Income Inequality and a FTT

Political discussions
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69145
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Income Inequality and a FTT

Post by kalm »

The first couple of paragraphs are for JSO to debunk, but if the first stat is true... :shock:

The authors remedy is a Financial Transactions Tax which appears to work well in low financial regulatory countries. It seems like a clean way to generate revenue and discourage casino like investing, without having to increase regulatory bureaucracy.

What say you?
The information came from the Credit Suisse 2014 Global Wealth Databook (GWD), which goes on to reveal much more about the disappearing middle class.

1. Each Year Since the Recession, America's Richest 1% Have Made More Than the Cost of All U.S. Social Programs

In effect, a reverse transfer from the poor to the rich. Even as conservatives blame Social Security for being too costly.

Much of the 1% wealth just sits there, accumulating more wealth. The numbers are nearly unfathomable. Depending on the estimate, the 1% took in anywhere from $2.3 trillion to $5.7 trillion per year. (All numeric analysis is detailed here.)

Even the smaller estimate of $2.3 trillion per year is more than the budget for Social Security ($860 billion), Medicare ($524 billion), Medicaid ($304 billion), and the entire safety net ($286 billion for SNAP, WIC [Women, Infants, Children], Child Nutrition, Earned Income Tax Credit, Supplemental Security Income, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, and Housing).

2. Almost None of the New 1% Wealth Led To Innovation and Jobs

In 2005, for every $1 of financial wealth there was 66 cents of non-financial (home) wealth. Ten years later, for every $1 of financial wealth there was just 43 cents of non-financial (home) wealth.

What happens to all this financial wealth?

Over 90% of the assets owned by millionaires are held in low-risk investments (bonds and cash), the stock market, and real estate. Business startup costs made up less than 1% of the investments of high net worth individuals in North America in 2011. A recent study found that less than 1 percent of all entrepreneurs came from very rich or very poor backgrounds. They come from the middle class.

On the corporate side, stock buybacks are employed to enrich executives rather than to invest in new technologies. In 1981, major corporations were spending less than 3 percent of their combined net income on buybacks, but in recent years they've been spending up to 95 percent of their profits on buybacks and dividends…………………………..

The FTT has extraordinary revenue-generating potential, on a global scale. The Bank for International Settlements reported in 2008 that annual trading in derivatives had surpassed $1.14 quadrillion. Just one-tenth of one percent of that is a trillion dollars.

It's also a fair tax. While average Americans pay up to a 10% sales tax on shoes for the kids, millionaire investors pay a zero sales tax on financial purchases. They pay just a .00002% SEC fee (2 cents for every thousand dollars) for a financial instrument.

In addition, the FTT is easy to administer and difficult to evade. Clearing houses already review all trades, and serve as collection agencies for transaction fees.

And as evidence of its suitability, three of the top five countries on the Heritage Foundation's Index of Economic Freedom are Singapore, Hong Kong, and Switzerland, all of whom have FTTs.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: Income Inequality and a FTT

Post by AZGrizFan »

kalm wrote:The first couple of paragraphs are for JSO to debunk, but if the first stat is true... :shock:

The authors remedy is a Financial Transactions Tax which appears to work well in low financial regulatory countries. It seems like a clean way to generate revenue and discourage casino like investing, without having to increase regulatory bureaucracy.

What say you?
The information came from the Credit Suisse 2014 Global Wealth Databook (GWD), which goes on to reveal much more about the disappearing middle class.

1. Each Year Since the Recession, America's Richest 1% Have Made More Than the Cost of All U.S. Social Programs

In effect, a reverse transfer from the poor to the rich. Even as conservatives blame Social Security for being too costly.
I'll admit, I stopped reading after this drivel. Just because the richest 1% made more, that does NOT automatically make it a reverse transfer from the poor to the rich. This (wealth generation) isn't a fucking closed system. It's not a zero-sum game.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69145
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Income Inequality and a FTT

Post by kalm »

AZGrizFan wrote:
kalm wrote:The first couple of paragraphs are for JSO to debunk, but if the first stat is true... :shock:

The authors remedy is a Financial Transactions Tax which appears to work well in low financial regulatory countries. It seems like a clean way to generate revenue and discourage casino like investing, without having to increase regulatory bureaucracy.

