THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE

College Hoops discussion
User avatar
vutomcat
Level2
Level2
Posts: 904
Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 11:38 am
I am a fan of: Villanova
Location: South Jersey

Re: THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE

Post by vutomcat »

clenz wrote:
Seahawks08 wrote:
Okay then. I'll replace Iowa with St. Josephs as another quality win for Nova. Not that it matters anymore. 8-)




Well now, this should be interesting. St. Joes vs. Uconn then winner takes on Nova most likely. At least you'll have a team in the sweet 16! :thumb:
I wouldn't argue St. Joes

24-9
32 RPI
51 SOS
3-3 vs top 25 6-5 against the top 50 10-8 against the top 100
A10 tourney champ
Trending up as the season went up winning 9 of last 11


Iowa on OTOH

20-12
64 RPI (and falling like a 2 ton brick to end the season)
Lost 8 of last 12 and 9 of last 14 with 3 of those W's being against Northwestern, Purdue, and Illinois (before their little run)
Lost to Northwestern in the first round of the B10 tourney.
Their non-ET OOC opponents have current RPIs of 282 208 349 343 289 274 267.
That means against the top 200 (including 200) in RPI they are 13-12
2-8 against the RPI top 25, 5-9 against the RPI top 50 and 6-10 against the top 100

Tell me again how Iowa would be considered a anything more than an average win - other than they are a B10 team - at this point.



Clenz- Iowa was an "at large" selection into the tourney. Not sure about the type of adjective one needs to apply to a win over that kind of a team but at least it would be accurate to say it was a win over a NCAA tourney team.

I did a quick check to see how some of the elite seeds did against tournament teams and Arizona comes out looking the best using this criteria.

Arizona- 11
Michigan- 9
Nova- 8
Florida-8
Virginia - 6
Wichita State-3
clenz
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 21211
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE

Post by clenz »

The only reason Iowa got in is because they are in the B10...their resume isn't really that good.

That's why they were the second lowest ranked AL team (I believe) according to the committees full 1-68 ranking
User avatar
vutomcat
Level2
Level2
Posts: 904
Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 11:38 am
I am a fan of: Villanova
Location: South Jersey

Re: THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE

Post by vutomcat »

clenz wrote:The only reason Iowa got in is because they are in the B10...their resume isn't really that good.

That's why they were the second lowest ranked AL team (I believe) according to the committees full 1-68 ranking
Your thoughts on the tournament team wins?
clenz
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 21211
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE

Post by clenz »

vutomcat wrote:
clenz wrote:The only reason Iowa got in is because they are in the B10...their resume isn't really that good.

That's why they were the second lowest ranked AL team (I believe) according to the committees full 1-68 ranking
Your thoughts on the tournament team wins?
Tough for Wichita State to get them when teams won't play them....well documented teams saying no to them.
User avatar
vutomcat
Level2
Level2
Posts: 904
Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 11:38 am
I am a fan of: Villanova
Location: South Jersey

Re: THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE

Post by vutomcat »

clenz wrote:
vutomcat wrote:
Your thoughts on the tournament team wins?
Tough for Wichita State to get them when teams won't play them....well documented teams saying no to them.

So, how many "good" wins do they have?
clenz
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 21211
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE

Post by clenz »

vutomcat wrote:
clenz wrote: Tough for Wichita State to get them when teams won't play them....well documented teams saying no to them.

So, how many "good" wins do they have?
If I want to count good wins like you do


@ Tulsa, BYU, @ St. Louis, Tennessee, NC Central, Missouri State x3 and Indiana State x3


Though, I'm not sure what bringing up Wichita State has to do with anything.

They made the final four last season, returned 90% of everything, are a much better team this season, and have been straight wrecking bitches this season.

Answer this question - when was the last time Wichita State lost by 31, 28, and 16 in the same season? What's that? That really has no actual bearing on anyting? Neither does WSU on this conversation....

But...

