLive/

I found 5 Conks who had guest hosted...

...over about 400 shows.



Yeaahh...no political hate there.

[kalm]

BTW...Here's a list of 143 notable celebrity entertainers who were identified as Republicans...

http://m.ranker.com/list/actors-republi ... servatives

...and here's a list of SNL guest hosts since the beginning...

http://epguides.com/SaturdayNightLive/

I found 5 Conks who had guest hosted...

...over about 400 shows.



Yeaahh...no political hate there.

It's like black over-representation on TV. Out of thousands of entertainers, 5 hosted and 3 were cast members.

I'm surprised he was able to find that many conks with comedic chops.

[Ibanez]

BTW...Here's a list of 143 notable celebrity entertainers who were identified as Republicans...

http://m.ranker.com/list/actors-republi ... servatives

...and here's a list of SNL guest hosts since the beginning...

http://epguides.com/SaturdayNightLive/

I found 5 Conks who had guest hosted...

...over about 400 shows.



Yeaahh...no political hate there.

I learned a few things from that list:

1) Adam Sandler is a Republican
2) Dennis Hopper is dead
3) George Hamilton was born in 1788 and died in 1836
4) Freddie Prinz died the same year as his father

[Vidav]

Fucking bigot shouldn't have been invited back.

So, people who are not of the "Progressive" mindset are bigots?

No. People that actively try to keep equal rights away from people are bigots.

[kalm]

So, people who are not of the "Progressive" mindset are bigots?

No. People that actively try to keep equal rights away from people are bigots.

Victoria is smarter than Louis Gohmert, Roy Moore, and Ted Cruz combined.

[Cap'n Cat]

I'm curious: How can one, on one hand, claim to "have stopped watching SNL 20 years ago", while on the OTHER hand make a blanket statement like "the current writers are humorless". How would you KNOW if you don't watch it?

Is every skit a home run? No...but if you watch some of the guys/ladies who came out of that show in the mid-late 2000's and don't find them funny then you truly do NOT have a sense of humor any more.

I stop in every once in a while...watch a few sketches. I'm not knocking the cast...I'm critical of the writing. I "get" the jokes...they're just not that humorous. Occasionally they have talented prople on WHO CONTRIBUTE TO THE WRITING...AND IT SHOWS! Justin Timberlake has contributed several of the better recent ideas.

Look back at the original characters...Chase, Belushi, Radner, Curtain. One of my faves was Emily Litella's editorial rants...
Violins on TV
Busting schoolchildren
Eagle rights
Making Puerto Rico a steak

Shit was pure.

And BTW Commienez...my name calling was in response to YOUR personal attack...which was absent of any comment or criticism of SNL. Just like now. Other than saying, "They're funny...you just don't have a sense of humor." What is your position on the status of the show's production/development in particular as it pertains to political bias; the original topic of this thread.

And see if you're able to comment absent a personal attack.

Fuck you, ya fat bastard. You're wrong, several people are telling you you're wrong. You're a pompous Conk know-it-all fuck pontificator khundt.

Get back in your hole, Tubs.

[travelinman67]

I stop in every once in a while...watch a few sketches. I'm not knocking the cast...I'm critical of the writing. I "get" the jokes...they're just not that humorous. Occasionally they have talented prople on WHO CONTRIBUTE TO THE WRITING...AND IT SHOWS! Justin Timberlake has contributed several of the better recent ideas.

Look back at the original characters...Chase, Belushi, Radner, Curtain. One of my faves was Emily Litella's editorial rants...
Violins on TV
Busting schoolchildren
Eagle rights
Making Puerto Rico a steak

Shit was pure.

And BTW Commienez...my name calling was in response to YOUR personal attack...which was absent of any comment or criticism of SNL. Just like now. Other than saying, "They're funny...you just don't have a sense of humor." What is your position on the status of the show's production/development in particular as it pertains to political bias; the original topic of this thread.

And see if you're able to comment absent a personal attack.

Fuck you, ya fat bastard. You're wrong, several people are telling you you're wrong. You're a pompous Conk know-it-all fuck pontificator khundt.

Get back in your hole, Tubs.

Fuck off, Troll.

[travelinman67]

So, people who are not of the "Progressive" mindset are bigots?

No. People that actively try to keep equal rights away from people are bigots.

Yet, remarkably, a few years ago, the "line" defining equal rights fell where Jackson still stands.

