Say hello to Dr. Ben Carson, Sr.
Woo Hoo!

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/meet-ben ... d=26735300





She's a blowhard, but I don't think we have seen tangible exhibits of her competence yet. She's more of an unknown (although she DOES have experience in governance).Vidav wrote:I sure hope Sarah Palin runs. Because having someone even more incompetent than Obama would be a boon for the left.


I remember a time when the conventional wisdom was that some nearly anonymous, unaccomplished freshman senator from Illinois had no chance of beating Hillary Clinton.Ibanez wrote:Carson has no chance. Why waste the time and money?


I know i'm right. It has nothing to do with "conventional wisdom" he's a black Republican. You guys aren't ready for that.CitadelGrad wrote:I remember a time when the conventional wisdom was that some nearly anonymous, unaccomplished freshman senator from Illinois had no chance of beating Hillary Clinton.Ibanez wrote:Carson has no chance. Why waste the time and money?
Having said that, you are right. Carson doesn't have and will never have the juice behind him that Obama had. The dark forces don't like people like Carson.
I'm not looking forward to all the campaigning, that you know will ratchet up in the Spring.andy7171 wrote:Why would someone announce so early? It don't make sense. A flame out is bound to happen.

Well then, it seems the conventional wisdom (if you represent conventional wisdom) is that Republicans areIbanez wrote:I know i'm right. It has nothing to do with "conventional wisdom" he's a black Republican. You guys aren't ready for that.CitadelGrad wrote:
I remember a time when the conventional wisdom was that some nearly anonymous, unaccomplished freshman senator from Illinois had no chance of beating Hillary Clinton.
Having said that, you are right. Carson doesn't have and will never have the juice behind him that Obama had. The dark forces don't like people like Carson.

CitadelGrad wrote:Well then, it seems the conventional wisdom (if you represent conventional wisdom) is that Republicans areIbanez wrote:
I know i'm right. It has nothing to do with "conventional wisdom" he's a black Republican. You guys aren't ready for that.
unwilling to nominate a black Republican. This is where you are wrong. Most Tea Partiers are anxious to vote for a black Republican to prove to MSNBC and the MSM that they aren't really racist.
If South Carolina can elect Scott to the Senate with a pretty significant majority, Republicans across the country are willing to nominate a black Republican. The big question for Carson is whether the GOP big money donors will get behind him. I suspect they won't. They like their puppets as much as Dem big money donors do. Carson doesn't seem to be a puppet kind of guy.

Ibanez wrote:CitadelGrad wrote:
Well then, it seems the conventional wisdom (if you represent conventional wisdom) is that Republicans are
unwilling to nominate a black Republican. This is where you are wrong. Most Tea Partiers are anxious to vote for a black Republican to prove to MSNBC and the MSM that they aren't really racist.
If South Carolina can elect Scott to the Senate with a pretty significant majority, Republicans across the country are willing to nominate a black Republican. The big question for Carson is whether the GOP big money donors will get behind him. I suspect they won't. They like their puppets as much as Dem big money donors do. Carson doesn't seem to be a puppet kind of guy.
Translation: They want to do it out of spite, not because he's qualified.

I wouldn't call it spite. They genuinely like Carson, but their desire to refute charges of racism make them ignore his lack of qualifications for the office. A shared ideology should not trump qualifications.Ibanez wrote:CitadelGrad wrote:
Well then, it seems the conventional wisdom (if you represent conventional wisdom) is that Republicans are
unwilling to nominate a black Republican. This is where you are wrong. Most Tea Partiers are anxious to vote for a black Republican to prove to MSNBC and the MSM that they aren't really racist.
If South Carolina can elect Scott to the Senate with a pretty significant majority, Republicans across the country are willing to nominate a black Republican. The big question for Carson is whether the GOP big money donors will get behind him. I suspect they won't. They like their puppets as much as Dem big money donors do. Carson doesn't seem to be a puppet kind of guy.
Translation: They want to do it out of spite, not because he's qualified.

Cluck U wrote:Ibanez wrote:
Translation: They want to do it out of spite, not because he's qualified.![]()
Seems as though you are the one with the entrenched phobias regarding people and race.
He has no qualifications. At least Obama was in government (and look where that got us.) Sarah Palin has more gov't experience then him and that's not saying much. Is he an intelligent, successful man? Probably. But is he executive material? I'm not sure.CitadelGrad wrote:I wouldn't call it spite. They genuinely like Carson, but their desire to refute charges of racism make them ignore his lack of qualifications for the office. A shared ideology should not trump qualifications.Ibanez wrote:
Translation: They want to do it out of spite, not because he's qualified.