You're a fucking moron that has has his bitch ass owned by some "no nothing schmuck that likes a basketball team that isn't worth talking about because it isn't in the Big East...or Philly...and no one can know anything unless you live out east about college basketball"

So you'll continue to try to spin things, unsuccessfully, and bring up things that don't matter.


You act liek I said Nova was dog shit and will get bounced in the first round...all I said is that Iowa isn't anything other than an average win and asked you to provide proof of how it's a good win while I was providing proof to prove my point. Did you do that? Shockingly, no. You decided to bring up things that had no bearing on anything we are talking about.

I'm waiting for the "Oh yeah...UNI isn't in the tournament so suck on that" reply from you.

Had you asked me two months ago I'd have told you Iowa was a great win and St. Joes was meh...

However, you have to judge based on a full season...Iowa isn't a good team right now and St. Joes is.
User avatar
vutomcat
Level2
Level2
Posts: 904
Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 11:38 am
I am a fan of: Villanova
Location: South Jersey

Re: THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE

Post by vutomcat »

clenz wrote:
vutomcat wrote:

So, how many "good" wins do they have?
If I want to count good wins like you do


@ Tulsa, BYU, @ St. Louis, Tennessee, NC Central, Missouri State x3 and Indiana State x3


Though, I'm not sure what bringing up Wichita State has to do with anything.


They made the final four last season, returned 90% of everything, are a much better team this season, and have been straight wrecking bitches this season.

Answer this question - when was the last time Wichita State lost by 31, 28, and 16 in the same season? What's that? That really has no actual bearing on anyting? Neither does WSU on this conversation....

But...

You're a **** moron that has has his bitch ass owned by some "no nothing schmuck that likes a basketball team that isn't worth talking about because it isn't in the Big East...or Philly...and no one can know anything unless you live out east about college basketball"

So you'll continue to try to spin things, unsuccessfully, and bring up things that don't matter.


You act liek I said Nova was dog **** and will get bounced in the first round...all I said is that Iowa isn't anything other than an average win and asked you to provide proof of how it's a good win while I was providing proof to prove my point. Did you do that? Shockingly, no. You decided to bring up things that had no bearing on anything we are talking about.

I'm waiting for the "Oh yeah...UNI isn't in the tournament so suck on that" reply from you.

Had you asked me two months ago I'd have told you Iowa was a great win and St. Joes was meh...

However, you have to judge based on a full season...Iowa isn't a good team right now and St. Joes is.

You need therapy my man. You have a lot of pent up anger. You are foul, can't follow simple logic and seem to not care how unintelligent you sound. I gave you a last chance to have a civil discussion. you failed again.
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19120
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE

Post by GannonFan »

Further downward trend for the Big East conference, from the perch of the best conference in basketball to now competing with the A10 for relevance - the ACC reportedly will be in Brooklyn for its conference tournament in 2017. Having gone to the Big East tournament back in the day at MSG when the conference was at its height, I may very well go to the ACC with my kids when it goes to Barclay's. It'll be the closest thing to what the Big East tournament used to be.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
User avatar
BlueHen86
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13555
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:40 pm
I am a fan of: The McManus Brothers
A.K.A.: Duffman
Location: Area XI

Re: THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE

Post by BlueHen86 »

GannonFan wrote:Further downward trend for the Big East conference, from the perch of the best conference in basketball to now competing with the A10 for relevance - the ACC reportedly will be in Brooklyn for its conference tournament in 2017. Having gone to the Big East tournament back in the day at MSG when the conference was at its height, I may very well go to the ACC with my kids when it goes to Barclay's. It'll be the closest thing to what the Big East tournament used to be.
It will be interesting to see how this plays out over the next few years. Seems to me that the Big East teams got a lot of credit for being in a conference named the Big East, as if the Big East were still the super conference that it has been the last several years. Right now, to me, the conference looks like Villanova and a bunch of Mid-Majors. It certainly isn't a super conference.
Seahawks08
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:28 pm
I am a fan of: Villanova

