Why Not $900 Million?

Political discussions
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69143
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Why Not $900 Million?

Post by kalm »

I mean why stop short when you're so close? At least we now have an established third party. :thumb:
Koch Brothers’ Budget of $889 Million for 2016 Is on Par With Both Parties’ Spending

The political network overseen by the conservative billionaires Charles G. and David H. Koch plans to spend close to $900 million on the 2016 campaign, an unparalleled effort by coordinated outside groups to shape a presidential election that is already on track to be the most expensive in history.

The spending goal, revealed Monday at the Kochs’ annual winter donor retreat near Palm Springs, Calif., would allow their political organization to operate at the same financial scale as the Democratic and Republican Parties. It would require a significant financial commitment from the Kochs and roughly 300 other donors they have recruited over the years, and covers both the presidential and congressional races. In the last presidential election, the Republican National Committee and the party’s two congressional campaign committees spent a total of $657 million.

Hundreds of conservative donors recruited by the Kochs gathered over the weekend for three days of issue seminars, strategy sessions and mingling with rising elected officials. These donors represent the largest concentration of political money outside the party establishment, one that has achieved enormous power in Republican circles in recent years………..

As the three senators addressed the audience of rich donors — effectively an audition for the 2016 primary — they dismissed a question about whether the wealthy had too much influence in politics. At times they seemed to be addressing an audience of two: the Kochs themselves, now among the country’s most influential conservative power brokers.

Mr. Cruz gave an impassioned defense of his hosts as job creators and the victims of unfair attacks by Democrats, while Mr. Rubio suggested that only liberals supported campaign finance restrictions, so as to empower what he said were their allies in Hollywood and the news media.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/27/us/po ... .html?_r=0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 31515
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: Why Not $900 Million?

Post by Gil Dobie »

It's the American way. Carnegie, Rockefeller and Morgan helped elect Mckinley and if we could find the stat, I bet they spent a lot more than the parties back in 1896.
Image
User avatar
Wedgebuster
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 12260
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 3:06 pm
I am a fan of: UNC BEARS
A.K.A.: OB55
Location: Where The Rivers Run North

Re: Why Not $900 Million?

Post by Wedgebuster »

Some say the Koch bros stand to pocket 100B on the Keystone Pipeline, a single billion is chump change when buying control of the US Government.

:nod:
Image
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 31515
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: Why Not $900 Million?

Post by Gil Dobie »

Wedgebuster wrote:Some say the Koch bros stand to pocket 100B on the Keystone Pipeline, a single billion is chump change when buying control of the US Government.

:nod:
They are paying a whopping $20 per gallon for the Canadian sandoil.
Image
User avatar
Cap'n Cat
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13614
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:38 am
I am a fan of: Mostly myself.
A.K.A.: LabiaInTheSunlight

Re: Why Not $900 Million?

Post by Cap'n Cat »

Koch Brothers and every other Conk in the world profiting from the Obama stock market, yet haranguing him.

GObama!!!!


:notworthy:
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 31515
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: Why Not $900 Million?

Post by Gil Dobie »

Cap'n Cat wrote:Koch Brothers and every other Conk in the world profiting from the Obama stock market, yet haranguing him.

GObama!!!!


:notworthy:
I need to get on the Conk list and see some of that profit. :kisswink:
Image
User avatar
Cap'n Cat
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13614
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:38 am
I am a fan of: Mostly myself.
A.K.A.: LabiaInTheSunlight

Re: Why Not $900 Million?

Post by Cap'n Cat »

Gil Dobie wrote:
Cap'n Cat wrote:Koch Brothers and every other Conk in the world profiting from the Obama stock market, yet haranguing him.

GObama!!!!


:notworthy:
I need to get on the Conk list and see some of that profit. :kisswink:
You're not 1 percenter material, Gil.
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 31515
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: Why Not $900 Million?

Post by Gil Dobie »

Cap'n Cat wrote:
Gil Dobie wrote:
I need to get on the Conk list and see some of that profit. :kisswink:
You're not 1 percenter material, Gil.
You are right, I'll never be a politician.
Image
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: Why Not $900 Million?

Post by Ivytalk »

Pikers. :coffee:
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
YoUDeeMan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12088
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
A.K.A.: Delaware Homie

Re: Why Not $900 Million?

Post by YoUDeeMan »

Well, somebody has to balance out all the tax sucking, "gimmee somfrin fo' nothin'" losers who are voting Democrat. :nod:

In the end, the lower class and upper class get their money, while the middle class gets screwed.
These signatures have a 500 character limit?

