Like Rats Off a Sinking Ship....

[kalm]

I guess even Carney found his conscience after lying to everyone for the last few years.

You know I have wondered about that repeatedly. I see him up there obviously covering for total bullshit and wonder how he reconciles that with his conscience.

How long have you wondered that?

[AZGrizFan]

You know I have wondered about that repeatedly. I see him up there obviously covering for total bullshit and wonder how he reconciles that with his conscience.

How long have you wondered that?

About the last 75 years.

[YoUDeeMan]

I guess even Carney found his conscience after lying to everyone for the last few years.

You know I have wondered about that repeatedly. I see him up there obviously covering for total bullshit and wonder how he reconciles that with his conscience.

He's Christian. All he has to do is say a few Hail Marys and he's forgiven. Voila!

It's an easy religion for people who live a lie.

[JohnStOnge]

How long have you wondered that?

I don't know exactly. But I'd say it really has come to my mind a lot during the past six months or so because it's really gotten bad. Like the thing recently where it becomes really obvious that the White House did indeed monkey with the message on the Benghazi thing and he had to get up there and try to weasel around it.

[LeadBolt]

The difference with transparency with Obama and Bush is that Obama promised that this would be the most transparent. And no secrecy.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9GSBT_-JoQ[/youtube]

It would seem to me that if you believe what Obama says about his administration as being transparent, then you believe it has been, and if you observe what Obama has done through his administration then you believe it has not.

[kalm]

The difference with transparency with Obama and Bush is that Obama promised that this would be the most transparent. And no secrecy.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9GSBT_-JoQ[/youtube]

It would seem to me that if you believe what Obama says about his administration as being transparent, then you believe it has been, and if you observe what Obama has done through his administration then you believe it has not.

I tried to believe him for about one week.

And that video...

[Ivytalk]

It would seem to me that if you believe what Obama says about his administration as being transparent, then you believe it has been, and if you observe what Obama has done through his administration then you believe it has not.

I tried to believe him for about one week.

And that video...

No More Secrecy!!

[Chizzang]

That video is NOT funny... its SAD
Down right heartbreaking actually

[OL FU]

The day we measure Presidents against W's performance is a very sad day indeed.

Unfortunately, it looks like we are there.

[ASUG8]

The day we measure Presidents against W's performance is a very sad day indeed.

Unfortunately, it looks like we are there.

It's funny that BHO has been doing his best for 5 yrs to present himself as the anti-Bush and distancing himself from his policies publicly while privately expanding on them.

[kalm]

The day we measure Presidents against W's performance is a very sad day indeed.

Unfortunately, it looks like we are there.

It's funny that BHO has been doing his best for 5 yrs to present himself as the anti-Bush and distancing himself from his policies publicly while privately expanding on them.

[Ibanez]

The day we measure Presidents against W's performance is a very sad day indeed.

Unfortunately, it looks like we are there.

It's funny that BHO has been doing his best for 5 yrs to present himself as the anti-Bush and distancing himself from his policies publicly while privately expanding on them.

Yeah, well, Reagan, Nixon and yeah. They sucked. Don't get me started on Pierce. That traitorous, son of a bitch.

[Chizzang]

The day we measure Presidents against W's performance is a very sad day indeed.

Unfortunately, it looks like we are there.

It's funny that BHO has been doing his best for 5 yrs to present himself as the anti-Bush and distancing himself from his policies publicly while privately expanding on them.

Sad ^ but true...
And this below is sad but true also

Chizzang +1 kalm +1 =

[travelinman67]

It's funny that BHO has been doing his best for 5 yrs to present himself as the anti-Bush and distancing himself from his policies publicly while privately expanding on them.

Sad ^ but true...
And this below is sad but true also

Chizzang +1 kalm +1 =

Acknowledging Obama is worse...

...while declaring you won the debate.

Welcome to D1B world...

