Kalm's Election Re-Cap

Political discussions
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69142
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Kalm's Election Re-Cap

Post by kalm »

1) Democrats don't seem to have much success running as moderate republicans. Will these results bring a more progressive group of candidates to the table in 2016? :geek:

2) Attack ads are way more meaningful than policy discussions. Not that anyone really believes or cares in what's promised anyway. :ugeek:

3) Odds that this congress brings meaningful change to our lives? 0% and that might be a good thing. :nod:

4) Where is the Tea Party? :?

5) Red states Alaska, Arkansas, South Dakota, and Nebraska all voted minimum wage increases. I'm neutral on the minimum wage and it affects my business a ton. Just pointing this out that while voting for the center right and further right parties because they have no other choices, Americans continue to be progressive on the issues. :nod:

6) Despite the revolution, weed is legalized in Alaska, Oregon, and D.C. See point #5. :clap:

7) Once again, money wins. And dark money appears to be really popular. :nod:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Rob Iola
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3724
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Lurking

Re: Kalm's Election Re-Cap

Post by Rob Iola »

kalm wrote:1) Democrats don't seem to have much success running as moderate republicans. Will these results bring a more progressive group of candidates to the table in 2016? :geek:

2) Attack ads are way more meaningful than policy discussions. Not that anyone really believes or cares in what's promised anyway. :ugeek:

3) Odds that this congress brings meaningful change to our lives? 0% and that might be a good thing. :nod:

4) Where is the Tea Party? :?

5) Red states Alaska, Arkansas, South Dakota, and Nebraska all voted minimum wage increases. I'm neutral on the minimum wage and it affects my business a ton. Just pointing this out that while voting for the center right and further right parties because they have no other choices, Americans continue to be progressive on the issues. :nod:

6) Despite the revolution, weed is legalized in Alaska, Oregon, and D.C. See point #5. :clap:

7) Once again, money wins. And dark money appears to be really popular. :nod:
Wordy.

The election was about Obama.
Proletarians of the world, unite!
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69142
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Kalm's Election Re-Cap

Post by kalm »

Rob Iola wrote:
kalm wrote:1) Democrats don't seem to have much success running as moderate republicans. Will these results bring a more progressive group of candidates to the table in 2016? :geek:

2) Attack ads are way more meaningful than policy discussions. Not that anyone really believes or cares in what's promised anyway. :ugeek:

3) Odds that this congress brings meaningful change to our lives? 0% and that might be a good thing. :nod:

4) Where is the Tea Party? :?

5) Red states Alaska, Arkansas, South Dakota, and Nebraska all voted minimum wage increases. I'm neutral on the minimum wage and it affects my business a ton. Just pointing this out that while voting for the center right and further right parties because they have no other choices, Americans continue to be progressive on the issues. :nod:

6) Despite the revolution, weed is legalized in Alaska, Oregon, and D.C. See point #5. :clap:

7) Once again, money wins. And dark money appears to be really popular. :nod:
Wordy.

The election was about Obama.
:lol:

I'll keep it shorter for you next time, sweetheart. :thumb:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
CitadelGrad
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5210
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:19 pm
I am a fan of: Jack Kerouac
A.K.A.: El Cid
Location: St. Louis

Re: Kalm's Election Re-Cap

Post by CitadelGrad »

kalm wrote:1) Democrats don't seem to have much success running as moderate republicans. Will these results bring a more progressive group of candidates to the table in 2016? :geek:

2) Attack ads are way more meaningful than policy discussions. Not that anyone really believes or cares in what's promised anyway. :ugeek:

3) Odds that this congress brings meaningful change to our lives? 0% and that might be a good thing. :nod:

4) Where is the Tea Party? :?

5) Red states Alaska, Arkansas, South Dakota, and Nebraska all voted minimum wage increases. I'm neutral on the minimum wage and it affects my business a ton. Just pointing this out that while voting for the center right and further right parties because they have no other choices, Americans continue to be progressive on the issues. :nod:

6) Despite the revolution, weed is legalized in Alaska, Oregon, and D.C. See point #5. :clap:

7) Once again, money wins. And dark money appears to be really popular. :nod:
That's some real fucking profundity. You should write for Yahoo.
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."

