Richard Dawkins

Post by **SeattleGriz** » Sun Aug 24, 2014 12:19 am

So atheists, isn't this guy one of your spokesman?

He seems to have fallen off the deep end, or actually just has been letting his mouth run uncensored.

A little trolling here, but I would love to hear what our atheist friends think about Dawkins telling a lady with a Downs fetus to abort it because it would be immoral bring such a child into the World (paraphrase).

Post by **Vidav** » Sun Aug 24, 2014 9:29 am

I have no problem with it.

houndawg · Post by **houndawg** » Sun Aug 24, 2014 9:35 am

Atheists have spokesmen?

Post by **SeattleGriz** » Sun Aug 24, 2014 9:45 am

houndawg wrote:Atheists have spokesmen?

You have conventions too!

Post by **Grizalltheway** » Sun Aug 24, 2014 9:53 am

Did the bitch ask him what she should do with it? What kind of answer was she expecting?

Post by **SeattleGriz** » Sun Aug 24, 2014 10:53 am

Grizalltheway wrote:Did the bitch ask him what she should do with it? What kind of answer was she expecting?

Immoral to bring a child with Downs into the World?

Pwns · Post by **Pwns** » Sun Aug 24, 2014 6:16 pm

There are plenty of folks out there with normal chromosomes who are less worthwhile than Downs folks.

Post by **SeattleGriz** » Sun Aug 24, 2014 6:26 pm

Pwns wrote:There are plenty of folks out there with normal chromosomes who are less worthwhile than Downs folks.

No kidding, considering something like 98% are happy with their lives.

JoltinJoe · Post by **JoltinJoe** » Mon Aug 25, 2014 12:18 pm

I'm not sure why the surprise about Dawkins's answer. I guess it's a shock to see it said so plainly in black and white, but I could have guessed what his answer to this question would be.

He's an admitted utilitarian. Ask a utilitarian a question, get a utilitarian answer.

YoUDeeMan · Post by **YoUDeeMan** » Mon Aug 25, 2014 6:38 pm

SeattleGriz wrote:
Pwns wrote:There are plenty of folks out there with normal chromosomes who are less worthwhile than Downs folks.
No kidding, considering something like 98% are happy with their lives.

Well, most carefree, hippie idiots are also happy with their lives, but what about everyone that has to put up with their bullsh!t?

But, I agree with Pwns...plenty of other people to sterilize without having to bring up people with real handicaps.

Post by **kalm** » Mon Aug 25, 2014 6:59 pm

Cluck U wrote:
SeattleGriz wrote:
No kidding, considering something like 98% are happy with their lives.
Well, most carefree, hippie idiots are also happy with their lives, but what about everyone that has to put up with their bullsh!t?

But, I agree with Pwns...plenty of other people to sterilize without having to bring up people with real handicaps.

Hippies have been saving this country for decades you fucking ingrate...

Post by **Vidav** » Mon Aug 25, 2014 7:05 pm

Hippies are too lazy to save anything.

Post by **kalm** » Mon Aug 25, 2014 7:06 pm

Vidav wrote:Hippies are too lazy to save anything.

Perhaps Montana hippies.

Chizzang · Post by **Chizzang** » Mon Aug 25, 2014 7:20 pm

Vidav wrote:Hippies are too lazy to save anything.

The Seattle Hippies are pretty damn active (frankly)
They did get Marijuana legalized
and are about to get minimum wage moved to $15.00 an hour

(They're like spider monkey hippies)

Post by **AZGrizFan** » Mon Aug 25, 2014 7:34 pm

Chizzang wrote:
Vidav wrote:Hippies are too lazy to save anything.

The Seattle Hippies are pretty damn active (frankly)
They did get Marijuana legalized
and are about to get minimum wage moved to $15.00 an hour

(They're like spider monkey hippies)

Active <> Productive. Both of those things will accelerate Washington's slide into the gutter.

Post by **SeattleGriz** » Mon Aug 25, 2014 7:37 pm

Chizzang wrote:
Vidav wrote:Hippies are too lazy to save anything.

The Seattle Hippies are pretty damn active (frankly)
They did get Marijuana legalized
and are about to get minimum wage moved to $15.00 an hour

(They're like spider monkey hippies)

All hopped up on Mountain Dew!

