#2 EWU at Washington Game Thread
-
dal4018
- Level5

- Posts: 10681
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 12:17 pm
- I am a fan of: South Carolina St
- A.K.A.: SC State
Re: #2 EWU at Washington Game Thread
[quote="catbooster"]52-45. UW start of 4 qtr[/]Even tough it was a 59-52 loss for Eastern they acquitted themselves quite nicely the WR for Eastern should have had a field day vs the Huskies!!!!
-
YoUDeeMan
- Level5

- Posts: 12088
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
- I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
- A.K.A.: Delaware Homie
Re: #2 EWU at Washington Game Thread
Pitt would have scored 70. They would have scored 100 on UD if they wanted. Either way, Pitt would bowl over EWU's DL line all day and chewed up the clock.SeattleGriz wrote:Yeah, they probably would have given up 45 to Pitt.Cluck U wrote:
You aren't going to stop many teams either. That D is atrocious.
EWU simply can't play defense.
Not sure why anyone is arguing about that...it makes you look stupid.
These signatures have a 500 character limit?
What if I have more personalities than that?
What if I have more personalities than that?
- SeattleGriz
- Supporter

- Posts: 19108
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: PhxGriz
Re: #2 EWU at Washington Game Thread
What has it been...about 15 minutes since your last ad hominem attack.Cluck U wrote:Pitt would have scored 70. They would have scored 100 on UD if they wanted. Either way, Pitt would bowl over EWU's DL line all day and chewed up the clock.SeattleGriz wrote:
Yeah, they probably would have given up 45 to Pitt.
EWU simply can't play defense.
Not sure why anyone is arguing about that...it makes you look stupid.
You must really enjoy "beating up verbally" on your sister in law because you get your ass handed to you daily here!
Not to mention UD had 57 total yards of offense against Pitt, while EWU had 573 against Washington. TEN TIMES AS MUCH. You still think Pitt scores 70 on EWU with their offense.
You ain't so bright are you?
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
Re: #2 EWU at Washington Game Thread
Let's cut to the chase. I don't have all the emotional baggage that you two carry.SeattleGriz wrote:What has it been...about 15 minutes since your last ad hominem attack.Cluck U wrote:
Pitt would have scored 70. They would have scored 100 on UD if they wanted. Either way, Pitt would bowl over EWU's DL line all day and chewed up the clock.
EWU simply can't play defense.
Not sure why anyone is arguing about that...it makes you look stupid.So predictable and boring.
You must really enjoy "beating up verbally" on your sister in law because you get your ass handed to you daily here!![]()
![]()
Not to mention UD had 57 total yards of offense against Pitt, while EWU had 573 against Washington. TEN TIMES AS MUCH. You still think Pitt scores 70 on EWU with their offense.
You ain't so bright are you?
Is EWU better than Delaware right now? Of course
Does EWU's defense suck? You betcha
Will NDSU fourpeat? More than likely
OK, next issue...
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
Re: #2 EWU at Washington Game Thread
Our defense does suck, but you are attempting an apples and oranges comparison here. That UW team is going to win some games this year. They have a tom of talent.Cluck U wrote:Pitt would have scored 70. They would have scored 100 on UD if they wanted. Either way, Pitt would bowl over EWU's DL line all day and chewed up the clock.SeattleGriz wrote:
Yeah, they probably would have given up 45 to Pitt.
EWU simply can't play defense.
Not sure why anyone is arguing about that...it makes you look stupid.

-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69391
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: #2 EWU at Washington Game Thread
Shoulda, coulda, woulda, transitive property, envy...cough, cough, cough.Cluck U wrote:Pitt would have scored 70. They would have scored 100 on UD if they wanted. Either way, Pitt would bowl over EWU's DL line all day and chewed up the clock.SeattleGriz wrote:
Yeah, they probably would have given up 45 to Pitt.
EWU simply can't play defense.
Not sure why anyone is arguing about that...it makes you look stupid.
I hope UD turns it around and makes the playoffs.
- SeattleGriz
- Supporter

- Posts: 19108
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: PhxGriz
Re: #2 EWU at Washington Game Thread
As I have pointed out, cluck is the King of logical fallacies. Would you expect any different?kalm wrote:Shoulda, coulda, woulda, transitive property, envy...cough, cough, cough.Cluck U wrote:
Pitt would have scored 70. They would have scored 100 on UD if they wanted. Either way, Pitt would bowl over EWU's DL line all day and chewed up the clock.
EWU simply can't play defense.
Not sure why anyone is arguing about that...it makes you look stupid.
I hope UD turns it around and makes the playoffs.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
- Gil Dobie
- Supporter

- Posts: 31519
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
- I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
- Location: Historic Leduc Estate
Re: #2 EWU at Washington Game Thread
Nice game Reagles (Red Eagles)
Gave dem Husky's a good run for their money.
Gave dem Husky's a good run for their money.