Yeah, he was in government. A state senator of no accomplishment. A rookie U.S. senator of no accomplishment. He's always been a professional negro. Nothing more.Ibanez wrote:He has no qualifications. At least Obama was in government (and look where that got us.) Sarah Palin has more gov't experience then him and that's not saying much. Is he an intelligent, successful man? Probably. But is he executive material? I'm not sure.CitadelGrad wrote:
I wouldn't call it spite. They genuinely like Carson, but their desire to refute charges of racism make them ignore his lack of qualifications for the office. A shared ideology should not trump qualifications.
Then again, it would probably be good to have someone like that in the White House.

Professional negro? Glad you're living in 1953, Cid. Race has nothing to do with this lack of character, leadership and overall ability to lead this nation.CitadelGrad wrote:Yeah, he was in government. A state senator of no accomplishment. A rookie U.S. senator of no accomplishment. He's always been a professional negro. Nothing more.Ibanez wrote:
He has no qualifications. At least Obama was in government (and look where that got us.) Sarah Palin has more gov't experience then him and that's not saying much. Is he an intelligent, successful man? Probably. But is he executive material? I'm not sure.
Then again, it would probably be good to have someone like that in the White House.

Who's "you guys"? He's a more intelligent, more conservative, more in-tune Colin Powell.Ibanez wrote:I know i'm right. It has nothing to do with "conventional wisdom" he's a black Republican. You guys aren't ready for that.CitadelGrad wrote:
I remember a time when the conventional wisdom was that some nearly anonymous, unaccomplished freshman senator from Illinois had no chance of beating Hillary Clinton.
Having said that, you are right. Carson doesn't have and will never have the juice behind him that Obama had. The dark forces don't like people like Carson.


It's become painfully obvious in this country that mere lack of qualifications for the office isn't an impediment to actually getting elected.CitadelGrad wrote:I wouldn't call it spite. They genuinely like Carson, but their desire to refute charges of racism make them ignore his lack of qualifications for the office. A shared ideology should not trump qualifications.Ibanez wrote:
Translation: They want to do it out of spite, not because he's qualified.


Plenty of misogynists marry women, and plenty of people with entrenched phobias regarding people and race marry people of other races.Ibanez wrote:Cluck U wrote:
![]()
Seems as though you are the one with the entrenched phobias regarding people and race.![]()
Yeah. Sure. Tell that to my wife who is white/black. I am so afraid of them that I married a mulatto and had a child with her.
- Spoiler: show
Whatever you say, Cluckster. All that matters is that I know you're wrong.Cluck U wrote:Plenty of misogynists marry women, and plenty of people with entrenched phobias regarding people and race marry people of other races.Ibanez wrote:![]()
Yeah. Sure. Tell that to my wife who is white/black. I am so afraid of them that I married a mulatto and had a child with her.
- Spoiler: show
![]()
Hint: you should probably stay away from making generalizations about an individual or a group of individuals.
In this case, regarding the Tea Party, you sound like a, "tolerant," Liberal hack.

Of course Obama is a professional negro, just like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. They are community organizers and their profession is their race and identity politics. What has Obama actually done other than trade on his pigmentation? Oh yeah, he's also a constitutional scholar by virtue of his short time at U. Chicago as an instructor.Ibanez wrote:Professional negro? Glad you're living in 1953, Cid. Race has nothing to do with this lack of character, leadership and overall ability to lead this nation.CitadelGrad wrote:
Yeah, he was in government. A state senator of no accomplishment. A rookie U.S. senator of no accomplishment. He's always been a professional negro. Nothing more.

Obama has screwed the American people, does that count?CitadelGrad wrote:Of course Obama is a professional negro, just like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. They are community organizers and their profession is their race and identity politics. What has Obama actually done other than trade on his pigmentation? Oh yeah, he's also a constitutional scholar by virtue of his short time at U. Chicago as an instructor.Ibanez wrote:
Professional negro? Glad you're living in 1953, Cid. Race has nothing to do with this lack of character, leadership and overall ability to lead this nation.


Define "you guys."Ibanez wrote:I know i'm right. It has nothing to do with "conventional wisdom" he's a black Republican. You guys aren't ready for that.
