http://m.cnsnews.com/news/article/ali-m ... year-low-0
11 million have left workforce since Obama took office!
Labor Participation At 36 Year Low!! GoObama!!!
- travelinman67
- Supporter

- Posts: 9884
- Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 9:51 pm
- I am a fan of: Portland State Vikings
- A.K.A.: Modern Man
- Location: Where the 1st Amendment still exists: CS.com
Labor Participation At 36 Year Low!! GoObama!!!
"That is how government works - we tell you what you can do today."
- EPA Kommissar Gina McCarthy
- EPA Kommissar Gina McCarthy
- CitadelGrad
- Level4

- Posts: 5210
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:19 pm
- I am a fan of: Jack Kerouac
- A.K.A.: El Cid
- Location: St. Louis
Re: Labor Participation At 36 Year Low!! GoObama!!!
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson, in letter to William S. Smith, 1787

- Thomas Jefferson, in letter to William S. Smith, 1787

- dbackjon
- Moderator Team

- Posts: 45627
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
Re: Labor Participation At 36 Year Low!! GoObama!!!
This canard again?
Nearly a quarter of Americans were born between 1946 and 1964, the typical definition of the baby boom generation. That’s more than 75 million people. In their heyday, the boomers were an unprecedented economic force, pushing up rates of homeownership, consumer spending and, most important of all, employment. It’s no coincidence that the U.S. labor force participation rate — the share of the adult population that has a job or is trying to find one — hit a record high in the late 1990s, when the boomers were at the peak of their working lives.
It’s been downhill ever since. The participation rate hit a 36-year low last month, and while there are multiple reasons for the decline, the aging of the baby boom generation is a dominant factor. In 2003, 82 percent of boomers were part of the labor force; a decade later, that number has declined to 66 percent, and it will only continue to fall.
The Baby Boom generation began hitting retirement age in 2009. Lead elements hit 65 in 2011.
Duh.
Nearly a quarter of Americans were born between 1946 and 1964, the typical definition of the baby boom generation. That’s more than 75 million people. In their heyday, the boomers were an unprecedented economic force, pushing up rates of homeownership, consumer spending and, most important of all, employment. It’s no coincidence that the U.S. labor force participation rate — the share of the adult population that has a job or is trying to find one — hit a record high in the late 1990s, when the boomers were at the peak of their working lives.
It’s been downhill ever since. The participation rate hit a 36-year low last month, and while there are multiple reasons for the decline, the aging of the baby boom generation is a dominant factor. In 2003, 82 percent of boomers were part of the labor force; a decade later, that number has declined to 66 percent, and it will only continue to fall.
The Baby Boom generation began hitting retirement age in 2009. Lead elements hit 65 in 2011.
Duh.
-
CAA Flagship
- 4th&29

- Posts: 38529
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
- Location: Pizza Hell
Re: Labor Participation At 36 Year Low!! GoObama!!!
Soooooo, you agree that Obama sucks?dbackjon wrote:This canard again?
Nearly a quarter of Americans were born between 1946 and 1964, the typical definition of the baby boom generation. That’s more than 75 million people. In their heyday, the boomers were an unprecedented economic force, pushing up rates of homeownership, consumer spending and, most important of all, employment. It’s no coincidence that the U.S. labor force participation rate — the share of the adult population that has a job or is trying to find one — hit a record high in the late 1990s, when the boomers were at the peak of their working lives.
It’s been downhill ever since. The participation rate hit a 36-year low last month, and while there are multiple reasons for the decline, the aging of the baby boom generation is a dominant factor. In 2003, 82 percent of boomers were part of the labor force; a decade later, that number has declined to 66 percent, and it will only continue to fall.
The Baby Boom generation began hitting retirement age in 2009. Lead elements hit 65 in 2011.
Duh.
- DSUrocks07
- Supporter