- SuperHornet
- SuperHornet

- Posts: 20858
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:24 pm
- I am a fan of: Sac State
- Location: Twentynine Palms, CA
Re: #2 EWU at Washington Game Thread
Not wanting to talk trash or anything, particularly given that I predicted an EWU straight-up win, but PLEASE tell me this wasn't a McNeese choke job....

SuperHornet's Athletics Hall of Fame includes Jacksonville State kicker Ashley Martin, the first girl to score in a Division I football game. She kicked 3 PATs in a 2001 game for J-State.
Re: #2 EWU at Washington Game Thread
No. They hung with a better team but got edged out.SuperHornet wrote:Not wanting to talk trash or anything, particularly given that I predicted an EWU straight-up win, but PLEASE tell me this wasn't a McNeese choke job....
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69391
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: #2 EWU at Washington Game Thread
We were down 21 to start.SuperHornet wrote:Not wanting to talk trash or anything, particularly given that I predicted an EWU straight-up win, but PLEASE tell me this wasn't a McNeese choke job....
-
grizzaholic
- One Man Wolfpack

- Posts: 34860
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
- I am a fan of: Hodgdon
- A.K.A.: Random Mailer
- Location: Backwoods of Montana
Re: #2 EWU at Washington Game Thread
Must have been a good game for both teams to get their defensive players a rest for the future.93henfan wrote:No. They hung with a better team but got edged out.SuperHornet wrote:Not wanting to talk trash or anything, particularly given that I predicted an EWU straight-up win, but PLEASE tell me this wasn't a McNeese choke job....
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."
Justin Halpern
Justin Halpern
-
YoUDeeMan
- Level5

- Posts: 12088
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
- I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
- A.K.A.: Delaware Homie
Re: #2 EWU at Washington Game Thread
Wait, perhaps you didn't notice it was SeattleDope that first brought up a third party...Delaware.kalm wrote:Shoulda, coulda, woulda, transitive property, envy...cough, cough, cough.Cluck U wrote:
Pitt would have scored 70. They would have scored 100 on UD if they wanted. Either way, Pitt would bowl over EWU's DL line all day and chewed up the clock.
EWU simply can't play defense.
Not sure why anyone is arguing about that...it makes you look stupid.
I hope UD turns it around and makes the playoffs.
Doesn't matter, the fact is that Pitt would have steamrolled EWU's defense.
Wait, I am wrong.
Pitt would not have steamrolled EWU's defense...EWU didn't actually send out a defense. So, technically, Pitt would have steamrolled whatever cones EWU put our there when their offense wasn't playing.
Hey, I'm here to help. Have Vernon read this...
http://www.wikihow.com/Reduce-Menstrual-Cramps" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
These signatures have a 500 character limit?
What if I have more personalities than that?
What if I have more personalities than that?
-
YoUDeeMan
- Level5

- Posts: 12088
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
- I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
- A.K.A.: Delaware Homie
Re: #2 EWU at Washington Game Thread
You should stop posting while you drink.SeattleGriz wrote:What has it been...about 15 minutes since your last ad hominem attack.Cluck U wrote:
Pitt would have scored 70. They would have scored 100 on UD if they wanted. Either way, Pitt would bowl over EWU's DL line all day and chewed up the clock.
EWU simply can't play defense.
Not sure why anyone is arguing about that...it makes you look stupid.So predictable and boring.
You must really enjoy "beating up verbally" on your sister in law because you get your ass handed to you daily here!![]()
![]()
Not to mention UD had 57 total yards of offense against Pitt, while EWU had 573 against Washington. TEN TIMES AS MUCH. You still think Pitt scores 70 on EWU with their offense.
You ain't so bright are you?
These signatures have a 500 character limit?
What if I have more personalities than that?
What if I have more personalities than that?
- SeattleGriz
- Supporter

- Posts: 19108
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: PhxGriz
Re: #2 EWU at Washington Game Thread
Weak.Cluck U wrote:You should stop posting while you drink.SeattleGriz wrote:
What has it been...about 15 minutes since your last ad hominem attack.So predictable and boring.
You must really enjoy "beating up verbally" on your sister in law because you get your ass handed to you daily here!![]()
![]()
Not to mention UD had 57 total yards of offense against Pitt, while EWU had 573 against Washington. TEN TIMES AS MUCH. You still think Pitt scores 70 on EWU with their offense.
You ain't so bright are you?
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
-
grizzaholic
- One Man Wolfpack

- Posts: 34860
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
- I am a fan of: Hodgdon
- A.K.A.: Random Mailer
- Location: Backwoods of Montana
Re: #2 EWU at Washington Game Thread
SeaGriz...don't listen to him. We all love it when you go on a rant!SeattleGriz wrote:Weak.Cluck U wrote:
You should stop posting while you drink.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."
Justin Halpern
Justin Halpern
- BDKJMU
- Level5