What say you?
I'll admit, I stopped reading after this drivel. Just because the richest 1% made more, that does NOT automatically make it a reverse transfer from the poor to the rich. This (wealth generation) isn't a fucking closed system. It's not a zero-sum game.
So you believe perpetual growth is possible?
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 31515
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: Income Inequality and a FTT

Post by Gil Dobie »

AZGrizFan wrote:
I'll admit, I stopped reading after this drivel. Just because the richest 1% made more, that does NOT automatically make it a reverse transfer from the poor to the rich. This (wealth generation) isn't a **** closed system. It's not a zero-sum game.
How does a CEO justify millions in stock options, while converting thousands of employees to contract employees at 80% of their former wages with no benefits? This is happening in corporate America. It's what happens when we elect the rich and/or famous to run our country. Jobs are there, but the pay is less for the workers, and the money goes to the executives, aka Rich.
Image
HI54UNI
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 12394
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:39 pm
I am a fan of: Firing Mark Farley
A.K.A.: Bikinis for JSO
Location: The Panther State

Re: Income Inequality and a FTT

Post by HI54UNI »

AZGrizFan wrote:
kalm wrote:The first couple of paragraphs are for JSO to debunk, but if the first stat is true... :shock:

The authors remedy is a Financial Transactions Tax which appears to work well in low financial regulatory countries. It seems like a clean way to generate revenue and discourage casino like investing, without having to increase regulatory bureaucracy.

What say you?
I'll admit, I stopped reading after this drivel. Just because the richest 1% made more, that does NOT automatically make it a reverse transfer from the poor to the rich. This (wealth generation) isn't a fucking closed system. It's not a zero-sum game.
:lol: :lol:

I did the same thing.

We need to be cutting spending not taking in more revenue for the dumb fucks in DC to spend!
If fascism ever comes to America, it will come in the name of liberalism. Ronald Reagan, 1975.

Progressivism is cancer

All my posts are satire
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19233
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: Income Inequality and a FTT

Post by GannonFan »

kalm wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
I'll admit, I stopped reading after this drivel. Just because the richest 1% made more, that does NOT automatically make it a reverse transfer from the poor to the rich. This (wealth generation) isn't a **** closed system. It's not a zero-sum game.
So you believe perpetual growth is possible?
So do you believe there's a ceiling to growth?
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69145
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Income Inequality and a FTT

Post by kalm »

GannonFan wrote:
kalm wrote:
So you believe perpetual growth is possible?
So do you believe there's a ceiling to growth?
Give me an example of something that grows forever.
Image
Image
Image
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: Income Inequality and a FTT

Post by Ivytalk »

:popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:

This could be a good one!

Or it could be another attack on the insidious, evil 1%. :jack:
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: Income Inequality and a FTT

Post by Ivytalk »

kalm wrote:
GannonFan wrote:
So do you believe there's a ceiling to growth?
Give me an example of something that grows forever.
Guvmint. :coffee:
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69145
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Income Inequality and a FTT

Post by kalm »

Ivytalk wrote:
kalm wrote:
Give me an example of something that grows forever.
Guvmint. :coffee:
:lol: :clap:
Image
Image
Image
Baldy
Level4
Level4
Posts: 9921
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:38 pm
I am a fan of: Georgia Southern

Re: Income Inequality and a FTT

Post by Baldy »

Ivytalk wrote:
kalm wrote:
Give me an example of something that grows forever.
Guvmint. :coffee:
[/thread]
HI54UNI
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 12394
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:39 pm
I am a fan of: Firing Mark Farley
A.K.A.: Bikinis for JSO
Location: The Panther State

Re: Income Inequality and a FTT

Post by HI54UNI »

Ivytalk wrote:
kalm wrote:
Give me an example of something that grows forever.
Guvmint. :coffee:

:lol: :lol: :notworthy: :notworthy:
If fascism ever comes to America, it will come in the name of liberalism. Ronald Reagan, 1975.