[Chizzang]

Sad ^ but true...
And this below is sad but true also

Chizzang +1 kalm +1 =

Acknowledging Obama is worse...

...while declaring you won the debate.

Welcome to D1B world...

I'm agreeing with ASUG8's post
and making special note that kalm and I agreed on something - which makes it awesome by default

[CID1990]

It's funny that BHO has been doing his best for 5 yrs to present himself as the anti-Bush and distancing himself from his policies publicly while privately expanding on them.

Sad ^ but true...
And this below is sad but true also

Chizzang +1 kalm +1 =

fixed it for ya

[Bronco]

-


"Did Jay Carney decide to quit his job because he knew about news of the Bergdahl deal coming, and remembered what he had said less than a year ago?"

Jay Carney in 2013: No detainee transfer for Bergdahl 'without consulting Congress'
American Thinker ^ | 06/03/2014 | Thomas Lifson


“With regard to the transfer of Taliban detainees from Guantanamo Bay, we have made — the United States has not made the decision to do that, though we do expect the Taliban to raise this issue in our discussion, if and when those discussions happen,” Carney said. “As we have long said, however, we would not make any decisions about transfer of any detainees without consulting with Congress and without doing so in accordance with U.S. law.”

Carney made the remarks at the press briefing on June 21, 2013. Less than a year later, Congress was not informed as the Obama administration agreed to release five Taliban leaders in exchange for Bergdahl.

You can watch the broken promise here:
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...

[ASUG8]

-


"Did Jay Carney decide to quit his job because he knew about news of the Bergdahl deal coming, and remembered what he had said less than a year ago?"

Jay Carney in 2013: No detainee transfer for Bergdahl 'without consulting Congress'
American Thinker ^ | 06/03/2014 | Thomas Lifson


“With regard to the transfer of Taliban detainees from Guantanamo Bay, we have made — the United States has not made the decision to do that, though we do expect the Taliban to raise this issue in our discussion, if and when those discussions happen,” Carney said. “As we have long said, however, we would not make any decisions about transfer of any detainees without consulting with Congress and without doing so in accordance with U.S. law.”

Carney made the remarks at the press briefing on June 21, 2013. Less than a year later, Congress was not informed as the Obama administration agreed to release five Taliban leaders in exchange for Bergdahl.

You can watch the broken promise here:
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...

First off, Carney likely hasn't been able to look himself in the mirror for a few years now over some of the works of fiction he's had to spin.
Secondly, if this Bergdahl situation turns into a desertion of his post as some of his fellow soldiers have asserted and we've given Al-Quaeda their starting 5 back this will make Fast and Furious and Benghazi look small in comparison. Either way it's a disturbing precedent to begin negotiating with these asshats.

[CID1990]

-


"Did Jay Carney decide to quit his job because he knew about news of the Bergdahl deal coming, and remembered what he had said less than a year ago?"

Jay Carney in 2013: No detainee transfer for Bergdahl 'without consulting Congress'
American Thinker ^ | 06/03/2014 | Thomas Lifson


“With regard to the transfer of Taliban detainees from Guantanamo Bay, we have made — the United States has not made the decision to do that, though we do expect the Taliban to raise this issue in our discussion, if and when those discussions happen,” Carney said. “As we have long said, however, we would not make any decisions about transfer of any detainees without consulting with Congress and without doing so in accordance with U.S. law.”

Carney made the remarks at the press briefing on June 21, 2013. Less than a year later, Congress was not informed as the Obama administration agreed to release five Taliban leaders in exchange for Bergdahl.

You can watch the broken promise here:
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...

Carney has worse whoppers to keep him awake at night, IMO

that is, if he loses any sleep at all

[AZGrizFan]

-


"Did Jay Carney decide to quit his job because he knew about news of the Bergdahl deal coming, and remembered what he had said less than a year ago?"

