MSU has great defense.

Post by **SACCAT** » Mon Oct 13, 2014 8:17 pm

It actually is the worst in the history of football....but it got everyone to read this.

Prukop is a beast out there. He has more rushing TDs than UM has as a team. He has amassed 1300 yards in total offense IN THE LAST TWO GAMES...Now I know what you are all going to say " Sure, but has he played any good defenses yet?". And the answer to that is...No, but that is because everyone looks bad this year at D, and I don't think a real good D could even stop this team. We average 11 different players a game catching passes, and have had 4 different RBs score TDs. I am not one to exaggerate , but we will score 70 points a game for the next 20 years...(until it gets cold...which is probably this weekend).

Post by **kalm** » Mon Oct 13, 2014 8:52 pm

This is some fantastic stuff and let's just say I'm truly glad we have you out of the way!

Post by **clenz** » Mon Oct 13, 2014 8:59 pm

SACCAT wrote:It actually is the worst in the history of football....but it got everyone to read this.

Prukop is a beast out there. He has more rushing TDs than UM has as a team. He has amassed 1300 yards in total offense IN THE LAST TWO GAMES...Now I know what you are all going to say " Sure, but has he played any good defenses yet?". And the answer to that is...No, but that is because everyone looks bad this year at D, and I don't think a real good D could even stop this team. We average 11 different players a game catching passes, and have had 4 different RBs score TDs. I am not one to exaggerate , but we will score 70 points a game for the next 20 years...(until it gets cold...which is probably this weekend).

You face Big Sky defenses...so 70 probably isn't out of the question

Post by **SACCAT** » Mon Oct 13, 2014 8:59 pm

kalm wrote: This is some fantastic stuff and let's just say I'm truly glad we have you out of the way!

We will see you again this year.

Post by **Grizalltheway** » Mon Oct 13, 2014 9:10 pm

Totally agree. Cats are the next NDSU, and Ron Ash will take over at Alabama after Saban leaves.

SuperHornet · Post by **SuperHornet** » Mon Oct 13, 2014 9:16 pm

As soon as Ash leaves, they make a run at the coach at ISU.

Post by **SACCAT** » Mon Oct 13, 2014 10:02 pm

Grizalltheway wrote:Totally agree. Cats are the next NDSU, and Ron Ash will take over at Alabama after Saban leaves.

Not true sir. I would say we are more like Oregon. Destroy every tream till the final game, then get crushed....

grizcountry420 · Post by **grizcountry420** » Tue Oct 14, 2014 10:23 am

MSU fans be like:

and then November rolls around:

Post by **SACCAT** » Tue Oct 14, 2014 12:09 pm

grizcountry420 wrote:MSU fans be like:

and then November rolls around:

Post by **AZGrizFan** » Tue Oct 14, 2014 3:32 pm

SACCAT wrote:
Grizalltheway wrote:Totally agree. Cats are the next NDSU, and Ron Ash will take over at Alabama after Saban leaves.
Not true sir. I would say we are more like Oregon. Destroy every tream till the final game, then get crushed....

The U of A apparently doesn't buy into that.

Brock Landers · Post by **Brock Landers** » Tue Oct 14, 2014 3:49 pm

I honestly expect Cat-Griz to be a complete trainwreck this year. I'm not sure for which team, possibly both.

Post by **SACCAT** » Tue Oct 14, 2014 6:36 pm

Brock Landers wrote:I honestly expect Cat-Griz to be a complete trainwreck this year. I'm not sure for which team, possibly both.

I expect I will be drunk, think every call will go against the Cats, and I will be a trainwreck by the end of it...I also expect the same from every griz fan.

Post by **Grizalltheway** » Tue Oct 14, 2014 7:03 pm

SACCAT wrote:
Brock Landers wrote:I honestly expect Cat-Griz to be a complete trainwreck this year. I'm not sure for which team, possibly both.
I expect I will be drunk, think every call will go against the Cats, and I will be a trainwreck by the end of it...I also expect the same from every griz fan.

