It's not most certainly true. In fact it's most probably false.kalm wrote:I read that in your link too although Warren's point was that Glass-Steagal wouldn't have prevented the crisis on it's own but would have lessened the blow which is certainly true. There's a reason the financial sector spend $5 billion in the 90's to deregulate and get Glass-Steagal repealed. They're not stupid…at least when it comes to making themselves money and running a casino.Baldy wrote:![]()
Ummm well uhhh I hate to break the news to you, but Glass-Steagall never prevented banks from being able to invest in residential mortgages and residential mortgage backed securities. To further burst your bubble, even the the object of your masturbatory fantasies, Elizabeth Fauxcahontas Warren, stated that Glass-Steagall wouldn't have prevented the meltdown.
What most people don't realize is that Glass-Steagall was never repealed. In fact, it is almost entirely still intact. The only change made was that it allowed commercial banks to be affiliated with investment banks, period. No rules and regulations were repealed. Banks were still prohibited from underwriting or dealing in securities...plain and simple.