Re: THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE

Post by Seahawks08 »

I wouldn't argue St. Joes

24-9
32 RPI
51 SOS
3-3 vs top 25 6-5 against the top 50 10-8 against the top 100
A10 tourney champ
Trending up as the season went up winning 9 of last 11


Iowa on OTOH

20-12
64 RPI (and falling like a 2 ton brick to end the season)
Lost 8 of last 12 and 9 of last 14 with 3 of those W's being against Northwestern, Purdue, and Illinois (before their little run)
Lost to Northwestern in the first round of the B10 tourney.
Their non-ET OOC opponents have current RPIs of 282 208 349 343 289 274 267.
That means against the top 200 (including 200) in RPI they are 13-12
2-8 against the RPI top 25, 5-9 against the RPI top 50 and 6-10 against the top 100

Tell me again how Iowa would be considered a anything more than an average win - other than they are a B10 team - at this point.
Again, you are using the entire season. And if we use that as the measuring tool, you are correct. I would argue how they are playing at the time (early in the season) as to how good the win is. It doesn't matter anymore. It's tournament time!
Image
Seahawks08
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:28 pm
I am a fan of: Villanova

Re: THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE

Post by Seahawks08 »

It will be interesting to see how this plays out over the next few years. Seems to me that the Big East teams got a lot of credit for being in a conference named the Big East, as if the Big East were still the super conference that it has been the last several years. Right now, to me, the conference looks like Villanova and a bunch of Mid-Majors. It certainly isn't a super conference.
Big East was the 4th best conference this year after Big 12, Big 10, and Pac-12. They are not the superconference they used to be obviously, but they are not midmajors either. And overall, the Big East had the 4th hardest SOS. I would say this was a successful season for the new conference! :thumb:
Image
User avatar
BlueHen86
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13555
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:40 pm
I am a fan of: The McManus Brothers
A.K.A.: Duffman
Location: Area XI

Re: THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE

Post by BlueHen86 »

Seahawks08 wrote:
It will be interesting to see how this plays out over the next few years. Seems to me that the Big East teams got a lot of credit for being in a conference named the Big East, as if the Big East were still the super conference that it has been the last several years. Right now, to me, the conference looks like Villanova and a bunch of Mid-Majors. It certainly isn't a super conference.
Big East was the 4th best conference this year after Big 12, Big 10, and Pac-12. They are not the superconference they used to be obviously, but they are not midmajors either. And overall, the Big East had the 4th hardest SOS. I would say this was a successful season for the new conference! :thumb:
I strongly disagree with you there. I think Villanova is the real deal, I like Creighton this year, but the rest are mid majors. Way over rated conference.

Not sure where you get the idea that it's the fourth best conference. Xavier was one of the last teams in, and Providence is only in because they got the Auto Bid. The ACC is a better conference, and there isn't much difference between the Big East, A-10 and AAC.

Tell you what, I agree that the Big East is a Super Mid Major. :lol:
clenz
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 21211
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE

Post by clenz »

Creighton has been discussed at length here...they will fall way back.

Marquette has been backsliding for years now.
Butler is going to be a bottom half team but will rack up winds with a weak ooc going forward
Xavier...tbd
Providence...won the tourney title this year bit how much do you really trust them?
Depaul.....yeah...

The big east/aac split can't be judged off of just this season...you need to see when the ripple stats to settle. Having said that the AAC moving forward isn't in great shape, especially since uconn and cinci are gone with their first train out, and with Louisville leaving after this year you've got the old cusa but not as good. The new BE is going to backslide. You can be as big of a homer and deny that if you want but it's going to happen. You can try to raid the a10...but raising mid majors to prove you aren't a mid major conference...is...well....
User avatar
BlueHen86
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13555
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:40 pm
I am a fan of: The McManus Brothers
A.K.A.: Duffman
Location: Area XI

Re: THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE

Post by BlueHen86 »

clenz wrote:Creighton has been discussed at length here...they will fall way back.

