Trust me, being in business, I have a shit ton of direct issues with the government on an almost daily basis. There's no lover affair, just a recognition that it's necessary and that ours has pulled the right strings on more than a few occasions to the benefit of many.CID1990 wrote:No, you shoveled a load of horsecrap, got called on it for the sheer ridiculousness, and now you're playing the "you didn't understand what i was saying because Im so nuanced" gamekalm wrote:
The term "reactionary" was brought by you to the conversation in reply to a point I was making. If you weren't in such a hurry to talk past me, you might understand the conversation better.
For example, when would the market had gotten around to building Grand Coulee Dam?
I'd start with the notion that government sucks, but it does some good things ahead of when the market does...then go on from there. I'm here to help temper your neo liberalism...
government is 100% reactive-reactionary-whatever the hell you want to call it. it responds to events only and lately cannot even do THAT properly
your premise that our government is sometimes out ahead of markets is false- I really have no idea where this liberal love affair with government comes from
I gave you examples of where government was ahead of the markets, several of which not only weren't reactionary but one might say visionary. There are tons more.
I can only lead you so far. It's ok to admit you're wrong sometimes.




