That was before Sperbeck came to town. Besides, isn’t this kind of talk the point of this site?BlackFalkin wrote:Thats alot of trash talk from a team with *NO* Big Sky Conf titles!Sit your ass down and get ya game up first, before you step to me with that guess work.
Whens the last time Sac State finished 3rd in Big Sky play? Easterns 2008 year was bad and they landed in 3rd place. Sac state's average season gets them in 8th or last fvckin place!
Spare me the monologue about reason and logic. That’s where the Montana and Weber State finishing 1 and 2 come into play. As far as I’m concerned the rest of the conference is up for grabs.BlackFalkin wrote:Of course im talking about football, I dont give a shtt about volleyball. If sac state has been an impotent mule in a conf with about 5 thoroughbreds for the past 12 seasons, what in the world would force you to think that they are gonna be GREAT this year?
Look man, i know you love your team but miss me with that emotional guessing which is what your brain uses instead of reason & logic.
SDHornet wrote: As far as I’m concerned the rest of the conference is up for grabs. ;)
you can NOT be serious! If thats the case, why do you give montana the #1 spot? you should be gunnin for the top spot you underachieving sob. Your an idiot, have fun losing to 6 conf games this year guy 
Ok good, now focus on:Herky wrote: All I know is, EWU lost 15-13 at home to the Hornets last season.
3 of those 4 titles ARE SHARED! Sac Had better attendance than the almighty eags last season by the way, for such a dynamite program like EWU, you'd think you could have better attendance than little ol' Sac State.BlackFalkin wrote:Ok good, now focus on:Herky wrote: All I know is, EWU lost 15-13 at home to the Hornets last season.
Filling up your stadium
Winning a Big Sky conf title
Not getting embarrased EVERY SINGLE year!
Eastern has a walter payton award, & buchanon award winner, 4 bsc titles, a second round draft pick... cmon man Eastern Washington University has a legitimate shot each year & sac state is a team u schedule for homecoming. face facts and stop living in a fairy tale.
I like the loyalty of Sac St. fans and they always have fairly good attendance. I am one of the believers in Sac putting some things together this year and shocking a few teams. Looks to be a bad year for a breakout at Sac this season though due to some real talent around the Sky.Herky wrote:3 of those 4 titles ARE SHARED! Sac Had better attendance than the almighty eags last season by the way, for such a dynamite program like EWU, you'd think you could have better attendance than little ol' Sac State.BlackFalkin wrote:
Ok good, now focus on:
Filling up your stadium
Winning a Big Sky conf title
Not getting embarrased EVERY SINGLE year!
Eastern has a walter payton award, & buchanon award winner, 4 bsc titles, a second round draft pick... cmon man Eastern Washington University has a legitimate shot each year & sac state is a team u schedule for homecoming. face facts and stop living in a fairy tale.
Last season, Sac Averaged 8,184 and EWU averaged 6,719 fans per game!
Sac st's stadium is 22k maxHerky wrote: Sac Averaged 8,184 and EWU averaged 6,719 fans per game!
Both stadiums have extra seats available so I don't see how the % makes any difference at all. You did say fill your stadium but that doesn't change the fact that they have more people there and neither team is filling their stadium.BlackFalkin wrote:Sac st's stadium is 22k maxHerky wrote: Sac Averaged 8,184 and EWU averaged 6,719 fans per game!
Eastern's stadium is 12k max (with added south endzone seats)
So averaging almost 7k in a standard 10k seat stadium aint bad. 70%
but averaging 8k in a 22k stadium is about 36%
Eastern has 10k standard, and on a bad year they average 7k.Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:Both stadiums have extra seats available so I don't see how the % makes any difference at all.
Good post and welcome to the board. Travelinman will be happy to see another PSU guy on the board posting.frinq wrote:Not much talk about PSU. Maybe with reason, given the number of sophomores and freshmen on the team. Haven't done too well the last two seasons, and that doesn't help. For a change, though, a QB has been designated as starter - no more playing two QBs. With experienced WRs this year, Hubel should do much better. The O line should be better- no more sack records. Kicking's a question - Urego signed on as free agent. Schantz, our intrepid OLB, signed with the Steelers, but the other LBs are sound. We should go 7-4; anything more would be sheer luck. Montana and Weber are up there at the top. And Sac State might surprise people
You gotta admit that's pretty funny though. Good times man, good times.BlackFalkin wrote:Eastern has 10k standard, and on a bad year they average 7k.Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:Both stadiums have extra seats available so I don't see how the % makes any difference at all.
Sac averages 8k in a 22k stadium. those are facts.
