Democrats Try Wooing Ones Who Got Away: White Men

[mrklean]

The Democrats, apparently.

Yes, because a significant chunk of the Democrat's collection of hypocritical, intolerant, racist, stolen gun toting, thuggish, spread legged, baby mama, daddy too busy to stick around, crooked government employed, ticks are too lazy to vote consistently or legally.

Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee...this is fun!

Tuna eating, KKK hood wearing, Fox News network watching, King of all the racist, Mass murdering, Land stealing, Trety breaking, Man Boy loving, NAACP excuse making, Jessie and Al Hating, Kiddie Porn watching..........Got to get back to work. OOOOOH, Workers Comp check cashing....MOFO!!!!!!

[AZGrizFan]

"Steady as a rock"

"Yeah but I shoot with this hand"

"We'll take the chinks....and we'll take the n****rs...but we DON'T WANT THE IRISH!"

[mrklean]

"Steady as a rock"

"Yeah but I shoot with this hand"

"We'll take the chinks....and we'll take the n****rs...but we DON'T WANT THE IRISH!"

Ill take the Asian Women all damn day. IJS

[bluehenbillk]

Why wouldn't the Democrats try to win more white men? They already win every other group there is.

Saw yesterday that 25% of Republicans said they'd vote for Hillary. If that # is even in the ballpark the 2016 race is over.

We need a Chris Christie Comeback...our only hope.

Wrong. Donks nationally on avg don't win a majority of white women (but not the large gap there is with white men).

And a link for that claim that 25% of conks would vote for Hillary?

And she ain't gonna run anyway. Like I said in the RIP Holder thread, after someone else pointed out she had health issues that apparently are worse than disclosed:

http://dailycaller.com/2014/02/28/rumor ... disclosed/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Hiladabeast, 66 now, would be 69 by the 16' elections, same as Reagan (she would be 8+ months younger), and 77 by 2024, which of the previous 44 POTUSes, would make her the 2nd oldest ever after Reagan.

Here's the 25% for Hillary link:
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/20 ... n-in-2016/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I wouldn't put a lot of stock in more white women voting for the GOP, I'd put it at 50% for them tops.

[BDKJMU]

Wrong. Donks nationally on avg don't win a majority of white women (but not the large gap there is with white men).

And a link for that claim that 25% of conks would vote for Hillary?

And she ain't gonna run anyway. Like I said in the RIP Holder thread, after someone else pointed out she had health issues that apparently are worse than disclosed:

http://dailycaller.com/2014/02/28/rumor ... disclosed/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Hiladabeast, 66 now, would be 69 by the 16' elections, same as Reagan (she would be 8+ months younger), and 77 by 2024, which of the previous 44 POTUSes, would make her the 2nd oldest ever after Reagan.

Here's the 25% for Hillary link:
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/20 ... n-in-2016/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I wouldn't put a lot of stock in more white women voting for the GOP, I'd put it at 50% for them tops.

You said "Saw yesterday that 25% of Republicans said they'd vote for Hillary."

Not according to the poll. They said "8% of Republicans said there is a “good chance” and 17% said there was “some chance” they would vote for her in 2016."

"good chance" and "some chance" is a whole lot different than "would".

[BDKJMU]

Wrong. Donks nationally on avg don't win a majority of white women (but not the large gap there is with white men).

And a link for that claim that 25% of conks would vote for Hillary?

And she ain't gonna run anyway. Like I said in the RIP Holder thread, after someone else pointed out she had health issues that apparently are worse than disclosed:

http://dailycaller.com/2014/02/28/rumor ... disclosed/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Hiladabeast, 66 now, would be 69 by the 16' elections, same as Reagan (she would be 8+ months younger), and 77 by 2024, which of the previous 44 POTUSes, would make her the 2nd oldest ever after Reagan.

Here's the 25% for Hillary link:
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/20 ... n-in-2016/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I wouldn't put a lot of stock in more white women voting for the GOP, I'd put it at 50% for them tops.

Wrong on that, at least in terms of POTUS elections.

White women 2012 voted 42% for Obama, 56% Romney
http://www.cnn.com/election/2012/results/race/president" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
White women 2008 voted 46% Obama, 53% McCain
White women 2004 voted 44% Kerry, 55% Bush
White women 2000 voted 48% Gore, 49% Bush
White women in 1996 voted 48% Clinton, 43% Dole, 8% Perot
White women in 1992' voted 40% Clinton, 41% GHW Bush, ?? Perot
White women in 1988 voted 44% Dukakis, 56% GHW Bush
White women in 1984 voted 38% Mondale, 62% Reagan
White women in 1980 voted 40% Carter, 52% Reagan
http://www.nationaljournal.com/voting-p ... 8-20120824" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

So Democrats the last 9 POTUS elections have won an avg of about 43% of the white woman vote. Republicans have avg about 52% of the white woman vote, winning white women in at least 7 of the last 8 elections. The lone time they didn't was 96' but even then Clinton only got 48% of the vote.

[BDKJMU]

....No Democratic presidential candidate has won a majority of white men since Lyndon B. Johnson in 1964. Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and Barack Obama all prevailed with support of the so-called rising electorate of women, especially single women, and minorities. But fewer of those voters typically participate in midterm elections, making the votes of white men more potent and the struggle of Democrats for 2014 clear......

I've got more to say on the basic post but my first knee jerk is to say that it's probably true that no Democratic Presidential candidate has won the majority of the white vote period...men and women...since then. Yes white men have voted more overwhelmingly against the democratic candidate but I have looked before at all of the elections starting with Nixon vs. Humphrey and no Democrat has won the majority of the white vote in that time. Obama lost both among white men and white women both times. The only Democratic candidate of my voting lifetime that's won the majority of white women is ... you can guess it...Bill Clinton. And I honestly don't think that's because of his philosophy. Honestly, I think it's because a sufficient proportion of white women thought he was hot.

Looks to be true (see my above post going back to 1980)

Clinton only won the white woman vote once, in 96, but that was with 48% of the white women, not a majority.

[YoUDeeMan]

Yes, because a significant chunk of the Democrat's collection of hypocritical, intolerant, racist, stolen gun toting, thuggish, spread legged, baby mama, daddy too busy to stick around, crooked government employed, ticks are too lazy to vote consistently or legally.

Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee...this is fun!

Tuna eating, KKK hood wearing, Fox News network watching, King of all the racist, Mass murdering, Land stealing, Trety breaking, Man Boy loving, NAACP excuse making, Jessie and Al Hating, Kiddie Porn watching..........Got to get back to work. OOOOOH, Workers Comp check cashing....MOFO!!!!!!

BLACK POWER!!!!