So by your definition, when the court moves a social boundary of acceptance, anyone not changing their own belief instantly becomes a bigot?

[D1B]

BTW...Here's a list of 143 notable celebrity entertainers who were identified as Republicans...

http://m.ranker.com/list/actors-republi ... servatives

...and here's a list of SNL guest hosts since the beginning...

http://epguides.com/SaturdayNightLive/

I found 5 Conks who had guest hosted...

...over about 400 shows.



Yeaahh...no political hate there.

You're a perfect example of why conks have no place in the arts, except as objects of satire and derision.

1. Mean spirited and violent
2. Stupid and predictable coupled with arrogance
3. Archaic thinking
4. Fat, white and unattractive



"It's Obama's fault!!"

[Ibanez]

You must get out matched quite often, because you'll be the first to do so. That's not an attack, that's the truth.

Example?

And NOT a Cappy/D exchange...those are theater.

http://www.championshipsubdivision.com/ ... 10&t=42471" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[travelinman67]

Example?

And NOT a Cappy/D exchange...those are theater.

http://www.championshipsubdivision.com/ ... 10&t=42471" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Try again, Stalker. I was AGREEING with what Brownshirt said!

What do you have to add to this thread?

Or are you fixated on following me around and criticizing every word I write?

[Vidav]

No. People that actively try to keep equal rights away from people are bigots.

Yet, remarkably, a few years ago, the "line" defining equal rights fell where Jackson still stands.

So by your definition, when the court moves a social boundary of acceptance, anyone not changing their own belief instantly becomes a bigot?

It's not about what the courts. It's about people and having basic human decency. There is no good reason to be against gay marriage rights. It can only stem from bigotry.

[Ibanez]

http://www.championshipsubdivision.com/ ... 10&t=42471" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Try again, Stalker. I was AGREEING with what Brownshirt said!

What do you have to add to this thread?

Or are you fixated on following me around and criticizing every word I write?

who cares. You called him a Brownshirt, an obvious slight, which you always do. Brownshirt isn't a term of endearment.

And don't flatter yourself, kingmaker. Nobody is following you around in CS, waiting for some comment. We all stay stupid shit, eventually.

[D1B]

Try again, Stalker. I was AGREEING with what Brownshirt said!

What do you have to add to this thread?

Or are you fixated on following me around and criticizing every word I write?

who cares. You called him a Brownshirt, an obvious slight, which you always do. Brownshirt isn't a term of endearment.

And don't flatter yourself, kingmaker. Nobody is following you around in CS, waiting for some comment. We all stay stupid shit, eventually.

Tbag is that asshole at the party who loudly holds court and terrorizes people into listening to his paranoid ramblings on class warfare and the best ammo. The only reason he was invited was everyone owes him money.

[travelinman67]

Try again, Stalker. I was AGREEING with what Brownshirt said!

What do you have to add to this thread?

Or are you fixated on following me around and criticizing every word I write?
It

who cares. You called him a Brownshirt, an obvious slight, which you always do. Brownshirt isn't a term of endearment.

And don't flatter yourself, kingmaker. Nobody is following you around in CS, waiting for some comment. We all stay stupid shit, eventually.

Your stalker post cites a a post I made in another thread...
...adding NOTHING, AGAIN, about the discussion within topic, D1banez.

Add your name to the list of Official Tman stalkers:
D1B
Cap'n Cat
Densedawg
D1banez

[travelinman67]

Yet, remarkably, a few years ago, the "line" defining equal rights fell where Jackson still stands.

So by your definition, when the court moves a social boundary of acceptance, anyone not changing their own belief instantly becomes a bigot?

It's not about what the courts. It's about people and having basic human decency. There is no good reason to be against gay marriage rights. It can only stem from bigotry.

It stems from religious beliefs, not bigotry. She was raised/schooled in a strict Catholic family. It is no easier for her to accept LGBT than it is for an LGBT to "change" their physiology.

Physiological v emotional(irrational/religious) motivator?

Go ahead...you know you want to!

[D1B]

It's not about what the courts. It's about people and having basic human decency. There is no good reason to be against gay marriage rights. It can only stem from bigotry.

It stems from religious beliefs, not bigotry. She was raised/schooled in a strict Catholic family. It is no easier for her to accept LGBT than it is for an LGBT to "change" their physiology.

Physiological v emotional(irrational/religious) motivator?

Go ahead...you know you want to!

Dumbfuck post of the year nomination.