- Posts: 5339
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 7:32 pm
- I am a fan of: Delaware State
- A.K.A.: phillywild305
- Location: The 9th Circle of Hellaware
Re: Labor Participation At 36 Year Low!! GoObama!!!
Breaking News:CAA Flagship wrote:Soooooo, you agree that Obama sucks?dbackjon wrote:This canard again?
Nearly a quarter of Americans were born between 1946 and 1964, the typical definition of the baby boom generation. That’s more than 75 million people. In their heyday, the boomers were an unprecedented economic force, pushing up rates of homeownership, consumer spending and, most important of all, employment. It’s no coincidence that the U.S. labor force participation rate — the share of the adult population that has a job or is trying to find one — hit a record high in the late 1990s, when the boomers were at the peak of their working lives.
It’s been downhill ever since. The participation rate hit a 36-year low last month, and while there are multiple reasons for the decline, the aging of the baby boom generation is a dominant factor. In 2003, 82 percent of boomers were part of the labor force; a decade later, that number has declined to 66 percent, and it will only continue to fall.
The Baby Boom generation began hitting retirement age in 2009. Lead elements hit 65 in 2011.
Duh.
"Obama confirmed to be sole source of Baby Boomers aging and retiring"
Thanks Obama.
- CitadelGrad
- Level4

- Posts: 5210
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:19 pm
- I am a fan of: Jack Kerouac
- A.K.A.: El Cid
- Location: St. Louis
Re: Labor Participation At 36 Year Low!! GoObama!!!
This has been explained to you before but apparently you didn't understand.dbackjon wrote:This canard again?
Nearly a quarter of Americans were born between 1946 and 1964, the typical definition of the baby boom generation. That’s more than 75 million people. In their heyday, the boomers were an unprecedented economic force, pushing up rates of homeownership, consumer spending and, most important of all, employment. It’s no coincidence that the U.S. labor force participation rate — the share of the adult population that has a job or is trying to find one — hit a record high in the late 1990s, when the boomers were at the peak of their working lives.
It’s been downhill ever since. The participation rate hit a 36-year low last month, and while there are multiple reasons for the decline, the aging of the baby boom generation is a dominant factor. In 2003, 82 percent of boomers were part of the labor force; a decade later, that number has declined to 66 percent, and it will only continue to fall.
The Baby Boom generation began hitting retirement age in 2009. Lead elements hit 65 in 2011.
Duh.
The only segment of the labor force that is increasing its participation is the 54+ segment. That means that they aren't retiring. Every other segment of labor force participation is declining.
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson, in letter to William S. Smith, 1787

- Thomas Jefferson, in letter to William S. Smith, 1787

- DSUrocks07
- Supporter

- Posts: 5339
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 7:32 pm
- I am a fan of: Delaware State
- A.K.A.: phillywild305
- Location: The 9th Circle of Hellaware
Re: Labor Participation At 36 Year Low!! GoObama!!!
Sounds like we need those death panels every was talking about. Problem solved.CitadelGrad wrote:This has been explained to you before but apparently you didn't understand.dbackjon wrote:This canard again?
Nearly a quarter of Americans were born between 1946 and 1964, the typical definition of the baby boom generation. That’s more than 75 million people. In their heyday, the boomers were an unprecedented economic force, pushing up rates of homeownership, consumer spending and, most important of all, employment. It’s no coincidence that the U.S. labor force participation rate — the share of the adult population that has a job or is trying to find one — hit a record high in the late 1990s, when the boomers were at the peak of their working lives.
It’s been downhill ever since. The participation rate hit a 36-year low last month, and while there are multiple reasons for the decline, the aging of the baby boom generation is a dominant factor. In 2003, 82 percent of boomers were part of the labor force; a decade later, that number has declined to 66 percent, and it will only continue to fall.
The Baby Boom generation began hitting retirement age in 2009. Lead elements hit 65 in 2011.
Duh.
The only segment of the labor force that is increasing its participation is the 54+ segment. That means that they aren't retiring. Every other segment of labor force participation is declining.
- DSUrocks07
- Supporter

- Posts: 5339
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 7:32 pm
- I am a fan of: Delaware State
- A.K.A.: phillywild305
- Location: The 9th Circle of Hellaware