Post by **kalm** » Mon Aug 25, 2014 7:51 pm

AZGrizFan wrote:
Chizzang wrote:

The Seattle Hippies are pretty damn active (frankly)
They did get Marijuana legalized
and are about to get minimum wage moved to $15.00 an hour

(They're like spider monkey hippies)
Active <> Productive. Both of those things will accelerate Washington's slide into the gutter.

Please...let me know when Washington stoops to the level of that shit hole that is Texas.

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Mon Aug 25, 2014 8:25 pm

Chizzang wrote:
Vidav wrote:Hippies are too lazy to save anything.

The Seattle Hippies are pretty damn active (frankly)
They did get Marijuana legalized
and are about to get minimum wage moved to $15.00 an hour

(They're like spider monkey hippies)

when it gets so good in Seattle that you start drawing off yankees from NC and SC I'll be impressed

Chizzang · Post by **Chizzang** » Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:20 am

CID1990 wrote:
Chizzang wrote:

The Seattle Hippies are pretty damn active (frankly)
They did get Marijuana legalized
and are about to get minimum wage moved to $15.00 an hour

(They're like spider monkey hippies)
when it gets so good in Seattle that you start drawing off yankees from NC and SC I'll be impressed

We don't get them way out here very much... which of course is excellent
The worst thing about the South is the Northerners (frankly)

One of my favorite encounters in Charleston was eating next to some New Yorker who proceeded to tell me about the town and acted like he was personally responsible for building the place
strangest damn thing I'd ever seen
Classic NY attitude

You can have them...

Note:
I love NY - its one of my favorite places - and I love NYers a lot WHEN THEY'RE IN NY

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Tue Aug 26, 2014 2:04 pm

Chizzang wrote:
CID1990 wrote:
when it gets so good in Seattle that you start drawing off yankees from NC and SC I'll be impressed
We don't get them way out here very much... which of course is excellent
The worst thing about the South is the Northerners (frankly)

One of my favorite encounters in Charleston was eating next to some New Yorker who proceeded to tell me about the town and acted like he was personally responsible for building the place
strangest damn thing I'd ever seen
Classic NY attitude

You can have them...

Note:
I love NY - its one of my favorite places - and I love NYers a lot WHEN THEY'RE IN NY

Believe me

We here in the South wish you all the success and luck in the world creating your utopia

or at least tell us your secret to keeping the yankees away in spite of your wild societal and economic successes

Chizzang · Post by **Chizzang** » Tue Aug 26, 2014 3:43 pm

CID1990 wrote:
Chizzang wrote:
We don't get them way out here very much... which of course is excellent
The worst thing about the South is the Northerners (frankly)

One of my favorite encounters in Charleston was eating next to some New Yorker who proceeded to tell me about the town and acted like he was personally responsible for building the place
strangest damn thing I'd ever seen
Classic NY attitude

You can have them...

Note:
I love NY - its one of my favorite places - and I love NYers a lot WHEN THEY'RE IN NY
Believe me

We here in the South wish you all the success and luck in the world creating your utopia

or at least tell us your secret to keeping the yankees away in spite of your wild societal and economic successes

I got one word for you: Rain..!

Post by **SeattleGriz** » Tue Aug 26, 2014 5:28 pm

Chizzang wrote:
CID1990 wrote:
Believe me

We here in the South wish you all the success and luck in the world creating your utopia

or at least tell us your secret to keeping the yankees away in spite of your wild societal and economic successes

I got one word for you: Rain..!

No kidding. In Montana it usually only takes one winter and out-of-staters move back.

Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Richard Dawkins

Richard Dawkins

Re: Richard Dawkins

Re: Richard Dawkins

Re: Richard Dawkins

Re: Richard Dawkins

Re: Richard Dawkins

Re: Richard Dawkins

Re: Richard Dawkins

Re: Richard Dawkins

Re: Richard Dawkins

Re: Richard Dawkins

Re: Richard Dawkins

Re: Richard Dawkins

Re: Richard Dawkins

Re: Richard Dawkins

Re: Richard Dawkins

Re: Richard Dawkins

Re: Richard Dawkins

Re: Richard Dawkins

Re: Richard Dawkins

Re: Richard Dawkins

Re: Richard Dawkins