- Thomas Jefferson, in letter to William S. Smith, 1787

Image
OL FU
Level3
Level3
Posts: 4336
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:25 pm
I am a fan of: Furman
Location: Greenville SC

Re: Kalm's Election Re-Cap

Post by OL FU »

kalm wrote:1) Democrats don't seem to have much success running as moderate republicans. Will these results bring a more progressive group of candidates to the table in 2016? :geek:

2) Attack ads are way more meaningful than policy discussions. Not that anyone really believes or cares in what's promised anyway. :ugeek:

3) Odds that this congress brings meaningful change to our lives? 0% and that might be a good thing. :nod:

4) Where is the Tea Party? :?

5) Red states Alaska, Arkansas, South Dakota, and Nebraska all voted minimum wage increases. I'm neutral on the minimum wage and it affects my business a ton. Just pointing this out that while voting for the center right and further right parties because they have no other choices, Americans continue to be progressive on the issues. :nod:

6) Despite the revolution, weed is legalized in Alaska, Oregon, and D.C. See point #5. :clap:

7) Once again, money wins. And dark money appears to be really popular. :nod:
1) Only if they want to lose. The country, as a whole, is not nearly as progressive or conservative as the political parties would like them to be.
2) What's new
3) Gridlock is good.
4) Still voting republican unfortunately.
5) Raising the minimum wage by minimal amounts is pretty low on most people's agenda. Don't think I would hold up a progressive victory flag. Also, good, the issue should be with the states.
6) Great news that libertarian values are beginning to grow.
7) See 2 above.

;)
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69142
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Kalm's Election Re-Cap

Post by kalm »

CitadelGrad wrote:
kalm wrote:1) Democrats don't seem to have much success running as moderate republicans. Will these results bring a more progressive group of candidates to the table in 2016? :geek:

2) Attack ads are way more meaningful than policy discussions. Not that anyone really believes or cares in what's promised anyway. :ugeek:

3) Odds that this congress brings meaningful change to our lives? 0% and that might be a good thing. :nod:

4) Where is the Tea Party? :?

5) Red states Alaska, Arkansas, South Dakota, and Nebraska all voted minimum wage increases. I'm neutral on the minimum wage and it affects my business a ton. Just pointing this out that while voting for the center right and further right parties because they have no other choices, Americans continue to be progressive on the issues. :nod:

6) Despite the revolution, weed is legalized in Alaska, Oregon, and D.C. See point #5. :clap:

7) Once again, money wins. And dark money appears to be really popular. :nod:
That's some real fucking profundity. You should write for Yahoo.
Thanks! :clap:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: Kalm's Election Re-Cap

Post by AZGrizFan »

kalm wrote:
Rob Iola wrote: Wordy.

The election was about Obama.
:lol:

I'll keep it shorter for you next time, sweetheart. :thumb:
You've been reading too much JSO. :coffee:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
Rob Iola
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3724
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Lurking

Re: Kalm's Election Re-Cap

Post by Rob Iola »

kalm wrote:
Rob Iola wrote: Wordy.

The election was about Obama.
:lol:

I'll keep it shorter for you next time, sweetheart. :thumb:
Policy referendums (minimum wage, weed, personhood) reflected the country's democratic lean.
Actual elections rejected Obama's policies/personality - look no further than a republican beating Mini-Me for Maryland governor.
Proletarians of the world, unite!
User avatar
Pwns
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7344
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:38 pm
I am a fan of: Georgia Friggin' Southern
A.K.A.: FCS_pwns_FBS (AGS)

Re: Kalm's Election Re-Cap

Post by Pwns »

Money always wins…unless it's teacher's union money or money from the various unions and drug companies that oppose marijuana legalization. :nod:
Celebrate Diversity.*
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: Kalm's Election Re-Cap

Post by Ivytalk »

kalm wrote:1) Democrats don't seem to have much success running as moderate republicans. Will these results bring a more progressive group of candidates to the table in 2016? :geek:

2) Attack ads are way more meaningful than policy discussions. Not that anyone really believes or cares in what's promised anyway. :ugeek:

3) Odds that this congress brings meaningful change to our lives? 0% and that might be a good thing. :nod:

4) Where is the Tea Party? :?