Jay Carney in 2013: No detainee transfer for Bergdahl 'without consulting Congress'
American Thinker ^ | 06/03/2014 | Thomas Lifson


“With regard to the transfer of Taliban detainees from Guantanamo Bay, we have made — the United States has not made the decision to do that, though we do expect the Taliban to raise this issue in our discussion, if and when those discussions happen,” Carney said. “As we have long said, however, we would not make any decisions about transfer of any detainees without consulting with Congress and without doing so in accordance with U.S. law.”

Carney made the remarks at the press briefing on June 21, 2013. Less than a year later, Congress was not informed as the Obama administration agreed to release five Taliban leaders in exchange for Bergdahl.

You can watch the broken promise here:
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...

First off, Carney likely hasn't been able to look himself in the mirror for a few years now over some of the works of fiction he's had to spin.
Secondly, if this Bergdahl situation turns into a desertion of his post as some of his fellow soldiers have asserted and we've given Al-Quaeda their starting 5 back this will make Fast and Furious and Benghazi look small in comparison. Either way it's a disturbing precedent to begin negotiating with these asshats.

Carney sleeps just fine. That fucker can't POSSIBLY have a conscience, or he'd have quit months ago.

[travelinman67]

A once over of White House failings...
http://nypost.com/2014/06/07/obama-is-d ... y-to-ruin/

Even uber-lib Noam Chomsky sees the Totalitarian path Obama had been following...
http://dailycaller.com/2014/06/04/choms ... liberties/

Hey, look at the bright side...at least Susan Rice didn't have to make the Sunday morning lying circuit this week.

[andy7171]

Well that was some great news to wake up to!

[Chizzang]

A once over of White House failings...
http://nypost.com/2014/06/07/obama-is-d ... y-to-ruin/

Even uber-lib Noam Chomsky sees the Totalitarian path Obama had been following...
http://dailycaller.com/2014/06/04/choms ... liberties/

Whoa there Crazy Train
Chomsky is an Anarchist not a Liberal...
Every Sophomore knows that - that's Political Science 201 right there T-fart

Nobody has criticized the American Media System / Democratic Congress and Social Programming more than Chomsky, he is hated by Political Liberals - Chomsky is one of THE BEST and entertaining critics of Liberal Think you can find (very entertaining)

and (as it just so happens) he is also HATED by Political Conservatives because he destroys their IDEOLOGY and their hypocrisy in a few short steps by discussing the Military Industrial Complex

Chomsky = Anarchist

Only FOX News and the slow witted throw Chomsky into the "Liberal" catch all basket

[CID1990]

A once over of White House failings...
http://nypost.com/2014/06/07/obama-is-d ... y-to-ruin/

Even uber-lib Noam Chomsky sees the Totalitarian path Obama had been following...
http://dailycaller.com/2014/06/04/choms ... liberties/

Whoa there Crazy Train
Chomsky is an Anarchist not a Liberal...
Every Sophomore knows that - that's Political Science 201 right there T-fart

Nobody has criticized the American Media System / Democratic Congress and Social Programming more than Chomsky, he is hated by Political Liberals
and (as it just so happens) also by Political Conservatives because he destroys their IDEOLOGY and their hypocrisy in a few short steps by discussing the Military Industrial Complex

Chomsky = Anarchist

Only FOX News and the slow witted throw Chomsky into the "Liberal" catch all basket

Isn't an anarchist sort of a super duper liberal?

Mind you I am not talking about a progressive

Or maybe an anarchist is a super duper libertarian- that sounds more right

[Chizzang]

Isn't an anarchist sort of a super duper liberal?

Mind you I am not talking about a progressive

Or maybe an anarchist is a super duper libertarian- that sounds more right

Elements of Libertarian for sure and Classical Enlightenment
He's all about individual (personal) Liberty vs. The ever growing Political Machine and the ever growing Corporate machine and the now entangled indecipherable mixture of both in the USA

He also HATES Military as a Governing Body (Like a Branch) of Politics (more on that later)

He spoke out against Obama before he was elected and predicted most of what we're seeing today