Marquette has been backsliding for years now.
Butler is going to be a bottom half team but will rack up winds with a weak ooc going forward
Xavier...tbd
Providence...won the tourney title this year bit how much do you really trust them?
Depaul.....yeah...

The big east/aac split can't be judged off of just this season...you need to see when the ripple stats to settle. Having said that the AAC moving forward isn't in great shape, especially since uconn and cinci are gone with their first train out, and with Louisville leaving after this year you've got the old cusa but not as good. The new BE is going to backslide. You can be as big of a homer and deny that if you want but it's going to happen. You can try to raid the a10...but raising mid majors to prove you aren't a mid major conference...is...well....
The Big East needs St Johns and Georgetown to return to past glory. The potential for a great conference is there, but right now I agree with you, it is going to backslide.
Seahawks08
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:28 pm
I am a fan of: Villanova

Re: THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE

Post by Seahawks08 »

I strongly disagree with you there. I think Villanova is the real deal, I like Creighton this year, but the rest are mid majors. Way over rated conference.

Not sure where you get the idea that it's the fourth best conference. Xavier was one of the last teams in, and Providence is only in because they got the Auto Bid. The ACC is a better conference, and there isn't much difference between the Big East, A-10 and AAC.

Tell you what, I agree that the Big East is a Super Mid Major.
:lol: My bad. I forgot to add it was 4th strongest based on RPI. And I wouldn't call Gtown, St. Johns, Marquette, Xavier or Providence mid majors.

And I assume you would add the SEC as another Super Mid Major conference? As long as the BE stays ahead of the A-10, AAC, and SEC, I consider it a win! :nod:
Image
Seahawks08
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:28 pm
I am a fan of: Villanova

Re: THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE

Post by Seahawks08 »

Marquette has been backsliding for years now.
Butler is going to be a bottom half team but will rack up winds with a weak ooc going forward
Xavier...tbd
Providence...won the tourney title this year bit how much do you really trust them?
Depaul.....yeah...
Marquette has not been backsliding for years. They were 26-9 last year and 27-8 the year before. And that was with the old Big East.
Butler - I agree
Xavier - I agree
Providence - Need to see how they do without Cotton
Depaul - should get rid of their program
St Johns - promising young players. Need to see how they turn out.
Gtown - rebuilding
Creighton - wait and see
Nova - good to go for the foreseeable future
Seton Hall - meh
Image
clenz
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 21211
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE

Post by clenz »

Seahawks08 wrote:
Marquette has been backsliding for years now.
Butler is going to be a bottom half team but will rack up winds with a weak ooc going forward
Xavier...tbd
Providence...won the tourney title this year bit how much do you really trust them?
Depaul.....yeah...
Marquette has not been backsliding for years. They were 26-9 last year and 27-8 the year before. And that was with the old Big East.
Butler - I agree
Xavier - I agree
Providence - Need to see how they do without Cotton
Depaul - should get rid of their program
St Johns - promising young players. Need to see how they turn out.
Gtown - rebuilding
Creighton - wait and see
Nova - good to go for the foreseeable future
Seton Hall - meh
Backslide may have been too strong for Marquette but they just don't strike me as a "power" anymore. They were 17-15 this season and Jamil Wilson, Chris Otule, Jake Thomas and Davante Gardner aren't going to be easy to replace. I don't know much about their younger playes . Between those 4 players that is 3,300 of Marquettes 6600 minutes this past season, 436 of 800 FG makes, 936 of 1800 attempts, 101 of 152 3s made, 286 of 480 attempted threes (meaning the rest of the team went 51-194-26%), 316 of 555 FT makes, 453 of 800 FT attempts, 600 of 1100 rebounds, 68 of 100 blocks, 1300 of 2300 points. Now...maybe the underclassmen have more talent and can easily double their production - I have no idea. They strike me much like Creighton moving forward though. I remember when Marquette had household names year after year - they haven't had that for awhile.