What if I have more personalities than that?
User avatar
ALPHAGRIZ1
Level5
Level5
Posts: 16077
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:26 am
I am a fan of: 1995 Montana Griz
A.K.A.: Fuck Off
Location: America: and having my rights violated on a daily basis

Re: Why Not $900 Million?

Post by ALPHAGRIZ1 »

I like how the Left is trying to tell these guys how, when and what they can spend their money on.

ITS THEIR FU*KING MONEY, NOT YOURS!!!
Image

ALPHAGRIZ1 - Now available in internet black

The flat earth society has members all around the globe
User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25486
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: Why Not $900 Million?

Post by CID1990 »

kalm wrote:I mean why stop short when you're so close? At least we now have an established third party. :thumb:
Koch Brothers’ Budget of $889 Million for 2016 Is on Par With Both Parties’ Spending

The political network overseen by the conservative billionaires Charles G. and David H. Koch plans to spend close to $900 million on the 2016 campaign, an unparalleled effort by coordinated outside groups to shape a presidential election that is already on track to be the most expensive in history.

The spending goal, revealed Monday at the Kochs’ annual winter donor retreat near Palm Springs, Calif., would allow their political organization to operate at the same financial scale as the Democratic and Republican Parties. It would require a significant financial commitment from the Kochs and roughly 300 other donors they have recruited over the years, and covers both the presidential and congressional races. In the last presidential election, the Republican National Committee and the party’s two congressional campaign committees spent a total of $657 million.

Hundreds of conservative donors recruited by the Kochs gathered over the weekend for three days of issue seminars, strategy sessions and mingling with rising elected officials. These donors represent the largest concentration of political money outside the party establishment, one that has achieved enormous power in Republican circles in recent years………..

As the three senators addressed the audience of rich donors — effectively an audition for the 2016 primary — they dismissed a question about whether the wealthy had too much influence in politics. At times they seemed to be addressing an audience of two: the Kochs themselves, now among the country’s most influential conservative power brokers.

Mr. Cruz gave an impassioned defense of his hosts as job creators and the victims of unfair attacks by Democrats, while Mr. Rubio suggested that only liberals supported campaign finance restrictions, so as to empower what he said were their allies in Hollywood and the news media.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/27/us/po ... .html?_r=0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
You mean a 5th party. You left out George Soros and Hollywood.

:coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee:
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69143
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Why Not $900 Million?

Post by kalm »

CID1990 wrote:
kalm wrote:I mean why stop short when you're so close? At least we now have an established third party. :thumb:



http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/27/us/po ... .html?_r=0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
You mean a 5th party. You left out George Soros and Hollywood.

:coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee:
Ok Ted.
Mr. Cruz gave an impassioned defense of his hosts as job creators and the victims of unfair attacks by Democrats, while Mr. Rubio suggested that only liberals supported campaign finance restrictions, so as to empower what he said were their allies in Hollywood and the news media.
Image
Image
Image
YoUDeeMan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12088
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
A.K.A.: Delaware Homie

Re: Why Not $900 Million?

Post by YoUDeeMan »

kalm wrote:
CID1990 wrote:
You mean a 5th party. You left out George Soros and Hollywood.

:coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee:
Ok Ted.
Mr. Cruz gave an impassioned defense of his hosts as job creators and the victims of unfair attacks by Democrats, while Mr. Rubio suggested that only liberals supported campaign finance restrictions, so as to empower what he said were their allies in Hollywood and the news media.
Sorros' money doesn't count? The ALFCIO money doesn't count?

Whose money counts...and whose money doesn't count? :suspicious:
These signatures have a 500 character limit?

What if I have more personalities than that?
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69143
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Why Not $900 Million?

Post by kalm »

Cluck U wrote:
kalm wrote:
Ok Ted.
Sorros' money doesn't count? The ALFCIO money doesn't count?

Whose money counts...and whose money doesn't count? :suspicious:
Of course it all counts. I want it all gone.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Bronco
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3055
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 12:12 pm
I am a fan of: Griz

Re: Why Not $900 Million?

Post by Bronco »

As usual whatever the neo-socialists accuse conservatives of is what they are really doing
It has worked well so why stop
Democrats bagged the bulk of big dollar donations in the 2014 midterm elections according to an analysis by the Associated Press.

Out of the $128 million spent by the top 10 individual donors to outside groups, Democrats hauled in $91 million or 71% of donations.