5) Red states Alaska, Arkansas, South Dakota, and Nebraska all voted minimum wage increases. I'm neutral on the minimum wage and it affects my business a ton. Just pointing this out that while voting for the center right and further right parties because they have no other choices, Americans continue to be progressive on the issues. :nod:

6) Despite the revolution, weed is legalized in Alaska, Oregon, and D.C. See point #5. :clap:

7) Once again, money wins. And dark money appears to be really popular. :nod:
8) Environmental and labor regulations will be lifted on the private golf industry, lifting profits to new highs.
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
CAA Flagship
4th&29
4th&29
Posts: 38529
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
I am a fan of: Old Dominion
A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
Location: Pizza Hell

Re: Kalm's Election Re-Cap

Post by CAA Flagship »

There are tax adjustments that could be made for low income workers before raising the minimum wage. Raising the minimum wage alone just hurts certain businesses, and their customers. It does nothing for the person already making $11/hour but only working 25 hours a week.

And yes, the states should be able to adjust their minimum wage above the national minimum. The funny thing is that those 4 states are at the bottom of the list that need to be adjusted higher due to cost of living. :lol:
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Kalm's Election Re-Cap

Post by Ibanez »

Pwns wrote:Money always wins…unless it's teacher's union money or money from the various unions and drug companies that oppose marijuana legalization. :nod:
Or Monsanto.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69142
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Kalm's Election Re-Cap

Post by kalm »

Rob Iola wrote:
kalm wrote:
:lol:

I'll keep it shorter for you next time, sweetheart. :thumb:
Policy referendums (minimum wage, weed, personhood) reflected the country's democratic lean.
Actual elections rejected Obama's policies/personality - look no further than a republican beating Mini-Me for Maryland governor.
But consider that candidates like Grimes and Nunn ran away from Obama. Which Obama policies sunk those who ran on his record? Obamacare is gaining popularity, the economy and unemployment are doing better, there haven't been any catastrophic terrorist attacks. Perhaps the economy isn't lifting up the average voter enough, which should be core democratic strength.

I'm not discounting what you're saying, just curious, and I especially agree with the personality angle. It turns out the R base and keeps the D's at home.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Rob Iola
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3724
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Lurking

Re: Kalm's Election Re-Cap

Post by Rob Iola »

kalm wrote:
Rob Iola wrote: Policy referendums (minimum wage, weed, personhood) reflected the country's democratic lean.
Actual elections rejected Obama's policies/personality - look no further than a republican beating Mini-Me for Maryland governor.
But consider that candidates like Grimes and Nunn ran away from Obama. Which Obama policies sunk those who ran on his record? Obamacare is gaining popularity, the economy and unemployment are doing better, there haven't been any catastrophic terrorist attacks. Perhaps the economy isn't lifting up the average voter enough, which should be core democratic strength.

I'm not discounting what you're saying, just curious, and I especially agree with the personality angle. It turns out the R base and keeps the D's at home.
That's the really crazy part - the economy is doing better - and yet the Dems didn't just lose but got absolutely crushed because R's linked them to Obama (all McConnell ran on was linking Grimes to O - the whole bit about her refusing to say she voted for him, even when she was a delegate for him in '12).
Proletarians of the world, unite!
User avatar
Skjellyfetti
Anal
Anal
Posts: 14681
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:56 pm
I am a fan of: Appalachian

Re: Kalm's Election Re-Cap

Post by Skjellyfetti »

Rob Iola wrote:all McConnell ran on
Well, he's also been a Senator for Kentucky longer than I've been alive. He did have that going for him. :coffee:

30 fucking years in the Senate come January. :ohno:
"The unmasking thing was all created by Devin Nunes"
- Richard Burr, (R-NC)
User avatar
Bronco
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3055
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 12:12 pm
I am a fan of: Griz

Re: Kalm's Election Re-Cap

Post by Bronco »

Forgot to mention the Hillary effect on the election
Did anyone she campaigned for actually win?
Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair or fucking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back. Al Swearengen
Image
http://www.whirligig-tv.co.uk/tv/childr ... bronco.wav" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
ASUG8
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 17570
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 12:57 pm
I am a fan of: ASU
Location: SC