Butler - we agree they pulled one of the biggest coups of all of conference realignment to get out of the Horizon and align itself in the A10/Big East. I think going forward they will wish they were back in the A10 except having the "iconic" Big East logo on their court

Xavier - Wait and see...they could easily move up but I see them staying stationary for the most part.

DePaul - yeah...nothing needs to be said.

St. Johns - don't they always have promising players? Doesn't the EC(b) hype machine try to build them up every single year...yet they've made just 1 tournament in the last decade and are a .500 team over that time. Is it a coincidence that there best season comes after UCONN, Louisville, Pitt, and Cincinnati leave the conference OR would they have had that same record this year playing those teams instead of multiple games against Seton Hall, DaPaul (Who they lost too), and Butler...also look at the OOC schedule (RPIs of 204, 166, 293, 337, 158, 227, 240, 129, 268 and 114 [which was a loss])...I wish UNI would play that kind of OOC.

Seton Hall - somewhere between DePaul and Buter, IMO

Georgetown - the term backslide and living off of a reputation older than any of the players on the roster is much more fitting here. People out east don't want to here this (and don't like too as I discovered on AGS) but Georgetown doesn't have half the name you out east believe it does nationally.

I think the BE will continue to be a pretty good conference. However, the B12, B10, ACC, PAC12, SEC will all continue/move a head of it and the A10 and MWC will be right there with it for RPI rating - though we've learned that RPI can be very easily manipulated by the MWC.

It also has yet to be seen how recruiting for the new BE might be affected. No longer are you on CBS all of the time...no longer do you have the major tournament in NYC (with the ACC coming in and the A10 showing you up in Brooklyn)...No longer do you have teams like Syracuse, UCONN, Louisville (who I realize is more recent), Pitt, Notre Dame and Cinci (Also more recent) to carry the top half of the league every single year with national names/fanbases and have them drive recruiting. They are now in the ACC (4 of them) with the other two in the works of the ACC/B12/B10 depending how big they want to get. Recruiting may not be influenced at all but that is yet to be seen.

I realize vutomcat thinks I can't carry a conversation but he thinks that because I'm not bowing down to the new big east like he wants and he doesn't want to put any effort into actually backing his position up.
User avatar
UNI88
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 28830
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
I am a fan of: UNI
Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico

Re: THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE

Post by UNI88 »

BlueHen86 wrote:
clenz wrote:Creighton has been discussed at length here...they will fall way back.

Marquette has been backsliding for years now.
Butler is going to be a bottom half team but will rack up winds with a weak ooc going forward
Xavier...tbd
Providence...won the tourney title this year bit how much do you really trust them?
Depaul.....yeah...

The big east/aac split can't be judged off of just this season...you need to see when the ripple stats to settle. Having said that the AAC moving forward isn't in great shape, especially since uconn and cinci are gone with their first train out, and with Louisville leaving after this year you've got the old cusa but not as good. The new BE is going to backslide. You can be as big of a homer and deny that if you want but it's going to happen. You can try to raid the a10...but raising mid majors to prove you aren't a mid major conference...is...well....
The Big East needs St Johns and Georgetown to return to past glory. The potential for a great conference is there, but right now I agree with you, it is going to backslide.
I agree and would add DePaul to the list of schools that need to return to past glory. They may have sucked for a long time but the potential is there. Chicago is a recruiting hot bed and they only need to bring in a handful of talented city kids each year to turn the corner. They need to reestablish their public league connections so they can hold to the local talent - Jabari Parker, Jahlil Okafor, Tyler Ulis, Cliff Alexander, etc.

