Hagel's Defense Cut Proposal

Political discussions
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Hagel's Defense Cut Proposal

Post by AZGrizFan »

Former Vice President Dick Cheney said Monday that Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel’s proposed drastic cuts to the U.S. Army are “absolutely dangerous" and would cause long-term damage to the military.

Cheney told Fox News’ Sean Hannity the proposed cuts, which would shrink the Army to its smallest size since just before the U.S. entered World War II, would have a devastating impact on the ability of future presidents to deal with future crises.

“This is really over the top,” Cheney said. “It does enormous long-term damage to our military.”

The Army had already been preparing to shrink to 490,000 active-duty members from a wartime peak of 570,000. Hagel is proposing to cut it further to between 440,000 and 450,000.

"We are repositioning to focus on the strategic challenges and opportunities that will define our future: new technologies, new centers of power, and a world that is growing more volatile, more unpredictable, and in some instances more threatening to the United States," Hagel said at a press conference at the Pentagon.
Cheney needs to really just STFU.

I support the move, and can't imagine how another 50,000 troops could make that much difference in the long run....I also believe Hagel is right in focusing on new technologies and not just more bodies...but I support the move ONLY if there is a commeasurate DECREASE in our desire/willingness to be the worlds' policeman.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
Cap'n Cat
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13614
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:38 am
I am a fan of: Mostly myself.
A.K.A.: LabiaInTheSunlight

Re: Hagel's Defense Cut Proposal

Post by Cap'n Cat »

AZGrizFan wrote:
Former Vice President Dick Cheney said Monday that Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel’s proposed drastic cuts to the U.S. Army are “absolutely dangerous" and would cause long-term damage to the military.

Cheney told Fox News’ Sean Hannity the proposed cuts, which would shrink the Army to its smallest size since just before the U.S. entered World War II, would have a devastating impact on the ability of future presidents to deal with future crises.

“This is really over the top,” Cheney said. “It does enormous long-term damage to our military.”

The Army had already been preparing to shrink to 490,000 active-duty members from a wartime peak of 570,000. Hagel is proposing to cut it further to between 440,000 and 450,000.

"We are repositioning to focus on the strategic challenges and opportunities that will define our future: new technologies, new centers of power, and a world that is growing more volatile, more unpredictable, and in some instances more threatening to the United States," Hagel said at a press conference at the Pentagon.
Cheney needs to really just STFU.

I support the move, and can't imagine how another 50,000 troops could make that much difference in the long run....I also believe Hagel is right in focusing on new technologies and not just more bodies...but I support the move ONLY if there is a commeasurate DECREASE in our desire/willingness to be the worlds' policeman.

"Commensurate": corresponding in size or degree; in proportion.

synonyms: equivalent, equal, corresponding, correspondent, comparable, proportionate, proportional



Nevertheless, applause for a progressive stance on this.

:nod:
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: Hagel's Defense Cut Proposal

Post by AZGrizFan »

Cap'n Cat wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
Cheney needs to really just STFU.

I support the move, and can't imagine how another 50,000 troops could make that much difference in the long run....I also believe Hagel is right in focusing on new technologies and not just more bodies...but I support the move ONLY if there is a commeasurate DECREASE in our desire/willingness to be the worlds' policeman.

"Commensurate": corresponding in size or degree; in proportion.

synonyms: equivalent, equal, corresponding, correspondent, comparable, proportionate, proportional



Nevertheless, applause for a progressive stance on this.

:nod:
Thank you, Church Lady.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmwqnqL3Hbg[/youtube]
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
Cap'n Cat
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13614
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:38 am
I am a fan of: Mostly myself.
A.K.A.: LabiaInTheSunlight

Re: Hagel's Defense Cut Proposal

Post by Cap'n Cat »

Just wouldn't want you to misspell the word in a letter to your customers.

For example, "My bloated salary and the fact that I fuck around on sports websites all day makes the interest I charge you not commensurate with my effort."

:thumb:
User avatar
93henfan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 56358
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:03 pm
Location: Slower Delaware

Re: Hagel's Defense Cut Proposal

Post by 93henfan »

Cap'n Cat wrote:Just wouldn't want you to misspell the word in a letter to your customers.

For example, "My bloated salary and the fact that I fuck around on sports websites all day makes the interest I charge you not commensurate with my effort."

:thumb:
:lol:
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
User avatar
Cap'n Cat
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13614
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:38 am
I am a fan of: Mostly myself.
A.K.A.: LabiaInTheSunlight

Re: Hagel's Defense Cut Proposal

Post by Cap'n Cat »

93henfan wrote:
Cap'n Cat wrote:Just wouldn't want you to misspell the word in a letter to your customers.