Progressivism is cancer

All my posts are satire
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45627
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: Income Inequality and a FTT

Post by dbackjon »

60% Upper Bracket sounds right - using our military to enforce it globally :thumb:
:thumb:
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Income Inequality and a FTT

Post by 89Hen »

It's also a fair tax. While average Americans pay up to a 10% sales tax on shoes for the kids, millionaire investors pay a zero sales tax on financial purchases. They pay just a .00002% SEC fee (2 cents for every thousand dollars) for a financial instrument.
Maybe the cough medicine is still taking control (I did put three MEAC teams in the field) but what part of the above makes sense? :suspicious:
Image
User avatar
travelinman67
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 9884
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 9:51 pm
I am a fan of: Portland State Vikings
A.K.A.: Modern Man
Location: Where the 1st Amendment still exists: CS.com

Re: Income Inequality and a FTT

Post by travelinman67 »

Ivytalk wrote:
kalm wrote:
Give me an example of something that grows forever.
Guvmint. :coffee:
POTY

:nod:
"That is how government works - we tell you what you can do today."
- EPA Kommissar Gina McCarthy
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: Income Inequality and a FTT

Post by AZGrizFan »

kalm wrote:
GannonFan wrote:
So do you believe there's a ceiling to growth?
Give me an example of something that grows forever.
Um....the cost of living?
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
JohnStOnge
Egalitarian
Egalitarian
Posts: 20316
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:47 pm
I am a fan of: McNeese State
A.K.A.: JohnStOnge

Re: Income Inequality and a FTT

Post by JohnStOnge »

I'll admit, I stopped reading after this drivel. Just because the richest 1% made more, that does NOT automatically make it a reverse transfer from the poor to the rich. This (wealth generation) isn't a **** closed system. It's not a zero-sum game.
Ok I don't need to put too much effort into responding because someone else pretty much already said what I was thinking as I read it.

I don't see any of it as having demonstrated any unfairness or anything. I guess if you want to say, "hey look there's this big pot of money we could tax" there is indeed a big pot of money they could tax. But there's nothing at all in the discussion that constitutes evidence of unfairness or a reverse transfer from the poor to the rich.

Otherwise, I think it's disgusting that we have people sitting around with their mouths watering constantly thinking of how government can confiscate even more of people's money.
Well, I believe that I must tell the truth
And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?

Deep Purple: No One Came
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69145
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Income Inequality and a FTT

Post by kalm »

JohnStOnge wrote:
I'll admit, I stopped reading after this drivel. Just because the richest 1% made more, that does NOT automatically make it a reverse transfer from the poor to the rich. This (wealth generation) isn't a **** closed system. It's not a zero-sum game.
Ok I don't need to put too much effort into responding because someone else pretty much already said what I was thinking as I read it.

I don't see any of it as having demonstrated any unfairness or anything. I guess if you want to say, "hey look there's this big pot of money we could tax" there is indeed a big pot of money they could tax. But there's nothing at all in the discussion that constitutes evidence of unfairness or a reverse transfer from the poor to the rich.

Otherwise, I think it's disgusting that we have people sitting around with their mouths watering constantly thinking of how government can confiscate even more of people's money.
How many of those people do you think exist?
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Chizzang
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19274
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
Location: Palermo Italy

Re: Income Inequality and a FTT

Post by Chizzang »

When you're talking about billionaires
(and as far as I can tell that's what we're talking about)
You might as well forget about trying to "get more" because it's not going to happen

Its a far more productive process (more can be learned from)
The exercise of reducing government spending

As it turns out - because we are so divided and unfocused - we will successfully accomplish neither
50% of the population says TAX MORE and the other half says SPEND LESS

all the while nothing gets done on either front
However if 100% of the people said: SPEND LESS and GET SMALLER - it might actually happen




