Paging Spandos: X-37B

Political discussions
expandspanos
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1970
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 11:16 am
I am a fan of: School of Hard Knocks

Re: Paging Spandos: X-37B

Post by expandspanos »

BlueHen86 wrote:
expandspanos wrote:Do you think this is real footage?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOdzhQS_MMw[/youtube]
Do you wake up every morning wondering if you can be dumber than you were yesterday morning? If that is your goal, you are succeeding. Congrats!
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2rSz6gLPN4[/youtube]

Hahaa great movie.. 1977 :notworthy:
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
expandspanos
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1970
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 11:16 am
I am a fan of: School of Hard Knocks

Re: Paging Spandos: X-37B

Post by expandspanos »

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qhlnst3ZWRI[/youtube]

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0077294/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Paging Spandos: X-37B

Post by Ibanez »

CAA Flagship wrote:
89Hen wrote: Oh, they're classic alright. Surely you remember:

Johnny Sokko and His Flying Robot
Ultraman
The Space Giants
Holy smokes. :shock:
I don't have a clue on any of those.

The obscure shit in my childhood included:
Gigantor
Courageous Cat and Minute Mouse
Banana Splits
Johnny Quest
Johnny Quest isn't obscure.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Paging Spandos: X-37B

Post by Ibanez »

expandspanos wrote:Haven't really looked into it much.. looks like the old Space Shuttle.. just with a facelift.. Doubt it was in space, or they'd show us some video.

Just to find out where we are.. you think this footage is real, don't you?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMINSD7MmT4[/youtube]
You can't prove otherwise. :coffee:
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
expandspanos
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1970
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 11:16 am
I am a fan of: School of Hard Knocks

Re: Paging Spandos: X-37B

Post by expandspanos »

Ibanez wrote:
expandspanos wrote:Haven't really looked into it much.. looks like the old Space Shuttle.. just with a facelift.. Doubt it was in space, or they'd show us some video.

Just to find out where we are.. you think this footage is real, don't you?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMINSD7MmT4[/youtube]
You can't prove otherwise. :coffee:
Actually, it's pretty obviously faked, and bad at that.. and I could present hours more evidence.. but you're not going to change your mind anyway, or have an open mind looking into the subject, so I'm not going to waste my time.


Every technological mechanical achievement in history has led to faster/larger/better models in the years after their inception - EXCEPT the space program.

The last time we were on the moon was Apollo 17- Which supposedly landed men on the moon in 1972, That was 42 years ago.. they were using "computers" that were a total joke, and we haven't been back since?

So, we make it to the Moon, then never go back again.. and no other country has either :ohno:

Airplanes advanced very quickly.. You had the first airplane at Kitty Hawk.. then you had some wood framed propeller driven plains.. Vickers Viscout etc.. that quickly advanced to the Comet, and then you suddenly had large bodies Boeing 707's then 747s and Airbus A380s.. and Super Sonic aircraft.

Not only did the technology advance at an exponential rate, but there a proliferation of it.

Cars: Same thing.. Very basic electric and steam cars originally.. progressed to Model-T.. then cars got very advanced.. and proliferated..

Going to the moon: Well, after "we made it".. in 72.. 42 years ago, nothin'. No new high-definition images that look like people are really on the moon, just absolutely nothing, and the "new space shuttle" isn't even manned.. I mean, that tells you something- there is a serious radiation problem going on in deeper space than near-earth orbit.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
User avatar
93henfan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 56358
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:03 pm
Location: Slower Delaware

Re: Paging Spandos: X-37B

Post by 93henfan »

Yep. 400,000 people involved in the Apollo missions have managed to keep silent about the big hoax, a remarkable feat. The Russians who tracked the six Apollo missions leaving earth orbit to their disappointment and the amateur astronomers who did the same to their delight also were in on the trickery. And sometime in the intervening four decades, NASA was somehow able to get a spaceship up to the moon to make footprints, lay fake rover tracks, and plant flags so that when high resolution photos showing the "landing sites" were possible, they'd look real.

And to your point about planes, the reason they evolved so well is because of the tremendous economic benefits. The benefits of the Apollo program were that we accomplished something a president said we were going to do within a decade and we beat the Russians doing it during the Cold War. There was no further economic benefit and thus no further missions.