For example, "My bloated salary and the fact that I fuck around on sports websites all day makes the interest I charge you not commensurate with my effort."

:thumb:
:lol:

:rofl:
User avatar
93henfan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 56358
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:03 pm
Location: Slower Delaware

Re: Hagel's Defense Cut Proposal

Post by 93henfan »

The key point was made by AZ. If we can shift our foreign policy away from world police status, we can start making a dent in our national debt. Of course, entitlement reform, the other fiscal suck, needs to occur...

wait for it

...commensurately.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
User avatar
Cap'n Cat
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13614
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:38 am
I am a fan of: Mostly myself.
A.K.A.: LabiaInTheSunlight

Re: Hagel's Defense Cut Proposal

Post by Cap'n Cat »

93henfan wrote:The key point was made by AZ. If we can shift our foreign policy away from world police status, we can start making a dent in our national debt. Of course, entitlement reform, the other fiscal suck, needs to occur...

wait for it

...commensurately.

The degree to which you advocate said issues is commensurate to the passion with which I enjoin on the same.
User avatar
Bison Fan in NW MN
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1272
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2011 1:14 pm
I am a fan of: NDSU
A.K.A.: bisoninnwmn

Re: Hagel's Defense Cut Proposal

Post by Bison Fan in NW MN »

Now frickin cut entitlements also.

:nod:
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Hagel's Defense Cut Proposal

Post by Ibanez »

AZGrizFan wrote:
Former Vice President Dick Cheney said Monday that Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel’s proposed drastic cuts to the U.S. Army are “absolutely dangerous" and would cause long-term damage to the military.

Cheney told Fox News’ Sean Hannity the proposed cuts, which would shrink the Army to its smallest size since just before the U.S. entered World War II, would have a devastating impact on the ability of future presidents to deal with future crises.

“This is really over the top,” Cheney said. “It does enormous long-term damage to our military.”

The Army had already been preparing to shrink to 490,000 active-duty members from a wartime peak of 570,000. Hagel is proposing to cut it further to between 440,000 and 450,000.

"We are repositioning to focus on the strategic challenges and opportunities that will define our future: new technologies, new centers of power, and a world that is growing more volatile, more unpredictable, and in some instances more threatening to the United States," Hagel said at a press conference at the Pentagon.
Cheney needs to really just STFU.

I support the move, and can't imagine how another 50,000 troops could make that much difference in the long run....I also believe Hagel is right in focusing on new technologies and not just more bodies...but I support the move ONLY if there is a commeasurate DECREASE in our desire/willingness to be the worlds' policeman.
Yeah, Cheney needs to pipe down. The DoD isn't supposed to provide jobs. It provides defense and Hagel is right on the money. New technologies and strategies can be implemented to protect and engage the enemy and be just as effective as boots on the ground. The wars are over/winding down and there is no need to have a large, standing army.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Hagel's Defense Cut Proposal

Post by Ibanez »

Cap'n Cat wrote:
93henfan wrote:The key point was made by AZ. If we can shift our foreign policy away from world police status, we can start making a dent in our national debt. Of course, entitlement reform, the other fiscal suck, needs to occur...

wait for it

...commensurately.

The degree to which you advocate said issues is commensurate to the passion with which I enjoin on the same.
This kind of talk makes me wish a pigeon was cooing...
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
User avatar
BDKJMU
Level5
Level5
Posts: 36376
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
I am a fan of: JMU
A.K.A.: BDKJMU
Location: Philly Burbs

Re: Hagel's Defense Cut Proposal

Post by BDKJMU »

Reduce the Army's size to pre WWII levels, only if at the same time we reduce the # of people on food stamps to pre WWII levels....
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Hagel's Defense Cut Proposal

Post by Ibanez »

BDKJMU wrote:Reduce the Army's size to pre WWII levels, only if at the same time we reduce the # of people on food stamps to pre WWII levels....
:ohno: :ohno: :ohno: Baby steps.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
User avatar
BDKJMU
Level5
Level5
Posts: 36376
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
I am a fan of: JMU
A.K.A.: BDKJMU
Location: Philly Burbs

Re: Hagel's Defense Cut Proposal

Post by BDKJMU »

Ibanez wrote:
BDKJMU wrote:Reduce the Army's size to pre WWII levels, only if at the same time we reduce the # of people on food stamps to pre WWII levels....
:ohno: :ohno: :ohno: Baby steps.
Why just the military? How about cut ALL of fed govt to pre WWII levels... :coffee:
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
User avatar
mrklean
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3794
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 11:06 am
I am a fan of: Georgia Southern Uni.
Location: Stockbridge, GA

Re: Hagel's Defense Cut Proposal

Post by mrklean »

BDKJMU wrote:Reduce the Army's size to pre WWII levels, only if at the same time we reduce the # of people on food stamps to pre WWII levels....