“Among groups that funneled more than $100,000 to allies, the top of the list tilted overwhelmingly toward Democrats—a group favoring the GOP doesn’t appear on the list until No. 14,” reports the AP.
Democrats also enjoyed a 3-to-1 cash advantage when it came to the 183 groups stroking checks of $100,000 or more. The liberal National Education Association (NEA) topped the list of big money donors at $22 million. The top ten list contained zero Republican-leaning groups.

“They’re total hypocrites when it comes to this subject,” said Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus. “They’ve made a living off campaign talking points when, in reality, they’ve been raking in more money from millionaire donors than Republicans for quite a while.”

Democrat hedge fund billionaire and global warming activist Tom Steyer blew at least $74 million on the 2014 midterm elections, making him the cycle’s largest individual donor.

The libertarian Koch Brothers came in tied for the 23rd spot of largest spenders, according to the
Associated Press.
Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair or fucking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back. Al Swearengen
Image
http://www.whirligig-tv.co.uk/tv/childr ... bronco.wav" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
ALPHAGRIZ1
Level5
Level5
Posts: 16077
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:26 am
I am a fan of: 1995 Montana Griz
A.K.A.: Fuck Off
Location: America: and having my rights violated on a daily basis

Re: Why Not $900 Million?

Post by ALPHAGRIZ1 »

kalm wrote:
Cluck U wrote:
Sorros' money doesn't count? The ALFCIO money doesn't count?

Whose money counts...and whose money doesn't count? :suspicious:
Of course it all counts. I want it all gone.
Why do you hate democracy and freedom?
Image

ALPHAGRIZ1 - Now available in internet black

The flat earth society has members all around the globe
YoUDeeMan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12088
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
A.K.A.: Delaware Homie

Re: Why Not $900 Million?

Post by YoUDeeMan »

Bronco wrote:As usual whatever the neo-socialists accuse conservatives of is what they are really doing
It has worked well so why stop
Democrats bagged the bulk of big dollar donations in the 2014 midterm elections according to an analysis by the Associated Press.

Out of the $128 million spent by the top 10 individual donors to outside groups, Democrats hauled in $91 million or 71% of donations.

“Among groups that funneled more than $100,000 to allies, the top of the list tilted overwhelmingly toward Democrats—a group favoring the GOP doesn’t appear on the list until No. 14,” reports the AP.
Democrats also enjoyed a 3-to-1 cash advantage when it came to the 183 groups stroking checks of $100,000 or more. The liberal National Education Association (NEA) topped the list of big money donors at $22 million. The top ten list contained zero Republican-leaning groups.

“They’re total hypocrites when it comes to this subject,” said Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus. “They’ve made a living off campaign talking points when, in reality, they’ve been raking in more money from millionaire donors than Republicans for quite a while.”

Democrat hedge fund billionaire and global warming activist Tom Steyer blew at least $74 million on the 2014 midterm elections, making him the cycle’s largest individual donor.

The libertarian Koch Brothers came in tied for the 23rd spot of largest spenders, according to the
Associated Press.

kalm sneaks quietly away...
These signatures have a 500 character limit?

What if I have more personalities than that?
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: Why Not $900 Million?

Post by Ivytalk »

TOM STEYER!!! :rofl: :rofl:
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25486
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: Why Not $900 Million?

Post by CID1990 »

kalm wrote:
Cluck U wrote:
Sorros' money doesn't count? The ALFCIO money doesn't count?

Whose money counts...and whose money doesn't count? :suspicious:
Of course it all counts. I want it all gone.
says the guy who starts threads about the Kochs only
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69143
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Why Not $900 Million?

Post by kalm »

CID1990 wrote:
kalm wrote:
Of course it all counts. I want it all gone.
says the guy who starts threads about the Kochs only
Yeah, still looking for a right wing article about the negative influence of money on elections. :coffee:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Bronco
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3055
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 12:12 pm
I am a fan of: Griz

Re: Why Not $900 Million?

Post by Bronco »

Here is the list of unions that top the Koch Brothers in political donations.
Over the past twenty five years, from 1989 to 2014, Koch Industries has donated $18,083,948 in political contributions to Republicans. While that seems like a large sum, it only ranks them as number 59 on the list of top all-time political donors – behind 18 different unions.