:coffee:
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69145
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Income Inequality and a FTT

Post by kalm »

Chizzang wrote:When you're talking about billionaires
(and as far as I can tell that's what we're talking about)
You might as well forget about trying to "get more" because it's not going to happen

Its a far more productive process (more can be learned from)
The exercise of reducing government spending

As it turns out - because we are so divided and unfocused - we will successfully accomplish neither
50% of the population says TAX MORE and the other half says SPEND LESS

all the while nothing gets done on either front
However if 100% of the people said: SPEND LESS and GET SMALLER - it might actually happen



:coffee:
I would say far more than 50% are for cutting spending. :coffee:

And no, what were talking about is that

1). We can afford the crumbs

2). A FTT has proven effective in countries more financially "free" than ours.

:coffee: :coffee:

Pessimist. :ohno:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Grizalltheway
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 35688
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
Location: BSC

Re: Income Inequality and a FTT

Post by Grizalltheway »

kalm wrote:
JohnStOnge wrote:
Ok I don't need to put too much effort into responding because someone else pretty much already said what I was thinking as I read it.

I don't see any of it as having demonstrated any unfairness or anything. I guess if you want to say, "hey look there's this big pot of money we could tax" there is indeed a big pot of money they could tax. But there's nothing at all in the discussion that constitutes evidence of unfairness or a reverse transfer from the poor to the rich.

Otherwise, I think it's disgusting that we have people sitting around with their mouths watering constantly thinking of how government can confiscate even more of people's money.
How many of those people do you think exist?
However many Fox News tells him. :coffee:
User avatar
Chizzang
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19274
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
Location: Palermo Italy

Re: Income Inequality and a FTT

Post by Chizzang »

kalm wrote:
Chizzang wrote:When you're talking about billionaires
(and as far as I can tell that's what we're talking about)
You might as well forget about trying to "get more" because it's not going to happen

Its a far more productive process (more can be learned from)
The exercise of reducing government spending

As it turns out - because we are so divided and unfocused - we will successfully accomplish neither
50% of the population says TAX MORE and the other half says SPEND LESS

all the while nothing gets done on either front
However if 100% of the people said: SPEND LESS and GET SMALLER - it might actually happen



:coffee:
I would say far more than 50% are for cutting spending. :coffee:

And no, what were talking about is that

1). We can afford the crumbs

2). A FTT has proven effective in countries more financially "free" than ours.

:coffee: :coffee:

Pessimist. :ohno:

:lol:

Everybody says they want spending cut... virtually 100% agree


(as long as its somewhere else) :geek:
And I'm not a pessimist - but - nothing can change in a system designed to never change
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69145
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Income Inequality and a FTT

Post by kalm »

Chizzang wrote:
kalm wrote:
I would say far more than 50% are for cutting spending. :coffee:

And no, what were talking about is that

1). We can afford the crumbs

2). A FTT has proven effective in countries more financially "free" than ours.

:coffee: :coffee:

Pessimist. :ohno:

:lol:

Everybody says they want spending cut... virtually 100% agree


(as long as its somewhere else) :geek:
And I'm not a pessimist - but - nothing can change in a system designed to never change
I know you're not a pessimist. You're a cynic (which is good).

And the system was designed to change. In fact it changes all the time.
Image
Image
Image
CAA Flagship
4th&29
4th&29
Posts: 38529
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
I am a fan of: Old Dominion
A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
Location: Pizza Hell

Re: Income Inequality and a FTT

Post by CAA Flagship »

kalm wrote:
Chizzang wrote:

:lol:

Everybody says they want spending cut... virtually 100% agree


(as long as its somewhere else) :geek:
And I'm not a pessimist - but - nothing can change in a system designed to never change
I know you're not a pessimist. You're a cynic (which is good).

And the system was designed to change. In fact it changes all the time.
Image
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Income Inequality and a FTT

Post by 89Hen »

kalm wrote:2). A FTT has proven effective in countries more financially "free" than ours.
How about we do what's best for our country, not others? :coffee:
Image
Post Reply