Re: Kalm's Election Re-Cap

Post by ASUG8 »

Rob Iola wrote: That's the really crazy part - the economy is doing better - and yet the Dems didn't just lose but got absolutely crushed because R's linked them to Obama (all McConnell ran on was linking Grimes to O - the whole bit about her refusing to say she voted for him, even when she was a delegate for him in '12).
That's how Tillis ousted Hagan in NC. She tried blasting him for his record on teacher/education funding and presenting herself as the "most moderate" senator in DC. All he had to do was present her voting record and its correlation to the prez in order to win.
CAA Flagship
4th&29
4th&29
Posts: 38529
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
I am a fan of: Old Dominion
A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
Location: Pizza Hell

Re: Kalm's Election Re-Cap

Post by CAA Flagship »

Rob Iola wrote: That's the really crazy part - the economy is doing better - and yet the Dems didn't just lose but got absolutely crushed because R's linked them to Obama (all McConnell ran on was linking Grimes to O - the whole bit about her refusing to say she voted for him, even when she was a delegate for him in '12).
Statistics say that the economy is doing better, but history says that it's recovery is way too slow. That is the problem.
CAA Flagship
4th&29
4th&29
Posts: 38529
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
I am a fan of: Old Dominion
A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
Location: Pizza Hell

Re: Kalm's Election Re-Cap

Post by CAA Flagship »

Bronco wrote:Forgot to mention the Hillary effect on the election
Did anyone she campaigned for actually win?
Yes. New Hampshire.
CAA Flagship
4th&29
4th&29
Posts: 38529
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
I am a fan of: Old Dominion
A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
Location: Pizza Hell

Re: Kalm's Election Re-Cap

Post by CAA Flagship »

kalm wrote:
Rob Iola wrote: Policy referendums (minimum wage, weed, personhood) reflected the country's democratic lean.
Actual elections rejected Obama's policies/personality - look no further than a republican beating Mini-Me for Maryland governor.
But consider that candidates like Grimes and Nunn ran away from Obama. Which Obama policies sunk those who ran on his record? Obamacare is gaining popularity, the economy and unemployment are doing better, there haven't been any catastrophic terrorist attacks. Perhaps the economy isn't lifting up the average voter enough, which should be core democratic strength.

I'm not discounting what you're saying, just curious, and I especially agree with the personality angle. It turns out the R base and keeps the D's at home.
http://www.cnn.com/election/2014/result ... exit-polls" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Take a look at the link and you will get an idea of how people voted.
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69142
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Kalm's Election Re-Cap

Post by kalm »

CAA Flagship wrote:There are tax adjustments that could be made for low income workers before raising the minimum wage. Raising the minimum wage alone just hurts certain businesses, and their customers. It does nothing for the person already making $11/hour but only working 25 hours a week.

And yes, the states should be able to adjust their minimum wage above the national minimum. The funny thing is that those 4 states are at the bottom of the list that need to be adjusted higher due to cost of living. :lol:
Like I said, I'm neutral on the min. wage. My point is that an increase was extremely popular in red states, so much so that the republican senatorial candidates in Alaska and Arkansas both came out in favor of it .
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19233
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: Kalm's Election Re-Cap

Post by GannonFan »

kalm wrote:
CAA Flagship wrote:There are tax adjustments that could be made for low income workers before raising the minimum wage. Raising the minimum wage alone just hurts certain businesses, and their customers. It does nothing for the person already making $11/hour but only working 25 hours a week.

And yes, the states should be able to adjust their minimum wage above the national minimum. The funny thing is that those 4 states are at the bottom of the list that need to be adjusted higher due to cost of living. :lol:
Like I said, I'm neutral on the min. wage. My point is that an increase was extremely popular in red states, so much so that the republican senatorial candidates in Alaska and Arkansas both came out in favor of it .
Minimum wage is just a feel good issue. In the longterm, any increases in minimum wage are erased by inflationary pressures. There may be some short term impacts, megative and positive, but really, raising the minimum wage does absolutely nothing long term when it comes to improving the standard of living of those for whom raising the minimum wage was intended. More people should be for it because it looks like you're doing something without really having to solve an issue. It's perfect for politics.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
User avatar
Cap'n Cat
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13614
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:38 am
I am a fan of: Mostly myself.
A.K.A.: LabiaInTheSunlight