Marquette has always been able to do more with less and I'm not ready to close the door on them based on one down year.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm

MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
User avatar
bluehenbillk
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7660
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:26 am
I am a fan of: elaware
Location: East Coast/Hawaii

Re: THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE

Post by bluehenbillk »

Seahawks08 wrote:
It will be interesting to see how this plays out over the next few years. Seems to me that the Big East teams got a lot of credit for being in a conference named the Big East, as if the Big East were still the super conference that it has been the last several years. Right now, to me, the conference looks like Villanova and a bunch of Mid-Majors. It certainly isn't a super conference.
Big East was the 4th best conference this year after Big 12, Big 10, and Pac-12. They are not the superconference they used to be obviously, but they are not midmajors either. And overall, the Big East had the 4th hardest SOS. I would say this was a successful season for the new conference! :thumb:
I'd take the top half of the American over the top half of the Big East in a heartbeat - undebatable.
Make Delaware Football Great Again
clenz
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 21211
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE

Post by clenz »

And Xavier, who finished third in the big east, is getting boat raced by nc state, who finished in 7th place in the acc....and nearly lost the tie breakers to fall to ninth.

Nc state was up by 19, I believe, at one point in the second half. Final MOV was 15
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19120
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE

Post by GannonFan »

clenz wrote:And Xavier, who finished third in the big east, is getting boat raced by nc state, who finished in 7th place in the acc....and nearly lost the tie breakers to fall to ninth.

Nc state was up by 19, I believe, at one point in the second half. Final MOV was 15
But...but...how can that be? The Big East, by other posters on this board, was better than the ACC this year. :coffee:

Conference RPI - the last refuge of people trying to believe something that their eyes tell them isn't true.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
Seahawks08
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:28 pm
I am a fan of: Villanova

Re: THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE

Post by Seahawks08 »

But...but...how can that be? The Big East, by other posters on this board, was better than the ACC this year. :coffee:

Conference RPI - the last refuge of people trying to believe something that their eyes tell them isn't true.
Keep ignoring that 4th best SoS statistic too. Funny that you look at a play-in game to somehow justify that the ACC is better than the Big East this year.
Image
User avatar
SDHornet
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19504
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets

Re: THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE

Post by SDHornet »

This thread is pure gold. :popcorn:
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19120
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE

Post by GannonFan »

Seahawks08 wrote:
But...but...how can that be? The Big East, by other posters on this board, was better than the ACC this year. :coffee:

Conference RPI - the last refuge of people trying to believe something that their eyes tell them isn't true.
Keep ignoring that 4th best SoS statistic too. Funny that you look at a play-in game to somehow justify that the ACC is better than the Big East this year.
Should we use the St. John's home loss last night, in front of just over 1k people, to Robert Morris, in a game where the Johnnies were down by 26 at one point, as another example?

Come on, let's use common sense - the ACC is significantly better than the Big East. Are you honestly saying that UVA, Syracuse, Duke, North Carolina, Pittsburgh, Clemson, and North Carolina St don't trump nova, Creighton, Providence, and Xavier? The best thing about the Big East is that their worst team is better than the ACC's worst team. But at the top, it's no contest, and the top is where things ultimately matter.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
clenz
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 21211
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: THE BIG EAST CONFERENCE

Post by clenz »

Seahawks08 wrote:
But...but...how can that be? The Big East, by other posters on this board, was better than the ACC this year. :coffee:

Conference RPI - the last refuge of people trying to believe something that their eyes tell them isn't true.
Keep ignoring that 4th best SoS statistic too. Funny that you look at a play-in game to somehow justify that the ACC is better than the Big East this year.
I look at the fact that a team from the ACC, that was mere % points from finishing 9th, boat raced the shit out of the third place Big East team.

How about a team, in St. John's, that tied for 3rd in the Big East getting shit stomped by a 13 loss Northeast Conference team with zero good wins and 6 atrocious losses during the season? That same NEC team that played a SOS (since you're big on that for the BE) of 232 in the 26th rated (of 32) conference. That was 0-6 against the top 100 before last night. That same NEC team that had 13 of it's wins come against 201+ RPIs. That same NEC school that had 0 wins against the top 175 RPI and multiple loses to 230+ RPIs. That NEC team that got outscored by an average of 20 points against the RPI top 106.

What's that say about them?
Post Reply