Think a little bro.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
User avatar
Grizalltheway
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 35688
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
Location: BSC

Re: Paging Spandos: X-37B

Post by Grizalltheway »

93henfan wrote:Yep. 400,000 people involved in the Apollo missions have managed to keep silent about the big hoax, a remarkable feat. The Russians who tracked the six Apollo missions leaving earth orbit to their disappointment and the amateur astronomers who did the same to their delight also were in on the trickery. And sometime in the intervening four decades, NASA was somehow able to get a spaceship up to the moon to make footprints, lay fake rover tracks, and plant flags so that when high resolution photos showing the "landing sites" were possible, they'd look real.

And to your point about planes, the reason they evolved so well is because of the tremendous economic benefits. The benefits of the Apollo program were that we accomplished something a president said we were going to do within a decade and we beat the Russians doing it during the Cold War. There was no further economic benefit and thus no further missions.

Think a little bro.
Yo bro, Spandos ain't gonna waste his time reading this.
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Paging Spandos: X-37B

Post by 89Hen »

expandspanos wrote:The last time we were on the moon was Apollo 17- Which supposedly landed men on the moon in 1972, That was 42 years ago.. they were using "computers" that were a total joke, and we haven't been back since?

So, we make it to the Moon, then never go back again.. and no other country has either :ohno:
Going to the moon: Well, after "we made it".. in 72.. 42 years ago, nothin'. No new high-definition images that look like people are really on the moon, just absolutely nothing, and the "new space shuttle" isn't even manned.. I mean, that tells you something- there is a serious radiation problem going on in deeper space than near-earth orbit.
:suspicious: Why go back?

http://www.space.com/12796-photos-apoll ... s-lro.html
Image
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Paging Spandos: X-37B

Post by Ibanez »

expandspanos wrote:
Ibanez wrote: You can't prove otherwise. :coffee:
Actually, it's pretty obviously faked, and bad at that.. and I could present hours more evidence.. but you're not going to change your mind anyway, or have an open mind looking into the subject, so I'm not going to waste my time.


Every technological mechanical achievement in history has led to faster/larger/better models in the years after their inception - EXCEPT the space program.

The last time we were on the moon was Apollo 17- Which supposedly landed men on the moon in 1972, That was 42 years ago.. they were using "computers" that were a total joke, and we haven't been back since?

So, we make it to the Moon, then never go back again.. and no other country has either :ohno:

Airplanes advanced very quickly.. You had the first airplane at Kitty Hawk.. then you had some wood framed propeller driven plains.. Vickers Viscout etc.. that quickly advanced to the Comet, and then you suddenly had large bodies Boeing 707's then 747s and Airbus A380s.. and Super Sonic aircraft.

Not only did the technology advance at an exponential rate, but there a proliferation of it.

Cars: Same thing.. Very basic electric and steam cars originally.. progressed to Model-T.. then cars got very advanced.. and proliferated..

Going to the moon: Well, after "we made it".. in 72.. 42 years ago, nothin'. No new high-definition images that look like people are really on the moon, just absolutely nothing, and the "new space shuttle" isn't even manned.. I mean, that tells you something- there is a serious radiation problem going on in deeper space than near-earth orbit.
3 people can keep a secret, if two of them are dead.

We've also had more advances in technology since Roswell than all of human history before What does that tell you??
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Paging Spandos: X-37B

Post by Ibanez »

expandspanos wrote:
Ibanez wrote: You can't prove otherwise. :coffee:
Actually, it's pretty obviously faked, and bad at that.. and I could present hours more evidence.. but you're not going to change your mind anyway, or have an open mind looking into the subject, so I'm not going to waste my time.


Every technological mechanical achievement in history has led to faster/larger/better models in the years after their inception - EXCEPT the space program.

The last time we were on the moon was Apollo 17- Which supposedly landed men on the moon in 1972, That was 42 years ago.. they were using "computers" that were a total joke, and we haven't been back since?

So, we make it to the Moon, then never go back again.. and no other country has either :ohno:

Airplanes advanced very quickly.. You had the first airplane at Kitty Hawk.. then you had some wood framed propeller driven plains.. Vickers Viscout etc.. that quickly advanced to the Comet, and then you suddenly had large bodies Boeing 707's then 747s and Airbus A380s.. and Super Sonic aircraft.

