https://www.vocativ.com/interactive/usa ... adability/
Kinda thinkin' he's just speaking to his supporters.




Simple. Libtard insistence that Bush was "dumbest".93henfan wrote:Why do we keep arguing this point? It plays right into Spandos' two party-same shit argument.
Yes, the last two presidents we elected were, if not the two dumbest, both clearly in the bottom ten.
I guess I have to give Bush credit for at least not having so much hubris that he couldn't laugh at himself. Obama really believes that his shit doesn't stink, and his fat baboon-looking wife has an even higher opinion of herself.

+1travelinman67 wrote:Simple. Libtard insistence that Bush was "dumbest".93henfan wrote:Why do we keep arguing this point? It plays right into Spandos' two party-same shit argument.
Yes, the last two presidents we elected were, if not the two dumbest, both clearly in the bottom ten.
I guess I have to give Bush credit for at least not having so much hubris that he couldn't laugh at himself. Obama really believes that his shit doesn't stink, and his fat baboon-looking wife has an even higher opinion of herself.
Bush was dumb. Obama is dumber.
If our nation continues on its current path, we have not yet elected the dumbest.
Personally, I'm aghast that anyone still attempts to defend the failed policies of the current administration. Ideologue or not, the time and energy wasted defending failed policies to protect party vanity is destroying our nation.

ouch... that sting a little teabag?kalm wrote:+1travelinman67 wrote:
Simple. Libtard insistence that Bush was "dumbest".
Bush was dumb. Obama is dumber.
If our nation continues on its current path, we have not yet elected the dumbest.
Personally, I'm aghast that anyone still attempts to defend the failed policies of the current administration. Ideologue or not, the time and energy wasted defending failed policies to protect party vanity is destroying our nation.![]()
Take reaganomics for example...

technicality, I know, but the dumbest wasn't elected, he was appointed by the Supreme Court.travelinman67 wrote:Simple. Libtard insistence that Bush was "dumbest".93henfan wrote:Why do we keep arguing this point? It plays right into Spandos' two party-same **** argument.
Yes, the last two presidents we elected were, if not the two dumbest, both clearly in the bottom ten.
I guess I have to give Bush credit for at least not having so much hubris that he couldn't laugh at himself. Obama really believes that his **** doesn't stink, and his fat baboon-looking wife has an even higher opinion of herself.
Bush was dumb. Obama is dumber.
If our nation continues on its current path, we have not yet elected the dumbest.
Personally, I'm aghast that anyone still attempts to defend the failed policies of the current administration. Ideologue or not, the time and energy wasted defending failed policies to protect party vanity is destroying our nation.

I've been to all 57 states...houndawg wrote:Everybody is playing for second place in the dumb speech category.
Is our children being educated....

A good candidate for second. Doesn't touch "is our children being educated", too much irony.BDKJMU wrote:I've been to all 57 states...houndawg wrote:Everybody is playing for second place in the dumb speech category.
Is our children being educated....





What?travelinman67 wrote:Ideologues drop in, without having reviewed the research, and blindly defend failed policies.
Point
Made
Thank You

Kalm, you, densedawg, nobrains86, just don't get it.kalm wrote:What?travelinman67 wrote:Ideologues drop in, without having reviewed the research, and blindly defend failed policies.
Point
Made
Thank You

The fact that Obama said :"Corpsman" not once, but twice, certainly does touch that..BlueHen86 wrote:A good candidate for second. Doesn't touch "is our children being educated", too much irony.BDKJMU wrote:
I've been to all 57 states...

Bronco wrote:-
George Bush had higher grades at Harvard


C'mon...you can at least TRY and look less obvious.travelinman67 wrote:Kalm, you, densedawg, nobrains86, just don't get it.kalm wrote:
What?


travelinman67 wrote:Scientific analysis of readability finds Obama's speeches most "dumbed down" of all Presidents.
https://www.vocativ.com/interactive/usa ... adability/
Kinda thinkin' he's just speaking to his supporters.


You mean getting out of the ConkWars and cleaning up W's economic mess?Bronco wrote:The speech to the 1st graders should have been our first clue as to what was to come.