- Posts: 36567
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
Re: #2 EWU at Washington Game Thread
Like I said on the EWU/SHSU thread:
"These 2 team combined for 91 points and 1166 yds of offense. Think if they played again this season in the playoffs, they easily could combine for well over 100 points & 1300+ Yds of offense. Regardless, great offense and subpar defense can get you to qtrs or semis, but won't get you to the NC game."
In 2 Div I games EWU has given up close to 1100 yds and 94 points. Great offense and horrid defense ain't going to get you to Frisco...
"These 2 team combined for 91 points and 1166 yds of offense. Think if they played again this season in the playoffs, they easily could combine for well over 100 points & 1300+ Yds of offense. Regardless, great offense and subpar defense can get you to qtrs or semis, but won't get you to the NC game."
In 2 Div I games EWU has given up close to 1100 yds and 94 points. Great offense and horrid defense ain't going to get you to Frisco...
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: #2 EWU at Washington Game Thread
It'll be different this year! It really, really will!BDKJMU wrote:Like I said on the EWU/SHSU thread:
"These 2 team combined for 91 points and 1166 yds of offense. Think if they played again this season in the playoffs, they easily could combine for well over 100 points & 1300+ Yds of offense. Regardless, great offense and subpar defense can get you to qtrs or semis, but won't get you to the NC game."
In 2 Div I games EWU has given up close to 1100 yds and 94 points. Great offense and horrid defense ain't going to get you to Frisco...
-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69391
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: #2 EWU at Washington Game Thread
1). We were down two starters on the dline and a corner for this one and it showed.Grizalltheway wrote:It'll be different this year! It really, really will!BDKJMU wrote:Like I said on the EWU/SHSU thread:
"These 2 team combined for 91 points and 1166 yds of offense. Think if they played again this season in the playoffs, they easily could combine for well over 100 points & 1300+ Yds of offense. Regardless, great offense and subpar defense can get you to qtrs or semis, but won't get you to the NC game."
In 2 Div I games EWU has given up close to 1100 yds and 94 points. Great offense and horrid defense ain't going to get you to Frisco...
2). The game will slow down now as I doubt we'll see any teams as fast, athletic, and with better olines than SHSU and UW.
3). Speaking of every year, ever year we hear how our defense can't stop powerful rushing attacks like SDSU, Nova, UD, and ISU. But we even held T West somewhat in check. We lost close semifinals to two quality teams who everyone had trouble stopping.
Is defense a concern? Yep. Can we make adjustments, get a few of our bullets back, and/or improve?
So if you don't mind, I'm not quite ready to throw the towell...just yet.
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: #2 EWU at Washington Game Thread
That's all well and good, but he said it would get you the quarters or semis but not the NC game, which I agree with.
-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69391
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: #2 EWU at Washington Game Thread
If the defense plays like it did yesterday against a quality offense in the playoffs, I agree.Grizalltheway wrote:That's all well and good, but he said it would get you the quarters or semis but not the NC game, which I agree with.
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: #2 EWU at Washington Game Thread
If our coaches pull their heads out of their asses before the 4th quarter this year, it could be a long day for them.kalm wrote:If the defense plays like it did yesterday against a quality offense in the playoffs, I agree.Grizalltheway wrote:That's all well and good, but he said it would get you the quarters or semis but not the NC game, which I agree with.
-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69391
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: #2 EWU at Washington Game Thread
We won't let the foot off the gas this time, sugartits.Grizalltheway wrote:If our coaches pull their heads out of their asses before the 4th quarter this year, it could be a long day for them.kalm wrote:
If the defense plays like it did yesterday against a quality offense in the playoffs, I agree.![]()
You just worry about a running game because we all know JJ can't beat us alone.
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: #2 EWU at Washington Game Thread
You're right. Canada, Van, Hendo, Jones, and Wags & co. will all do their part.kalm wrote:We won't let the foot off the gas this time, sugartits.Grizalltheway wrote:
If our coaches pull their heads out of their asses before the 4th quarter this year, it could be a long day for them.![]()
You just worry about a running game because we all know JJ can't beat us alone.![]()
![]()
Shit, is it only September?
-
YoUDeeMan
- Level5

- Posts: 12088
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
- I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
- A.K.A.: Delaware Homie
Re: #2 EWU at Washington Game Thread
You let that slip.Grizalltheway wrote: You're right. Canada, Van, Hendo, Jones, and Wags & co. will all do their part.
Now we have proof that you Montanan folks aren't really true 'Mericans.
These signatures have a 500 character limit?
What if I have more personalities than that?
What if I have more personalities than that?