Via Open Secrets:
2.) American Fedn of State, County & Municipal Employees $60,667,379
4.) National Education Assn $53,594,488
7.) Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers $44,478,789
8.) United Auto Workers $41,667,858
9.) Carpenters & Joiners Union $39,260,371
10.) Service Employees International Union $38,395,690
11.) Laborers Union $37,494,010
12.) American Federation of Teachers $36,713,325
13.) Communications Workers of America $36,188,135
14.) Teamsters Union $36,123,209
16.) United Food & Commercial Workers Union $33,756,550
20.) Machinists & Aerospace Workers Union $31,313,097
23.) AFL-CIO $30,938,977
32.) National Assn of Letter Carriers $26,106,359
39.) Plumbers & Pipefitters Union $23,886,248
42.) Operating Engineers Union $23,036,848
43.) International Assn of Fire Fighters $22,963,260
46.) Sheet Metal Workers Union $22,372,978
59.) Koch Industries $18,083,948


(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair or fucking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back. Al Swearengen
Image
http://www.whirligig-tv.co.uk/tv/childr ... bronco.wav" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69143
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Why Not $900 Million?

Post by kalm »

Bronco wrote:Here is the list of unions that top the Koch Brothers in political donations.
Over the past twenty five years, from 1989 to 2014, Koch Industries has donated $18,083,948 in political contributions to Republicans. While that seems like a large sum, it only ranks them as number 59 on the list of top all-time political donors – behind 18 different unions.

Via Open Secrets:
2.) American Fedn of State, County & Municipal Employees $60,667,379
4.) National Education Assn $53,594,488
7.) Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers $44,478,789
8.) United Auto Workers $41,667,858
9.) Carpenters & Joiners Union $39,260,371
10.) Service Employees International Union $38,395,690
11.) Laborers Union $37,494,010
12.) American Federation of Teachers $36,713,325
13.) Communications Workers of America $36,188,135
14.) Teamsters Union $36,123,209
16.) United Food & Commercial Workers Union $33,756,550
20.) Machinists & Aerospace Workers Union $31,313,097
23.) AFL-CIO $30,938,977
32.) National Assn of Letter Carriers $26,106,359
39.) Plumbers & Pipefitters Union $23,886,248
42.) Operating Engineers Union $23,036,848
43.) International Assn of Fire Fighters $22,963,260
46.) Sheet Metal Workers Union $22,372,978
59.) Koch Industries $18,083,948


(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Interesting considering their network spent over $400 million in 2012 alone. They must really believe in their ideology. :lol:
The Washington Post and the Center for Responsive Politics identified a coalition of allied conservative groups active in the 2012 elections that together raised at least $407 million, backed by a donor network organized by the industrialists Charles and David Koch. Most of the funds originated with two groups, the Freedom Partners Chamber of Commerce and TC4 Trust, both of which routed some of the money through a Phoenix-based nonprofit group called the Center to Protect Patient Rights (CPPR).
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ ... story.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
ALPHAGRIZ1
Level5
Level5
Posts: 16077
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:26 am
I am a fan of: 1995 Montana Griz
A.K.A.: Fuck Off
Location: America: and having my rights violated on a daily basis

Re: Why Not $900 Million?

Post by ALPHAGRIZ1 »

Bronco wrote:Here is the list of unions that top the Koch Brothers in political donations.
Over the past twenty five years, from 1989 to 2014, Koch Industries has donated $18,083,948 in political contributions to Republicans. While that seems like a large sum, it only ranks them as number 59 on the list of top all-time political donors – behind 18 different unions.

Via Open Secrets:
2.) American Fedn of State, County & Municipal Employees $60,667,379
4.) National Education Assn $53,594,488
7.) Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers $44,478,789
8.) United Auto Workers $41,667,858
9.) Carpenters & Joiners Union $39,260,371
10.) Service Employees International Union $38,395,690
11.) Laborers Union $37,494,010
12.) American Federation of Teachers $36,713,325
13.) Communications Workers of America $36,188,135
14.) Teamsters Union $36,123,209
16.) United Food & Commercial Workers Union $33,756,550
20.) Machinists & Aerospace Workers Union $31,313,097
23.) AFL-CIO $30,938,977
32.) National Assn of Letter Carriers $26,106,359
39.) Plumbers & Pipefitters Union $23,886,248
42.) Operating Engineers Union $23,036,848
43.) International Assn of Fire Fighters $22,963,260
46.) Sheet Metal Workers Union $22,372,978
59.) Koch Industries $18,083,948


(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
It is simply mindbottling how stupid the left is. That is an incredible amount of money they waste on unions, it is sad they are so god dammed dumb. :dunce:
Image

ALPHAGRIZ1 - Now available in internet black

The flat earth society has members all around the globe
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69143
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Why Not $900 Million?

Post by kalm »

Image
Image
Image
Image
Post Reply