Yes, we can't buy every new F-22 and F-35. BTW, they don't work like they said they would. Now we have 2.5 billion Fighters that are junk.
ImageImage
FROM DA DURTY SOUTH!
User avatar
ASUG8
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 17570
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 12:57 pm
I am a fan of: ASU
Location: SC

Re: Hagel's Defense Cut Proposal

Post by ASUG8 »

As much as I'd like to believe that we would see these "savings" redirected toward reducing debt, the cynic that several administrations have created in me remains hugely skeptical.

I'd like to see us start either closing or consolidating regional bases overseas which could be a huge cost savings. It would certainly send a message that countries are responsible for their own security and defense but might cost us some allies. With friends like the Afghans who needs enemies, amirite?
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Hagel's Defense Cut Proposal

Post by Ibanez »

BDKJMU wrote:
Ibanez wrote: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: Baby steps.
Why just the military? How about cut ALL of fed govt to pre WWII levels... :coffee:
You have to start somewhere. Besides, abuse of social programs is gravely exaggerated. Does it need to be reformed? Yes. But many elderly people and good people down on their luck depend on a little bit of help.

Btw, the economics and demographics of today are totally different. There were 132,164,569 (319,510,848 in 2014) in the 1940 Census. Unemployment was 14.6%.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Hagel's Defense Cut Proposal

Post by Ibanez »

ASUG8 wrote:As much as I'd like to believe that we would see these "savings" redirected toward reducing debt, the cynic that several administrations have created in me remains hugely skeptical.

I'd like to see us start either closing or consolidating regional bases overseas which could be a huge cost savings. It would certainly send a message that countries are responsible for their own security and defense but might cost us some allies. With friends like the Afghans who needs enemies, amirite?
:thumb: :thumb: :thumb:
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
User avatar
93henfan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 56358
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:03 pm
Location: Slower Delaware

Re: Hagel's Defense Cut Proposal

Post by 93henfan »

ASUG8 wrote:With friends like the Afghans who needs enemies, amirite?
Never trust a guy who wears hats without brims.

Image
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
houndawg
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25096
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
I am a fan of: SIU
A.K.A.: houndawg
Location: Egypt

Re: Hagel's Defense Cut Proposal

Post by houndawg »

Bison Fan in NW MN wrote:Now frickin cut entitlements also.

:nod:
Damn straight! :thumb:

About time Boeing and GE started paying their own way. :coffee:
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.


"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
houndawg
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25096
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
I am a fan of: SIU
A.K.A.: houndawg
Location: Egypt

Re: Hagel's Defense Cut Proposal

Post by houndawg »

BDKJMU wrote:
Ibanez wrote: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: Baby steps.
Why just the military? How about cut ALL of fed govt to pre WWII levels... :coffee:
different issue :silly:
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.


"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
User avatar
BDKJMU
Level5
Level5
Posts: 36376
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
I am a fan of: JMU
A.K.A.: BDKJMU
Location: Philly Burbs

Re: Hagel's Defense Cut Proposal

Post by BDKJMU »

houndawg wrote:
BDKJMU wrote:
Why just the military? How about cut ALL of fed govt to pre WWII levels... :coffee:
different issue :silly:
Bloated is bloated..
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
houndawg
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25096
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
I am a fan of: SIU
A.K.A.: houndawg
Location: Egypt

Re: Hagel's Defense Cut Proposal

Post by houndawg »

BDKJMU wrote:
houndawg wrote:
different issue :silly:
Bloated is bloated..
This thread is about defense cuts. You can start another one about non-military entitlements.
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.


"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
User avatar
Chizzang
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19274
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
Location: Palermo Italy

Re: Hagel's Defense Cut Proposal

Post by Chizzang »

As exciting as this talk is about reducing the bodies...
It won't actually translate into spending less on the Military and defense contractors

It'll end up being just less bodies / same overall price tag

Trust me when I say this
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
User avatar
93henfan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 56358
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:03 pm
Location: Slower Delaware

Re: Hagel's Defense Cut Proposal

Post by 93henfan »

Chizzang wrote:As exciting as this talk is about reducing the bodies...
It won't actually translate into spending less on the Military and defense contractors

It'll end up being just less bodies / same overall price tag

Trust me when I say this

Kind of like entitlements. Benefits are cut, but the cost remains the same. The difference goes to bureacracy and fraud.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
Post Reply