Stunning.

[travelinman67]

It stems from religious beliefs, not bigotry. She was raised/schooled in a strict Catholic family. It is no easier for her to accept LGBT than it is for an LGBT to "change" their physiology.

Physiological v emotional(irrational/religious) motivator?

Go ahead...you know you want to!

Dumbfuck post of the year nomination.

Stunning.

50+ years old, and you spend your time stalking posters on the internet.



Grow up, Troll.

[D1B]

Dumbfuck post of the year nomination.

Stunning.

50+ years old, and you spend your time stalking posters on the internet.



Grow up, Troll.

You're the fattest troll here, Tbung.

BTW, I invented the "you're a stalker" reversal gambit. It only works when I use it.

As long as you're posting here there will be reasonable people quick to "houndawg" you.

[kalm]

It's not about what the courts. It's about people and having basic human decency. There is no good reason to be against gay marriage rights. It can only stem from bigotry.

It stems from religious beliefs, not bigotry. She was raised/schooled in a strict Catholic family. It is no easier for her to accept LGBT than it is for an LGBT to "change" their physiology.

Physiological v emotional(irrational/religious) motivator?

Go ahead...you know you want to!

Bigotry mostly comes from religion and the adherents need to own their beliefs. Nobody forces them to think that way, but beliefs are not the same as rights.

[Ibanez]

who cares. You called him a Brownshirt, an obvious slight, which you always do. Brownshirt isn't a term of endearment.

And don't flatter yourself, kingmaker. Nobody is following you around in CS, waiting for some comment. We all stay stupid shit, eventually.

Your stalker post cites a a post I made in another thread...
...adding NOTHING, AGAIN, about the discussion within topic, D1banez.

Add your name to the list of Official Tman stalkers:
D1B
Cap'n Cat
Densedawg
D1banez

You're delusional. This is a message board. People view other topics. My viewing a thread, seeing a post and it reminding me of something else isn't stalking, you pretentious bastard. You're apparently too fucking stupid to understand my post in context with the post I quoted. You're the white dal/mrklean.

See, this is why old people shouldn't be on the internet. They don't understand how it works. You should honestly quit, this isn't working out for you.

And, you personally attacked me. I thought you didn't do that. I thought you were a man. I thought wrong. You're just a troll in California (which is hysterical b/c you live in a state you bitch about 24/7) who sits on his computer thinking his shit doesn't stink and he's some learned man that knows everything about everything. You're a pompous ass. That's the real issue here. Nobody can tell you anything. You can't take a fucking joke and you are the first and second person to go on the defensive and start name calling like some 5th grader. Then you get pissed when people throw that shit right back at you.

[travelinman67]

Reread your preceding post. I'm not the one with anger issues, D1banez.

[Ibanez]

Reread your preceding post. I'm not the one with anger issues, D1banez.

Nah, I'm good. Life's too short to get angry over some blowhard on the inter webs. Besides, I'm not the one acting like a child. I'll be the adult and end this conversation. Somebody needs to be mature and not resort to childish name-calling. Have a lovely day.

[travelinman67]

It stems from religious beliefs, not bigotry. She was raised/schooled in a strict Catholic family. It is no easier for her to accept LGBT than it is for an LGBT to "change" their physiology.

Physiological v emotional(irrational/religious) motivator?

Go ahead...you know you want to!

Bigotry mostly comes from religion and the adherents need to own their beliefs. Nobody forces them to think that way, but beliefs are not the same as rights.

So, you're asserting that all rights are equal and inalienable?

Regardless of sex, age, ethnicity, culture, sexual preference, socio-economic class...

...but not religious alignment?

You do know that religion is one of the few areas the courts have recognized as being exempt from certain laws? (I.e., afforded greater protection than other protected classes).

If you are raised in, belong to, and practice the religion of the Church of _______________, and believe that failure to practice chastity on rainy days will result in your eternal damnation...AND FURTHER...you have a moral responsibility to witness in an effort to save the souls of non-believing wet-willie'ers...

...your life will revolve around the weather radar.

Not really a stretch if you think about it.

Is it illogical? Sure.

Are they infringing on the rights of lovers of rainy days? Depends on the DEGREE of interference.

Do they have a *right* to practice an illogical religion? Hell yes!

When any court or government attempts to regulate religious doctrine, humanity will begin the journey towards a dystopian totalitarian demise.



(Stalker posts in 5-4-3-2-)