I actually felt pretty great leaving the litter box last year...

Post by **SACCAT** » Wed Oct 15, 2014 11:27 am

Grizalltheway wrote:
SACCAT wrote:
I expect I will be drunk, think every call will go against the Cats, and I will be a trainwreck by the end of it...I also expect the same from every griz fan.
I actually felt pretty great leaving the litter box last year...

Probably as good as I felt leaving Missoula the year before. Also, MSU has now been mentioned on both the "Dan Patrick show" and on "Mike & Mike". Mike & Mike said that we score to many points, and that they would not watch games like these, because they are not real football. They think that Football should be a game of field position, and controlling the line of scrimmage. Fat Mike even said he would much rather watch a game with a final score of 7-3, because that is what real football is.

Post by **Grizalltheway** » Wed Oct 15, 2014 12:05 pm

SACCAT wrote:
Grizalltheway wrote: I actually felt pretty great leaving the litter box last year...
Probably as good as I felt leaving Missoula the year before. Also, MSU has now been mentioned on both the "Dan Patrick show" and on "Mike & Mike". Mike & Mike said that we score to many points, and that they would not watch games like these, because they are not real football. They think that Football should be a game of field position, and controlling the line of scrimmage. Fat Mike even said he would much rather watch a game with a final score of 7-3, because that is what real football is.

Ha! Suck it Cats!

Sioux · Post by **Sioux** » Wed Oct 15, 2014 1:33 pm

SACCAT wrote:It actually is the worst in the history of football....but it got everyone to read this.

Prukop is a beast out there. He has more rushing TDs than UM has as a team. He has amassed 1300 yards in total offense IN THE LAST TWO GAMES...Now I know what you are all going to say " Sure, but has he played any good defenses yet?". And the answer to that is...No, but that is because everyone looks bad this year at D, and I don't think a real good D could even stop this team. We average 11 different players a game catching passes, and have had 4 different RBs score TDs. I am not one to exaggerate , but we will score 70 points a game for the next 20 years...(until it gets cold...which is probably this weekend).

He had -18 yards rushing vs. UND. They won't piss a drop in the playoffs.

Post by **kalm** » Wed Oct 15, 2014 2:01 pm

Sioux wrote:
SACCAT wrote:It actually is the worst in the history of football....but it got everyone to read this.

Prukop is a beast out there. He has more rushing TDs than UM has as a team. He has amassed 1300 yards in total offense IN THE LAST TWO GAMES...Now I know what you are all going to say " Sure, but has he played any good defenses yet?". And the answer to that is...No, but that is because everyone looks bad this year at D, and I don't think a real good D could even stop this team. We average 11 different players a game catching passes, and have had 4 different RBs score TDs. I am not one to exaggerate , but we will score 70 points a game for the next 20 years...(until it gets cold...which is probably this weekend).
He had -18 yards rushing vs. UND. They won't piss a drop in the playoffs.

They were up 26 to 7 at half.

Sioux · Post by **Sioux** » Wed Oct 15, 2014 2:18 pm

kalm wrote:
Sioux wrote:
He had -18 yards rushing vs. UND. They won't piss a drop in the playoffs.
They were up 26 to 7 at half.

What's your point? One of those TD's was by their defense too so they scored a whole 22 points vs. UND at home. I would say they played a good defense that day and struggled mightily compared to what they have done to everyone else.

Post by **Grizalltheway** » Wed Oct 15, 2014 2:25 pm

Sioux wrote:
SACCAT wrote:It actually is the worst in the history of football....but it got everyone to read this.

Prukop is a beast out there. He has more rushing TDs than UM has as a team. He has amassed 1300 yards in total offense IN THE LAST TWO GAMES...Now I know what you are all going to say " Sure, but has he played any good defenses yet?". And the answer to that is...No, but that is because everyone looks bad this year at D, and I don't think a real good D could even stop this team. We average 11 different players a game catching passes, and have had 4 different RBs score TDs. I am not one to exaggerate , but we will score 70 points a game for the next 20 years...(until it gets cold...which is probably this weekend).
He had -18 yards rushing vs. UND. They won't piss a drop in the playoffs.