Re: Kalm's Election Re-Cap

Post by Cap'n Cat »

Rob Iola wrote:
kalm wrote:
But consider that candidates like Grimes and Nunn ran away from Obama. Which Obama policies sunk those who ran on his record? Obamacare is gaining popularity, the economy and unemployment are doing better, there haven't been any catastrophic terrorist attacks. Perhaps the economy isn't lifting up the average voter enough, which should be core democratic strength.

I'm not discounting what you're saying, just curious, and I especially agree with the personality angle. It turns out the R base and keeps the D's at home.
That's the really crazy part - the economy is doing better - and yet the Dems didn't just lose but got absolutely crushed because R's linked them to Obama (all McConnell ran on was linking Grimes to O - the whole bit about her refusing to say she voted for him, even when she was a delegate for him in '12).

Agreed, except for the fact that the Dems didn't get "crushed". Balance simply shifted, as it has done countless times. Seems like "crushed" because of how our sensationalist media characterizes things these days.

My disappointment? Neither Obama nor Dems touted the great things they did. The administration has been scandal-free (especially when held to the light of something like Reagan's), the economy improved immensely and their are no major world conflagrations in which we are entangled. Why the Dems abandoned Obama and let the Conks link them to any semblance of "malaise" or trouble is nothing more than extreme cowardice. The nation IS much better off than it was 6 hers ago.
They have no sense of party and, instead, after years of heinous, unabashed obstruction, allowed the Conks to lead them around by their noses. Shame. My party is the party of pussies.

:ohno:

Edit: re: dark money, the Dems out raised and outspent the Conks in Minnesota and put their people back in office with the exception of one guy who probably had to go, anyway. None of them abandoned Obama or party principle.
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69142
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Kalm's Election Re-Cap

Post by kalm »

GannonFan wrote:
kalm wrote:
Like I said, I'm neutral on the min. wage. My point is that an increase was extremely popular in red states, so much so that the republican senatorial candidates in Alaska and Arkansas both came out in favor of it .
Minimum wage is just a feel good issue. In the longterm, any increases in minimum wage are erased by inflationary pressures. There may be some short term impacts, megative and positive, but really, raising the minimum wage does absolutely nothing long term when it comes to improving the standard of living of those for whom raising the minimum wage was intended. More people should be for it because it looks like you're doing something without really having to solve an issue. It's perfect for politics.
Like I said, I'm neutral on the min. wage. My point is that an increase was extremely popular in red states, so much so that the republican senatorial candidates in Alaska and Arkansas both came out in favor of it .
Image
Image
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69142
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Kalm's Election Re-Cap

Post by kalm »

Cap'n Cat wrote:
Rob Iola wrote: That's the really crazy part - the economy is doing better - and yet the Dems didn't just lose but got absolutely crushed because R's linked them to Obama (all McConnell ran on was linking Grimes to O - the whole bit about her refusing to say she voted for him, even when she was a delegate for him in '12).

Agreed, except for the fact that the Dems didn't get "crushed". Balance simply shifted, as it has done countless times. Seems like "crushed" because of how our sensationalist media characterizes things these days.

My disappointment? Neither Obama nor Dems touted the great things they did. The administration has been scandal-free (especially when held to the light of something like Reagan's), the economy improved immensely and their are no major world conflagrations in which we are entangled. Why the Dems abandoned Obama and let the Conks link them to any semblance of "malaise" or trouble is nothing more than extreme cowardice. The nation IS much better off than it was 6 hers ago.
They have no sense of party and, instead, after years of heinous, unabashed obstruction, allowed the Conks to lead them around by their noses. Shame. My party is the party of pussies.

:ohno:

Edit: re: dark money, the Dems out raised and outspent the Conks in Minnesota and put their people back in office with the exception of one guy who probably had to go, anyway. None of them abandoned Obama or party principle.
Yep. When they run as liberals, they do better. When they run as moderate conks, they lose. :nod:
Image
Image
Image
Post Reply