And your post content rarely if ever states specific reasons why you are disputing another post, or cite contradicting sources. Your pot shot posting has elevated you to King Troll meme.kalm wrote:Seriously, most of the articles you cite are as credible as a Spandos video.travelinman67 wrote:
If you're disputing what they've published, then state your reasons why or post your contradicting sources....
...otherwise, STFU, Troll.
Keep on pluggin away!travelinman67 wrote:Extortion>Wealth Redistribution Eric Holder style...
BofA settlement to be spread around to liberal advocacy groups, Democratic stronghold communities:
http://dailycaller.com/2014/08/28/doj-t ... z3BjhQfyZo
Why should MSM cover something you found in an opinion piece?travelinman67 wrote:DOJ Civil Division caught attempting to extort $55 million and land from logging company. Eastern District judge recuses ALL judges in District due to exposure to falsified evidence.
Fingerprints trace back to Washington.
Where's MSM???????
http://observer.com/2014/10/fed-up-with ... ar-option/
Bumptravelinman67 wrote:DOJ Civil Division caught attempting to extort $55 million and land from logging company. Eastern District judge recuses ALL judges in District due to exposure to falsified evidence.
Fingerprints trace back to Washington.
Where's MSM???????
http://observer.com/2014/10/fed-up-with ... ar-option/
travelinman67 wrote:Bumptravelinman67 wrote:DOJ Civil Division caught attempting to extort $55 million and land from logging company. Eastern District judge recuses ALL judges in District due to exposure to falsified evidence.
Fingerprints trace back to Washington.
Where's MSM???????
http://observer.com/2014/10/fed-up-with ... ar-option/
BlueHen86 wrote:Why should MSM cover something you found in an opinion piece?travelinman67 wrote:DOJ Civil Division caught attempting to extort $55 million and land from logging company. Eastern District judge recuses ALL judges in District due to exposure to falsified evidence.
Fingerprints trace back to Washington.
Where's MSM???????
http://observer.com/2014/10/fed-up-with ... ar-option/
BumpBlueHen86 wrote:travelinman67 wrote:
BumpBlueHen86 wrote:
Why should MSM cover something you found in an opinion piece?
travelinman67 wrote:DOJ Civil Division caught attempting to extort $55 million and land from logging company. Eastern District judge recuses ALL judges in District due to exposure to falsified evidence.
Fingerprints trace back to Washington.
Where's MSM???????
http://observer.com/2014/10/fed-up-with ... ar-option/
Says the guy who won't answer my question.travelinman67 wrote:NoBrains86...adds nothing, has nothing to say...
[youtube]http://youtube/watch?v=qMBvQ3QVJp0[/youtube]
I will not waste time with a Troll. You add nothing. You have nothing to say. You exist to interfere with reasoned debate.BlueHen86 wrote:Says the guy who won't answer my question.travelinman67 wrote:NoBrains86...adds nothing, has nothing to say...
[youtube]http://youtube/watch?v=qMBvQ3QVJp0[/youtube]
Reasoned debate? Seriously? You linked to an opinion piece and wondered why the MSM wasn't covering it? Should the MSM cover every opinion piece out there?travelinman67 wrote:I will not waste time with a Troll. You add nothing. You have nothing to say. You exist to interfere with reasoned debate.BlueHen86 wrote:
Says the guy who won't answer my question.
Fuck off, Loser.
get off your high horse. You linked an opinion. Why should an opinion piece be covered by the MSM?travelinman67 wrote:I will not waste time with a Troll. You add nothing. You have nothing to say. You exist to interfere with reasoned debate.BlueHen86 wrote:
Says the guy who won't answer my question.
Fuck off, Loser.
He won't be punished.travelinman67 wrote:Released document index confirm WH chief Valerie Jarrett's involvement in coverup...
HOLDER PERJURY TO CONGRESS.
Now the reason for Holder's epic battle to withhold the documents becomes apparent.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2014/ ... -congress/
Holder is severely ethically/morally deficient.travelinman67 wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... nment.html
Amazing that Justice acknowledges Fast and Furious program weapons, SPECIFICALLY SOLD TO GUN SMUGGLERS FOR THE POLITICAL PURPOSE OF GENERATING THE CAUSE TO PASS MORE GUN CONTROL LEGISLATION (!!!!!!!!!!!), will be continually used for criminal activities for "years to come"!!
And no government agents or agencies are being prosecuted???
Truth: The biggest violator of current gun laws is our government.
You can't prosecute the undead, Jon.dbackjon wrote:Where is your prosecute Cheney thread?
Ibanez wrote:You can't prosecute the undead, Jon.dbackjon wrote:Where is your prosecute Cheney thread?
Don't be so silly .
I think an EMP would do it.dbackjon wrote:Ibanez wrote: You can't prosecute the undead, Jon.
Don't be so silly .
So we need to stick a spike in the back of his head?
