Both incidents were initiated by civilians (Native Americans), who had committed violent crimes (robbery, kidnapping, attempted murder) and federal Law Enforcement agents, FBI and Federal Marshalls were responding to those crimes.houndawg wrote:travelinman67 wrote:[Klam]Good question. In the case of large rural counties, locals are are barely equipped enough to handle their own issues. In this case, I believe it was Clark County which includes Vegas, but I'm still guessing they don't count on having to shift a massive amount of resources out of the high crime urban areas. Besides, this is federal land and while the case for using federal marshals and the FBI makes a bit of sense, there's also something to be said for the BLM being more familiar with the land they manage. Also keep in mind that each of these agencies by necessity have a law enforcement wing due to real threats to agents in the field. Some of them have been murdered in the past. Then, there's also the militarization desires of every law enforcement agency. They all want to be top cop and have the fancy gadgets.You sound like a teen operative Organizing for America.
There is no "necessity" that agencies have an enforcement staff of paramilitary agents.: That's why we have mutual aid policies. I.e., leave it to the professionals.
Furthermore, your assertion of "murdered" agents is unsupported hyperbole
Stupid conk fvck.![]()
Wounded Knee? Leonard Peltier?
Apples and Oranges.
Get dropped on your head much as an infant, Densedawg?