Especially if the road goes through Fargo again, which it most likely will. No way they score more than 25 against NDSU, and their D will get steamrolled.

Sioux · Post by **Sioux** » Wed Oct 15, 2014 2:50 pm

Grizalltheway wrote:
Sioux wrote:
He had -18 yards rushing vs. UND. They won't piss a drop in the playoffs.
Especially if the road goes through Fargo again, which it most likely will. No way they score more than 25 against NDSU, and their D will get steamrolled.

25? More like 10, if that. That would be an ugly football game for the road team.

Post by **kalm** » Thu Oct 16, 2014 5:47 am

Sioux wrote:
kalm wrote:
They were up 26 to 7 at half.
What's your point? One of those TD's was by their defense too so they scored a whole 22 points vs. UND at home. I would say they played a good defense that day and struggled mightily compared to what they have done to everyone else.

You're under-rating how good Montana State is.

Post by **Grizalltheway** » Thu Oct 16, 2014 7:04 am

kalm wrote:
Sioux wrote:
What's your point? One of those TD's was by their defense too so they scored a whole 22 points vs. UND at home. I would say they played a good defense that day and struggled mightily compared to what they have done to everyone else.
You're under-rating how good Montana State is.

No one's under-rating their offense. But against the only two decent defenses they've faced (UND and Ark. St.), it was pretty clear it's possible to slow them down.

Post by **SACCAT** » Thu Oct 16, 2014 1:12 pm

Grizalltheway wrote:
kalm wrote:
You're under-rating how good Montana State is.
No one's under-rating their offense. But against the only two decent defenses they've faced (UND and Ark. St.), it was pretty clear it's possible to slow them down.

The only thing that slowed us down in the Arkansas State game was us. Prukop had 300 yards and 4 TD's called back because of holding calls on our kicker....PLUS we felt bad that Arkansas State had to play Tennessee and Miami, so we LET them win to make them feel good. The UND game was because we were wearing the 1984 jerseys, and so we wanted to score the same amount we did back then.

Post by **Grizalltheway** » Thu Oct 16, 2014 1:16 pm

SACCAT wrote:
Grizalltheway wrote:
No one's under-rating their offense. But against the only two decent defenses they've faced (UND and Ark. St.), it was pretty clear it's possible to slow them down.
The only thing that slowed us down in the Arkansas State game was us. Prukop had 300 yards and 4 TD's called back because of holding calls on our kicker....PLUS we felt bad that Arkansas State had to play Tennessee and Miami, so we LET them win to make them feel good. The UND game was because we were wearing the 1984 jerseys, and so we wanted to score the same amount we did back then.

Ahh, it all makes sense now. Thank you for helping out us slow folk, Sac.

Post by **EWURanger** » Fri Oct 17, 2014 4:03 pm

Grizalltheway wrote:
kalm wrote:
You're under-rating how good Montana State is.
No one's under-rating their offense. But against the only two decent defenses they've faced (UND and Ark. St.), it was pretty clear it's possible to slow them down.

If the Griz beat MSU this year I'll, dunno...I'll do something. Seriously, though...I think they win handily.

Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

MSU has great defense.

MSU has great defense.

Re: MSU has great defense.

Re: MSU has great defense.

Re: MSU has great defense.

Re: MSU has great defense.

Re: MSU has great defense.

Re: MSU has great defense.

Re: MSU has great defense.

Re: MSU has great defense.

Re: MSU has great defense.

Re: MSU has great defense.

Re: MSU has great defense.

Re: MSU has great defense.

Re: MSU has great defense.

Re: MSU has great defense.

Re: MSU has great defense.

Re: MSU has great defense.

Re: MSU has great defense.

Re: MSU has great defense.

Re: MSU has great defense.

Re: MSU has great defense.

Re: MSU has great defense.

Re: MSU has great defense.

Re: MSU has great defense.

Re: MSU has great defense.