Sac st has a fairly big stadium, and thats great, I wish Eastern had a bigger stadium, but they should fill it but they cant and they havent in a loooooooong time.
Thats just one of the things wrong with the program up there in Sac town.
no titles
no playoff appearances
33% butts in seats
hardly ever get a winning season
5'10 quarterback
visiter locker room is a 15 x 15 and in 2005 we had to get dress outside! true fvckin story!
The list goes on and on my friend!
If the standard is 10,000 on a good year and 7,000 on a bad year, why did Eastern average 6,719 last season? A season in which the team was ranked at the beginning of the season! Doesnt seem very "standard" does it?BlackFalkin wrote:Eastern has 10k standard, and on a bad year they average 7k.Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:Both stadiums have extra seats available so I don't see how the % makes any difference at all.
Sac averages 8k in a 22k stadium. those are facts.
Sac st has a fairly big stadium, and thats great, I wish Eastern had a bigger stadium, but they should fill it but they cant and they havent in a loooooooong time.
Thats just one of the things wrong with the program up there in Sac town.
no titles
no playoff appearances
33% butts in seats
hardly ever get a winning season
5'10 quarterback
visiter locker room is a 15 x 15 and in 2005 we had to get dress outside! true fvckin story!
The list goes on and on my friend!
Sac State does have some athletes! I'm not thinking that this will be a title year for Sacramento, but I do believe coach Sperbeck is the real deal. He has done a good job of both recruiting above average talent and instilling a wee bit of discipline and focus.SuperHornet wrote:Sac will be at least 14-1, if not 15-0. The only game I see on the schedule that will give us any trouble is Montana.
I dont think SH was thinking straight, I dont see the team doing better than 7-4 or 8-3. Of course, as alway's, I hope that SH's prediction come's true.native wrote:Sac State does have some athletes! I'm not thinking that this will be a title year for Sacramento, but I do believe coach Sperbeck is the real deal. He has done a good job of both recruiting above average talent and instilling a wee bit of discipline and focus.SuperHornet wrote:Sac will be at least 14-1, if not 15-0. The only game I see on the schedule that will give us any trouble is Montana.
Weber's coach Mac thinks the Hornets will be pretty good in 2009.
Sounds good, are we allowed to bet? How will we exchange funds?BlackFalkin wrote:I will bet (through paypal) 20$ American dollars to anyone who wants to bet that Sacramento St. will:
Lose to Eastern Washington University in the 2009 NCAA football season.
and/or
Finish in 4th or worse in Big Sky Conference standings at the end of the regular 2009 NCAA football season.
Put your money where your 'mouth' is...... any bets?
If a third party is needed to moderate, let me knowHerky wrote:Sounds good, are we allowed to bet? How will we exchange funds?BlackFalkin wrote:I will bet (through paypal) 20$ American dollars to anyone who wants to bet that Sacramento St. will:
Lose to Eastern Washington University in the 2009 NCAA football season.
and/or
Finish in 4th or worse in Big Sky Conference standings at the end of the regular 2009 NCAA football season.
Put your money where your 'mouth' is...... any bets?
Is this a straight game bet, win or lose, or does Sac State have to fulfill and/or proposal?
I'm willing to bet $20 on the win/lose.
Whatever BF wants, I'm in.dbackjon wrote:If a third party is needed to moderate, let me knowHerky wrote:
Sounds good, are we allowed to bet? How will we exchange funds?
Is this a straight game bet, win or lose, or does Sac State have to fulfill and/or proposal?
I'm willing to bet $20 on the win/lose.
So you do agree with my 4th place finish prediction. I knew you'd see it my way.BlackFalkin wrote:I will bet (through paypal) 20$ American dollars to anyone who wants to bet that Sacramento St. will:
Lose to Eastern Washington University in the 2009 NCAA football season.
and/or
Finish in 4th or worse in Big Sky Conference standings at the end of the regular 2009 NCAA football season.
Even though i said they probably wouldnt do so hot this year i could see PSU upsetting some people and messing up the BSC standings rather easily. I personally think the Vikings are a probably the best team falling under the category of "sleeper" in the BSC.frinq wrote:Not much talk about PSU. Maybe with reason, given the number of sophomores and freshmen on the team. Haven't done too well the last two seasons, and that doesn't help. For a change, though, a QB has been designated as starter - no more playing two QBs. With experienced WRs this year, Hubel should do much better. The O line should be better- no more sack records. Kicking's a question - Urego signed on as free agent. Schantz, our intrepid OLB, signed with the Steelers, but the other LBs are sound. We should go 7-4; anything more would be sheer luck. Montana and Weber are up there at the top. And Sac State might surprise people