Not only did the technology advance at an exponential rate, but there a proliferation of it.

Cars: Same thing.. Very basic electric and steam cars originally.. progressed to Model-T.. then cars got very advanced.. and proliferated..

Going to the moon: Well, after "we made it".. in 72.. 42 years ago, nothin'. No new high-definition images that look like people are really on the moon, just absolutely nothing, and the "new space shuttle" isn't even manned.. I mean, that tells you something- there is a serious radiation problem going on in deeper space than near-earth orbit.
Is anything real in your world?
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
expandspanos
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1970
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 11:16 am
I am a fan of: School of Hard Knocks

Re: Paging Spandos: X-37B

Post by expandspanos »

Ibanez wrote:
Is anything real in your world?

Yes, we're really bombing Syria now.. we're really bombing Iraq still, we really have bases all over the world, our population is really stupid, we have a bunch of porn-addicted alcoholics as a society, and the price of everything is going up all the time, even though if technology really worked like it should those items should be less expensive.

So, there's a lot of real stuff in my world.. I'm keepin' it real ;) :notworthy:
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
expandspanos
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1970
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 11:16 am
I am a fan of: School of Hard Knocks

Re: Paging Spandos: X-37B

Post by expandspanos »

93henfan wrote:Yep. 400,000 people involved in the Apollo missions have managed to keep silent about the big hoax, a remarkable feat. The Russians who tracked the six Apollo missions leaving earth orbit to their disappointment and the amateur astronomers who did the same to their delight also were in on the trickery. And sometime in the intervening four decades, NASA was somehow able to get a spaceship up to the moon to make footprints, lay fake rover tracks, and plant flags so that when high resolution photos showing the "landing sites" were possible, they'd look real.

And to your point about planes, the reason they evolved so well is because of the tremendous economic benefits. The benefits of the Apollo program were that we accomplished something a president said we were going to do within a decade and we beat the Russians doing it during the Cold War. There was no further economic benefit and thus no further missions.

Think a little bro.
Watch the movie Capricorn One (the first half) and you'll get how you could be deceived about the space program, or even it wouldn't take as many to people to "be in on it" as you would think.

Image

Image

Excellent movie get it on Netflix!

and yes you get get to see O.J. Simpson's acting, which was Oscar Worthy. :twocents:
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
User avatar
93henfan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 56358
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:03 pm
Location: Slower Delaware

Re: Paging Spandos: X-37B

Post by 93henfan »

Do you think our sworn enemies, the Russians, were "in on it" as they tracked the Apollo missions leaving earth orbit and returning days later? Who is "in on" getting the lunar modules, flags, rover tracks, and footprints up on the surface of the moon, or the retroreflector arrays that are still utilized on the moon's surface for laser ranging experiments?
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
User avatar
Col Hogan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 12230
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:29 am
I am a fan of: William & Mary
Location: Republic of Texas

Re: Paging Spandos: X-37B

Post by Col Hogan »

expandspanos wrote:
Ibanez wrote:
Is anything real in your world?

Yes, we're really bombing Syria now.. we're really bombing Iraq still, we really have bases all over the world, our population is really stupid, we have a bunch of porn-addicted alcoholics as a society, and the price of everything is going up all the time, even though if technology really worked like it should those items should be less expensive.

So, there's a lot of real stuff in my world.. I'm keepin' it real ;) :notworthy:
Gas is down to $2.83 here...

Just sayin' :ohno:
“Tolerance and Apathy are the last virtues of a dying society.” Aristotle

Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.
CAA Flagship
4th&29
4th&29
Posts: 38529
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
I am a fan of: Old Dominion
A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
Location: Pizza Hell

Re: Paging Spandos: X-37B

Post by CAA Flagship »

93henfan wrote:Do you think our sworn enemies, the Russians, were "in on it" as they tracked the Apollo missions leaving earth orbit and returning days later? Who is "in on" getting the lunar modules, flags, rover tracks, and footprints up on the surface of the moon, or the retroreflector arrays that are still utilized on the moon's surface for laser ranging experiments?
Since Andy is not here, I'll do it.

NERD!!!!!


:kisswink:
Post Reply